[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Capital Punishment - R_P - Jan 18, 2021 - 5:19pm
 
What makes you smile? - Antigone - Jan 18, 2021 - 3:49pm
 
Trump - R_P - Jan 18, 2021 - 2:32pm
 
Google Docs (Docs, Spreadsheets, etc) - rgio - Jan 18, 2021 - 2:10pm
 
The death penalty on trial? - black321 - Jan 18, 2021 - 1:06pm
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2021 - 10:41am
 
What did you have for dinner? - Antigone - Jan 18, 2021 - 10:27am
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jan 18, 2021 - 10:05am
 
Fox Spews - rgio - Jan 18, 2021 - 8:49am
 
Language - rhahl - Jan 18, 2021 - 7:35am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Jan 18, 2021 - 7:29am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Jan 18, 2021 - 7:12am
 
Liberal please, - rhahl - Jan 18, 2021 - 6:57am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Jan 18, 2021 - 6:47am
 
Live Music - R_P - Jan 17, 2021 - 10:01pm
 
COVID-19 - R_P - Jan 17, 2021 - 6:53pm
 
honk if you think manbird and OV are one and the same ent... - oldviolin - Jan 17, 2021 - 2:59pm
 
Jam! - rhahl - Jan 17, 2021 - 1:10pm
 
Poetry Forum - ScottN - Jan 17, 2021 - 11:54am
 
A motivational quote - kurtster - Jan 17, 2021 - 11:41am
 
Regarding dogs - rhahl - Jan 17, 2021 - 11:10am
 
The Obituary Page - rgio - Jan 17, 2021 - 9:48am
 
Freedom of speech? - miamizsun - Jan 17, 2021 - 8:22am
 
Social Media Are Changing Everything - black321 - Jan 17, 2021 - 7:37am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jan 17, 2021 - 7:36am
 
Best movies ever? - rhahl - Jan 17, 2021 - 3:41am
 
Breaking News - kurtster - Jan 16, 2021 - 4:37pm
 
Automotive Lust - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 16, 2021 - 4:28pm
 
Trump Lies - ScottN - Jan 16, 2021 - 12:05pm
 
Outstanding Covers - R_P - Jan 16, 2021 - 11:48am
 
What Are You Going To Do Today? - miamizsun - Jan 16, 2021 - 5:54am
 
Vocabulary Quiz - rhahl - Jan 16, 2021 - 5:31am
 
Flim Festivals on Now - rhahl - Jan 16, 2021 - 3:59am
 
2020 Elections - haresfur - Jan 15, 2021 - 8:44pm
 
Baby words that stuck in your family - Manbird - Jan 15, 2021 - 8:06pm
 
Our tolerance for opposing views - Isabeau - Jan 15, 2021 - 2:14pm
 
What is the meaning of this? - Isabeau - Jan 15, 2021 - 2:00pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jan 15, 2021 - 12:47pm
 
what the hell, miamizsun? - oldviolin - Jan 15, 2021 - 10:20am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Jan 15, 2021 - 9:51am
 
Physics questions - oldviolin - Jan 15, 2021 - 8:56am
 
Classical Music - rhahl - Jan 15, 2021 - 6:48am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - miamizsun - Jan 15, 2021 - 6:10am
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Jan 15, 2021 - 5:55am
 
Back to the 10's - rhahl - Jan 15, 2021 - 5:37am
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Proclivities - Jan 15, 2021 - 4:58am
 
Twitter's finest moment - Jiggz - Jan 15, 2021 - 1:28am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - oldviolin - Jan 14, 2021 - 8:14pm
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Jan 14, 2021 - 8:09pm
 
In My Room - oldviolin - Jan 14, 2021 - 7:58pm
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - R_P - Jan 14, 2021 - 5:25pm
 
Insane-looking Lawyers - rhahl - Jan 14, 2021 - 4:14pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jan 14, 2021 - 2:54pm
 
Joe Biden - black321 - Jan 14, 2021 - 2:07pm
 
Race in America - sirdroseph - Jan 14, 2021 - 12:32pm
 
New Music - R_P - Jan 14, 2021 - 12:11pm
 
hallucinogenic drugs - sirdroseph - Jan 14, 2021 - 11:09am
 
Back to the 90's - rgio - Jan 14, 2021 - 7:47am
 
Concept Albums - oldviolin - Jan 14, 2021 - 7:34am
 
Democratic Party - kurtster - Jan 14, 2021 - 6:17am
 
Biden Crime Family - westslope - Jan 13, 2021 - 6:59pm
 
2 questions. - miamizsun - Jan 13, 2021 - 5:30pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Jan 13, 2021 - 5:12pm
 
