[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

As California Goes, So Goes The Rest Of The Country - haresfur - Sep 16, 2021 - 2:11am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - n4ku - Sep 15, 2021 - 10:32pm
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 9:54pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Sep 15, 2021 - 8:49pm
 
Spambags on RP - rgio - Sep 15, 2021 - 6:50pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Sep 15, 2021 - 6:35pm
 
NASA & other news from space - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 6:09pm
 
Music documentaries - miamizsun - Sep 15, 2021 - 5:49pm
 
The Dragons' Roost - miamizsun - Sep 15, 2021 - 5:22pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Sep 15, 2021 - 4:25pm
 
Are you ready for some football? - Red_Dragon - Sep 15, 2021 - 4:18pm
 
Star Trek - miamizsun - Sep 15, 2021 - 3:07pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Sep 15, 2021 - 2:37pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 2:28pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 2:20pm
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - Red_Dragon - Sep 15, 2021 - 1:58pm
 
COVID and China's Influence - coding_to_music - Sep 15, 2021 - 12:43pm
 
Trump - black321 - Sep 15, 2021 - 12:41pm
 
COVID and Children - coding_to_music - Sep 15, 2021 - 12:37pm
 
COVID and Eugenics - coding_to_music - Sep 15, 2021 - 12:27pm
 
COVID lockdowns and mandates - coding_to_music - Sep 15, 2021 - 12:23pm
 
COVID notable people - coding_to_music - Sep 15, 2021 - 12:21pm
 
The Abortion Wars - R_P - Sep 15, 2021 - 11:20am
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 10:24am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 10:12am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 10:11am
 
What is the meaning of this? - oldviolin - Sep 15, 2021 - 10:05am
 
The Obituary Page - ptooey - Sep 15, 2021 - 10:00am
 
Album recommendation for fans of pop music - Proclivities - Sep 15, 2021 - 9:40am
 
Let's build a city - Red_Dragon - Sep 15, 2021 - 8:46am
 
Best of George Carlin - Jonathon - Sep 15, 2021 - 8:34am
 
*** PUNS *** PINK FLOYD - coding_to_music - Sep 14, 2021 - 9:49pm
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - haresfur - Sep 14, 2021 - 6:59pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 14, 2021 - 6:19pm
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - haresfur - Sep 14, 2021 - 4:27pm
 
Fox Spews - R_P - Sep 14, 2021 - 2:16pm
 
But Why? - Manbird - Sep 14, 2021 - 2:12pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - oldviolin - Sep 14, 2021 - 1:35pm
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - GeneP59 - Sep 14, 2021 - 1:23pm
 
Looking back - Ohmsen - Sep 14, 2021 - 10:29am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 14, 2021 - 10:06am
 
TV shows you watch - Ohmsen - Sep 14, 2021 - 9:32am
 
Florida - sunybuny - Sep 14, 2021 - 8:20am
 
Things that piss me off - black321 - Sep 14, 2021 - 8:17am
 
Manbird's Episiotomy Stitch Licking Clinic - KEEP OUT - miamizsun - Sep 14, 2021 - 5:07am
 
Things You Thought Today - miamizsun - Sep 14, 2021 - 4:22am
 
Favorite Quotes - coding_to_music - Sep 13, 2021 - 4:49pm
 
TEXAS - Red_Dragon - Sep 13, 2021 - 4:30pm
 
Song title? - oldviolin - Sep 13, 2021 - 3:41pm
 
Infinite cat - miamizsun - Sep 13, 2021 - 2:46pm
 
Afghanistan - black321 - Sep 13, 2021 - 1:24pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 13, 2021 - 11:11am
 
September 11 Theories - coding_to_music - Sep 13, 2021 - 10:39am
 
Terrorist Watch! - Red_Dragon - Sep 13, 2021 - 10:15am
 
For Jrzy! - JrzyTmata - Sep 13, 2021 - 8:15am
 
Jam! (why should a song stop) - rhahl - Sep 13, 2021 - 7:24am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Sep 13, 2021 - 6:58am
 
Brexit - coding_to_music - Sep 12, 2021 - 10:38pm
 
Republican Party - R_P - Sep 12, 2021 - 6:24pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Sep 12, 2021 - 5:12pm
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - haresfur - Sep 12, 2021 - 4:26pm
 
