Ask an Atheist
- Steely_D - Apr 19, 2024 - 11:53am
Trump
- rgio - Apr 19, 2024 - 11:10am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2024 - 10:42am
NYTimes Connections
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:34am
Joe Biden
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:55am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:39am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:23am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:23am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
2024 Elections!
- black321 - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:51am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:20am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
When I need a Laugh I ...
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
Remembering the Good Old Days
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:41am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 19, 2024 - 4:43am
The Obituary Page
- kurtster - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:45pm
TV shows you watch
- kcar - Apr 18, 2024 - 9:13pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 18, 2024 - 8:25pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:22am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 7:04pm
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2024 - 3:27pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Apr 17, 2024 - 2:50pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- dischuckin - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:29pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Russia
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:14pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Ukraine
- kurtster - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:05am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:38am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:56am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Republican Party
- Isabeau - Apr 15, 2024 - 12:12pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:59am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
What Did You See Today?
- Steely_D - Apr 13, 2024 - 6:42am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000
- gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Apr 11, 2024 - 8:29am
New Song Submissions system
- MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- kurtster - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:26pm
Caching to Apple watch quit working
- email-muri.0z - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:25pm
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Alchemist - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:52am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- orrinc - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:48am
NPR Listeners: Is There Liberal Bias In Its Reporting?
- black321 - Apr 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
Sonos
- rnstory - Apr 9, 2024 - 10:43am
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet
- gvajda - Apr 9, 2024 - 9:55am
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- kurtster - Apr 8, 2024 - 10:34am
And the good news is....
- thisbody - Apr 8, 2024 - 3:57am
How do I get songs into My Favorites
- Huey - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:29pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 7, 2024 - 5:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- Isabeau - Apr 7, 2024 - 12:50pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:18am
Why is Mellow mix192kbps?
- dean2.athome - Apr 7, 2024 - 1:11am
Musky Mythology
- haresfur - Apr 6, 2024 - 7:11pm
China
- R_P - Apr 6, 2024 - 11:19am
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Apr 5, 2024 - 12:45pm
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
USA/Canada »
Joe Biden
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 104, 105, 106 Next |
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Jan 17, 2024 - 9:06am |
|
black321 wrote:
Agreed, but Kurtster does have a point about putting the horse before the cart...poor or too forced planning for the inevitable transition.
Though I'm not sure why he and others are so hell bent against any type of transition.
I love electric cars...quiet, excellent acceleration, easier to maintain and not to mention the lack of (direct) exhaust.
You are exactly right. Any debate should be about the transition, not the need to transition.
|
|
black321
Location: An earth without maps Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 17, 2024 - 9:01am |
|
Steely_D wrote:
Itâs OK to inconvenience people to make long term progress. Natural gas appliances can be replaced over time, and itâs better for your health.
I find it hard to fathom that appliances become less efficient over time, because itâs rarely that way. More expensive, probably; whenâs the last time a new iteration was cheaper? Not his fault - thanks, capitalism! And itâs good for the people to become richer - because corporations are people, too, IIRC.
Regarding food, under the Orange Failure the USDA was crippled and that hurt the USAâs food supply. Bidenâs administration is trying to reverse that damage and deal with the very real problem of hunger. Unless someone (remember, corporations are people, too) gets in his way.
And, Climate Change is the threat. It makes no difference if you want to use gas or electric if the weather is so messed up that we canât grow things. So for Biden to take it seriously - in the face of so many business interests telling him not to - is a sign of character and benevolence as well as being able to listen to science, which is smarter than a businessman.
Agreed, but Kurtster does have a point about putting the horse before the cart...poor or too forced planning for the inevitable transition.
Though I'm not sure why he and others are so hell bent against any type of transition.
I love electric cars...quiet, excellent acceleration, easier to maintain and not to mention the lack of (direct) exhaust.
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Jan 17, 2024 - 8:42am |
|
Steely_D wrote:
Itâs OK to inconvenience people to make long term progress. Natural gas appliances can be replaced over time, and itâs better for your health.
