[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Apr 12, 2021 - 6:40am
 
Immigration - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 6:35am
 
Race in America - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 6:03am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:31am
 
Race/Ethnicity-Genetics Connection - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:25am
 
Media Bias - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:16am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:12am
 
Guns - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 4:37am
 
The Netherlands - second - Blackbirds - Apr 12, 2021 - 2:42am
 
Two sexes or ? Gender as a non-binary concept - Jiggz - Apr 12, 2021 - 1:55am
 
A Brave Woman - Jiggz - Apr 12, 2021 - 1:48am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Apr 11, 2021 - 7:49pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Lazy8 - Apr 11, 2021 - 4:02pm
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 3:16pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 2:54pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Apr 11, 2021 - 2:16pm
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 8:41am
 
Poetry Forum - GeneP59 - Apr 11, 2021 - 8:28am
 
Death Metal - westslope - Apr 11, 2021 - 8:21am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Apr 11, 2021 - 7:01am
 
Extraordinary Machine - miamizsun - Apr 11, 2021 - 6:50am
 
Iran - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 6:48am
 
Bring Back the New RP Fonts! - GeneP59 - Apr 10, 2021 - 7:56pm
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - Apr 10, 2021 - 4:50pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Apr 10, 2021 - 2:37pm
 
New Music - R_P - Apr 10, 2021 - 11:30am
 
Live Music - sirdroseph - Apr 10, 2021 - 5:53am
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - rhahl - Apr 10, 2021 - 5:27am
 
Economix - sirdroseph - Apr 10, 2021 - 4:50am
 
Freedom of speech? - sirdroseph - Apr 10, 2021 - 4:11am
 
So, where do you go, what happens? - oldviolin - Apr 9, 2021 - 6:15pm
 
Automotive Lust - R_P - Apr 9, 2021 - 3:07pm
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - scoots_mcgoo - Apr 9, 2021 - 3:05pm
 
Funny Videos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 9, 2021 - 2:56pm
 
First World Problems - Lindo525 - Apr 9, 2021 - 2:45pm
 
COVID-19 - miamizsun - Apr 9, 2021 - 2:22pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - haresfur - Apr 9, 2021 - 12:47pm
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Apr 9, 2021 - 10:47am
 
The War On You - sirdroseph - Apr 9, 2021 - 8:44am
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Apr 9, 2021 - 8:34am
 
Trump - R_P - Apr 9, 2021 - 7:21am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - miamizsun - Apr 9, 2021 - 4:49am
 
Joe Biden - sirdroseph - Apr 9, 2021 - 4:08am
 
What Did You Do Today? - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 8, 2021 - 9:36pm
 
KEEP YOUR MONEY! - haresfur - Apr 8, 2021 - 2:37pm
 
Recommended documentaries - Red_Dragon - Apr 8, 2021 - 2:24pm
 
partial incompatibility with Symantec's Moon Mind2? - BillG - Apr 8, 2021 - 9:51am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - sirdroseph - Apr 8, 2021 - 5:06am
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:36pm
 
A designers worst nightmare - kcar - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:00pm
 
Beer - GeneP59 - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:29am
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:00am
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - cc_rider - Apr 7, 2021 - 8:08am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - rhahl - Apr 7, 2021 - 6:22am
 
Questions. - R_P - Apr 6, 2021 - 8:07pm
 
Unusual News - haresfur - Apr 6, 2021 - 5:15pm
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - kcar - Apr 6, 2021 - 4:15pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Apr 6, 2021 - 2:58pm
 
workplaces that work - sirdroseph - Apr 6, 2021 - 4:05am
 
And the good news is.... - haresfur - Apr 5, 2021 - 8:50pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Apr 5, 2021 - 5:32pm
 
RP via Bluesound - Lagging - jarro - Apr 5, 2021 - 4:33pm
 
In My Room - kcar - Apr 5, 2021 - 2:50pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 5, 2021 - 11:23am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Apr 5, 2021 - 10:33am
 
Israel - westslope - Apr 5, 2021 - 7:22am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Apr 4, 2021 - 8:10am
 
RP song titles in cache - conkyjoe - Apr 4, 2021 - 7:37am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Blackbirds - Apr 4, 2021 - 6:07am
 
Iphone app "my favourites" - BillG - Apr 3, 2021 - 9:14pm
 
FLAC Streaming - jarro - Apr 3, 2021 - 1:04pm
 
Latin Music - R_P - Apr 3, 2021 - 12:03pm
 
MIXES - miamizsun - Apr 3, 2021 - 6:33am
 
Electronic Music - Manbird - Apr 2, 2021 - 7:44pm
 
Derplahoma! - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 2, 2021 - 1:31pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Those lovable acronym guys & gals Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27
Post to this Topic
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:17am

LOl! I think Bill is monitoring this thread:

Now playing:

Gotye - Don't Worry We'll be Watching{#Lol}
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:14am

 kurtster wrote:

Known that for a long time.   An employer can do this with comapny issued phones.   We have seen schools do this with the laptops they have issued students.

