March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- Proclivities - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:44am
NY Times Strands
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:39am
The Obituary Page
- Antigone - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:21am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:20am
Wordle - daily game
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:15am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:15am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:09am
Breaking News
- rgio - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:03am
Trump
- haresfur - Mar 29, 2024 - 5:40am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Mar 29, 2024 - 4:30am
Main Mix Playlist
- R567 - Mar 29, 2024 - 4:08am
Ukraine
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:51pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:27pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:11pm
Uploading Music
- macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
Baseball, anyone?
- zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Climate Change
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 105, 106, 107 ... 125, 126, 127 Next |
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Dec 29, 2009 - 9:18am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:I listened to "Home Planet"- a programme about the environment and natural world on radio 4 today whilst driving over Dartmoor. I thought that it dealt with a number of items that we have been discussing here (although I missed the first ten minutes). The focus for the day was energy and climate change. They also dealt with some sensible and some extremely harebrained letters with suggestions from listeners very well. It's available to listen for 7 days if anyone cares to. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006sdz0
they discussed nuclear power, ice ages, methane, solar energy and other related areas with a mixture of scientists and experts in the area All the energy we generate using fossil fuels is releasing energy that's been stored in the earth for millennia. Plentiful, but definitely finite. Meanwhile, the sun is pouring more energy than we could possibly use on a daily basis onto the planet every day. Releasing all that stored energy has a lot of negative effects, finding an efficient way to use the sun's energy is imperative.
|
|
Welly
Location: Lotusland Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 29, 2009 - 9:11am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:I listened to "Home Planet"- a programme about the environment and natural world on radio 4 today whilst driving over Dartmoor. I thought that it dealt with a number of items that we have been discussing here (although I missed the first ten minutes). The focus for the day was energy and climate change. They also dealt with some sensible and some extrememly harebrained letters with suggestions from listeners very well. It's available to listen for 7 days if anyone cares to. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006sdz0
Thanks!
|
|
MrsHobieJoe
Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 29, 2009 - 8:59am |
|
I listened to "Home Planet"- a programme about the environment and natural world on radio 4 today whilst driving over Dartmoor. I thought that it dealt with a number of items that we have been discussing here (although I missed the first ten minutes). The focus for the day was energy and climate change. They also dealt with some sensible and some extremely harebrained letters with suggestions from listeners very well. It's available to listen for 7 days if anyone cares to. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006sdz0
they discussed nuclear power, ice ages, methane, solar energy and other related areas with a mixture of scientists and experts in the area
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 27, 2009 - 5:40pm |
|
lowelltr wrote: The earth CANNOT "run out of water" - its a closed system. Nothing escapes the atmosphere, not hydrogen nor oxygen. Except for some astronaut pee and a few other "drops in the bucket", the earth has the EXACT same amount of water that it has had for millenia...... but if water is fixed (roughly) and population is not, then water per person is decreasing. And the quality of that water may not always be what we are used to since a lot of people use water to carry away their refuse. Want a nice cold cup of this?
|
|
Xeric
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 27, 2009 - 11:42am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: MrsHobieJoe wrote:I thought that the earth is NOT a closed system because we have the sun's energy coming in.
There is a pretty big issue though with the water and the people being in different places and more people and people having a higher water consumption.
A better choice of words would be running out of drinkable water. And that will always be a localized problem— "the world" is not running out of water.
But of course neither is it running out of people, nor out of an increasingly-irrigation-dependent agribusiness conglomerate to feed those people. Just agreeing that the total amount of water is not the problem. The total number of people—people accustomed to or wishing to become accustomed to a certain lifestyle—might lead to large water-related problems, indeed.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 27, 2009 - 11:35am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:I thought that the earth is NOT a closed system because we have the sun's energy coming in.
There is a pretty big issue though with the water and the people being in different places and more people and people having a higher water consumption.
A better choice of words would be running out of drinkable water. And that will always be a localized problem—"the world" is not running out of water.
|
|
MrsHobieJoe
Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 27, 2009 - 11:29am |
|
lowelltr wrote: The earth CANNOT "run out of water" - its a closed system. Nothing escapes the atmosphere, not hydrogen nor oxygen. Except for some astronaut pee and a few other "drops in the bucket", the earth has the EXACT same amount of water that it has had for millenia...... I thought that the earth is NOT a closed system because we have the sun's energy coming in. There is a pretty big issue though with the water and the people being in different places and more people and people having a higher water consumption.
|
|
lowelltr
Location: Cardinal Nation Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 27, 2009 - 10:49am |
|
hippiechick wrote: Especially that part about running out of water.
"Water is the new oil."
The earth CANNOT "run out of water" - its a closed system. Nothing escapes the atmosphere, not hydrogen nor oxygen. Except for some astronaut pee and a few other "drops in the bucket", the earth has the EXACT same amount of water that it has had for millenia......