Impeachment Time: - R_P - Jan 13, 2021 - 2:49pm
 
Back to the 60's - kcar - Jan 13, 2021 - 2:45pm
 
Oh, The Stupidity - R_P - Jan 13, 2021 - 2:16pm
 
Know your memes - black321 - Jan 13, 2021 - 12:02pm
 
Republican Party - miamizsun - Jan 13, 2021 - 10:53am
 
The Global War on Terror - westslope - Jan 13, 2021 - 9:36am
 
Great guitar faces - yuel - Jan 13, 2021 - 6:37am
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - miamizsun - Jan 13, 2021 - 4:41am
 
• • • Poopoo • • • - miamizsun - Jan 13, 2021 - 4:15am
 
Those Lovable Policemen - haresfur - Jan 12, 2021 - 5:26pm
 
Military Matters - Ohmsen - Jan 12, 2021 - 2:00pm
 
Dear Retail Fashion Industry - Ohmsen - Jan 12, 2021 - 1:30pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » 2020 Elections Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 118, 119, 120  Next
Post to this Topic
VV

VV Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 23, 2020 - 8:45am



 sirdroseph wrote:
 

Wait there is evidence of election fraud out there.?.... 
 
Well slap my ass and call me “Sally”!
 
By all means let’s finally see it!


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 23, 2020 - 8:17am

 
 
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 23, 2020 - 8:06am

 
Meanwhile back at the ranch.......
 
 

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Ron Raffensperger, the Brother of Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, Works for Huawei in China – How Close Are They to the China Government?

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 22, 2020 - 11:14pm

 AliGator wrote:
Who the fuck is Jiggz and why are you engaging with them?
 
It's a reincarnation...
AliGator

AliGator Avatar



Posted: Dec 22, 2020 - 8:48pm

Who the fuck is Jiggz and why are you engaging with them?
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 22, 2020 - 8:18pm

 Steely_D wrote:

And, yet, this will do absolutely nothing to convince Jiggz or KK or any of the other mind's-made-up folks.
Such a waste of time to unravel their word salads, but to let their ludicrous late-night-AM-radio-conspiracy crap continue is worse.
 
Thank goodness for CNN.  You guys get your CT's broadcast in broad daylight in the middle of the day.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Dec 22, 2020 - 10:13am



 Steely_D wrote:


And, yet, this will do absolutely nothing to convince Jiggz or KK or any of the other mind's-made-up folks.
Such a waste of time to unravel their word salads, but to let their ludicrous late-night-AM-radio-conspiracy crap continue is worse.
 
Yes. 

This is the dilemma, isn’t it?
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 22, 2020 - 9:40am

Trump Plots to Overturn Election: An Attack on Democracy or a Scheme to Make Millions for Himself?
Steely_D

Steely_D Avatar

Location: Biscayne Bay
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 6:12pm



 steeler wrote:


 Jiggz wrote:


. . . 


This is not accurate. Many of the court cases were decided on the merits, not on “technicalities.”. They did not go to trial, but that is true of the vast majority of civil cases, which are regularly decided based on motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss. Some of these challenges have not only been dismissed, they have been dismissed with prejudice. In lay (slang)English, that is the judge saying “don’t bring this shit back here.” Quite a few of the judges dismissing these claims have done so in scathing language, underscoring the lack of support in fact and law. When you see language like that, it means the judge sees the claims as bordering on, if not, frivolous.These dismissals have come from state and federal judges, including  judges appointed by Republicans or who are Republicans. It defies credibility to assume these judges have it in for Trump or lack the courage to make the right call on these cases or some other spurious explanation. 

The reality is that it has been about 7 weeks since the election and plaintiffs have been unable to provide credible evidence to prove their extraordinary claims of massive voter fraud orchestrated by the Democrats. They have not been prohibited from doing so. They have not come close to meeting their burden of proof.


 

And, yet, this will do absolutely nothing to convince Jiggz or KK or any of the other mind's-made-up folks.
Such a waste of time to unravel their word salads, but to let their ludicrous late-night-AM-radio-conspiracy crap continue is worse.
Coaxial

Coaxial Avatar

Location: 543 miles west of Paradis,1491 miles eas
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 5:52pm

 hayduke2 wrote: 
That train left the station a long time ago.
hayduke2

hayduke2 Avatar

Location: Southampton, NY
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 4:42pm

 Trump Is Losing His Mind 
kcar

kcar Avatar



Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 4:28pm

Even Pat Robertson is saying that Trump should stop contesting the election results and move on. 


