[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:41pm
 
Breaking News - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:22pm
 
Orbiting Earth - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
 
Oldest Rock song on RP - Proclivities - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:11pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
 
Israel - R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
 
Irony 101 - MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
 
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App - pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:46am
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
 
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
 
Wordle - daily game - rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:00am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
 
NY Times Strands - geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
 
NYTimes Connections - geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:29am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
 
Business as Usual - black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
 
Trump - rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
 
Outstanding Covers - thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
 
Today in History - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
 
RightWingNutZ - R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Please Don't Post Here - Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
 
Motivational Office Cliches... - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
 
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy - islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
 
Food - Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Mar 25, 2024 - 6:56pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Mar 25, 2024 - 3:48pm
 
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands) - kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
 
China - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
 
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b... - jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
 
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse - Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
 
New Music - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
 
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and... - Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
 
Basketball - oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
 
Joe Biden - kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
 
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers - sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
 
Other Medical Stuff - Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
 
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones - Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
 
Can you afford to retire? - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
 
What Did You See Today? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
 
2024 Elections! - Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
 
Economix - R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
 
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum - DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
 
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great" - miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
 
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone - Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
 
Damn Dinosaurs! - oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
Great guitar faces - skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
 
Despots, dictators and war criminals - R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
 
Uploading Music - dischuckin - Mar 18, 2024 - 11:55am
 
Media Matters - thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
 
NASA & other news from space - miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
 
MEALTICKET - drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
 
What makes you smile? - Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Brexit Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Post to this Topic
SeriousLee

SeriousLee Avatar

Location: Dans l'milieu d'deux milles livres


Posted: Oct 15, 2016 - 7:20am


MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 11, 2016 - 1:26pm

 haresfur wrote:

What the hell is happening to UKIP?

The BBC called it "a rumbustious argument"


 
Apparently they see this as "the sort of thing that could happen to anyone". Not people you really want to spend too much time with. 

Interesting comments on the rest of the thread. Better to be on the outside looking than the inside looking out for this one. Luckily the " liberal elite/global citizens of nowhere" of which I am a part are well enough qualified for fuck off elsewhere when we've had enough.  


haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 6, 2016 - 3:20pm

What the hell is happening to UKIP?

The BBC called it "a rumbustious argument"

kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Jul 4, 2016 - 5:10pm

 Steely_D wrote:
Meet Michael Gove, the man who just turned British politics into an episode of ‘House of Cards’

The comparisons to Frank Underwood — the fictional schemer-in-chief on "House of Cards" — came thick and fast.


 

I should read this, especially if it has a TV equivalent for Boris Johnson. The guy is a sleazy, philandering buffoon. Yes, so is Trump but The Donald hasn't fathered two children with different mistresses now has he?
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 4, 2016 - 4:28pm


kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Jul 4, 2016 - 1:13pm

Nigel Farage quits. Presumably to get drunk and stay that way for the duration. 

Nigel Farage, Who Spurred ‘Brexit,’ Resigns as Head of U.K. Independence Party


LONDON — He spent nearly 20 years pushing for Britain to leave the European Union, and having succeeded in his aim, he is now taking his leave.

Nigel Farage, the politician who probably did more than any other to force the referendum on British membership in the European Union, resigned on Monday as leader of the right-wing populist U.K. Independence Party, saying “I’ve done my bit.”

...

Mr. Farage — brash, outspoken, loquacious and divisive, a commodities broker turned politician who loves widely striped suits and large glasses of beer — was probably not the man to lead the new party beyond its current limits. In a recent interview with the Financial Times over lunch, he consumed three pints of beer, half a bottle of wine and a glass of port.
ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 4, 2016 - 7:22am

UK government faces pre-emptive legal action over Brexit decision


Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 30, 2016 - 9:44pm

Meet Michael Gove, the man who just turned British politics into an episode of ‘House of Cards’

The comparisons to Frank Underwood — the fictional schemer-in-chief on "House of Cards" — came thick and fast.

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 30, 2016 - 3:39pm

 R_P wrote:


 
{#Naughty}{#High-five}
ScottN

ScottN Avatar

Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 30, 2016 - 3:01pm

 R_P wrote:
...

