Uploading Music
- macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
Baseball, anyone?
- zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Ukraine
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:41pm
Breaking News
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:22pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
Wordle - daily game
- rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:00am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:29am
Radio Paradise Comments
- pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Trump
- rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 25, 2024 - 6:56pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2024 - 3:48pm
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
News Items »
Don't Divorce Us
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next |
Leslie
Location: Antioch, CA Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:15pm |
|
Beaker wrote: You do realize that there is such a thing as conservatives right here on RP, who hold a different opinion than you — on this topic.
Like the various religions, one day in the future, I'd like to see the terms that separate us - conservative, liberal, libertarian, nutbag ... eliminated from our conversations. Then we would be merely a group of people with interesting ideas and opinions on how to make this world a better place.
That's just crazy talk!
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:15pm |
|
BillnDollarBaby wrote:
But if we lose the term "nutbag" what will we call Slabby behind his back?
I'm sure you'll think of something.
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:13pm |
|
Beaker wrote: You do realize that there is such a thing as conservatives right here on RP, who hold a different opinion than you — on this topic.
Like the various religions, one day in the future, I'd like to see the terms that separate us - conservative, liberal, libertarian, nutbag ... eliminated from our conversations. Then we would be merely a group of people with interesting ideas and opinions on how to make this world a better place.
But if we lose the term "nutbag" what will we call Slabby behind his back?
|
|
zipper
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:12pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: Doesn't make him wrong, tho—they are outnumbered.
And in this case wrong as well, but...where was I going with this?
off the crush list. :(
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:11pm |
|
Xeric wrote: In a self-selected community. Which always makes me wonder . . . I mean . . . well, where was I going with that?
...back to the guns thread.
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:10pm |
|
Xeric wrote: In a self-selected community. Which always makes me wonder . . . I mean . . . well, where was I going with that?
They aren't always outnumbered. Sometimes, it feels awfully lonely being a raving lib. It all depends on the time of day and the topic, me thinks. Or more than likely, me-don't-thinks. I am sleep deprived and on pain meds. What the hell am I talking about?
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:09pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: Doesn't make him wrong, tho—they are outnumbered.
And in this case wrong as well, but...where was I going with this?
In a self-selected community. Which always makes me wonder . . . I mean . . . well, where was I going with that?
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:07pm |
|
AliGator wrote: I've no qualms with your religion and its importance to you. I just want to know why religion has appropriated the term "marriage." And please forgive me for bringing up France again (I do it a lot here), but over there, the only legal marriage ceremony is the one performed by the mayor. You can be married by a priest (or other man of the cloth), but the only ceremony that is recognized by law is the one performed by the mayor of the town you're married in. And yet, people married by the mayor call themselves "mariés" and their union is a "marriage," whether they eventually have a ceremony in a church or not.
I was thinking that was France... don't you have two ceremonies? One legal and then one religious, assuming you want the religious one?
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:06pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: Another conservative loner amongst all the RP libs? You people should start a clique or something. You'd have to have a lot of extra fingers to count just the conservatives who've said they're vastly outnumbered here. Doesn't make him wrong, tho—they are outnumbered. And in this case wrong as well, but...where was I going with this?
|
|
AliGator
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:05pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:
Why is the term important to me? Because my religion is important to me. If that is a foreign concept to you and others, fine. And because my religion is important to me, its teachings are, too. I wasn't as religious as I am now until I was an 18 year old scared stiff kid hoping to stay alive in Nam...ok?
I've no qualms with your religion and its importance to you. I just want to know why religion has appropriated the term "marriage." And please forgive me for bringing up France again (I do it a lot here), but over there, the only legal marriage ceremony is the one performed by the mayor. You can be married by a priest (or other man of the cloth), but the only ceremony that is recognized by law is the one performed by the mayor of the town you're married in. And yet, people married by the mayor call themselves "mariés" and their union is a "marriage," whether they eventually have a ceremony in a church or not.
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:01pm |
|
Beanie wrote:Aaaaaagh!! I can't take it! Nobody is asking religion to broaden its definition of marriage. Just government. Sheesh. reallyreallygoingtobednow...
As always, Ms. Beanie nails it.
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:01pm |
|
AliGator wrote: That's a whole other issue. Don't bring it in here.
Tell me why the term "marriage" is so important to you. Do we need to separate people with the terms "marriage" and "civil unions"? Why?