I find it hard to fathom that appliances become less efficient over time, because itâs rarely that way. More expensive, probably; whenâs the last time a new iteration was cheaper? Not his fault - thanks, capitalism! And itâs good for the people to become richer - because corporations are people, too, IIRC.
Regarding food, under the Orange Failure the USDA was crippled and that hurt the USAâs food supply. Bidenâs administration is trying to reverse that damage and deal with the very real problem of hunger. Unless someone (remember, corporations are people, too) gets in his way.
And, Climate Change is the threat. It makes no difference if you want to use gas or electric if the weather is so messed up that we canât grow things. So for Biden to take it seriously - in the face of so many business interests telling him not to - is a sign of character and benevolence as well as being able to listen to science, which is smarter than a businessman.
+1
|
|
black321
Location: An earth without maps Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 17, 2024 - 7:03am |
|
Steely_D wrote:
Democrats push for national healthcare coverage. Republicans push back. Why? Why would they not want their constituents to have health care thatâs affordable? Because whyâre in the pocket of, theyâre beholden to, theyâre puppets of others. They certainly arenât trying to make the nation better.
I agree with what you're saying, but rather than trying to hurt people, maybe the "real" republicans just think (wrongly) the people are better served (in the aggregate) by keeping healthcare private?
Again, I dont agree and think we should have a universal healthcare system, provided by private providers but financed by the gov. Reason being, healthcare isnt an option, its not elective, and people, especially older folks, should be protected from the stress of financing necessary procedures. Further, risk management 101 shows that to minimize costs, put everyone in the pool, increase diversification, reduce variability and costs...increase preventive care, reduce emergency care, expand value based care and also reduce costs.
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 17, 2024 - 5:44am |
|
kurtster wrote:
On topic, Biden is taking away options from us, Americans, not growing them. He is banning petroleum based transportation. We even have a date. Natural gas powered appliances are being eliminated. We have dates for that, too. Other appliances are being made less efficient and more expensive. Even our food choices are being reduced because of Biden's declaration that Climate Change is the existential threat. The only one that matters when it comes to his policy decisions.
Itâs OK to inconvenience people to make long term progress. Natural gas appliances can be replaced over time, and itâs better for your health.
I find it hard to fathom that appliances become less efficient over time, because itâs rarely that way. More expensive, probably; whenâs the last time a new iteration was cheaper? Not his fault - thanks, capitalism! And itâs good for the people to become richer - because corporations are people, too, IIRC.
Regarding food, under the Orange Failure the USDA was crippled and that hurt the USAâs food supply. Bidenâs administration is trying to reverse that damage and deal with the very real problem of hunger. Unless someone (remember, corporations are people, too) gets in his way.
And, Climate Change is the threat. It makes no difference if you want to use gas or electric if the weather is so messed up that we canât grow things. So for Biden to take it seriously - in the face of so many business interests telling him not to - is a sign of character and benevolence as well as being able to listen to science, which is smarter than a businessman.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 11:56pm |
|
Steely_D wrote: So, back to the topic headline, yay for a President who - within the limitations of politics and contracts and international relationships - chooses to give the USA more options instead of fewer.
On topic, Biden is taking away options from us, Americans, not growing them. He is banning petroleum based transportation. We even have a date. Natural gas powered appliances are being eliminated. We have dates for that, too. Other appliances are being made less efficient and more expensive. Even our food choices are being reduced because of Biden's declaration that Climate Change is the existential threat. The only one that matters when it comes to his policy decisions.
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 11:24pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
Sorry, autocorrected the word Emiratis for me. Those are the people.
My point, which you got and somewhat were consonant with, was that as long as we are in the clutches of those who control oil/gas, then we are beholden to them. The President of the USA doesnât really control the price at the pumps, the folks selling it to the USA do.
However, recognizing that there are only so many dead dinosaurs down there, and that the cost to our livelihood in ecological terms is so massive, moving away from burning petroleum whenever possible is the right goal. Folks pushing against the use of electricity in lieu of fossil fuels are ignoring the dependence on others, the threat to the environment, and the eventual disappearance of the petroleum product. And who would want us to still be paying for oil? Not the USA, if they want independence and financial stability. They should be looking away from the oil biz.
