[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

2020 Elections - kcar - Oct 21, 2020 - 12:19am
 
Live Music - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 10:48pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 10:04pm
 
Trump - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 9:15pm
 
You might be getting old if...... - Steely_D - Oct 20, 2020 - 8:43pm
 
how do you feel right now? - kurtster - Oct 20, 2020 - 7:43pm
 
audiophile - kurtster - Oct 20, 2020 - 7:27pm
 
The Obituary Page - GeneP59 - Oct 20, 2020 - 6:21pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Oct 20, 2020 - 6:10pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Oct 20, 2020 - 6:07pm
 
Rock Movies/Documentaries - miamizsun - Oct 20, 2020 - 5:53pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Oct 20, 2020 - 5:24pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Oct 20, 2020 - 5:16pm
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - kcar - Oct 20, 2020 - 4:39pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 4:25pm
 
Bolivia - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 4:09pm
 
New Music - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 20, 2020 - 3:45pm
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - KarmaKarma - Oct 20, 2020 - 2:29pm
 
Freedom of speech? - miamizsun - Oct 20, 2020 - 2:18pm
 
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Oct 20, 2020 - 1:04pm
 
Environment - Red_Dragon - Oct 20, 2020 - 1:03pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Oct 20, 2020 - 12:49pm
 
Health Care - R_P - Oct 20, 2020 - 8:41am
 
Things You Thought Today - pigtail - Oct 20, 2020 - 8:33am
 
Android app playing same playlist - bevgerry - Oct 20, 2020 - 5:42am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Oct 20, 2020 - 5:35am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Oct 20, 2020 - 1:39am
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - Oct 19, 2020 - 9:36pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - jarro - Oct 19, 2020 - 8:54pm
 
Quick! I need a chicken... - R_P - Oct 19, 2020 - 4:46pm
 
Working from home - BlueHeronDruid - Oct 19, 2020 - 4:17pm
 
Republican Party - cc_rider - Oct 19, 2020 - 2:54pm
 
Anti-War - miamizsun - Oct 19, 2020 - 9:43am
 
I have no idea what this thread was about, but let's talk... - miamizsun - Oct 19, 2020 - 9:35am
 
Art Show - Coaxial - Oct 19, 2020 - 5:33am
 
Graphic designers, ho! - Proclivities - Oct 19, 2020 - 5:27am
 
How's the weather? - miamizsun - Oct 19, 2020 - 4:52am
 
Democratic Party - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 18, 2020 - 10:28pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Oct 18, 2020 - 3:10pm
 
Feature Request: My Ratings Sort by Date - jarro - Oct 18, 2020 - 2:19pm
 
NASA & other news from space - R_P - Oct 18, 2020 - 12:18pm
 
A "Kinky" Twist - sirdroseph - Oct 18, 2020 - 5:59am
 
New Zealand - oldviolin - Oct 17, 2020 - 8:30pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - oldviolin - Oct 17, 2020 - 7:27pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - oldviolin - Oct 17, 2020 - 7:19pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Oct 17, 2020 - 7:05pm
 
Small-town news - Antigone - Oct 17, 2020 - 1:35pm
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - R_P - Oct 17, 2020 - 10:28am
 
Radio Paradise is awesome! - Steely_D - Oct 17, 2020 - 9:09am
 
Name My Band - steeler - Oct 17, 2020 - 8:51am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Oct 17, 2020 - 7:03am
 
Play the Blues - sirdroseph - Oct 17, 2020 - 4:20am
 
Race in America - sirdroseph - Oct 17, 2020 - 4:03am
 
Astronomy! - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2020 - 5:40pm
 
It's the economy stupid. - westslope - Oct 16, 2020 - 3:18pm
 
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou... - jarro - Oct 16, 2020 - 1:43pm
 
Alexa skill - not working :( - jarro - Oct 16, 2020 - 1:36pm
 
Derplahoma Questions and Points of Interest - ScottFromWyoming - Oct 16, 2020 - 11:15am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Oct 16, 2020 - 10:57am
 
Turkey Sandwiches? Veev Wants to Know What's For Lunch - oldviolin - Oct 16, 2020 - 9:43am
 
RP App in Android Auto: - jwaldrep - Oct 16, 2020 - 9:30am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - oldviolin - Oct 16, 2020 - 8:52am
 
American Justice - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2020 - 7:59am
 
Obvious Headlines - Red_Dragon - Oct 16, 2020 - 5:59am
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - sirdroseph - Oct 16, 2020 - 4:57am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Steely_D - Oct 15, 2020 - 7:30pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Oct 15, 2020 - 7:01pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - Antigone - Oct 15, 2020 - 2:53pm
 
MICHIGAN - Ohmsen - Oct 15, 2020 - 1:42pm
 
Automotive Lust - R_P - Oct 15, 2020 - 1:07pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Red_Dragon - Oct 15, 2020 - 12:58pm
 