Many people who wish to hold totally off the record conversations will collect everyone's cell phones and place them in another room in a box separate from the one where the conversation(s) will be held.

 
What cracks me up is people who have "smart" phones but are too unsmart to know what they are actually used by the government for. {#Lol}

My cell phone was made during the Fred Flintstone era and has no GPS or the ability to be cracked with a remote command. .


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 7:50am

 bokey wrote:


 Bokey said {#Silenced}

 Oh wait.
You do realize that the NSA can remotely access your cell phone and activate the microphone without your knowledge?They can monitor any private conversations in your own home without your knowledge.

 
Known that for a long time.  An employer can do this with comapny issued phones.  We have seen schools do this with the laptops they have issued students.

Many people who wish to hold totally off the record conversations will collect everyone's cell phones and place them in another room in a box separate from the one where the conversation(s) will be held.


bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 7:22am

 kurtster wrote:

Just want to add a couple things . . .

Knowledge of how we are observed will have a chilling effect on the long held right to freely associate with anyone we choose for any reason we choose.   Its conceivable that people will no longer contact each other for fear of certain conclusions being made.   It can affect the nature of  innocent relationships.

Cell phones have become GPS devices and the location of the phone will be known at all times.   Travel will no longer be anonymous.   I find it conceivable that with the search of coordinates and time references, one can be linked to a random event such as a robbery of a store.   The example I try and make would be that you are getting gas at a station that is in the process of being robbed.   You may or may not see anything.   If you do, you might choose to split so as not to be caught up in possible violence or not be a witness with all the personal intrusion that follows, not to mention reprisals from the perps.   If a querry is made as to what phones were there at the time of the robbery, you are found to be there and can be called in to explain your presence there which would be totally innocent, but you would have to explain your innocence.

And only to complete the above thought . . . let's say that this gas station is in a place that is far away from where you might ordinarily be.   Were you there meeting a lover while the wife thought you were working late ?   Or did you go there to score a bag of sumthin ?   Maybe you were driving a buddy to a medical marijuana dispensary.   While the transaction was cash to remain anonymous, you were noticed being at that location for 20 to 30 minutes.   Explain your presence there sir and OBTW would you mind peeing in this cup while we have you here . . .

 

 Bokey said {#Silenced}

 Oh wait. It's worse than that.
You do realize that the NSA can remotely access your cell phone and activate the microphone without your knowledge? They can monitor any private conversations in your own home without your knowledge.


ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 7:14am

 kurtster wrote:
Knowledge of how we are observed will have a chilling effect on the long held right to freely associate with anyone we choose for any reason we choose.  Its conceivable that people will no longer contact each other for fear of certain conclusions being made.  It can affect the nature of  innocent relationships.
 
Sorry but this is not new or unique to government observation. It is life.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 6:57am

 miamizsun wrote:

“Metadata” Can Tell the Government More About You Than the Content of Your Phonecalls

The Electronic Frontier Foundation points out:

What government officials are trying to say is that disclosure of metadata—the details about phone calls, without the actual voice—isn’t a big deal, not something for Americans to get upset about if the government knows. Let’s take a closer look at what they are saying:

  • They know you rang a phone sex service at 2:24 am and spoke for 18 minutes. But they don’t know what you talked about.
  • They know you called the suicide prevention hotline from the Golden Gate Bridge. But the topic of the call remains a secret.
  • They know you spoke with an HIV testing service, then your doctor, then your health insurance company in the same hour. But they don’t know what was discussed.
  • They know you received a call from the local NRA office while it was having a campaign against gun legislation, and then called your senators and congressional representatives immediately after. But the content of those calls remains safe from government intrusion.
  • They know you called a gynecologist, spoke for a half hour, and then called the local Planned Parenthood’s number later that day. But nobody knows what you spoke about.

Sorry, your phone records—oops, “so-called metadata”—can reveal a lot more about the content of your calls than the government is implying. Metadata provides enough context to know some of the most intimate details of your lives.  And the government has given no assurances that this data will never be correlated with other easily obtained data.


please see more here


 
Just want to add a couple things ...

Knowledge of how we are observed will have a chilling effect on the long held right to freely associate with anyone we choose for any reason we choose.  Its conceivable that people will no longer contact each other for fear of certain conclusions being made.  It can affect the nature of  innocent relationships.

Cell phones have become GPS devices and the location of the phone will be known at all times.  Travel will no longer be anonymous.  I find it conceivable that with the search of coordinates and time references, one can be linked to a random event such as a robbery of a store.  The example I try and make would be that you are getting gas at a station that is in the process of being robbed.  You may or may not see anything.  If you do, you might choose to split so as not to be caught up in possible violence or not be a witness with all the personal intrusion that follows, not to mention reprisals from the perps.  If a querry is made as to what phones were there at the time of the robbery, you are found to be there and can be called in to explain your presence there which would be totally innocent, but you would have to explain your innocence.

