[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

The Obituary Page - Steely_D - Jun 5, 2023 - 11:46pm
 
TV shows you watch - Steely_D - Jun 5, 2023 - 11:45pm
 
Ukraine - kcar - Jun 5, 2023 - 10:45pm
 
Wordle - daily game - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 5, 2023 - 9:26pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Coaxial - Jun 5, 2023 - 6:14pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Jun 5, 2023 - 4:28pm
 
Song of the Day - Manbird - Jun 5, 2023 - 3:32pm
 
Independent Party Candidates - Red_Dragon - Jun 5, 2023 - 3:19pm
 
June 2023 Photo Theme - Lines - parallel, converging, cur... - Antigone - Jun 5, 2023 - 2:40pm
 
Trump - rgio - Jun 5, 2023 - 1:58pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Beez - Jun 5, 2023 - 12:16pm
 
Get the Quote - Isabeau - Jun 5, 2023 - 10:29am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 5, 2023 - 9:14am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - Steely_D - Jun 5, 2023 - 9:07am
 
New Music - miamizsun - Jun 5, 2023 - 8:06am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 5, 2023 - 7:52am
 
A Picture paints a thousand words - oldviolin - Jun 5, 2023 - 7:48am
 
May 2023 Photo Theme - Buds, Sprouts & Beginnings - sunybuny - Jun 5, 2023 - 7:22am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jun 5, 2023 - 5:42am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - lily34 - Jun 5, 2023 - 5:33am
 
Movie Recommendation - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 4, 2023 - 9:59pm
 
Tindersticks - oldviolin - Jun 4, 2023 - 8:53pm
 
just like old rario - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 4, 2023 - 7:41pm
 
Out the window - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 4, 2023 - 7:34pm
 
Things You Thought Today - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 4, 2023 - 7:31pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - geoff_morphini - Jun 4, 2023 - 1:48pm
 
Skeptix - R_P - Jun 4, 2023 - 12:04pm
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Jun 4, 2023 - 10:29am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jun 4, 2023 - 10:22am
 
ONE WORD - Red_Dragon - Jun 3, 2023 - 4:48pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - Antigone - Jun 3, 2023 - 4:40pm
 
FOUR WORDS - GeneP59 - Jun 3, 2023 - 4:25pm
 
THREE WORDS - GeneP59 - Jun 3, 2023 - 4:24pm
 
TWO WORDS - GeneP59 - Jun 3, 2023 - 4:23pm
 
Guns - R_P - Jun 3, 2023 - 1:34pm
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Jun 3, 2023 - 10:56am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jun 2, 2023 - 8:28pm
 
Puzzle it - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2023 - 2:04pm
 
Fascism In America - R_P - Jun 2, 2023 - 1:24pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - R_P - Jun 2, 2023 - 12:43pm
 
China - R_P - Jun 2, 2023 - 12:26pm
 
Musky Mythology - Proclivities - Jun 2, 2023 - 11:50am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jun 2, 2023 - 11:09am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2023 - 9:21am
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - Beez - Jun 2, 2023 - 9:00am
 
Bad Poetry - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2023 - 8:39am
 
Allergies ( aka pollen hell) - black321 - Jun 2, 2023 - 8:02am
 
Food Democracy - Proclivities - Jun 2, 2023 - 6:23am
 
Canada - westslope - Jun 2, 2023 - 12:57am
 
Rock mix no longer available in Denmark - klausf - Jun 1, 2023 - 11:37pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jun 1, 2023 - 9:00pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Jun 1, 2023 - 4:32pm
 
Republican Wingnut Freak of the Day - Red_Dragon - Jun 1, 2023 - 3:56pm
 
Artificial Intelligence - R_P - Jun 1, 2023 - 12:38pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jun 1, 2023 - 10:56am
 
Come join us in Eureka! - lily34 - Jun 1, 2023 - 5:10am
 
RP in a Tesla EV - miamizsun - Jun 1, 2023 - 4:37am
 
21 - ScottFromWyoming - May 31, 2023 - 2:27pm
 
Russia - westslope - May 31, 2023 - 6:56am
 
Outstanding Covers - Steely_D - May 30, 2023 - 9:35am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - renaultr17 - May 29, 2023 - 9:50pm
 
Helpful emergency signs - Proclivities - May 29, 2023 - 7:14am
 
Eversolo DMP-A6 streamer and RP? - William - May 28, 2023 - 8:36pm
 
MQA in administration - William - May 28, 2023 - 8:27pm
 
Stream stopping at promo - William - May 28, 2023 - 8:18pm
 
What's your favorite quote? - maryte - May 28, 2023 - 9:12am
 
Ask for a tea - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 28, 2023 - 3:29am
 
Graphic designers, ho's! - Manbird - May 27, 2023 - 5:43pm
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - ScottN - May 27, 2023 - 5:28pm
 
Animal Resistance - Red_Dragon - May 27, 2023 - 7:46am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - miamizsun - May 27, 2023 - 7:24am
 
You're welcome, manbird. - Bill_J - May 26, 2023 - 6:00pm
 
In My Room - KurtfromLaQuinta - May 26, 2023 - 4:17pm
 
The Lincoln quote ... wasn't from Lincoln - Proclivities - May 26, 2023 - 1:19pm
 
Live Music - Steely_D - May 26, 2023 - 10:51am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » RightWingNutZ Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 132, 133, 134 ... 159, 160, 161  Next
Post to this Topic
zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:20pm

 Painted_Turtle wrote:


 


???? is there some specific activity where indoctrination is inserted?  And is it a requirment that the students participate?

