[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Red_Dragon - Jun 3, 2020 - 3:56pm
 
Trump - steeler - Jun 3, 2020 - 3:52pm
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - Red_Dragon - Jun 3, 2020 - 3:46pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - Lazy8 - Jun 3, 2020 - 3:03pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Jun 3, 2020 - 2:35pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - ScopPics - Jun 3, 2020 - 2:30pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Jun 3, 2020 - 2:15pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jun 3, 2020 - 2:13pm
 
Amazon Echo/Alexa stream not working - Gourd - Jun 3, 2020 - 1:55pm
 
Guns - Red_Dragon - Jun 3, 2020 - 1:44pm
 
Trump Lies - hayduke2 - Jun 3, 2020 - 12:45pm
 
Fun - Proclivities - Jun 3, 2020 - 11:26am
 
Things You Thought Today - sirdroseph - Jun 3, 2020 - 11:13am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 3, 2020 - 10:04am
 
Party planning advice - Proclivities - Jun 3, 2020 - 9:04am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - ColdMiser - Jun 3, 2020 - 7:25am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - Proclivities - Jun 3, 2020 - 7:08am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Jun 3, 2020 - 6:45am
 
Counting with Pictures - Proclivities - Jun 3, 2020 - 6:37am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 7:31pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 7:26pm
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 7:24pm
 
In My Room - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 7:16pm
 
Favorite Quotes - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 5:03pm
 
The R_P & KarmaKarma bickering topic - R_P - Jun 2, 2020 - 4:40pm
 
Canada - haresfur - Jun 2, 2020 - 3:01pm
 
Joe Biden - R_P - Jun 2, 2020 - 2:55pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 2:42pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 2:10pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - kcar - Jun 2, 2020 - 1:20pm
 
RP Main Mix on TuneIn unavailable? - withdean1 - Jun 2, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
Post your favorite 'You Tube' Videos Here - black321 - Jun 2, 2020 - 11:28am
 
Epic Facebook Statuses - Coaxial - Jun 2, 2020 - 8:06am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 7:49am
 
Tales from the RAFT - Coaxial - Jun 2, 2020 - 6:50am
 
Sonos - scrubbrush - Jun 2, 2020 - 6:43am
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Jun 2, 2020 - 5:58am
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Jun 2, 2020 - 12:04am
 
Food - AliGator - Jun 1, 2020 - 8:48pm
 
Stupid Questions (and Answers) - haresfur - Jun 1, 2020 - 8:07pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - Antigone - Jun 1, 2020 - 6:10pm
 
Bernie Sanders - R_P - Jun 1, 2020 - 3:36pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - sirdroseph - Jun 1, 2020 - 12:24pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Steely_D - Jun 1, 2020 - 11:00am
 
Today in History - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 1, 2020 - 8:23am
 
I can't download a cache block for offline listening - q4Fry - Jun 1, 2020 - 6:50am
 
FLAC Streaming - Ohewitt - Jun 1, 2020 - 5:01am
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - KarmaKarma - May 31, 2020 - 1:27pm
 
RPeeps I miss. - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 11:55am
 
Two questions. That's it. I promise. - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 10:27am
 
Questions. - buddy - May 31, 2020 - 9:34am
 
A thousand million questions - buddy - May 31, 2020 - 9:32am
 
What kind of lunatic answers rhetorical questions? - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:45am
 
Crucial History Questions - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:43am
 
Medical Questions - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:42am
 
Questions I'd like to ask at tonight's debate - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:41am
 
What questions would you like to answer for the world? - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:36am
 
Dumbass Questions - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:35am
 
Rhetorical questions - oldviolin - May 31, 2020 - 8:33am
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - May 31, 2020 - 6:59am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - May 31, 2020 - 5:01am
 