And only to complete the above thought ... let's say that this gas station is in a place that is far away from where you might ordinarily be.  Were you there meeting a lover while the wife thought you were working late ?  Or did you go there to score a bag of sumthin ?  Maybe you were driving a buddy to a medical marijuana dispensary.  While the transaction was cash to remain anonymous, you were noticed being at that location for 20 to 30 minutes.  Explain your presence there sir and OBTW would you mind peeing in this cup while we have you here ...
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 5:50am

“Metadata” Can Tell the Government More About You Than the Content of Your Phonecalls

The Electronic Frontier Foundation points out:

What government officials are trying to say is that disclosure of metadata—the details about phone calls, without the actual voice—isn’t a big deal, not something for Americans to get upset about if the government knows. Let’s take a closer look at what they are saying:

  • They know you rang a phone sex service at 2:24 am and spoke for 18 minutes. But they don’t know what you talked about.
  • They know you called the suicide prevention hotline from the Golden Gate Bridge. But the topic of the call remains a secret.
  • They know you spoke with an HIV testing service, then your doctor, then your health insurance company in the same hour. But they don’t know what was discussed.
  • They know you received a call from the local NRA office while it was having a campaign against gun legislation, and then called your senators and congressional representatives immediately after. But the content of those calls remains safe from government intrusion.
  • They know you called a gynecologist, spoke for a half hour, and then called the local Planned Parenthood’s number later that day. But nobody knows what you spoke about.

Sorry, your phone records—oops, “so-called metadata”—can reveal a lot more about the content of your calls than the government is implying. Metadata provides enough context to know some of the most intimate details of your lives.  And the government has given no assurances that this data will never be correlated with other easily obtained data.


please see more here



ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 4:29am

 RichardPrins wrote:


 
I'd been thinking I'd seen a good anti-NSA rant but forgot what movie it was in... 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 10:55pm


islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:42pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Partly, but it's the title on his name plate, which makes me automatically deferent... {#Mrgreen}

  


bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:39pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

{#Clap}

 
Bokey says {#Silenced}.
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:11pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

Partly, but it's the title on his name plate, which makes me automatically deferent... {#Mrgreen}

{#Lol}{#High-five}

 


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:09pm

 oldviolin wrote:
Let me guess; it's the body language that convinces you, right?{#Wink} 

Partly, but it's the title on his name plate, which makes me automatically deferent... {#Mrgreen}
GeneP59

GeneP59 Avatar

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday.
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:07pm

tin foil hat
GeneP59

GeneP59 Avatar

Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday.
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:05pm

Shhhhhhh! they heard that.
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 9:03pm

Bokey says {#Silenced}.
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 8:54pm

 RichardPrins wrote:

{#Clap}

 
Let me guess; it's the body language that convinces you, right?{#Wink}


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 8:45pm


{#Clap}
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 7:48pm


bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 12, 2013 - 7:42pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
(. . . ) This is the undisputed domain of General Keith Alexander, a man few even in Washington would likely recognize. Never before has anyone in America’s intelligence sphere come close to his degree of power, the number of people under his command, the expanse of his rule, the length of his reign, or the depth of his secrecy. A four-star Army general, his authority extends across three domains: He is director of the world’s largest intelligence service, the National Security Agency; chief of the Central Security Service; and commander of the US Cyber Command. As such, he has his own secret military, presiding over the Navy’s 10th Fleet, the 24th Air Force, and the Second Army.

Alexander runs the nation’s cyberwar efforts, an empire he has built over the past eight years by insisting that the US’s inherent vulnerability to digital attacks requires him to amass more and more authority over the data zipping around the globe. In his telling, the threat is so mind-bogglingly huge that the nation has little option but to eventually put the entire civilian Internet under his protection, requiring tweets and emails to pass through his filters, and putting the kill switch under the government’s forefinger. “What we see is an increasing level of activity on the networks, ” he said at a recent security conference in Canada. “I am concerned that this is going to break a threshold where the private sector can no longer handle it and the government is going to have to step in. ”

In its tightly controlled public relations, the NSA has focused attention on the threat of cyberattack against the US—the vulnerability of critical infrastructure like power plants and water systems, the susceptibility of the military’s command and control structure, the dependence of the economy on the Internet’s smooth functioning. Defense against these threats was the paramount mission trumpeted by NSA brass at congressional hearings and hashed over at security conferences.

But there is a flip side to this equation that is rarely mentioned: The military has for years been developing offensive capabilities, giving it the power not just to defend the US but to assail its foes. Using so-called cyber-kinetic attacks, Alexander and his forces now have the capability to physically destroy an adversary’s equipment and infrastructure, and potentially even to kill. Alexander—who declined to be interviewed for this article—has concluded that such cyberweapons are as crucial to 21st-century warfare as nuclear arms were in the 20th.

And he and his cyberwarriors have already launched their first attack. The cyberweapon that came to be known as Stuxnet was created and built by the NSA in partnership with the CIA and Israeli intelligence in the mid-2000s. The first known piece of malware designed to destroy physical equipment, Stuxnet was aimed at Iran’s nuclear facility in Natanz. By surreptitiously taking control of an industrial control link known as a Scada (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) system, the sophisticated worm was able to damage about a thousand centrifuges used to enrich nuclear material. (. . . )


 
Bokey says {#Silenced}
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27