Ask an Atheist
- Lazy8 - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:28am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:23am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 19, 2024 - 8:23am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
2024 Elections!
- black321 - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:51am
NYTimes Connections
- ptooey - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:23am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:20am
NY Times Strands
- Proclivities - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:14am
Trump
- rgio - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:05am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
When I need a Laugh I ...
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
Remembering the Good Old Days
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:41am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 19, 2024 - 4:43am
The Obituary Page
- kurtster - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:45pm
TV shows you watch
- kcar - Apr 18, 2024 - 9:13pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 18, 2024 - 8:25pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 10:22am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 7:04pm
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 17, 2024 - 3:27pm
What's that smell?
- Isabeau - Apr 17, 2024 - 2:50pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- dischuckin - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:29pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Russia
- R_P - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:14pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Ukraine
- kurtster - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:05am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:38am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 9:08pm
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:56am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Republican Party
- Isabeau - Apr 15, 2024 - 12:12pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:59am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
What Did You See Today?
- Steely_D - Apr 13, 2024 - 6:42am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
Radio Paradise in Foobar2000
- gvajda - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:53pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Apr 11, 2024 - 8:29am
Joe Biden
- black321 - Apr 11, 2024 - 7:43am
New Song Submissions system
- MayBaby - Apr 11, 2024 - 6:29am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- kurtster - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:26pm
Caching to Apple watch quit working
- email-muri.0z - Apr 10, 2024 - 6:25pm
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Alchemist - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:52am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- orrinc - Apr 10, 2024 - 10:48am
NPR Listeners: Is There Liberal Bias In Its Reporting?
- black321 - Apr 9, 2024 - 2:11pm
Sonos
- rnstory - Apr 9, 2024 - 10:43am
RP Windows Desktop Notification Applet
- gvajda - Apr 9, 2024 - 9:55am
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- kurtster - Apr 8, 2024 - 10:34am
And the good news is....
- thisbody - Apr 8, 2024 - 3:57am
How do I get songs into My Favorites
- Huey - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:29pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 7, 2024 - 5:14pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- Isabeau - Apr 7, 2024 - 12:50pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 7, 2024 - 11:18am
Why is Mellow mix192kbps?
- dean2.athome - Apr 7, 2024 - 1:11am
Musky Mythology
- haresfur - Apr 6, 2024 - 7:11pm
China
- R_P - Apr 6, 2024 - 11:19am
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Apr 5, 2024 - 12:45pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
RightWingNutZ
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 133, 134, 135 ... 169, 170, 171 Next |
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 24, 2010 - 8:29am |
|
|
|
musik_knut
Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 24, 2010 - 8:26am |
|
kurtster wrote: Got yer undies in a bunch ? If context matters (around here it rarely does anymore, but wtf), then you need to really do some backscrolling to understand the context of my question. It was posed last year or several pages ago or something like that. Merely asking someone why they found it offensive to hear Obama being called a Socialist. I do not in any way advocate or support Socialism as a way of living in these United States. The same for Facism. Or any form of extremism for that matter.
From what I can see has happened, Bush set the table for Obama to belly up to and continue. Bush initiated the TARP Fund which most importantly gave the Treasury brand new unlimited powers to intervene and interfer in the economy. Bush also helped initiate the Patriot Act which gave the Federal Government a brand new set of powers to interfer and intervene in everday life here in the States and in citizens daily life in the name of Security. Obama has basically nationalized the banking system, taken over the Auto Industry, and with his blessings, Rep. Frank gave Freddie and Fannie a blank check to oversee its ownership of half of the housing stock in this country. In essence, the government owns half of the houses in America. That is taking over businesses and private property in my book. Seems to be taking over production, distribution and financing in this country. That's most of your definition of Socialism. And now he wants to nationalize Health Care. Looks like a duck to me.