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 7:57am |
|
miamizsun wrote: Me personally, I like to know the truth. All of it.
Preferably from people I trust. (In my experience it has always yielded better results.)
Which begs me to consider the source.
All of the credible scientific data I've seen indicates that there is a lag in C02 cycle from 500 to 1000 years.
C02 follows the warming, it doesn't precede it.
Would you agree that manipulating data (all data, not just climate) to fit the political model is standard operating procedure for politicians?
Do you not see that theme in all of politics?
Regards
sirdroseph wrote: I would never be in charge therefore it is not my place to implement poltical policy, what I can do is to recycle and lower my energy consumption the best I can on a personal level and what I won't do is politicize such an important issue by decrying the existence of climate change and dwell on buerocratic driven corruption that always exists regardless of the social issue. I agree there are cycles the Earth goes through regardless of our consumption, but I also know that C02 emissions accelerate the warming of the planet and that humans emit massive amounts of it therefore we should be looking at ways for us to reduce emissions and quite frankly that is all I need to know. Yes, I do.
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 7:51am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:
I would never be in charge therefore it is not my place to implement poltical policy, what I can do is to recycle and lower my energy consumption the best I can on a personal level and what I won't do is politicize such an important issue by decrying the existence of climate change and dwell on buerocratic driven corruption that always exists regardless of the social issue. I agree there are cycles the Earth goes through regardless of our consumption, but I also know that C02 emissions accelerate the warming of the planet and that humans emit massive amounts of it therefore we should be looking at ways for us to reduce emissions and quite frankly that is all I need to know.
Me personally, I like to know the truth. All of it. Preferably from people I trust. (In my experience it has always yielded better results.) Which begs me to consider the source. All of the credible scientific data I've seen indicates that there is a lag in C02 cycle from 500 to 1000 years. C02 follows the warming, it doesn't precede it. Would you agree that manipulating data (all data, not just climate) to fit the political model is standard operating procedure for politicians? Do you not see that theme in all of politics? Regards
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 7:12am |
|
miamizsun wrote: Joe, what is the human impact of climate change, specifically?
I agree we need to clean up the pollution.
But the planet has been going through these cycles for billions of years (I've posted evidence, charts etc.).
The Carbon Derivatives & Tax scheme is the end result.
Ask yourself if you were in charge what you'd do?
I would never be in charge therefore it is not my place to implement poltical policy, what I can do is to recycle and lower my energy consumption the best I can on a personal level and what I won't do is politicize such an important issue by decrying the existence of climate change and dwell on buerocratic driven corruption that always exists regardless of the social issue. I agree there are cycles the Earth goes through regardless of our consumption, but I also know that C02 emissions accelerate the warming of the planet and that humans emit massive amounts of it therefore we should be looking at ways for us to reduce emissions and quite frankly that is all I need to know.
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 6:11am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:This is the crux of the situation; Two men are in a boat that is starting to sink, one man is arguing with the other that he does not like the way that he bails and is not sure if they should be bailing in the first place seeing how it was not their fault the ship is sinking! If you think there is fraud in the climate change community and are wary of their methods, fine, but don't you think our time would be better spent on finding a better way to lessen human impact which is intensifying an already natural process to the extent that it poses a serious threat to our species survival? Joe, what is the human impact of climate change, specifically? I agree we need to clean up the pollution. But the planet has been going through these cycles for billions of years (I've posted evidence, charts etc.). The Carbon Derivatives & Tax scheme is the end result. Ask yourself if you were in charge what you'd do?
|
|
Southern_Boy
Location: On my way to the beach Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 6:06am |
|
HazzeSwede wrote: China man is slowly but surely tak ing over the planet,,leading world power now,IMHO ! Oh,,and Merry Christmas,,all ! We'll have to bomb the shit out of 'em so we can reestablish the world order.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 5:46am |
|
This is the crux of the situation; Two men are in a boat that is starting to sink, one man is arguing with the other that he does not like the way that he bails and is not sure if they should be bailing in the first place seeing how it was not their fault the boat is sinking! If you think there is fraud in the climate change community and are wary of their methods, fine, but don't you think our time would be better spent on finding a better way to lessen human impact which is intensifying an already natural process to the extent that it poses a serious threat to our species survival?
|
|
HazzeSwede
Location: Hammerdal Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 24, 2009 - 12:19am |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:I found this quite an interesting article. I didn't follow the talks in enough detail to filter the information well so I odn't have a feel for how accurate it is.