Australia and New Zealand Music - whatshisname - May 31, 2020 - 4:12am
 
Cloud Gazing (Photos You've Taken) - haresfur - May 30, 2020 - 9:50pm
 
Automotive Lust - Coaxial - May 30, 2020 - 4:53pm
 
Advice? - Red_Dragon - May 30, 2020 - 4:01pm
 
kurtster's quiet vinyl - kurtster - May 30, 2020 - 6:06am
 
the Todd Rundgren topic - Steely_D - May 29, 2020 - 6:34pm
 
suggest "clasical music" - kcar - May 29, 2020 - 3:49pm
 
Covid-19 hits home at RP - fractalv - May 29, 2020 - 3:07pm
 
submissions - TheKing2 - May 29, 2020 - 2:18pm
 
Well, DUH!! - KarmaKarma - May 29, 2020 - 11:43am
 
Free Books and Free Culture Online - R_P - May 29, 2020 - 11:34am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - oldviolin - May 29, 2020 - 10:15am
 
The RANT Forum - steeler - May 29, 2020 - 9:39am
 
The Buffoonery - oldviolin - May 29, 2020 - 9:28am
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » 2020 Elections Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Post to this Topic
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 7:27am



 black321 wrote:
 In some ways, he can play the same strategy as trump, while actually being a successful billionaire businessman. 
 
But therein lies the issue...is he too similar to Trump?  Can you get the undecided voter to move toward him, or in the end do they just either follow the herd toward Trump or not vote?  He's definitely different on issues, but November will end up a 2nd Amendment referendum.  Maybe that'll help Bloomberg?  He has more analysts than Goldman Sachs working the numbers, so who knows.

With Pete, you literally change the demographics of the leadership. In 4 years, the old white men in this race are done (Trump, Biden, Sanders). Warren is history.  What you'll see are the 40 and 50-year-old Senators coming after him (Cruz, Rubio, etc.) if he were to win.  Pete is polling really well with older voters oddly enough, so if the Sanders / Warren "socialist" crowd has a choice of Pete or Donnie....do they vote Pete, or just stay home?

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 7:22am

 rgio wrote:

 islander wrote:
I don't really have faith in people anymore. 
 
 His being a homosexual is also a real issue in November. 
 
i agree with some of the sentiment

however, my faith in people (if i can use that word) extends to those who are willing to have a conversation

i think pete's personal preference isn't as big of an issue as some might think

or the acceptance trends (long term) for race, sex, religion, etc. are going in the right direction

he could do well to partner with a solid vp pick too

also i would like to see him couch his message in some reason and logic to help broaden his leadership appeal

stay away negativity, divisive emotion, etc.

we'll see what his team comes up with
KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 7:08am



 islander wrote:


 steeler wrote:


 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

He's sober in his assessments and incredibly well-informed and able to communicate that without condescension. Smart enough to know who the advisers are.
 
Reminds me of my career. It wasn't important to know all the ins and outs of the IBM Principles of Operations manual. It was only important to know who was the expert in each area, and make nice with them. Knowing one's gray areas is as important as knowing one's strengths.
 

Yes, exactly on paragraph one.

That last sentence is an astute observation. Buttigieg seems humble enough. Anyone who runs for President has a good-sized ego. But are they humble enough?
 

I saw an interview the other day, and was very impressed.  Then I saw the video of the lady in Iowa who voted for him, but then learned he was gay and wanted her card back (I wonder if she voted for Obama, and then was surprised by his 'appearance ').

I don't really have faith in people anymore. Just wait until Bloomberg turns on the money faucets.
 
Impossible!  Everyone knows only conservatives and Republican supporters are the bigots / homophobes!

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 6:52am



 rgio wrote:


 islander wrote:

I saw an interview the other day, and was very impressed.  Then I saw the video of the lady in Iowa who voted for him, but then learned he was gay and wanted her card back (I wonder if she voted for Obama, and then was surprised by his 'appearance ').

I don't really have faith in people anymore. Just wait until Bloomberg turns on the money faucets.
 