So, back to the topic headline, yay for a President who - within the limitations of politics and contracts and international relationships - chooses to give the USA more options instead of fewer.
In the âstay safeâ category: AQI here in Dubai was 153 earlier. Leaving tonight.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 10:26pm |
|
Steely_D wrote:I’m visiting Abu Dhabi right now. A little research will show you that ADNOC (their national oil company) PROFITS about $2.7 million dollars a day from our reliance on gas and oil. The amount of wealth here, passed out to legit emirates (no immigrants or in laws) is mind-blowing. Mind blowing.
So who do you think is pushing Americans to eschew electricity (which can be created a number of ways) in lieu of petroleum? Certainly not the USA. Very confused by your remarks. An emirate is a type of municipality, for lack of a better term, in the Arab world ruled by an emir. We could keep that $2.7 million per day home if we would simply drill, baby, drill. Better we supply our own and keep our money at home to be recirculated and used to generate wealth and prosperity for us, not someone else. This would be an example of putting America first. Eschew electricity ? Petroleum is what is being pushed in America to be eschewed. Actually the entire world. The only actual problems with electricity as a power source that I can think of are its generation costs, scarcity, storage problems and distribution networks. Oh, and the wind. We use wind as a means to generate it and also as an excuse to withhold the supply. Some facts or opinions, you decide which is which. Controlling energy and access to it is the easiest way to enslave a people. Tesla wanted to provide free electricity with wireless transmission. Look at the opposition and by who that he faced. His life did not end well and we are still not sure who took his records in order to prevent his work from progressing any further. The standard of living is most dependent of the cost and reliability of energy. No civilization (that I can think of) that depended on renewable energy has ever survived, let alone expanded and prospered. Even the Amish depend on combustible hydrocarbon based energy as a fuel source to power critical needs necessary for survival. Mostly propane and gasoline. Their refrigeration is generally powered by propane. Back to you. Stay safe. Edit: I am seeing many reports of dead, frozen EV's as a direct result of the Polar Vortex that has taken over most of the US for the past week. They and their charging network has simply stopped working. When charged, their range drops as the temperature drops. Might as well ride a bicycle in the snow.
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 8:53pm |
|
haresfur wrote:
What accomplishments are realistic for a President who is dealing with a congress that doesn't want to pass a budget, spends all their time blocking military appointments, blocking foreign aid, running budget brinksmanship, fought internally so they couldn't even elect a speaker until the finally accepted someone with no skill set, and made it clear that any initiative from the president would be a non starter? Oh, and something about investigating him because of something about his son.
Itâs almost like the Republican Party is hell bent on ruining the United States, right? No focus on health care, education, infrastructure, food security. They run uno a huge deficit and then the next guy has to fix it.
But, man, are they really focused on drag queens and giving hand jobs in a kidsâ musical.
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 8:51pm |
|
black321 wrote:
Sure, everyone gets healthcare... if you can't pay it's called bad debt expense, typically at least 10% of a hospitals revenue.
Democrats push for national healthcare coverage. Republicans push back. Why? Why would they not want their constituents to have health care thatâs affordable? Because whyâre in the pocket of, theyâre beholden to, theyâre puppets of others. They certainly arenât trying to make the nation better.
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 8:48pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
Iâm visiting Abu Dhabi right now. A little research will show you that ADNOC (their national oil company) PROFITS about $2.7 million dollars a day from our reliance on gas and oil. The amount of wealth here, passed out to legit emirates (no immigrants or in laws) is mind-blowing. Mind blowing.
So who do you think is pushing Americans to eschew electricity (which can be created a number of ways) in lieu of petroleum? Certainly not the USA.
|
|
haresfur
Location: The Golden Triangle Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 7:55pm |
|
Beaker wrote:
"Big fail" is the opponent whose record is an abject failure. There are ZERO accomplishments to stand upon. (Unless one were to believe a wide fully-permissible border is an accomplishment. )
What accomplishments are realistic for a President who is dealing with a congress that doesn't want to pass a budget, spends all their time blocking military appointments, blocking foreign aid, running budget brinksmanship, fought internally so they couldn't even elect a speaker until the finally accepted someone with no skill set, and made it clear that any initiative from the president would be a non starter? Oh, and something about investigating him because of something about his son.
|
|
black321
Location: An earth without maps Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 4:43pm |
|
kcar wrote:
WE GET ITT. YOU ALREADY SAID THIS.