 
I listened via radio to John Kerry's speech to the Aspen Ideas Festival on Tuesday.  In  discreet "diplo-speak", he said that if the political will in UK is to reverse the Brexit result, there are several effective ways to do so. 


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 30, 2016 - 2:38pm


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 2:22pm


And so it begins/continues...
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 1:45pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
PS

the good thing about the whole Brexit campaign is that it has made this inherent inconsistency in the EU more visible. In the end, I think it might be a good thing. A big step on the way to the EU finally manning up to what it wants to be. 

 
Nicely said, this and your other post with the explanation you offered (which is pretty close to my own understanding of the problems).

So it is more than just about shadows and xenophobia.  Who knew ?   


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 1:09pm

PS

the good thing about the whole Brexit campaign is that it has made this inherent inconsistency in the EU more visible. In the end, I think it might be a good thing. A big step on the way to the EU finally manning up to what it wants to be. 
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 12:43pm

 Kaw wrote:

I'll admit that I don't know a lot about the EU.
For me the EU is the following:
- Easy travel
- Euro
- Trade agreements
I like that. Everybody likes this.

More neutral things:
- Being able to have a job or study in any nation within the EU
- Free immigration within the EU
- EU wide rights for a social income
I am sligthly positive about this but many people don't like this

But also:
- Subsidies for unprofitable industries
- Increased taxes because the EU told us so
- Boatloads of money towards Brussels
- Helping nations and banks that have failed to act properly for years
- Thousands of laws for things no real person cares about like laws for straight cucumbers and bend bananas
You have to be a politician or a beneficiary to like this but generally people hate those things about the EU.

And things in the future like:
- One army and police system
- One political system to rule them all

Merkel and friends want an United States of Europe. You might call me a nationalist, but I would like to limit the EU to the things people generally like. Just the travel, the trade and the euro. I think my nation would benefit from a local=national political system instead of an Europe wide system. It has to do with factors like demography and democracy. It just works better and will be more efficient.

 
well, quite frankly, I think you are actually being too kind to the EU. I am not born in Europe, so I am something of an outsider. I also had the good fortune to teach English to the top civil servant (Staatssekretär) of one of the German states and he tried to explain (without much success admittedly) the EU to me.

Put simply, the EU is one of the most bizarre political constructions you are ever likely to see. It was born of WW2 and the tremendous horror of everything that happened in the 20th century. It initially succeeded, at French initiation, because it fit American plans in the context of the cold war: a clear contrast to the Soviet bloc and economically powerful, without actually threatening US hegemony. But it is built on inherent inconsistencies. It did not abolish the nation-state but enshrined it while simultaneously building a huge pan-European back-office to hold the thing together. We discussed back then (20 years ago) how this structure must inevitably favour a renaissance of regional identity at the cost of the larger nations (i.e. Scottish independence), which btw, neither of us saw as a bad thing. But this anticipated evolution did imply a weakening of the larger nation states (Germany, France, the UK) and a simultaneous liberation of regional interests, such as the Basques, but all within the umbrella of a wider European structure, which would slowly grow more dominant in the minds of European citizens.

Unfortunately it hasn't panned out that way. Instead we've seen increasing impoverishment of the periphery, increasing dominance of Germany (in the name of fiscal prudence) and growing tensions between the disaffected (the have-nots) and the clear beneficiaries (the haves) - primarily the Germans, who can export their goods at effectively lower prices.

Now, before everyone thinks this was a secret plan on the part of Germany to regain regional dominance, I'd like to say that Germany is not at all interested in dominating the region. It does dominate the region, de facto, thanks to its size and economic prowess, but it is not actually interested in this role in the slightest. I sincerely believe that the overtures recently made by the EU to the Ukraine, were sincere. It would even like to include Russia in the EU, were Russia more open, mainly because the EU views itself as a progression away from the nation state. The problem being, that it forgot to abolish the nation-state beforehand. 