I think Bloomberg has played his hand perfectly, but something about him feels too much like Trump and Biden, and while I like him, I have doubts about his appeal to the masses in November.

Pete is a real change.  He is very...VERY young.  His being a homosexual is also a real issue in November.  That said, I think he tears Trump apart like nobody else will in a debate.  

There are two recent interactions that are very impressive (you can look them up I'm sure).

The first was when a woman in Iowa who originally joined the Pete squad found out he was gay.  She made it very clear she couldn't vote for a gay man...she had no idea (which is a really interesting moment).  The staffer was polite, understanding, and attempted to talk through the issue.  When asked about it, Pete's answer was to first talk about the staffer.  How proud he was of her, what a great job she did.  It was amazing to hear a leader support his staff without pause...just a natural leadership that flows from him.

The second was in the town hall last night.  I only caught the last 20 mins or so, but he was asked: "if you could fix one thing, what would it be?"  His response was to fix government because until you fix the issues in DC that are dividing everyone, nothing will get done.  That is a very mature, very informed, very composed answer, which was delivered in a thoughtful, almost solemn tone.  

I think America will really appreciate some well-packaged intelligence.  He is the smartest guy in the room, and we should embrace his willingness to work for us.

All of that said....I'm not sure any of the Dems can defeat Trump.  

EDIT: My suggested running mate for Pete:  Mitt Romney

 

My problem with Pete is, he is too young and you dont want to play your hand too soon, before you're ready.  The position takes maturity, or a boatload of braggadocio.  I think that was part of why Obama was so ineffective. How much better of a president would he had been if he continued to serve as a senator, matured and was running now...or even in 2016?  Pete's next step should be governor, senator... 

I think Bloomberg has a good amount of integrity. He didnt run in 2016 because he thought Clinton would win, and I imagine would have done a good job, ha. He waited to see how the 2020 round of candidates looked before entering, and has agreed to throw his full support behind any candidate who wins the nomination.  But yes, his likability in the midwest and south could be issues.  In some ways, he can play the same strategy as trump, while actually being a successful billionaire businessman. 
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 6:39am

 rgio wrote:


 islander wrote:

I saw an interview the other day, and was very impressed.  Then I saw the video of the lady in Iowa who voted for him, but then learned he was gay and wanted her card back (I wonder if she voted for Obama, and then was surprised by his 'appearance ').

I don't really have faith in people anymore. Just wait until Bloomberg turns on the money faucets.
 
I think Bloomberg has played his hand perfectly, but something about him feels too much like Trump and Biden, and while I like him, I have doubts about his appeal to the masses in November.

Pete is a real change.  He is very...VERY young.  His being a homosexual is also a real issue in November.  That said, I think he tears Trump apart like nobody else will in a debate.  

There are two recent interactions that are very impressive (you can look them up I'm sure).

The first was when a woman in Iowa who originally joined the Pete squad found out he was gay.  She made it very clear she couldn't vote for a gay man...she had no idea (which is a really interesting moment).  The staffer was polite, understanding, and attempted to talk through the issue.  When asked about it, Pete's answer was to first talk about the staffer.  How proud he was of her, what a great job she did.  It was amazing to hear a leader support his staff without pause...just a natural leadership that flows from him.

The second was in the town hall last night.  I only caught the last 20 mins or so, but he was asked: "if you could fix one thing, what would it be?"  His response was to fix government because until you fix the issues in DC that are dividing everyone, nothing will get done.  That is a very mature, very informed, very composed answer, which was delivered in a thoughtful, almost solemn tone.  

I think America will really appreciate some well-packaged intelligence.  He is the smartest guy in the room, and we should embrace his willingness to work for us.

All of that said....I'm not sure any of the Dems can defeat Trump.  