I have heard that students won't even be required to watch or listen to the speech.  That its fully free choice, determined school district by school district.  That's the way its being done here in Minnesota, perhaps your state is different..


 

I read that school districts can opt out. I also read that some schools, I think NY was mentioned, aren't yet in session. If it's determined by the school district, as you said, then how is that a student's fully free choice?

edit: as for the specific activity re indoctrination, I mentioned a couple of specificities already below. I'm not going to post the entire document and highlight it for you. It's all there for your own eyes.

Painted_Turtle

Painted_Turtle Avatar

Location: Land of Laughing Waters
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:14pm

 zipper wrote:

{#Eek}
 

{#Doh}
 
 
dude... wait. O apostrophe who? are you on crack?

 
I don't do crack...what's your problem

Painted_Turtle

Painted_Turtle Avatar

Location: Land of Laughing Waters
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:12pm



 
zipper wrote:
Whoa, kids can vote in MA? {#Lol} Seriously, the teachers were instructed to wear them?

Did you see the letter from the Sec of Ed to the nation's principals regarding the historic speech? Note the follow-up classroom activities listed under question 3. Despite the fact that few kids will be paying attention to the speech, all of them will be required to participate in projects to discuss and explain what they learned from the president's words. We can rest assured that it will amount to blatant partisan indoctrination.

 

Painted_Turtle wrote:
What specific activity is full of the blatant partisan indoctrination?  Are you sure there is a requirment for participation?

 

???? is there some specific activity where indoctrination is inserted?  And is it a requirment that the students participate?

I have heard that students won't even be required to watch or listen to the speech.  That its fully free choice, determined school district by school district.  That's the way its being done here in Minnesota, perhaps your state is different..

buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:10pm

 Painted_Turtle wrote:


That was a pretty weird article.  The video in the article is not the same as the proposed O'bama speech. 

Do you suppose people in Utah (maybe the Mormons) were mixing the two seperate events in their minds; since they happened the same week?
 
I didnt say they were the same. I said they hit at the same time.
zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:09pm

 Painted_Turtle wrote:


That was a pretty weird article.  The video in the article is not the same as the proposed O'bama speech. 

Do you suppose people in Utah (maybe the Mormons) were mixing the two seperate events in their minds; since they happened the same week?


 
{#Eek}
 

{#Doh}
 
 
dude... wait. O apostrophe who? are you on crack?


Painted_Turtle

Painted_Turtle Avatar

Location: Land of Laughing Waters
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:07pm

 buzz wrote:
One reason people are upset about the Obama speech is that it was announced the same week this came out.

 

That was a pretty weird article.  The video in the article is not the same as the proposed O'bama speech. 

Do you suppose people in Utah (maybe the Mormons) were mixing the two seperate events in their minds; since they happened the same week?

musik_knut

musik_knut Avatar

Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:06pm

 zipper wrote:

Previous presidents didn't attach a student curriculum to their speeches.
 

No. And that's just part of the wide difference between previous Presidents addressing students and President Obama's study guidelines, many of them focused on him.
buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:05pm

Since we are all gathered here, I will post this here.

This is the type of quality individual the president has as an advisor. Ain'tcha all proud? 
zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:03pm

 buzz wrote:
One reason people are upset about the Obama speech is that it was announced the same week this came out.

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”

 

 
One nation under O.

zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 2:02pm

 musik_knut wrote:


Other Presidents have addressed school kids. They did so in a manner unlike what Team Obama proposes. Previous Presidents prodded students to study, to stay in school, to seek higher education after K12, to be good citizens.

Teaching kids about Our Presidents is fine. Having them learn the life of our current President is more of Mr. Obama's 'hey, look at me' stuff. He really has taken to being The One...

And once again, Team Obama, more and more resembling  Pillars of Jell-O, backpedaled when considerable resistance erupted over some of the activities being proposed or actually, imposed.

 
Previous presidents didn't attach a student curriculum to their speeches.

musik_knut

musik_knut Avatar

Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:58pm

 zipper wrote:

Under the FAQ, the classroom activities for the K-6 grades begins with this.

Before the Speech
• Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama.

{#Lol} Who writes this stuff?
 