How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the roomAs recriminations fly post-Copenhagen, one writer offers a fly-on-the-wall account of how talks failed Ed Miliband: China tried to hijack climate deal The key players and how they rated Copenhagen was a disaster. That much is agreed. But the truth about what actually happened is in danger of being lost amid the spin and inevitable mutual recriminations. The truth is this: China wrecked the talks, intentionally humiliated Barack Obama, and insisted on an awful "deal" so western leaders would walk away carrying the blame. How do I know this? Because I was in the room and saw it happen. China's strategy was simple: block the open negotiations for two weeks, and then ensure that the closed-door deal made it look as if the west had failed the world's poor once again. And sure enough, the aid agencies, civil society movements and environmental groups all took the bait. The failure was "the inevitable result of rich countries refusing adequately and fairly to shoulder their overwhelming responsibility", said Christian Aid. "Rich countries have bullied developing nations," fumed Friends of the Earth International. MORE FROM THE GUARDIAN China man is slowly but surely tak ing over the planet,,leading world power now,IMHO ! Oh,,and Merry Christmas,,all !
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 23, 2009 - 5:01pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:miamizsun wrote:not one bleedin' comment on this?
Um, nice tie? It's appalling, but I don't have anything to add. The Medieval Warm Period is there (along with a notice that editing is locked until 12/25 due to vandalism), as is the Little Ice Age (which is particularly thorough and well-sourced). The IPCC's treatment of these events (including their waffling and dissembling about the earth's climate history) is described in this article. Connolley's activity on Wikipedia has its own section in the article on him. It includes this: A July 2006 article in The New Yorker reported that Connolley briefly became "a victim of an edit war over the entry on global warming", in which a skeptic repeatedly "watered down" the article's explanation of the greenhouse effect.<9> The skeptic later brought the case before Wikipedia's arbitration committee, claiming that Connolley was pushing his own point of view in the article by removing material with opposing viewpoints. The arbitration committee imposed a "humiliating one-revert-a-day" editing restriction on Connolley. Wikipedia "gives no privilege to those who know what they're talking about", Connolley told The New Yorker.<9> The restriction was later revoked, and Connolley went on to serve as a Wikipedia administrator from January 2006<9> until the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee revoked his administrator status on 13 September 2009. Nothing on Wikipedia is permanent, not even a lie. I noticed a ton of stuff he worked on were recently edited, some as recent as yesterday.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 23, 2009 - 4:40pm |
|
Manbird wrote:I edited the article about you so that it says the length of your inseam is 41 inches. I don't think anyone's corrected it yet.
You'll find a little something extra in your stocking this year. Or your hat, wherever they'll hold still.
|
|
Manbird
Location: ? ? ? Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 23, 2009 - 4:30pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:miamizsun wrote:not one bleedin' comment on this? Um, nice tie? It's appalling, but I don't have anything to add. The Medieval Warm Period is there (along with a notice that editing is locked until 12/25 due to vandalism), as is the Little Ice Age (which is particularly thorough and well-sourced). The IPCC's treatment of these events (including their waffling and dissembling about the earth's climate history) is described in this article. Connolley's activity on Wikipedia has its own section in the article on him. It includes this: A July 2006 article in The New Yorker reported that Connolley briefly became "a victim of an edit war over the entry on global warming", in which a skeptic repeatedly "watered down" the article's explanation of the greenhouse effect.<9> The skeptic later brought the case before Wikipedia's arbitration committee, claiming that Connolley was pushing his own point of view in the article by removing material with opposing viewpoints. The arbitration committee imposed a "humiliating one-revert-a-day" editing restriction on Connolley. Wikipedia "gives no privilege to those who know what they're talking about", Connolley told The New Yorker.<9> The restriction was later revoked, and Connolley went on to serve as a Wikipedia administrator from January 2006<9> until the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee revoked his administrator status on 13 September 2009. Nothing on Wikipedia is permanent, not even a lie. I edited the article about you so that it says the length of your inseam is 41 inches. I don't think anyone's corrected it yet.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 23, 2009 - 3:46pm |
|
miamizsun wrote:not one bleedin' comment on this?
I didn't see it the first time you posted it but it's old news so I probably would have ignored it anyway.
|
|
callum
Location: its wet, windy and chilly....take a guess Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 23, 2009 - 3:33pm |
|
lowelltr wrote:I find it fascinating marketing that this bogus campaign is now called "climate change" rather than the previous "global warming"..... Debunked? Doubters? That's OK - just rename it and resell it......will they stop at nothing to get their hands on tax dollars???!!
That is because global warming was a term used by the media when early long term climate models predicted global rises in average surface temperature. This did not correspond to warmer weather in all countries; for instance the melting of the ice caps slows the gulf stream, potentially giving Britain a climate closer to Canada. Who exactly is going to get their hnds on your taxes? Power companies that invest in wind turbines as opposed to ones with gas? Engineers working on renewable energy who would otherwise be working on aircraft engines?
|
|
|