mzpro5 wrote: 

I am all for kumbaya stuff, it works most the time, but lets not equate a simple removal of a person as a nuclear option. It's cancer remove it. You don't like the wallpaper, move or paint over it. It's really just being practical instead of just ignoring it. It's a big ole internets. There are plenty of places for it,, just not here.

 Beaker wrote: 
I'm not saying anyone should grow a thicker skin - I am saying ignore it walk away.

The speech is hateful, ugly and I want no part of it.  But you are feeding the flames of it's hateful attitude.  Your comments towards it will only strengthen it's deluded self image no matter how true they are.

I never said hate speech was ok we just feel differently on how to deal with it.  Look how angry and frustrated this insignificant piss ant has made you.  It has accomplished its goal.

It's like one of those sci-fi films where they are trying to destroy the monster with nuclear weapons only to find out it feeds on nuclear weapons.  Fighting it with it's own rhetoric only makes it stronger.

 Beaker wrote: 
We agree on that

 Beaker wrote: 
It is a meditation on not allowing others to inflame your ego.

 mzpro5 wrote: 
Well said

 Beaker wrote: 
I certainly agree on most accounts but people are effected by such drival only if they let themselves.  Pay it no mind, do not feed it's need to disrupt others.  It wastes your energy and even the most negative comments feed it's horrendous and distorted thoughts.  It craves attention - starve it.

 marko86 wrote: 
If he hasn't crossed the line already, he will - Bill knows what he won't have around here, and, although pretty forgiving, the judgment is fair and final, and the execution is swift - even joe gave up, eventually.

 Beaker wrote: 

Damn if I don't agree with you. It was not going to go away. In fact, I would be surprised if it don't back. It would be the 1st time I have ever advocated a removal, but seemed like an extreme case to me with nothing to gain by leaving it be. I might have had to reconsided had there been any actual interest in music on what is a music board.

 Beaker wrote: 
Wow, you're actually giving him status?

 brandog wrote: 

*comes back to post this*

I googled "Sad Little Man" and got this:

Remember, these people are haters. Do you want to be like them, do you want to be a hater too?

Instead, I feel sympathy and sorrow for someone who is suffering in their lives so much, that they become such evil people.

Let us all send warm thoughts to this person, to allow him/her to see the light.

*s Beaker and goes away*

I understand and share most everyone's opinion here, and as much as I'd like to verbally Ginsu this guy, I'm just not going to feed into it.

IMHO, he isn't worth. He is an obvious troll trying to push buttons.

When I first noticed him, I ran a modified search which revealed that he is in other forums as well.

If'n he gets shut out, he'll eventually leave. That is all.

Regards

I've spent some time reviewing the last few pages of this thread and what I don't understand is why anyone is wasting time responding to warped ramblings from the resident Facist.

You will never change his thinking and like most pests if ignored he will go away.

Feel better now? Now, please do not respond and maybe it will go away.

 Argonaut wrote: 
Ich würd mich an deiner Stelle mal ganz schnell wieder in dein braunes Erdloch verpissen. Dir gehört die Fresse gestopft. Hierzulande sind Äusserungen wie du sie hier zu Tage legst nämlich illegal...

*Cross-posted from rpeeps i won't miss *

The presence of such a despicable mind-set as held by our resident Fascist is an important marker that indicates the inevitable direction of that time worn and proven path. The spouters of the right wing regime should take that as a wake-up call regarding the inevitable conclusion of their belief system. No matter how much they might deny any affiliation with the concluding program, it is their support of the foundations of the rightwing that makes it conceivable that such dire politial systems as Fascism and Corporatism could flourish once again.

And  lest you righties get all finger pointy, as regards Socialism – in its concluding extremes of Stalinism and Maoism, we have no such exponents raising their heads here-in, that I can see, so is not a matter to be included. The forms of Socialism that proponents espouse in these pages looks to be the rather benign models provided by Denmark and Canada.

 Argonaut wrote: 
Obviously it's second grade or below. Stick with it and you'll make it to third grade in a few years.