EDIT: My suggested running mate for Pete:  Mitt Romney

 
You had me to the edit.  I am sure that is Romney's choice as well!{#Lol}
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 6:33am



 islander wrote:

I saw an interview the other day, and was very impressed.  Then I saw the video of the lady in Iowa who voted for him, but then learned he was gay and wanted her card back (I wonder if she voted for Obama, and then was surprised by his 'appearance ').

I don't really have faith in people anymore. Just wait until Bloomberg turns on the money faucets.
 
I think Bloomberg has played his hand perfectly, but something about him feels too much like Trump and Biden, and while I like him, I have doubts about his appeal to the masses in November.

Pete is a real change.  He is very...VERY young.  His being a homosexual is also a real issue in November.  That said, I think he tears Trump apart like nobody else will in a debate.  

There are two recent interactions that are very impressive (you can look them up I'm sure).

The first was when a woman in Iowa who originally joined the Pete squad found out he was gay.  She made it very clear she couldn't vote for a gay man...she had no idea (which is a really interesting moment).  The staffer was polite, understanding, and attempted to talk through the issue.  When asked about it, Pete's answer was to first talk about the staffer.  How proud he was of her, what a great job she did.  It was amazing to hear a leader support his staff without pause...just a natural leadership that flows from him.

The second was in the town hall last night.  I only caught the last 20 mins or so, but he was asked: "if you could fix one thing, what would it be?"  His response was to fix government because until you fix the issues in DC that are dividing everyone, nothing will get done.  That is a very mature, very informed, very composed answer, which was delivered in a thoughtful, almost solemn tone.  

I think America will really appreciate some well-packaged intelligence.  He is the smartest guy in the room, and we should embrace his willingness to work for us.

All of that said....I'm not sure any of the Dems can defeat Trump.  

EDIT: My suggested running mate for Pete:  Mitt Romney

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 6:18am

 islander wrote:


 steeler wrote:


 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

He's sober in his assessments and incredibly well-informed and able to communicate that without condescension. Smart enough to know who the advisers are.
 
Reminds me of my career. It wasn't important to know all the ins and outs of the IBM Principles of Operations manual. It was only important to know who was the expert in each area, and make nice with them. Knowing one's gray areas is as important as knowing one's strengths.
 

Yes, exactly on paragraph one.

That last sentence is an astute observation. Buttigieg seems humble enough. Anyone who runs for President has a good-sized ego. But are they humble enough?
 

I saw an interview the other day, and was very impressed.  Then I saw the video of the lady in Iowa who voted for him, but then learned he was gay and wanted her card back (I wonder if she voted for Obama, and then was surprised by his 'appearance ').

I don't really have faith in people anymore. Just wait until Bloomberg turns on the money faucets.
 
Welcome aboard!  Didn't expect to see you so soon!{#Cowboy}
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 6:01am



 steeler wrote:


 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

He's sober in his assessments and incredibly well-informed and able to communicate that without condescension. Smart enough to know who the advisers are.
 
Reminds me of my career. It wasn't important to know all the ins and outs of the IBM Principles of Operations manual. It was only important to know who was the expert in each area, and make nice with them. Knowing one's gray areas is as important as knowing one's strengths.
 

Yes, exactly on paragraph one.

That last sentence is an astute observation. Buttigieg seems humble enough. Anyone who runs for President has a good-sized ego. But are they humble enough?
 

I saw an interview the other day, and was very impressed.  Then I saw the video of the lady in Iowa who voted for him, but then learned he was gay and wanted her card back (I wonder if she voted for Obama, and then was surprised by his 'appearance ').

I don't really have faith in people anymore. Just wait until Bloomberg turns on the money faucets.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 4:18am

 steeler wrote:


 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

He's sober in his assessments and incredibly well-informed and able to communicate that without condescension. Smart enough to know who the advisers are.
 
Reminds me of my career. It wasn't important to know all the ins and outs of the IBM Principles of Operations manual. It was only important to know who was the expert in each area, and make nice with them. Knowing one's gray areas is as important as knowing one's strengths.
 

Yes, exactly on paragraph one.