Televangelist Pat Robertson says it’s time for Trump to accept Biden’s win and ‘move on’



Televangelist Pat Robertson, one of President Trump’s staunchest backers, on Monday described Trump as “very erratic,” called on him to accept that President-elect Joe Biden won and said the Republican should not consider running again in 2024.

The comments marked a sharp turnaround for Robertson, who recently voiced support for Trump’s false claims of widespread voter fraud and declared before the election that God had told him Trump was going to win.

“I think it’s a sideshow,” Robertson said Monday on his television show, “The 700 Club,” when asked whether he thinks Trump should run again in 2024. “I think it would be a mistake. My money would be on Nikki Haley; I think she’d make a tremendous candidate for the Republican Party.”

Trump has refused to concede after losing to Biden on Nov. 3 and has redoubled efforts to overturn the election results even after the electoral college affirmed the Democrat’s win with 306 electoral votes. The president also has hinted that he may run again in four years.

Robertson said that Trump has “done a marvelous job for the economy, but at the same time, he is very erratic, and he’s fired people and he’s fought people and he’s insulted people and he keeps going down the line.”

“And so, it’s a mixed bag,” he said. “And I think it would be well to say, ‘You’ve had your day and it’s time to move on.’”



haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 4:07pm



 Jiggz wrote:


 


 
Just a quick something to interject with here - as far as I know, to date not a single judge has heard a single presentation of any testimony or evidence.
Every case has been kicked down the road on a procedural issue or somesuch technicality around standing or suchlike, which is very suspicious to a lot of people, not just Trump supporters.

Not a single court has given any litigant an opportunity to present any evidence or facts or argue their case.


Legacy media tells you that cases have been thrown out of court but doesn't tell you that they have not actually been heard in court.
Not once.
 
You don't seem to understand the legal process. The litigants presented their evidence, such as it was (or in this case presented that they didn't really have any evidence), in their filings to the court. We can assume the judges read the material presented and decided that they could make a legal ruling based on what was presented. Having them stand up in court and present the same stuff wouldn't change anything.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 2:10pm



 Jiggz wrote:
Legacy media tells you that cases have been thrown out of court but doesn't tell you that they have not actually been heard in court.
Not once.

Which begs the question - why not?
Much like with the Hunter Biden laptop story, nobody has really once-and-for-all tried to refute any of the election irregularity claims or testimonies.
 
Bill Barr
just refuted both election irregularities and Hunter Biden's laptop.    Please explain.

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 10:40am

 Lazy8 wrote:
Jiggz wrote:


Wow that's compelling: a secondhand account of a secondhand account of an overheard conversation as reported by...a member of the Texas lege? I mean, he oughta know—every member of the Texas lege is well-connected at the US Supreme Court, they get all the scuttlebutt.

You know it's true because it's on C-SPAN.

...who fact-checked this claim. Here's what they said:
Matt Patrick CD32 fabricates a story about SCOTUS on the TX vs PA case.  SCOTUS did not meet in person, so the entire premise of the story is a lie.


A viral 4chan hoax about Chief Justice John Roberts tricked a presidential elector and pro-Trump media
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 9:51am



 steeler wrote:

This is not accurate. Many of the court cases were decided on the merits, not on “technicalities.”. They did not go to trial, but that is true of the vast majority of civil cases, which are regularly decided based on motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss. Some of these challenges have not only been dismissed, they have been dismissed with prejudice. In lay (slang)English, that is the judge saying “don’t bring this shit back here.” Quite a few of the judges dismissing these claims have done so in scathing language, underscoring the lack of support in fact and law. When you see language like that, it means the judge sees the claims as bordering on, if not, frivolous.These dismissals have come from state and federal judges, including  judges appointed by Republicans or who are Republicans. It defies credibility to assume these judges have it in for Trump or lack the courage to make the right call on these cases or some other spurious explanation. 

The reality is that it has been about 7 weeks since the election and plaintiffs have been unable to provide credible evidence to prove their extraordinary claims of massive voter fraud orchestrated by the Democrats. They have not been prohibited from doing so. They have not come close to meeting their burden of proof.


 



+1
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 9:42am



 Jiggz wrote:


 
Just a quick something to interject with here - as far as I know, to date not a single judge has heard a single presentation of any testimony or evidence.
Every case has been kicked down the road on a procedural issue or somesuch technicality around standing or suchlike, which is very suspicious to a lot of people, not just Trump supporters.

Not a single court has given any litigant an opportunity to present any evidence or facts or argue their case.

Legacy media tells you that cases have been thrown out of court but doesn't tell you that they have not actually been heard in court.
Not once.

Which begs the question - why not?
Much like with the Hunter Biden laptop story, nobody has really once-and-for-all tried to refute any of the election irregularity claims or testimonies.