Other Presidents have addressed school kids. They did so in a manner unlike what Team Obama proposes. Previous Presidents prodded students to study, to stay in school, to seek higher education after K12, to be good citizens.

Teaching kids about Our Presidents is fine. Having them learn the life of our current President is more of Mr. Obama's 'hey, look at me' stuff. He really has taken to being The One...

And once again, Team Obama, more and more resembling  Pillars of Jell-O, backpedaled when considerable resistance erupted over some of the activities being proposed or actually, imposed.
buzz

buzz Avatar

Location: up the boohai


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:58pm

One reason people are upset about the Obama speech is that it was announced the same week this came out.

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.”

 
zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:51pm

 musik_knut wrote:


{#Clap}

 
Under the FAQ, the classroom activities for the K-6 grades begins with this.

Before the Speech
• Teachers can build background knowledge about the President of the United States and his speech by reading books about presidents and Barack Obama.

{#Lol} Who writes this stuff?

musik_knut

musik_knut Avatar

Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:47pm

 Painted_Turtle wrote:


What specific activity is full of the blatant partisan indoctrination?  Are you sure there is a requirment for participation?

 

Question: regarding having students read the life story of President Obama. Is that not a form of indoctrination? Does it not smack of Dear One?
Painted_Turtle

Painted_Turtle Avatar

Location: Land of Laughing Waters
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:45pm

 zipper wrote:

Whoa, kids can vote in MA? {#Lol} Seriously, the teachers were instructed to wear them?

Did you see the letter from the Sec of Ed to the nation's principals regarding the historic speech? Note the follow-up classroom activities listed under question 3. Despite the fact that few kids will be paying attention to the speech, all of them will be required to participate in projects to discuss and explain what they learned from the president's words. We can rest assured that it will amount to blatant partisan indoctrination.

 

What specific activity is full of the blatant partisan indoctrination?  Are you sure there is a requirment for participation?
musik_knut

musik_knut Avatar

Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:37pm

 zipper wrote:

Whoa, kids can vote in MA? {#Lol} Seriously, the teachers were instructed to wear them?

Did you see the letter from the Sec of Ed to the nation's principals regarding the historic speech? Note the follow-up classroom activities listed under question 3. Despite the fact that few kids will be paying attention to the speech, all of them will be required to participate in projects to discuss and explain what they learned from the president's words. We can rest assured that it will amount to blatant partisan indoctrination.

 

{#Clap}
zipper

zipper Avatar



Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:36pm

 Mugro wrote:


Oh, what's wrong with a little "education" ?? Afterall, children need to be taught what to think, don't they? {#Lol}

I am not sure some of the students got "the message." Perhaps she should have worn the Obama button in class like all the teachers were instructed to do in Massachusetts during Deval Patrick's campaign for governor?

 
Whoa, kids can vote in MA? {#Lol} Seriously, the teachers were instructed to wear them?

Did you see the letter from the Sec of Ed to the nation's principals regarding the historic speech? Note the follow-up classroom activities listed under question 3. Despite the fact that few kids will be paying attention to the speech, all of them will be required to participate in projects to discuss and explain what they learned from the president's words. We can rest assured that it will amount to blatant partisan indoctrination.


Painted_Turtle

Painted_Turtle Avatar

Location: Land of Laughing Waters
Gender: Female


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:32pm

 Mugro wrote:


I am not sure some of the students got "the message." Perhaps she should have worn the Obama button in class like all the teachers were instructed to do in Massachusetts during Deval Patrick's campaign for governor?

 

Maybe every kid in the country should be given a Top Cat button to wear if they so choose too & if their parents allow them to wear one, of course.   {#Lol}

Seems to me that its all the adults that are in a big kerfuffle over presidents talking with school children that are making this in to a Kilkenny Cat fight as DMax mentioned.   Just sounds like more paranoid goofeyness to me.  Most little kids don't view people as Repubs or Dems; just as people like themselves.

"There once were two cats of Kilkenny
Each thought there was one cat too many
So they fought and they fit
And they scratched and they bit
'Til (excepting their nails
And the tips of their tails)
Instead of two cats there weren't any! "

musik_knut

musik_knut Avatar

Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Gender: Male


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:25pm

 jadewahoo wrote:
Its time for open revolt against these stupid motherfucking fundamentalist idiots.

 

jade,
'Open revolt'? And that would entail?
mk
Mugro

Mugro Avatar

Location: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg


Posted: Sep 4, 2009 - 1:16pm

 zipper wrote:

Because the country's educators are above reproach. What could go wrong? It's just a little indoctrination.


 

Oh, what's wrong with a little "education" ?? Afterall, children need to be taught what to think, don't they? {#Lol}

I am not sure some of the students got "the message." Perhaps she should have worn the Obama button in class like all the teachers were instructed to do in Massachusetts during Deval Patrick's campaign for governor?


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 132, 133, 134 ... 159, 160, 161  Next