Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:47am
NY Times Strands
- Proclivities - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:40am
Wordle - daily game
- rgio - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:30am
NYTimes Connections
- Proclivities - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:26am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl?
- rgio - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:01am
TV shows you watch
- rgio - Apr 24, 2024 - 4:42am
The Obituary Page
- sunybuny - Apr 24, 2024 - 4:36am
Radio Paradise Comments
- sunybuny - Apr 24, 2024 - 4:34am
The Moon
- haresfur - Apr 23, 2024 - 9:29pm
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- fractalv - Apr 23, 2024 - 8:32pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- Bill_J - Apr 23, 2024 - 7:15pm
China
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 5:35pm
Trump
- haresfur - Apr 23, 2024 - 2:44pm
Joe Biden
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 2:36pm
Israel
- black321 - Apr 23, 2024 - 2:24pm
Economix
- islander - Apr 23, 2024 - 12:11pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 11:05am
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:52am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
Ukraine
- haresfur - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:19pm
songs that ROCK!
- Steely_D - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:50pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- q4Fry - Apr 22, 2024 - 11:57am
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:59am
Republican Party
- R_P - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:36am
Mini Meetups - Post Here!
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2024 - 8:59am
Malaysia
- dcruzj - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:30am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:02am
Canada
- westslope - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:23am
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:03am
Broccoli for cats - you gotta see this!
- Bill_J - Apr 21, 2024 - 6:16pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 21, 2024 - 3:06pm
What's that smell?
- oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 1:59pm
Main Mix Playlist
- thisbody - Apr 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
George Orwell
- oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 11:36am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 20, 2024 - 7:44pm
What Did You See Today?
- Welly - Apr 20, 2024 - 4:50pm
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou...
- victory806 - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:11pm
Libertarian Party
- R_P - Apr 20, 2024 - 11:18am
Remembering the Good Old Days
- kurtster - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:37am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:21pm
The Abortion Wars
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:07pm
Words I didn't know...yrs ago
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:59pm
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:51pm
MILESTONES: Famous People, Dead Today, Born Today, Etc.
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:44pm
2024 Elections!
- steeler - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:49pm
Ask an Atheist
- R_P - Apr 19, 2024 - 3:04pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
When I need a Laugh I ...
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- oldviolin - Apr 16, 2024 - 10:10am
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Climate Chaos
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9, 10, 11 Next |
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 4:44pm |
|
kurtster wrote:We do have a disagreement that won't be resolved anytime soon. If I'm a Denier, you're a Warmist.
I believe that we are at a defining moment in the debate and you believe that there is nothing to debate. You primarily deconstruct the messenger rather than the message.
Neither of us will live long enough to see if you are right. I do have a chance of living long enough to see the science behind your view refuted. You could always try to come up with scientific evidence (that for instance prove natural cycles are causing the change, without a doubt), instead of being a cheerleader for those that can't do much more than accuse scientists of fraud and conspiracy. Be glad you get to look forward to yet another year that will likely once again confirm and further refine the existing evidence (that you obviously still can't refute). Though I suspect it will make little to no difference in a year from now as you continue to enjoy the dank darkness of your own rectum. And for shits and giggles look back (you will have to get out of your secure space for a bit) in some of the topics where similar grandiose claims were made by you and your fellow deniers, and then see whatever happened to those claims.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 4:02pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:As correctly observed below, and pointed out in my first reply, the deniers are the ones going around in circles by rehashing nonsense that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. We're not talking about what which side wants to do about the problem (nice red herring), we're talking about a solid basis of an observed problem which is still being denied by your ilk. It's no surprise that people like yourself act in the usual way, namely as obstructionists (like the party of no) that are unable to put forward any evidence for your views. This obviously includes the long debunked view that we're merely dealing with natural cycles. The data from numerous sources (see consilience) shows this to be an incorrect view, yet it is repeated endlessly as a mindless drone would (doing the same thing over and over again). Even if one data set could be proven to be incorrect (which of course it is not), you'd still have to prove that all the other scientists using various other data sets related to this phenomenon are liars too. One hell of a conspiracy, and no shortage of lies employed by deniers. So yeah, you're going in circles alright, but it's the only thing you can do when you smash headlong into a wall while believing to have finally reached a gotcha moment. Einstein, when he published his ground-breaking work in Annalen der Physik, was confronted with the same violent rhetoric from the then defenders of the status quo. Much like evolutionary biology had seen not too long before that from creationists (who obviously can't prove shit either), and what is now seen from climate change deniers. Old habits die hard and denial runs deeply. We do have a disagreement that won't be resolved anytime soon. If I'm a Denier, you're a Warmist. I believe that we are at a defining moment in the debate and you believe that there is nothing to debate. You primarily deconstruct the messenger rather than the message. Neither of us will live long enough to see if you are right. I do have a chance of living long enough to see the science behind your view refuted.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 10:45am |
|
kurtster wrote:You almost had me going in circles there, li'l buddy.