That last sentence is an astute observation. Buttigieg seems humble enough. Anyone who runs for President has a good-sized ego. But are they humble enough?
 
i want to like him

he's probably used to being the brightest guy in the room

he needs to embrace that through a relative lens

clearly he's got a lot of people trying to pull him in all four directions

at this level he's got to try and kiss a lot of ideological asses

it would be nice to hear something from him regarding his plan minus the fluff

a plan without mentioning biden, bernie, trump, wokeness, the usual broken record bs, etc.

an honest snapshot of where we are and how he can help people improve their lives

i know, it's politics, but if he could focus on strong straightforward message it would help

i wish him well
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 7, 2020 - 2:24am



 steeler wrote:
Watching town halls in New Hampshire. Buttigieg is a really smart and articulate guy. I have to admit, though, that I came into this campaign thinking that he is a little too young/inexperienced.  Reflecting on that. I think it was legitimate for Biden to say yesterday that there is a risk in assuming someone can go from Mayor of South Bend to the White House. But, again, the guy is impressive in answering questions and interacting. He has had diverse experiences; brings a lot to the table. Still . . .
 

Kind of ironic that of the Democratic candidates he seems like the adult in the room.   As a person, I rather like him too.  His major obstacles are AOC , the Bernie bros. and other leftist who will split between Sanders and Warren and the black vote who appears to have settled into Biden or stay home whatevs.   I think the DNC would accept him though as they are basically anybody but Sanders or Warren.    I would be quite pleased with a Trump vs. Buttigieg election cycle.  I would not vote for either one, but would feel comfortable with either as President.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 6, 2020 - 7:06pm



 BlueHeronDruid wrote:

He's sober in his assessments and incredibly well-informed and able to communicate that without condescension. Smart enough to know who the advisers are.
 
Reminds me of my career. It wasn't important to know all the ins and outs of the IBM Principles of Operations manual. It was only important to know who was the expert in each area, and make nice with them. Knowing one's gray areas is as important as knowing one's strengths.
 

Yes, exactly on paragraph one.

That last sentence is an astute observation. Buttigieg seems humble enough. Anyone who runs for President has a good-sized ego. But are they humble enough?
BlueHeronDruid

BlueHeronDruid Avatar

Location: planting flowers


Posted: Feb 6, 2020 - 6:56pm

 steeler wrote:
Watching town halls in New Hampshire. Buttigieg is a really smart and articulate guy. I have to admit, though, that I came into this campaign thinking that he is a little too young/inexperienced.  Reflecting on that. I think it was legitimate for Biden to say yesterday that there is a risk in assuming someone can go from Mayor of South Bend to the White House. But, again, the guy is impressive in answering questions and interacting. He has had diverse experiences; brings a lot to the table. Still . . .
 
He's sober in his assessments and incredibly well-informed and able to communicate that without condescension. Smart enough to know who the advisers are.
 
Reminds me of my career. It wasn't important to know all the ins and outs of the IBM Principles of Operations manual. It was only important to know who was the expert in each area, and make nice with them. Knowing one's gray areas is as important as knowing one's strengths.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 6, 2020 - 6:48pm

Watching town halls in New Hampshire. Buttigieg is a really smart and articulate guy. I have to admit, though, that I came into this campaign thinking that he is a little too young/inexperienced.  Reflecting on that. I think it was legitimate for Biden to say yesterday that there is a risk in assuming someone can go from Mayor of South Bend to the White House. But, again, the guy is impressive in answering questions and interacting. He has had diverse experiences; brings a lot to the table. Still . . .
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 29, 2020 - 10:26pm

Trump Is Growing Concerned About Bernie Sanders, While His Advisers Think the Vermont Senator Will Be Easy to Beat
The Bernie Blackout Is Real, and These Screenshots Prove It
buddy

buddy Avatar

Location: Denver
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 19, 2020 - 12:23pm

 kurtster wrote:

1972 was the first election that I voted in.  I voted for McGovern.  Similar scenario yes, but the times are much different and very much the same this time around.  There was a war in Viet Nam and the draft.  Those were the two biggest factors in determining my vote back then.
 