Want to label me ? Call me a Constuctionist as in the Constitution. That's how I see myself. I have a narrow view of what the Constitution allows and provides for. Settled law is that, yet I object to further weakening of the Constitution in the name of Security and Economic policies. Want to engage me on those terms ? Step right up and take your best swing, I can handle it.
|
|
dionysius
Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 7:43pm |
|
owchlaw wrote: I beg to differ with you, Argonaut. Socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production is publically owned and the ends are privately owned. Communism is public ownership of both. To suggest they are one in the same is incorrect. Implementation of pure socialism, pure communism or pure capitalism is simply not possible. All economic systems are hybrid to some degree. Aspects of our traditional capitalistic system have always, by necessity, had socialistic features (police, fire, public utilities, etc.). Likewise, the economic systems of China and the Soviet Union, often described as "communist" have had some capitalistic components. You also confuse political systems (dictatorship and fascism) with economic theory. Fascism doesn't always go hand in hand with socialism or communism. Largely capitalistic systems can exist with fascim (see GW Bush administration 2000-2008).
That's almost right.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 7:37pm |
|
Argonaut wrote:Wrong wrong wrong. Someone failed grade school. There is no ''socialist Classic(leftist)'' and there is no 'corporate socialism' either. First of all Socialism IS Communism. For anyone to suggest otherwise is UTTERLY ridiculous, as they both work for the same goal. As for you two, your statements above, that socialism has been in practise for a while is simply untrue. Many politicians adopt some labour policies, but this by no means suggests, you can call G W Bush 'socialist' and/or type these 'definitions' .. Mussolini? Here, his policy : ''.....FASCISM 1. often capitalized ;a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individualand that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. 2. a tendency toward or, actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial CONTROL. What is wrong of being a socialist? I would suggest you both get back to hitting the books, as you both clearly have not a clue what socialism is all about. Let me start educate you two : ''SOCIALISM . 1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the MEANS of production and DISTRIBUTION, of capital, land, etc., in the community AS A WHOLE. 2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory. 3 IN MARXIST THEORY: the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to COMMUNISM, characterised by the IMPERFECT IMPLEMENTATION OF collectivist principles.
Got yer undies in a bunch ? If context matters (around here it rarely does anymore, but wtf), then you need to really do some backscrolling to understand the context of my question. It was posed last year or several pages ago or something like that. Merely asking someone why they found it offensive to hear Obama being called a Socialist. I do not in any way advocate or support Socialism as a way of living in these United States. The same for Facism. Or any form of extremism for that matter. From what I can see has happened, Bush set the table for Obama to belly up to and continue. Bush initiated the TARP Fund which most importantly gave the Treasury brand new unlimited powers to intervene and interfer in the economy. Bush also helped initiate the Patriot Act which gave the Federal Government a brand new set of powers to interfer and intervene in everday life here in the States and in citizens daily life in the name of Security. Obama has basically nationalized the banking system, taken over the Auto Industry, and with his blessings, Rep. Frank gave Freddie and Fannie a blank check to oversee its ownership of half of the housing stock in this country. In essence, the government owns half of the houses in America. That is taking over businesses and private property in my book. Seems to be taking over production, distribution and financing in this country. That's most of your definition of Socialism. And now he wants to nationalize Health Care. Looks like a duck to me. Want to label me ? Call me a Constuctionist as in the Constitution. That's how I see myself. I have a narrow view of what the Constitution allows and provides for. Settled law is that, yet I object to further weakening of the Constitution in the name of Security and Economic policies. Want to engage me on those terms ? Step right up and take your best swing, I can handle it.
