Yet the Libertarian presidential nominee is still not being polled in one-third of the country, including states that are historically friendly to third-party candidates.
This election is far too important to vote for the person that best represents your values.
Yet the Libertarian presidential nominee is still not being polled in one-third of the country, including states that are historically friendly to third-party candidates.
"No party holds the privilege of dictating to me how I shall vote. If loyalty to party is a form of patriotism, I am no patriot. If there is any valuable difference between a monarchist and an American, it lies in the theory that the American can decide for himself what is patriotic and what isn't. I claim that difference. I am the only person in the sixty millions that is privileged to dictate my patriotism."
- Mark Twain
Good quote.
Calls to patriotism — popular with special interests — are an open invitation to stop thinking for yourself.
"No party holds the privilege of dictating to me how I shall vote. If loyalty to party is a form of patriotism, I am no patriot. If there is any valuable difference between a monarchist and an American, it lies in the theory that the American can decide for himself what is patriotic and what isn't. I claim that difference. I am the only person in the sixty millions that is privileged to dictate my patriotism."
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Nov 1, 2020 - 4:56am
In a statement, White House deputy press secretary Judd Deere sharply criticized Fauci, claiming he was inappropriately playing politics a few days before Election Day. âIt's unacceptable and breaking with all norms for Dr. Fauci, a senior member of the President's Coronavirus Taskforce and someone who has praised President Trump's actions throughout this pandemic, to choose three days before an election to play politics," Deere said in the statement. "As a member of the Task Force, Dr. Fauci has a duty to express concerns or push for a change in strategy, but he's not done that, instead choosing to criticize the President in the media and make his political leanings known by praising the President's opponentâ exactly what the American people have come to expect from The Swamp."
Uh-huh. Tony Fauci is now a creature from The Swamp.
The working paper, released late Friday, examined the impact of 18 rallies held between June 20 and Sept. 30.
President Donald Trump's campaign rallies between June and September may have caused some 30,000 coronavirus infections and more than 700 deaths, according to a new study by Stanford University economists.
The working paper, released late Friday, examined the impact of 18 rallies held between June 20 and Sept. 30 by comparing spread of the virus after each event to parts of the country that didn't host rallies. The findings illustrate the risks of not heeding public health warnings to wear masks and avoid large gatherings to mitigate the risks of Covid-19, the authors â including B. Douglas Bernheim, the chair of Stanford's economics department â wrote.
âThe communities in which Trump rallies took place paid a high price in terms of disease and death,â they wrote. Fifteen of the 18 events studied were held outdoors.
...
Michael Mina, an epidemiologist at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said the study is reminiscent of research thattried to quantify the impact a large motorcycle rally held in Sturgis, S.D., in August had on Covid-19 spread over the summer. While the design of the Stanford study appears fine, the methods are ânot particularly robust,â he cautioned.
âThere are better ways to look at this data through actual infectious disease epidemic lenses,â Mina said. âIt offers a data point, but nothing I would want to draw any strong conclusions from. It is also so overtly political that it makes it hard to distinguish if there were decisions made out of perhaps unrecognized bias.â
But Eleanor Murray, an assistant professor of epidemiology at Boston University School of Public Health, said the paper âapplies an appropriate method with some good robustness and sensitivity checks.â
âIf the key underlying assumption is realistic then the answer is probably something that could be relied upon,â Murray said.
Are you proud of "Trump Patriot Team"? Haven't you learned from Germany's history of fascism, political oppression and the use of violence to silence people?