So many questions.....and nobody has tried to answer any. ....just *crickets*......or denial. obfuscation, stonewalling, duck-n-dive, screeches of "conspiracy theorists" and "Trump Lies", and calls to "move on".
Or Facebook fact-checks........or pieces on NYT or WP or WSJ.
Which fewer and fewer are believing or swallowing anymore.

Nobody, least of all "just-your- less- than- average - Joe", says "OK, lets give them a an opportunity to make their case before a court. Let a court decide."


Hear their case at least?
What's to lose?

What are you all so afraid of?

Worst case scenario - some honest decent judge hears their case or some aspect of it, decides in their favour, a certain small element of the election is de-certified, and the rest of the house of cards, county-by-county, state-by-state tumbles down and you get another four more years of Trump.
Is that it?
Is that the worst of your fears?

Get a grip on yourself.

. . . 


This is not accurate. Many of the court cases were decided on the merits, not on “technicalities.”. They did not go to trial, but that is true of the vast majority of civil cases, which are regularly decided based on motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss. Some of these challenges have not only been dismissed, they have been dismissed with prejudice. In lay (slang)English, that is the judge saying “don’t bring this shit back here.” Quite a few of the judges dismissing these claims have done so in scathing language, underscoring the lack of support in fact and law. When you see language like that, it means the judge sees the claims as bordering on, if not, frivolous.These dismissals have come from state and federal judges, including  judges appointed by Republicans or who are Republicans. It defies credibility to assume these judges have it in for Trump or lack the courage to make the right call on these cases or some other spurious explanation. 

The reality is that it has been about 7 weeks since the election and plaintiffs have been unable to provide credible evidence to prove their extraordinary claims of massive voter fraud orchestrated by the Democrats. They have not been prohibited from doing so. They have not come close to meeting their burden of proof.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 8:33am

 VV wrote:


 Jiggz wrote:


 kcar wrote:


 R_P wrote:
Rand 'Toad' Paul: ‘Somebody Has To Do Something’ About GA Election Fraud
Maybe purge some rolls...
Brian Kilmeade did his part. He “asked” Paul, “You think the election was stolen, you tweeted out?”

“Absolutely. I think there’s a great deal of fraud, and it’s not the first time,” Paul said. He then cited “the famous story” of voter fraud by Lyndon Baines Johnson from 1948 which, as Mediaite noted, was a charge the U.S. Supreme Court dropped for lack of evidence and proof.
 

Actually, LBJ or people supporting his campaign did cheat in 1948. Robert Caro's brilliant book "The Means of Ascent" documented those efforts. According to Wikipedia, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black handed down the decision that the federal government could not intervene in a state election.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

https://www.washingtonpost.com...

https://www.nytimes.com/1977/0...
Here's the difference between 1948 and 2020: all the claims of 2020 election fraud have been exhaustively examined and ruled upon by the courts. State and federal governments have examined the presidential election and claims of fraud. Lawyers for Trump have had EVERY opportunity to provide evidence of fraud to back up their claims.

Nothing came of it. Even though Republican officials and Trump-appointed judges examined the claims. By and large Trump's lawyers have made complete fools of themselves in court.

So let's stop with the fraud and conspiracy crap. RPers talking this story up need to get a grip. If there was evidence of fraud, just about every news organization in the country would jump on that story because it would be the story of the decade.

The show's over. Just because Trump spews a claim of fraud doesn't make it true. Some of you may not ever grasp that fact but there it is.
 
Just a quick something to interject with here - as far as I know, to date not a single judge has heard a single presentation of any testimony or evidence.
Every case has been kicked down the road on a procedural issue or somesuch technicality around standing or suchlike, which is very suspicious to a lot of people, not just Trump supporters.

Not a single court has given any litigant an opportunity to present any evidence or facts or argue their case.

Legacy media tells you that cases have been thrown out of court but doesn't tell you that they have not actually been heard in court.
Not once.

Which begs the question - why not?
Much like with the Hunter Biden laptop story, nobody has really once-and-for-all tried to refute any of the election irregularity claims or testimonies.

So many questions.....and nobody has tried to answer any. ....just *crickets*......or denial. obfuscation, stonewalling, duck-n-dive, screeches of "conspiracy theorists" and "Trump Lies", and calls to "move on".
Or Facebook fact-checks........or pieces on NYT or WP or WSJ.
Which fewer and fewer are believing or swallowing anymore.

Nobody, least of all "just-your- less- than- average - Joe", says "OK, lets give them a an opportunity to make their case before a court. Let a court decide."
Hear their case at least?
What's to lose?

What are you all so afraid of?