There is no new theory being put forth for review. Just exposure of fraud of peer reviewed science. Fraud being falsifying / alteration of fundamental data used to prove a theory. We will only have to wait for your side to review our good accountant's findings. I'm sure it won't take long. But if it does take a while, the longer it takes, the worse it looks for your side.
Sadly, we must use the term "sides". Its because your side wants to spend trillions of dollars that no ones has, alter whole economic and industrial order, inflict austerity and punish people and entities for the sins of their wages and ways that have caused this manmade global chaos your side claims is happening. Your side allows for no other possibility that the source of climate change is not manmade. Your side says that there are no natural causes underway and have heaped plenty of slurs and epithets on legitimate skeptics. Y'all are trying to protect a closed system from investigation and defend it with the outrageous claim of 'settled science' which we all hear over and over again, endlessly.
No one is arguing that climate change is not happening. Its what is causing it and how we deal with it that is being argued. Your side claims they can fix it. That is indeed one of the most arrogant claims made in modern history and only a fool would believe that claim at this point in time. It is just as likely as making time travel a reality ...
Oh, and let us not get confused or hung up with the term cred. There is a difference between credentials and credibility. They are not synonymous. Can we both agree that generally speaking an accountant is very good with organizing numbers and working with them in meaningful ways ? I mean, its pretty hard to pull one over on a good accountant. I mean that it is their job to verify numbers between Exhibit A and Exhibit B so to speak, eh ? As correctly observed below, and pointed out in my first reply, the deniers are the ones going around in circles by rehashing nonsense that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. We're not talking about what which side wants to do about the problem (nice red herring), we're talking about a solid basis of an observed problem which is still being denied by your ilk. It's no surprise that people like yourself act in the usual way, namely as obstructionists (like the party of no) that are unable to put forward any evidence for your views. This obviously includes the long debunked view that we're merely dealing with natural cycles. The data from numerous sources (see consilience) shows this to be an incorrect view, yet it is repeated endlessly as a mindless drone would (doing the same thing over and over again). Even if one data set could be proven to be incorrect (which of course it is not), you'd still have to prove that all the other scientists using various other data sets related to this phenomenon are liars too. One hell of a conspiracy, and no shortage of lies employed by deniers. So yeah, you're going in circles alright, but it's the only thing you can do when you smash headlong into a wall while believing to have finally reached a gotcha moment. Einstein, when he published his ground-breaking work in Annalen der Physik, was confronted with the same violent rhetoric from the then defenders of the status quo. Much like evolutionary biology had seen not too long before that from creationists (who obviously can't prove shit either), and what is now seen from climate change deniers. Old habits die hard and denial runs deeply.
|
|
islander
Location: West coast somewhere Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 7:11am |
|
kurtster wrote: You speak for everyone here or your side ?
A predictable response ...