|
|
owchlaw
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 1:13pm |
|
jadewahoo wrote: Argonaut wrote:Wrong wrong wrong. Someone failed grade school. There is no ''socialist Classic(leftist)'' and there is no 'corporate socialism' either. First of all Socialism IS Communism. For anyone to suggest otherwise is UTTERLY ridiculous, as they both work for the same goal. As for you two, your statements above, that socialism has been in practise for a while is simply untrue. Many politicians adopt some labour policies, but this by no means suggests, you can call G W Bush 'socialist' and/or type these 'definitions' .. Mussolini? Here, his policy : ''.....FASCISM 1. often capitalized ;a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individualand that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. 2. a tendency toward or, actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial CONTROL. What is wrong of being a socialist? I would suggest you both get back to hitting the books, as you both clearly have not a clue what socialism is all about. Let me start educate you two : ''SOCIALISM . 1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the MEANS of production and DISTRIBUTION, of capital, land, etc., in the community AS A WHOLE. 2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory. 3 IN MARXIST THEORY: the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to COMMUNISM, characterised by the IMPERFECT IMPLEMENTATION OF collectivist principles.
ArgonautFascist NeoCon worlwide...
As an avowed Fascist, you are certainly posting in the right forum thread. I beg to differ with you, Argonaut. Socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production is publically owned and the ends are privately owned. Communism is public ownership of both. To suggest they are one in the same is incorrect. Implementation of pure socialism, pure communism or pure capitalism is simply not possible. All economic systems are hybrid to some degree. Aspects of our traditional capitalistic system have always, by necessity, had socialistic features (police, fire, public utilities, etc.). Likewise, the economic systems of China and the Soviet Union, often described as "communist" have had some capitalistic components. You also confuse political systems (dictatorship and fascism) with economic theory. Fascism doesn't always go hand in hand with socialism or communism. Largely capitalistic systems can exist with fascim (see GW Bush administration 2000-2008).
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 12:49pm |
|
Coaxial wrote:Is there just a long line of these idiots waiting to step forward and be stamped MORON?
Um yeah. "If idiots are a dime a dozen, I wanna find the guy who's supplying the dimes."
|
|
Coaxial
Location: Comfortably numb in So Texas Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 12:40pm |
|
hippiechick wrote: Is there just a long line of these idiots waiting to step forward and be stamped MORON?
|
|
jadewahoo
Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 12:32pm |
|
Argonaut wrote:Wrong wrong wrong. Someone failed grade school. There is no ''socialist Classic(leftist)'' and there is no 'corporate socialism' either. First of all Socialism IS Communism. For anyone to suggest otherwise is UTTERLY ridiculous, as they both work for the same goal. As for you two, your statements above, that socialism has been in practise for a while is simply untrue. Many politicians adopt some labour policies, but this by no means suggests, you can call G W Bush 'socialist' and/or type these 'definitions' .. Mussolini? Here, his policy : ''.....FASCISM 1. often capitalized ;a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individualand that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. 2. a tendency toward or, actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial CONTROL. What is wrong of being a socialist? I would suggest you both get back to hitting the books, as you both clearly have not a clue what socialism is all about. Let me start educate you two : ''SOCIALISM . 1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the MEANS of production and DISTRIBUTION, of capital, land, etc., in the community AS A WHOLE. 2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory. 3 IN MARXIST THEORY: the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to COMMUNISM, characterised by the IMPERFECT IMPLEMENTATION OF collectivist principles.
Argonaut Fascist NeoCon worlwide...
As an avowed Fascist, you are certainly posting in the right forum thread.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 9:15am |
|
hippiechick wrote: Brilliant. I wonder what he thought of Timothy McVeigh.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 23, 2010 - 8:54am |
|
|
|
jadewahoo
Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 2, 2010 - 1:45pm |
|
Monkeysdad wrote:
Socialist,...maybe; but Racist or Non-Citizen? Never. Sounds like a skewed poll that plays right into Ariana's court.
Maybe it just means that you aren't all the rightwinger you thought you were.
|
|
Monkeysdad
Location: Simi Valley, CA Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 2, 2010 - 11:19am |
|
hippiechick wrote: Socialist,...maybe; but Racist or Non-Citizen? Never. Sounds like a skewed poll that plays right into Ariana's court.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 2, 2010 - 10:36am |
|
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 6, 2010 - 8:27pm |
|
jadewahoo wrote: kurtster wrote:
Ok, D,
Serious question,
What is wrong in calling Obama a Socialist ? Forget the other two, they are not valid. But what is wrong with being a Socialist ?