Name these better candidates. Or simply stop complaining.
oye, then stop asking the same dumbass questions
|
|
Bill_J
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 4:01pm |
|
Beaker wrote:
"Big fail" is the opponent whose record is an abject failure. There are ZERO accomplishments to stand upon. (Unless one were to believe a wide fully-permissible border is an accomplishment. )
I guess accomplishments are in the eye of the beholder.
|
|
kcar
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 3:54pm |
|
black321 wrote:
I am gobsmacked the two leading parties can't put forth better candidates, and/or the support from their voters for these two leading candidates.
WE GET ITT. YOU ALREADY SAID THIS.
Name these better candidates. Or simply stop complaining.
|
|
Beaker
Location: Your safe space
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 3:44pm |
|
Bill_J wrote:
"Possibly inevitable"? Leaving that aside, I believe that "big fail" is a party that puts forth the same candidate who has already lost to his opponent.
"Big fail" is the opponent whose record is an abject failure. There are ZERO accomplishments to stand upon. (Unless one were to believe a wide fully-permissible border is an accomplishment. )
|
|
Bill_J
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 3:39pm |
|
Beaker wrote:
Dems should be offering a strong rebuttal to the possibly inevitable Trump. But they're not. Big fail.
"Possibly inevitable"? Leaving that aside, I believe that "big fail" is a party that puts forth the same candidate who has already lost to his opponent.
|
|
Beaker
Location: Your safe space
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 2:28pm |
|
black321 wrote:
I am gobsmacked the two leading parties can't put forth better candidates, and/or the support from their voters for these two leading candidates.
Dems should be offering a strong rebuttal to the possibly inevitable Trump. But they're not. Big fail.
|
|
black321
Location: An earth without maps Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 2:24pm |
|
kcar wrote:
All that is really super, but we're about 10 months away from election day. The American people are not going to be interested in a new party or alternate candidate (unless something shocking happens, like Trump getting disqualified).
But I'll play your game anyway...
Can you provide a name or party that you think is a viable alternative? Please don't say Gary Johnson. I'm not sure that even the dedicated liberatarians posting in this forum know what he's up to.
I am gobsmacked the two leading parties can't put forth better candidates, and/or the support from their voters for these two leading candidates.
|
|
kcar
|
Posted:
Jan 16, 2024 - 2:19pm |
|
black321 wrote:
Your response diverts attention from the problems of this admin, claiming that the prior admin would have done no better or worse.
The bigger issue with your response is you are trying to paint a picture of me that does not exist. Am I a proponent of Trump and his policies, and/or argued he would have done a better job?
No.
What I am attacking is Bidenâs policies and ability to effectively lead this country. This all started with my comment questioning why voters are fixated on trump/biden. I am almost as gobsmacked for the support Biden is receivingâ¦and that doesnât even consider his age, which is probably his biggest obstacle in the minds of voters.
As a sidebar, again I donât recall claiming ACA never worked. I do believe it was not the right plan, though better than what we had, was forced through in a partisan manner and that the republicans made it worse by virtually eliminating the individual mandate (this was a key piece of ACA, as it would have forced everyone into the insurance pool, improved diversification and overall reduced the cost of insurance).
It seems I donât see things as binary as you seem to, which to me is a big problem with todayâs political thinking.
All that is really super, but we're about 10 months away from election day. The American people are not going to be interested in a new party or alternate candidate (unless something shocking happens, like Trump getting disqualified).
But I'll play your game anyway...
Can you provide a name or party that you think is a viable alternative? Please don't say Gary Johnson. I'm not sure that even the dedicated liberatarians posting in this forum know what he's up to.
|
|
|