So, what we have is an entrenched bureaucratic structure in the background, a pile of elected national heads of states in the foreground, and a rough consensus that what they are all doing is a good thing, disturbed occasionally by the likes of Boris Johnson. It is rule by committee, saved only by the fact that most of the members of these committees have a common understanding of what is probably better for the Union.So far it has worked, more or less. Astonishingly. It might be inefficient, it might be lacking transparency and it might not have any direct accountability to the electorate, but so far it is working. The only explanation I have for its success, is that the Europeans actually want it to work.  lord help us if that disappears.
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 10:24am

 Kaw wrote:
The Brexit campaign was done by some people from the conservative party and the U.K. Independence party as far as I know. Maybe more people from other parties as well. There is not just one party with a certain opinion. So saying that the Brexit people fooled the British people is only partly true.

One can just as easily be fooled by multiple groups/parties working together in a coalition.
It's a stu;pid issue because even when they would unite to one party and promise such things: wouldn't you require to rule the country first before you make such promises?
Also the armageddon, WWIII and complete economic destruction as promised by people from the Bremain group are not going to be there either. Are you going to complain about that too?

It's not uncommon for political campaigns to make promises that are unlikely to be kept (or tell lies altogether).

People usually complain when good things (as promised) are not going to happen, but it's unlikely that people are going to complain that something extremely bad didn't happen. That's pretty simple and normal. You're not going to complain at the end of the day that your car didn't break down again. That would be very silly.

As for prophecies about what will or will not happen I take them with a large grain of salt. It's easier (and more realistic) to compare the present with past promises than to present good or bad promises about the future.
Kaw

Kaw Avatar

Location: Just above sea level
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 7:05am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

I'll accept your charge that the EU has failed miserably when it comes to transparency. Unfortunately that is a result of it being too timid (ironically, for such a grand project) and leaving the public perception of EU politics firmly at national level. That is why Merkel, Schäuble, Hollande, etc. have such power and influence. Underneath them is admittedly a huge governing apparatus that very few people get a glimpse of. Which makes many people very suspicious of what they are actually up to. I believe the truth to lie in some kind of vast bureaucratic structure that is more or less Kafka-esque depending on your persuasion.

But isn't this ironic? That people of a more nationalist bent (like yourself) find the greatest failing in the EU to be something that is ultimately a product of concessions being made to the nationalist perspective when the structures were drawn up?  
But ultimately, I agree with you, if the EU is to survive this current crisis, it badly needs to install pan-European political parties and find some way of making the whole apparatus transparent and accountable to the body politic.

 
I'll admit that I don't know a lot about the EU.
For me the EU is the following:
- Easy travel
- Euro
- Trade agreements
I like that. Everybody likes this.

More neutral things:
- Being able to have a job or study in any nation within the EU
- Free immigration within the EU
- EU wide rights for a social income
I am sligthly positive about this but many people don't like this

But also:
- Subsidies for unprofitable industries
- Increased taxes because the EU told us so
- Boatloads of money towards Brussels
- Helping nations and banks that have failed to act properly for years
- Thousands of laws for things no real person cares about like laws for straight cucumbers and bend bananas
You have to be a politician or a beneficiary to like this but generally people hate those things about the EU.

And things in the future like:
- One army and police system
- One political system to rule them all

Merkel and friends want an United States of Europe. You might call me a nationalist, but I would like to limit the EU to the things people generally like. Just the travel, the trade and the euro. I think my nation would benefit from a local=national political system instead of an Europe wide system. It has to do with factors like demography and democracy. It just works better and will be more efficient.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 6:42am

 Kaw wrote:

If we start from scratch you have to make a definition of a democracy.
Democracy, or democratic government, is "a system of government in which all the people of a state or polity ... are involved in making decisions about its affairs, typically by voting to elect representatives to a parliament or similar assembly"
What's happening in the EU is that we are not able to be involved in decision making. We don't know what kind of decisions are made and their content is often (partly) secret. The representatives we voted for are not the people making decissions in the EU. The direction of the EU is not the direction of the majority of the european citizens, but the direction of an invisible group of lobbyists and politicians that have great power, but from unknown orrigin.

That's what's causing people to be cynical and sceptical about the EU. What do they want? Who are they serving? What's the direction and future of the EU? Why is the EU good for me? Do we need a multibillion bureaucratic monster for free travel, trade agreements and the euro currency? Can we do these kind of things without Brussels?

For example Tusk recoginizes these concerns and is pleading for a reformation and reorganisation of the EU to improve democracy and just do the things the people want. I like that. I think that's the correct step.
 
