Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
Their use of the word "safe" seems to refer to "improved" as opposed to "unimproved" water sources. Their graph references this field listing.
Yeah, here's the factoid I was thinking of:
Only 63% of the world's population has access to improved sanitation - defined as a sanitation facility that ensures hygienic separation of human excreta from human contact. - WHO/Unicef.
I wondered about the water one too. Guess it depends on the definition of 'safe'. But for my dictionary - lives next to a clean stream and knows enough to do business downhill doesn't really mean access to safe water.
Their use of the word "safe" seems to refer to "improved" as opposed to "unimproved" water sources. Their graph references this field listing.
Interesting. I wonder about the Food and Water categories. Seem too low on the "starving" and "do not", respectively. 1% starving? I hope that is correct, sad as it is. This is a very well done graph, so I'll hope the author(s) did due diligence to "fact vetting".
I wondered about the water one too. Guess it depends on the definition of 'safe'. But for my dictionary - lives next to a clean stream and knows enough to do business downhill doesn't really mean access to safe water.
Interesting. I wonder about the Food and Water categories. Seem too low on the "starving" and "do not", respectively. 1% starving? I hope that is correct, sad as it is. This is a very well done graph, so I'll hope the author(s) did due diligence to "fact vetting".
If the Muslims can convert the no religion types to their way, they will outnumber Christians 34-33. I have outlined a plan as shown below.
Interesting. I wonder about the Food and Water categories. Seem too low on the "starving" and "do not", respectively. 1% starving? I hope that is correct, sad as it is. This is a very well done graph, so I'll hope the author(s) did due diligence to "fact vetting".
It is a nicely designed and well-executed graph. I haven't drilled through all of their figures but they do cite a lot of sources on their site. Their whole site is quite interesting.
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
Posted:
Jan 6, 2015 - 12:47pm
Proclivities wrote:
Interesting. I wonder about the Food and Water categories. Seem too low on the "starving" and "do not", respectively. 1% starving? I hope that is correct, sad as it is. This is a very well done graph, so I'll hope the author(s) did due diligence to "fact vetting".
. 