I have long called Bush the most Socialist President in the history of this country. He implemented more socialist actions into government than any before him put together. Or is it unfair to Bush to call him a Socialist ? Bush was never a conservative, at least in my opinion. And to blame him on conservatives is a tremendous disservice to conservatives, again in my opinion. Bush was straight out of the Woodrow Wilson school, but no one saw it coming. Anyway, eh ?
Uhhhmmm... because he isn't even close to being one? His policies have been to the right of JFK and LBJ, embracing of many Republican talking points. He is a Corporatist. Ok, so Corporatists are Socialists, only not what the likes of mk and you mean by Socialist. Classic (leftist) Socialism is where the government manages all the resources of a nation and meets the needs of all its peoples (ostensibly) through the redistribution of those resources. Corporate Socialism is where government, by decree, establishes coportate profit as policy. It assigns to the corporations the meeting of the needs of the people (ostensibly) through the mandatory participation of its citizens in the the profit-based services that those industries provide. This is a Right Wing agenda, as put into practice by Mussolini, lifted to status of official policy in the USA by GWB and continued by BHO. Jeez, its so good to be back to initials again. Its heart warming. DDE, JFK, LBJ, RMH. I so missed them. I guess we are getting into splitting RCH's (a bona fide measurement in the construction trades). I've long said the BHO would be like GWB on steroids. That's all I got on this one right now. But damn, its great to go back to initials !
|
|
jadewahoo
Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 6, 2010 - 12:12am |
|
kurtster wrote:
Ok, D,
Serious question,
What is wrong in calling Obama a Socialist ? Forget the other two, they are not valid. But what is wrong with being a Socialist ?
I have long called Bush the most Socialist President in the history of this country. He implemented more socialist actions into government than any before him put together. Or is it unfair to Bush to call him a Socialist ? Bush was never a conservative, at least in my opinion. And to blame him on conservatives is a tremendous disservice to conservatives, again in my opinion. Bush was straight out of the Woodrow Wilson school, but no one saw it coming. Anyway, eh ?
Uhhhmmm... because he isn't even close to being one? His policies have been to the right of JFK and LBJ, embracing of many Republican talking points. He is a Corporatist. Ok, so Corporatists are Socialists, only not what the likes of mk and you mean by Socialist. Classic (leftist) Socialism is where the government manages all the resources of a nation and meets the needs of all its peoples (ostensibly) through the redistribution of those resources. Corporate Socialism is where government, by decree, establishes coportate profit as policy. It assigns to the corporations the meeting of the needs of the people (ostensibly) through the mandatory participation of its citizens in the the profit-based services that those industries provide. This is a Right Wing agenda, as put into practice by Mussolini, lifted to status of official policy in the USA by GWB and continued by BHO.
|
|
jadewahoo
Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2010 - 11:57pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:
but not of the Saul Alinksy School of Community Organizing of which President Obama is an ardent advocate and former teacher of that radical left wing thought.
You say that like it is a bad thing.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2010 - 6:54pm |
|
musik_knut wrote:
but not of the Saul Alinksy School of Community Organizing of which President Obama is an ardent advocate and former teacher of that radical left wing thought.
Oh, I see.
|
|
musik_knut
Location: Third Stone From The Sun Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2010 - 6:52pm |
|
hippiechick wrote:The Tea Baggers have decided that the best way to grow is to use a grassroots movement in areas. Know what those grassroots people are called?
COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS!!
but not of the Saul Alinksy School of Community Organizing of which President Obama is an ardent advocate and former teacher of that radical left wing thought.
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2010 - 2:55pm |
|
The Tea Baggers have decided that the best way to grow is to use a grassroots movement in areas. Know what those grassroots people are called?
COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS!!
|
|
|