1972 was my first election also. I joined the county McGovern campaign in Texas. The war & the draft, yep .... and I was drafted in the very last draft in late 1972. I decided I wasn't going to dodge the draft or go to the jungle, so I enlisted in the Navy & picked an aviation MOS (air traffic controller) figuring North Vietnam didn't have a navy or airforce, so as long I didn't take liberty in Saigon & didn't fall off the boat (people do) I'd survive. Ended up never setting foot on a Navy vessel & never left the States, as the war for us ended in 1975, halfway through my 4-year stint. So my plan pretty much worked. As far as McGovern goes, he was stomped but 2 years later Nixon resigned, so there's that. And I'm categorized as a Vietnam Era Veteran, having enlisted during the conflict, which is different from "Vietnam Vet", for those deployed In Country or on a ship participating in the conflict.
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2020 - 5:24am

 sirdroseph wrote:
If it ends up being Trump vs. Sanders, is this not deja vu 1972?  Well at least we have very clear choices ala Nixon and McGovern and we will also have the same result.  If you think about it the notion of voting for any of these 4 men is equally ridiculous.  Makes one uber cynical and Machiavellian in regards to politics and politicians.   Humanity will pay for our arrogance and insolence, best to keep it at arms reach and take care of you and your'n best you can till your time comes.{#Meditate}
 
1972 was the first election that I voted in.  I voted for McGovern.  Similar scenario yes, but the times are much different and very much the same this time around.  There was a war in Viet Nam and the draft.  Those were the two biggest factors in determining my vote back then.
hayduke2

hayduke2 Avatar

Location: Southampton, NY
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2020 - 4:51am

Elizabeth Warren 🤙🌟👑. Ref: Indy100 article by Sirena Bergman!!!
https://www.indy100.com/article/elizabeth-warren-jon-stewart-the-daily-show-2009-financial-crash-regulation-9289596
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 18, 2020 - 4:32am

If it ends up being Trump vs. Sanders, is this not deja vu 1972?  Well at least we have very clear choices ala Nixon and McGovern and we will also have the same result.  If you think about it the notion of voting for any of these 4 men is equally ridiculous.  Makes one uber cynical and Machiavellian in regards to politics and politicians.   Humanity will pay for our arrogance and insolence, best to keep it at arms reach and take care of you and your'n best you can till your time comes.{#Meditate}
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Dec 4, 2019 - 7:23am



 islander wrote:


I don't know how to fix it.  We have a problem. Joe Biden (somewhat ironically) actually tipped us off to the problem when he said "show me your budget and I'll tell you what you value".

Yes, it's different as a percentage of GDP, but I'd say that regardless of gdp, we would be better off spending less on blowing stuff up.  Yes, it's a jobs program, but why not a peace corps? Or simply a civilian infrastructure support company that would enable our economy?  When we spend so much on a military hammer, we look for a military nail to use it on. Let's spend on some real hammers and nails and see if we can make some nice stuff instead. Maybe give some of that stuff away to people who are mad at us for blowing up their stuff so they will spend less trying to blow our stuff up?

I'm not the only one. But I do feel like I'm in the minority.
 

Around here, Bernie Sanders is the "free stuff" guy. Nothing is free, it's simply a matter of what you choose to spend the money on; he would rather it be spent on improving the lives of people instead of slaughtering them.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 4, 2019 - 7:12am



 islander wrote:



I don't know how to fix it.  We have a problem. Joe Biden (somewhat ironically) actually tipped us off to the problem when he said "show me your budget and I'll tell you what you value".


 
Interesting to note, combining our spending with our "allies & partners" we are out spending Russia and China more than 3:1

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 12, 13, 14  Next