What did you have for dinner? - nate917 - Oct 15, 2020 - 11:39am
 
Those Lovable Policemen - cc_rider - Oct 15, 2020 - 7:46am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - islander - Oct 15, 2020 - 6:32am
 
What Did You Do Today? - davidharper - Oct 15, 2020 - 4:36am
 
Index » Internet/Computer » The Web » Economix Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 198, 199, 200  Next
Post to this Topic
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Sep 16, 2020 - 11:56pm

The 'free market' manifesto that broke America and led to Trumpism
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Location: Valhalla
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 20, 2020 - 11:13am

Rabobank: The Response To The Fed's Minutes Make You Feel Many People Are Gargling The Bong Water

"We have to explain to the public far better why we are buying the assets of cash-rich mega companies that does nothing to help struggling SMEs and those on Main Street who can’t borrow, and which also exacerbates both irrevocable market and real economy distortions, such as it is."


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 18, 2020 - 5:07am

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:

if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
 

Thanks, but they are not (or no longer) my cup of tea. Loud bunch (with the possible exception of Fullwiler) who, more importantly, commit a number of fundamental errors.
 

so kelton, keen and the like are out?

maybe inet

not sure where you are or who you may want to connect with

i need clues

look out your window and tell me what you see

peace
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 18, 2020 - 2:55am

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:

if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
 

Thanks, but they are not (or no longer) my cup of tea. Loud bunch (with the possible exception of Fullwiler) who, more importantly, commit a number of fundamental errors.
 
Sorry, the only economist I know is on the other side of the bench.
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 18, 2020 - 2:29am



 miamizsun wrote:

if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
 

Thanks, but they are not (or no longer) my cup of tea. Loud bunch (with the possible exception of Fullwiler) who, more importantly, commit a number of fundamental errors.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 17, 2020 - 7:42am

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:


not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
 

My virginity anonymity. :-) Let‘s see. I‘m primarily looking for qualified feedback and maybe some connections.
 
if you're looking for a lay up, try the economics dept at university of missouri at kansas city

they're very well versed in mmt  (fullwiler, etc.)

good luck

{#Wave}
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 11:57pm

 rexi wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:


not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
 

My virginity anonymity. :-) Let‘s see. I‘m primarily looking for qualified feedback and maybe some connections.
 
{#Lol}
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 1:25pm



 miamizsun wrote:


not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
 

My virginity anonymity. :-) Let‘s see. I‘m primarily looking for qualified feedback and maybe some connections.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 6:37am

 rexi wrote:
Are there any (monetary) economists who hang out here who would be interested in reading a paper?
 

not a formal economist but put up a link

what do you have to lose?
{#Wink}
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2020 - 2:06am

Are there any (monetary) economists who hang out here who would be interested in reading a paper?
rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 4, 2020 - 2:32am



 westslope wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
 

Targeting inequality is a really, really bad idea in my opinion.

 

The article is neither about targeting inequality nor about eliminating it. Economic modelling / theorizing is about finding simplified (=modelled) mechanisms, to the extent that they exist, which can help explain and predict human behaviour and subsequent outcomes of commercial / material interactions.

Equilibrium theory, which you might think of as a mathematical version of the famous 'invisible hand', is a common such model. It predicts that a 'free market' will tend reach a stable state (=equilibrium) if an economy is fulfills certain criteria (perfect competition). Under such conditions, inequality is the result of differing capabilities of the agents involved. Or, it is the result of some friction or imperfection in the Competition department. Policy is then about managing those imperfections. But the message is clear, if things were perfect, as the model envisions, then the world would be, at least potentially, a better place. 

This new model (there are many others) now suggests that maybe this hands-off idea of perfection is nonsense. At least it is mathematically perfectly feasible to argue that a system of sequential trades may not be self-equilibrating at all. The important distinction between these two models, as I see it, is that, in the latter, trades takes place sequentially in time. So it makes a difference whether you win or lose the first toss. A x 1.2 x 0.8 =/= A x 0.8 x 1.2. In equilibrium models, all trade takes place in an instant of time, or outside of time, if you like. Changes to the system, and thus a dynamism over time, are introduces by adding 'random shocks' to an otherwise static system. Of Course, both are just models to which one must then add that awful imperfection called reality.

Now, when you say targeting inequality is a bad idea, you have to be aware of what your underlying assumption is. Do you assume that, if, say no redistributive tax is levied, outcomes will reflect the actual virtue of the economic agents involved? In that case you're in line with the equilibrium models mentioned above. Or, do you assume that, without redistribution, outcomes may be pretty much arbitrary and depend a lot on when and where you happend to be born, how much you inherited, and a bunch of other happenstances? In that case, you are more in line with the latter model.

The question is, which model has more predictive power? Which can be made to fit better with reality? And can not redistributing really be qualified as not targeting an outcome? If you see someone struggling in the water, do you intervene or not? That depends on what you think is happening. If the person is in the act of drowning, then non-intervention is the act of targeting death. If, however, you assume that bodies have a natural tendency to stay float and each individual may choose freely whether to S splash about frantically, then, whatever the outcome, non-intervention might be considered an act of granting the swimmer his freedom of expression, the outcome of which is fair by definiton. If he dies, he had it coming... In either case, you are targeting something based on your belief of what's 'actually' going on.