Democratic Party - Red_Dragon - Sep 12, 2021 - 3:41pm
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 12, 2021 - 3:27pm
 
Two questions. That's it. I promise. - Ohmsen - Sep 12, 2021 - 11:41am
 
What Makes You Laugh? - Ohmsen - Sep 12, 2021 - 9:56am
 
Helpful emergency signs - Ohmsen - Sep 12, 2021 - 9:51am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - Coaxial - Sep 12, 2021 - 8:00am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - miamizsun - Sep 12, 2021 - 7:59am
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - Proclivities - Sep 12, 2021 - 7:44am
 
Mars Exploration Rover Mission Status - R_P - Sep 11, 2021 - 10:06pm
 
Lyrics - Manbird - Sep 11, 2021 - 8:38pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Sep 11, 2021 - 6:04pm
 
Russia - westslope - Sep 11, 2021 - 10:02am
 
Angela Merkel - westslope - Sep 11, 2021 - 9:20am
 
Best Radio Station Ever - meddyliol - Sep 11, 2021 - 3:28am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Climate Change Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 112, 113, 114  Next
Post to this Topic
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 1:22pm

 kurtster wrote:

So what about the CO² emissions from humans ?

The average human exhales about 2.3 pounds of carbon dioxide on an average day. ... Take this number and multiply by a population of 7 billion people, breathing away for 365.25 days per year, and you get an annual CO2 output of 2.94 billion tons.

Time to reduce the human population, too ?

 
{#Propeller}

you think funny.   Getting back to the main point. Simply waiting for technology alone to solve the problem is now IMHO criminally complacent. The technology is not there yet on the scale we need it. Ergo, we need to change consumption patterns, this goes hand-in-hand with technological progress. The two are not incompatible.

And the ironic thing is, it seems the younger generation has already realized this and is acting on it. It's just us old farts who, despite being the first generation to really benefit from the abundance of post WWII growth, seem totally intransigent when it comes to being just a wee bit more responsible about what and how we consume, and yes I put myself in that group. 

 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 1:22pm

 kurtster wrote:
So what about the CO² emissions from humans ?

The average human exhales about 2.3 pounds of carbon dioxide on an average day. ... Take this number and multiply by a population of 7 billion people, breathing away for 365.25 days per year, and you get an annual CO2 output of 2.94 billion tons.

Time to reduce the human population, too ?

Unsourced kurtsterian blather.

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 1:13pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

nope. you're forgetting all those frictional losses aka bovine burping and farting.. which will be avoided by going vegetarian/vegan..

it is waaaay more efficient for us to eat the crops directly (well ok, not grass, but you get my drift).
 
So what about the CO² emissions from humans ?

The average human exhales about 2.3 pounds of carbon dioxide on an average day. ... Take this number and multiply by a population of 7 billion people, breathing away for 365.25 days per year, and you get an annual CO2 output of 2.94 billion tons.

Time to reduce the human population, too ?

Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 1:11pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
huh?  Kurtster brought up the vegan thing, not me. FWIW I am not vegetarian but my wife is.

You brought up the cows' blurp...

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 1:08pm

 Ohmsen wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
you're forgetting all those frictional losses aka bovine burping and farting.. which will be avoided by going vegetarian/vegan..

it is waaaay more efficient for us to eat the crops directly (well ok, not grass, but you get my drift).

You seem to be blowing one smokescreen after another.

 
huh?  Kurtster brought up the vegan thing, not me. FWIW I am not vegetarian but my wife is.
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 1:06pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
you're forgetting all those frictional losses aka bovine burping and farting.. which will be avoided by going vegetarian/vegan..

it is waaaay more efficient for us to eat the crops directly (well ok, not grass, but you get my drift).

You seem to be blowing one smokescreen after another.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:59pm

 Ohmsen wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

and btw.. it is not just energy consumption in all those sectors


Industrial farming is another (great) malefactor, while 80-90% of farmers worldwide still do it with their bare hands
 
my beef with industrial farming is primarily the loss of biodiversity and topsoil depletion, but yes, it also has a carbon footprint.. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:57pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
nope. you're forgetting all those frictional losses aka bovine burping and farting.. which will be avoided by going vegetarian/vegan..

it is waaaay more efficient for us to eat the crops directly (well ok, not grass, but you get my drift).