There's a chart somewhere. You can go look it up if you're really interested.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 7:01am |
|
kurtster wrote: Your side claims they can fix it. That is indeed one of the most arrogant claims made in modern history and only a fool would believe that claim at this point in time. It is just as likely as making time travel a reality ...
I don't know about all the rest, but sadly this is probably an accurate assessment.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 6:54am |
|
islander wrote: Talk about going in circles. Give it a rest dude, we're getting dizzy just watching you. Can't you go back to connecting dots?
You speak for everyone here or your side ? A predictable response ...
|
|
islander
Location: West coast somewhere Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 6:35am |
|
kurtster wrote: You almost had me going in circles there, li'l buddy.
There is no new theory being put forth for review. Just exposure of fraud of peer reviewed science. Fraud being falsifying / alteration of fundamental data used to prove a theory. We will only have to wait for your side to review our good accountant's findings. I'm sure it won't take long. But if it does take a while, the longer it takes, the worse it looks for your side.
Sadly, we must use the term "sides". Its because your side wants to spend trillions of dollars that no ones has, alter whole economic and industrial order, inflict austerity and punish people and entities for the sins of their wages and ways that have caused this manmade global chaos your side claims is happening. Your side allows for no other possibility that the source of climate change is not manmade. Your side says that there are no natural causes underway and have heaped plenty of slurs and epithets on legitimate skeptics. Y'all are trying to protect a closed system from investigation and defend it with the outrageous claim of 'settled science' which we all hear over and over again, endlessly.
No one is arguing that climate change is not happening. Its what is causing it and how we deal with it that is being argued. Your side claims they can fix it. That is indeed one of the most arrogant claims made in modern history and only a fool would believe that claim at this point in time. It is just as likely as making time travel a reality ...
Oh, and let us not get confused or hung up with the term cred. There is a difference between credentials and credibility. They are not synonymous. Can we both agree that generally speaking an accountant is very good with organizing numbers and working with them in meaningful ways ? I mean, its pretty hard to pull one over on a good accountant. I mean that it is their job to verify numbers between Exhibit A and Exhibit B so to speak, eh ?
Talk about going in circles. Give it a rest dude, we're getting dizzy just watching you. Can't you go back to connecting dots?
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 10, 2015 - 6:18am |
|
RichardPrins wrote: You almost had me going in circles there, li'l buddy. There is no new theory being put forth for review. Just exposure of fraud of peer reviewed science. Fraud being falsifying / alteration of fundamental data used to prove a theory. We will only have to wait for your side to review our good accountant's findings. I'm sure it won't take long. But if it does take a while, the longer it takes, the worse it looks for your side. Sadly, we must use the term "sides". Its because your side wants to spend trillions of dollars that no ones has, alter whole economic and industrial order, inflict austerity and punish people and entities for the sins of their wages and ways that have caused this manmade global chaos your side claims is happening. Your side allows for no other possibility that the source of climate change is not manmade. Your side says that there are no natural causes underway and have heaped plenty of slurs and epithets on legitimate skeptics. Y'all are trying to protect a closed system from investigation and defend it with the outrageous claim of 'settled science' which we all hear over and over again, endlessly. No one is arguing that climate change is not happening. Its what is causing it and how we deal with it that is being argued. Your side claims they can fix it. That is indeed one of the most arrogant claims made in modern history and only a fool would believe that claim at this point in time. It is just as likely as making time travel a reality ... Oh, and let us not get confused or hung up with the term cred. There is a difference between credentials and credibility. They are not synonymous. Can we both agree that generally speaking an accountant is very good with organizing numbers and working with them in meaningful ways ? I mean, its pretty hard to pull one over on a good accountant. I mean that it is their job to verify numbers between Exhibit A and Exhibit B so to speak, eh ?
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 10:31pm |
|
kurtster wrote:The Nobel Prize has been a joke ever since they gave it to Obama ...