I'll accept your charge that the EU has failed miserably when it comes to transparency. Unfortunately that is a result of it being too timid (ironically, for such a grand project) and leaving the public perception of EU politics firmly at national level. That is why Merkel, Schäuble, Hollande, etc. have such power and influence. Underneath them is admittedly a huge governing apparatus that very few people get a glimpse of. Which makes many people very suspicious of what they are actually up to. I believe the truth to lie in some kind of vast bureaucratic structure that is more or less Kafka-esque depending on your persuasion.

But isn't this ironic? That people of a more nationalist bent (like yourself) find the greatest failing in the EU to be something that is ultimately a product of concessions being made to the nationalist perspective when the structures were drawn up?  
But ultimately, I agree with you, if the EU is to survive this current crisis, it badly needs to install pan-European political parties and find some way of making the whole apparatus transparent and accountable to the body politic.
Kaw

Kaw Avatar

Location: Just above sea level
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 6:30am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
ok, let's try and offload all of our preconceptions, proclivities, political allegiances and all the rest of the baggage and start from scratch:

what sort of a world are we wanting to live in?
 
You would think it wouldn't be too hard to find consensus on this, as most of us want to prosper, pursue liberty and happiness. At least you'd hope so. I think it is a foregone conclusion that we all want to be able to work, earn money, have dreams and at the very least the illusion that we can realise them. If this gets thwarted, people get pretty disaffected pretty quickly.

Now, given that we have never had it so good as we do today, why on earth is everyone so unhappy? Is it because of the growing realisation that our dreams (the American dream if you will) is becoming increasingly unrealistic for a lot of people? Is it because the dreams themselves have just got too wild because we measure ourselves now on mega-billionaires and reality TV show stars and feel like failures if we don't at least have a modicum of what they've got? Are we just living in the age of disconnect? Dominated by virtual dreams and phantoms and forgotten what it means to grow our own food and survive in nature?

One thing for sure is that the old political spectrum is proving pretty inadequate:
 
 
 
If we start from scratch you have to make a definition of a democracy.
Democracy, or democratic government, is "a system of government in which all the people of a state or polity ... are involved in making decisions about its affairs, typically by voting to elect representatives to a parliament or similar assembly"
What's happening in the EU is that we are not able to be involved in decision making. We don't know what kind of decisions are made and their content is often (partly) secret. The representatives we voted for are not the people making decissions in the EU. The direction of the EU is not the direction of the majority of the european citizens, but the direction of an invisible group of lobbyists and politicians that have great power, but from unknown orrigin.

That's what's causing people to be cynical and sceptical about the EU. What do they want? Who are they serving? What's the direction and future of the EU? Why is the EU good for me? Do we need a multibillion bureaucratic monster for free travel, trade agreements and the euro currency? Can we do these kind of things without Brussels?

For example Tusk recoginizes these concerns and is pleading for a reformation and reorganisation of the EU to improve democracy and just do the things the people want. I like that. I think that's the correct step.
(And calling every EU sceptical person a dangerous, xenofobic, uninformed, lower class, simple minded, anti-democratic populist rebel isn't helping either)
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 27, 2016 - 5:27am

ok, let's try and offload all of our preconceptions, proclivities, political allegiances and all the rest of the baggage and start from scratch:

what sort of a world are we wanting to live in?
 
You would think it wouldn't be too hard to find consensus on this, as most of us want to prosper, pursue liberty and happiness. At least you'd hope so. I think it is a foregone conclusion that we all want to be able to work, earn money, have dreams and at the very least the illusion that we can realise them. If this gets thwarted, people get pretty disaffected pretty quickly.

Now, given that we have never had it so good as we do today, why on earth is everyone so unhappy? Is it because of the growing realisation that our dreams (the American dream if you will) is becoming increasingly unrealistic for a lot of people? Is it because the dreams themselves have just got too wild because we measure ourselves now on mega-billionaires and reality TV show stars and feel like failures if we don't at least have a modicum of what they've got? Are we just living in the age of disconnect? Dominated by virtual dreams and phantoms and forgotten what it means to grow our own food and survive in nature?

One thing for sure is that the old political spectrum is proving pretty inadequate:
 
 


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next