Oh noes, The Deep State is coming for your hamburgers/steaks!

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:54pm

 kurtster wrote:

Well, if we go vegan, then we have to make energy efficiency improvements for the expansion required in other parts of agriculture in order to replace the offenders, energy efficiently.
.
Right ?
 
nope. you're forgetting all those frictional losses aka bovine burping and farting.. which will be avoided by going vegetarian/vegan..

it is waaaay more efficient for us to eat the crops directly (well ok, not grass, but you get my drift).
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:27pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

and btw.. it is not just energy consumption in all those sectors


Industrial farming is another (great) malefactor, while 80-90% of farmers worldwide still do it with their bare hands
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:26pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
and btw.. it is not just energy consumption in all those sectors
 
Well, if we go vegan, then we have to make energy efficiency improvements for the expansion required in other parts of agriculture in order to replace the offenders, energy efficiently.
.
Right ?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:22pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

who says that?  
 
You seemed to imply that with your expression of urgency and impatience.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:21pm

and btw.. it is not just energy consumption in all those sectors
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 12:20pm

 kurtster wrote:

Not only what you said, but regarding the bolded above in NoEnz's thought, flattening the energy curve applies to all of the sectors above in the chart.  It is in the natural best interest to improve energy efficiency in all of them.  To think that no one is trying is just bizarre at any informed level.
 
who says that?  
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 11:59am

 Ohmsen wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


energy production and transport are just part of the problem. 
"flattening the demand curve" as you put has to extend to all other sectors as well OR we find new technologies to allow demand to stay high but simultaneously become more sustainable, or, even better, we do both at once for the fastest possible response.
 


Constant growth as paradigm is a malefactor, esp. in economics.

 
Not only what you said, but regarding the bolded above in NoEnz's thought, flattening the energy curve applies to all of the sectors above in the chart.  It is in the natural best interest to improve energy efficiency in all of them.  To think that no one is trying is just bizarre at any informed level.
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 11:53am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


energy production and transport are just part of the problem. 
"flattening the demand curve" as you put has to extend to all other sectors as well OR we find new technologies to allow demand to stay high but simultaneously become more sustainable, or, even better, we do both at once for the fastest possible response.
 


Constant growth as paradigm is a malefactor, esp. in economics.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 11:47am



energy production and transport are just part of the problem. 
"flattening the demand curve" as you put has to extend to all other sectors as well OR we find new technologies to allow demand to stay high but simultaneously become more sustainable, or, even better, we do both at once for the fastest possible response.
 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 11:41am

 kurtster wrote:

Yes, but no.  The best and fastest solution, imho, is to flatten and then reduce the energy demand curve, while we work on electrical energy generation advances.

There is a natural incentive to do this as energy is a huge part of the cost of production, let alone just living.  This natural incentive does not need political or ideological intervention, hence the opposition or diversion from this type of approach.  It is just simple economics.

And then we have to also work on electrical energy transmission problems, so that it does not start wildfires such as in NorCal, for example.
 
I've got no real idea of what you are actually trying to say here.. that climate activists should just shut up because it is all going to fix itself because of natural incentives?
Like this kind of natural incentive?



it's just natural economics. 
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 11:04am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

yep, but not changing consumption patterns in the hope that there will be some kind of technology fix is also kind of irresponsible, don't you think?  It's going to take both a change in consumption and investment in new technology. Only when we have the new technology can you think about upping your consumption (if you even need to). 
 
 
Yes, but no.  The best and fastest solution, imho, is to flatten and then reduce the energy demand curve, while we work on electrical energy generation advances.

There is a natural incentive to do this as energy is a huge part of the cost of production, let alone just living.  This natural incentive does not need political or ideological intervention, hence the opposition or diversion from this type of approach.  It is just simple economics.

And then we have to also work on electrical energy transmission problems, so that it does not start wildfires such as in NorCal, for example.
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 9, 2021 - 11:01am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
yep, but not changing consumption patterns in the hope that there will be some kind of technology fix is also kind of irresponsible, don't you think?  It's going to take both a change in consumption and investment in new technology. Only when we have the new technology can you think about upping your consumption (if you even need to).   

Less is more for one and all. - Something, not only the wise ones kept teaching, but Corona (meaning 'crown') seems to be teaching us, as well. 

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 112, 113, 114  Next