EXCLUSIVE: A @TheJusticeDept official confirms that in 2019, the @FBI opened up a criminal investigation into "Hunter Biden and his associates," focused on allegations of money-laundering, and that it remains open and active today. More very soon on your @WeAreSinclair stations.
Trump State Media was told by a guy without any verified evidence (by anyone in the FBI or CIA, who BTW are on record as saying they think the documents were A) of Russian origin, and B) offered up to Lev Parnas last summer) with whom 6 FBI agents and several lawyers working for the most corrupt administration in history spent the better part of a day (a week ago) and can't produce any documentation. That evidence, somehow disappeared in a shipping scandal, and those documents were so valuable that nobody has copies?
Do you feel it was fair and honest to not hold hearings for Garland and rush through the appointment of Barrett?
If you call being fair as playing by the rules already in force, then the answer is yes. Using them to your advantage is then smart.
Off to work to play with CV 19. Bye for now.
Just bumping this so that you might see my extra thought now that I am home and have some time.
Which is ...
As an accountant dealing with your clients, do you tell them not to use a loophole in the rules because it is not fair ? I would hope that you would tell them that it is both ethical as you are breaking no laws and the smart thing to do.
EXCLUSIVE: A @TheJusticeDept official confirms that in 2019, the @FBI opened up a criminal investigation into "Hunter Biden and his associates," focused on allegations of money-laundering, and that it remains open and active today. More very soon on your @WeAreSinclair stations.
By saying something vague like "big news" it leaves the prophecy open to any interpretation. Standard useless stuff.
No, Karma^2 wouldn't do that to us. Just look at the story he put up to corroborate the claim.... it's right here.... somewhere.... must be..... Maybe they are saving it for *right* before the election.
Yo karma, where is this story? Surely you have a link by now.
It would be funny if it were not so pathetic. "No, really, I did my homework! But, but, uh, the dog ate it! Yeah, that's it, the dog ate it!" A sack of eels (or Eels, for that matter) has more journalistic credibility. c.
It would be funny if it were not so pathetic. "No, really, I did my homework! But, but, uh, the dog ate it! Yeah, that's it, the dog ate it!" A sack of eels (or Eels, for that matter) has more journalistic credibility. c.
It would be funny if it were not so pathetic. "No, really, I did my homework! But, but, uh, the dog ate it! Yeah, that's it, the dog ate it!" A sack of eels (or Eels, for that matter) has more journalistic credibility. c.
I do not believe Trump would pack the court or he would have tried to do it already. Right ?
Try? Does Merrick Garland ring any bells? You can have one,
A) but by ending the filibuster
and not holding hearings he left the seat on the way in open for almost a year? ACB didn't have time to pick up her dry cleaning.
B) You already did pack the court,
so the Dems re-packing it is fair game.
What would Don say: "We won the election, we can do what we want." He's said it repeatedly. If the Dems win...same rules apply.
To be clear....I'm against all of it. 2 wrongs don't make it right, but the Republicans have abused their power in the Senate for years....and it appears it may be time to pay the tab.
BYE DON!! Enjoy Prison.