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 12:41pm

 westslope wrote:


 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
 

Targeting inequality is a really, really bad idea in my opinion.

 
It is not about targeting inequality. It is about keeping the wheel in balance.

Given that every modern nation has some form of redistribution of wealth I think the historical record is on our side on this one. Moreover, those countries that do it wisely are also among the best performers globally and that is not even factoring in softer factors like social cohesion, quality of life, crime rates, etc.

I would love to see what relative GDP per capita would look like if you stripped off the top percentile of each country's population.
I suspect that those countries with a more socially oriented welfare policy would outperform those countries pursuing more "free market" models. 
 
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 11:52am



 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
 

Targeting inequality is a really, really bad idea in my opinion.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 10:36am

 westslope wrote:
Please name me one economy in the world with no "inequality".  
 
err..  I think that is precisely the point.  ergo redistribution.
westslope

westslope Avatar

Location: BC sage brush steppe


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 8:55am

Please name me one economy in the world with no "inequality".  


rexi

rexi Avatar

Location: far out
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 3, 2020 - 12:24am


Is Inequality Inevitable?

Wealth naturally trickles up in free-market economies, model suggests



(…)

If you simulate this economy, a variant of the yard sale model, you will get a remarkable result: after a large number of transactions, one agent ends up as an “oligarch” holding practically all the wealth of the economy, and the other 999 end up with virtually nothing. It does not matter how much wealth people started with. It does not matter that all the coin flips were absolutely fair. It does not matter that the poorer agent's expected outcome was positive in each transaction, whereas that of the richer agent was negative. Any single agent in this economy could have become the oligarch—in fact, all had equal odds if they began with equal wealth. In that sense, there was equality of opportunity. But only one of them did become the oligarch, and all the others saw their average wealth decrease toward zero as they conducted more and more transactions. To add insult to injury, the lower someone's wealth ranking, the faster the decrease.


This outcome is especially surprising because it holds even if all the agents started off with identical wealth and were treated symmetrically. Physicists describe phenomena of this kind as “symmetry breaking” <see The Physics of Inequality below>. The very first coin flip transfers money from one agent to another, setting up an imbalance between the two. And once we have some variance in wealth, however minute, succeeding transactions will systematically move a “trickle” of wealth upward from poorer agents to richer ones, amplifying inequality until the system reaches a state of oligarchy.

(...)

We find it noteworthy that the best-fitting model for empirical wealth distribution discovered so far is one that would be completely unstable without redistribution rather than one based on a supposed equilibrium of market forces. In fact, these mathematical models demonstrate that far from wealth trickling down to the poor, the natural inclination of wealth is to flow upward, so that the “natural” wealth distribution in a free-market economy is one of complete oligarchy. It is only redistribution that sets limits on inequality.

The mathematical models also call attention to the enormous extent to which wealth distribution is caused by symmetry breaking, chance and early advantage (from, for example, inheritance). And the presence of symmetry breaking puts paid to arguments for the justness of wealth inequality that appeal to “voluntariness”—the notion that individuals bear all responsibility for their economic outcomes simply because they enter into transactions voluntarily—or to the idea that wealth accumulation must be the result of cleverness and industriousness. It is true that an individual's location on the wealth spectrum correlates to some extent with such attributes, but the overall shape of that spectrum can be explained to better than 0.33 percent by a statistical model that completely ignores them. Luck plays a much more important role than it is usually accorded, so that the virtue commonly attributed to wealth in modern society—and, likewise, the stigma attributed to poverty—is completely unjustified.



R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 10, 2020 - 2:16pm

"We should abandon the WTO and work with free nations to build a new international system that actually puts American workers first"


U.S. finalizing federal contract ban for companies that use Huawei, others
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 24, 2020 - 2:24pm

The Jobs We Need
Over the past four decades, American workers have suffered a devastating loss of economic power, manifest in their wages, benefits and working conditions. The annual economic output of the United States has almost tripled, but, with the help of policymakers from both political parties, the wealthy hoarded the fruits.

In the nation’s slaughterhouses, the average worker in 1982 made $24 an hour in inflation-adjusted dollars, or $50,000 a year. Today the average meatpacker processes significantly more meat — and makes less than $14 an hour.

The hundreds of thousands of home health care aides, often female, often minorities, who care for a nation of aging baby boomers rarely receive paid time to care for their own families.

Even in the high-flying technology sector, companies have found ways to leave their workers behind. More than half of the people who work for Google do not actually work for Google. They are classified as contractors, which means they do not need to be treated as employees. (...)

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 19, 2020 - 3:35pm

U.S. Ranked Worst for Workers’ Rights Among Major Economies
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 27, 2020 - 10:40am

Human capital stock
Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 198, 199, 200  Next