I've sent an email to my dad, a Protestant minister, asking him what he thinks about gay marriage. I can't wait to hear what he responds.
Me too.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 8:00pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:I suspect I am in a distinct minority in RP on this matter...I think I can count on one hand, those of Conservative bend like me...
Another conservative loner amongst all the RP libs? You people should start a clique or something. You'd have to have a lot of extra fingers to count just the conservatives who've said they're vastly outnumbered here.
|
|
mem_313
Location: Beachside, Paradise Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:59pm |
|
oy vey.
i gave back the only ring i was ever offered.
|
|
Beanie
Location: under the jellicle moon Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:59pm |
|
Aaaaaagh!! I can't take it! Nobody is asking religion to broaden its definition of marriage. Just government. Sheesh. reallyreallygoingtobednow...
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:58pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:
That line is a sentiment I sense...ok?
Sure, okay. But it's more than that. It's what those who would define marriage strictly on religious grounds would insist upon. My take: religious marriage, same-sex marriage, secular marriage . . . all legitimate marriages. Religious take: religious marriage. Which of those implies limitations? Which of those forces people who want marriage to toe some particular line?
|
|
dionysius
Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:57pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:It seems a good number would dictate, even demand, that religions broaden their definitions...that's not granting religious freedoms and freedoms of religions... In June, I will be attending a wedding to be held on a golf course...to me, the venue is insignificant...so if anyone might think I'm such a strict ass on the topic and that only a Church may serve as the cite for a wedding, they would be wrong. So, I am to mind my own business? In other words, suppress my thoughts on this matter? Sorry, but if that's the sentiment behind that statement, it quite simply and defiantly, won't happen. Ever. Of course, that seems to be part of the thrust by the majority in here...accept one definition...think alike...walk the line...show no variance from what is expected...genuflect...heel. I guess I'm what some would think of as an arrogant Conservative Republican: never yielding on my rights... Time to move along...this has become a circular discussion...thanks to all who participated and showed civility...I do respect that despite any differences... nite all... So...if nobody reasonable agrees with you, you close up shop and head home? That's a debate! Wait a minute, that's religion. "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."
|
|
musik_knut
Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:56pm |
|
AliGator wrote: Ok, then parenthood is not a right, yet people become parents all the time. I'm just saying, it's taken for granted in our society. We are free to marry who we want, unless we're gay, in which case, sorry, no dice.
Ah, free to marry is not the same as the right to marry...
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:56pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:
Suddenly, everything is a right: I have the right to default on my mortgage and the Government must assist me... Marriage is not a right...where does any statute speak of marriage rights? Bestow such a right?
You continue pushing the line about civil liberties...while overlooking my thoughts that Civil Unions should be recognized and in such Unions, no rights can be denied that are afforded all other 'unions'...I am not alone in that regard...seems your side of the issue isn't hearing my side: full rights, ALL rights, but not the term 'marriage'...
Perhaps many might wish it were so, but keeping religion out of this matter is impossible...
I might be wrong, but I am not aware of most religions denying Civil Unions...just the term 'marriage'.
You do not have the right to default on your mortgage. You entered into a legal contract. If you default, your mortage holder has the right to relief as outlined in the contract you signed. If your government chooses to bail you out, well, that's a whole 'nother conversation for a whole 'nother thread. I am not pushing the line about CL. You have the CL to engage in whatever religous belief you want. How is it wrong to support CL? I am not following you on that part at all. My denomination not only permits, but supports and works for the right for all citizens to be married on their own terms. It is possible to keep religon out of this matter, or any other for that matter. Many people simply choose not to. I do not believe that abortion is right, and would never have one. That is my personal choice based on my personal beliefs. However, I am pro-choice because my ethical beliefs should not make laws for someone else. They have to live with their actions if they choose to have one. I hear and understand you, but I don't agree with the concept. Your description of all rights, except to the term marriage reeks of the "separate but equal" concept of segregation. It may have been the law, but it was still wrong. And time has proven that it was wrong. The majority of religions at the time supported government mandated hatred. Churches, historically, have not proven to be good law makers. Its why our fore-fathers tried to guarantee us the freedom to worship and believe as we saw fit.
|
|
musik_knut
Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 19, 2009 - 7:55pm |
|
Xeric wrote: Again, dude, that is your line, not mine. And religion's stance on the matter, in general.
Open thine eyes, brother.
That line is a sentiment I sense...ok?
|
|
|