Oh and name one respectable peer reviewed scientific journal that will accept anything for review that challenges "settled science". It's been blemished ever since they gave it to Kissinger. However, if that doesn't work for you and your ilk, give the "heroic" accountant a Presidential Medal of Freedom/Science. Annalen der Physik
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 10:21pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:Almost everyone, including me, would welcome such good news. Now if you don't mind, I'll wait until the accountant gets properly published in a respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal, which then undoubtedly must be followed by a well-deserved Nobel prize. I'm not holding my breath though. The Nobel Prize has been a joke ever since they gave it to Obama ... Oh and name one respectable peer reviewed scientific journal that will accept anything for review that challenges "settled science".
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 10:02pm |
|
kurtster wrote:Almost everyone, including me, would welcome such good news. Now if you don't mind, I'll wait until the accountant gets properly published in a respectable peer-reviewed scientific journal, which then undoubtedly must be followed by a well-deserved Nobel prize. I'm not holding my breath though.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 9:50pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:All still reporting on the blog of the same sa(i)d "heroic" retired account... As some say "keep digging." Its there. It is standing up to scrutiny. No one has addressed it point by point as y'all usually do. All you have done is trotted out the same old knee jerk boiler plate bullsh*t. Look at the bright side ! The world won't end in a ball of man made flames and we won't drown from the rising oceans as all you warmists have been fear mongering us for so long now.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 9:40pm |
|
kurtster wrote: All still reporting on the blog of the same sa(i)d "heroic" retired account... As some say "keep digging."
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 9:23pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: The now almost standard annual fare for deniers (after more bad news has come their way), who still seem to be too intellectually challenged to produce any science for a contrary case, but instead end up having to rely on some retired heroic accountant who claims to find a yet another "biggest ever scandal" besting thousands of scientists. GOTCHA WARMISTS!!!! A case of rinse, and repeat. Do we have to go through this every year?
(...) Doing so caused a bit of a flashback—to January 2013, specifically. That was the last time that the previous year had been declared the warmest on record, an event that apparently prompts some people to question whether we can trust the temperature records at all. The culprit that time was Fox News, but the issue was the same: the raw data from temperature measurements around the world aren't just dumped into global temperature reconstructions as-is. Instead, they're processed first. To the more conspiracy minded, you can replace "processed" with "fraudulently manipulated to make it look warmer." (...)
The answer, much like with their fellow conspiracy-loving evolution-denying zombie-worshipping fundies, unfortunately appears to be yes... Not this time friendo. Its you who are the denier. Its all coming undone. INSIDE THE GLOBAL WARMING SCANDALYou better start doing some better digging. The more I dig, the more cred for this report I find. The author of the above link has major cred ... These were the guys that got Dan Rather fired amongst some other little things. Debunk away ...
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 8:55pm |
|
kurtster wrote:The now almost standard annual fare for deniers (after more bad news has come their way), who still seem to be too intellectually challenged to produce any science for a contrary case, but instead end up having to rely on some retired heroic accountant who claims to find a yet another "biggest ever scandal" besting thousands of scientists. GOTCHA WARMISTS!!!! A case of rinse, and repeat. Do we have to go through this every year?
(...) Doing so caused a bit of a flashback—to January 2013, specifically. That was the last time that the previous year had been declared the warmest on record, an event that apparently prompts some people to question whether we can trust the temperature records at all. The culprit that time was Fox News, but the issue was the same: the raw data from temperature measurements around the world aren't just dumped into global temperature reconstructions as-is. Instead, they're processed first. To the more conspiracy minded, you can replace "processed" with "fraudulently manipulated to make it look warmer." (...)
The answer, much like with their fellow conspiracy-loving evolution-denying zombie-worshipping fundies, unfortunately appears to be yes...
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 8:34pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:22000 comments there about 1000 per hour ...
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 8:31pm |
|
kurtster wrote: 22000 comments there
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 9, 2015 - 7:32pm |
|
|
|
ojibwe
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Oct 23, 2014 - 6:40pm |
|
islander wrote: ATFAB
|
|
|