Worst case scenario - some honest decent judge hears their case or some aspect of it, decides in their favour, a certain small element of the election is de-certified, and the rest of the house of cards, county-by-county, state-by-state tumbles down and you get another four more years of Trump.
Is that it?
Is that the worst of your fears?

Get a grip on yourself.

Oh, and maybe many people will go to jail.
All those filling in 20 or 30 fake ballots every night after work, making Facebook posts about 'every day doing their little bit, their little something, to get rid of Donald Trump".

I have been watching clips of people being sentenced to jail for voter fraud.
There are lots of those clips.  
A mayor gets 25 years, a poll worker who voted twice gets five. That's plenty enough.

I believe Gitmo has recently been substantially expanded, which is odd at a time when MIddle-Eastern troops are being brought home etc.

Maybe it's to be filled with Antifa and BLM and election riggers? Maybe the Zuck too, but he'll probably get a little section to himself.

Interesting times ahead, for sure!
 
Jiggz,

Aren’t you too old to be believing in fairy tales? 



 
Maybe he does or maybe he doesn't, but can you answer his questions?
VV

VV Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 21, 2020 - 8:28am



 Jiggz wrote:


 kcar wrote:


 R_P wrote:
Rand 'Toad' Paul: ‘Somebody Has To Do Something’ About GA Election Fraud
Maybe purge some rolls...
Brian Kilmeade did his part. He “asked” Paul, “You think the election was stolen, you tweeted out?”

“Absolutely. I think there’s a great deal of fraud, and it’s not the first time,” Paul said. He then cited “the famous story” of voter fraud by Lyndon Baines Johnson from 1948 which, as Mediaite noted, was a charge the U.S. Supreme Court dropped for lack of evidence and proof.

 

Actually, LBJ or people supporting his campaign did cheat in 1948. Robert Caro's brilliant book "The Means of Ascent" documented those efforts. According to Wikipedia, Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black handed down the decision that the federal government could not intervene in a state election.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

https://www.washingtonpost.com...

https://www.nytimes.com/1977/0...


Here's the difference between 1948 and 2020: all the claims of 2020 election fraud have been exhaustively examined and ruled upon by the courts. State and federal governments have examined the presidential election and claims of fraud. Lawyers for Trump have had EVERY opportunity to provide evidence of fraud to back up their claims.

Nothing came of it. Even though Republican officials and Trump-appointed judges examined the claims. By and large Trump's lawyers have made complete fools of themselves in court.

So let's stop with the fraud and conspiracy crap. RPers talking this story up need to get a grip. If there was evidence of fraud, just about every news organization in the country would jump on that story because it would be the story of the decade.

The show's over. Just because Trump spews a claim of fraud doesn't make it true. Some of you may not ever grasp that fact but there it is.
 
Just a quick something to interject with here - as far as I know, to date not a single judge has heard a single presentation of any testimony or evidence.
Every case has been kicked down the road on a procedural issue or somesuch technicality around standing or suchlike, which is very suspicious to a lot of people, not just Trump supporters.

Not a single court has given any litigant an opportunity to present any evidence or facts or argue their case.

Legacy media tells you that cases have been thrown out of court but doesn't tell you that they have not actually been heard in court.
Not once.

Which begs the question - why not?
Much like with the Hunter Biden laptop story, nobody has really once-and-for-all tried to refute any of the election irregularity claims or testimonies.

So many questions.....and nobody has tried to answer any. ....just *crickets*......or denial. obfuscation, stonewalling, duck-n-dive, screeches of "conspiracy theorists" and "Trump Lies", and calls to "move on".
Or Facebook fact-checks........or pieces on NYT or WP or WSJ.
Which fewer and fewer are believing or swallowing anymore.

Nobody, least of all "just-your- less- than- average - Joe", says "OK, lets give them a an opportunity to make their case before a court. Let a court decide."


Hear their case at least?
What's to lose?

What are you all so afraid of?

Worst case scenario - some honest decent judge hears their case or some aspect of it, decides in their favour, a certain small element of the election is de-certified, and the rest of the house of cards, county-by-county, state-by-state tumbles down and you get another four more years of Trump.
Is that it?
Is that the worst of your fears?

Get a grip on yourself.

Oh, and maybe many people will go to jail.
All those filling in 20 or 30 fake ballots every night after work, making Facebook posts about 'every day doing their little bit, their little something, to get rid of Donald Trump".

I have been watching clips of people being sentenced to jail for voter fraud.
There are lots of those clips.  
A mayor gets 25 years, a poll worker who voted twice gets five. That's plenty enough.

I believe Gitmo has recently been substantially expanded, which is odd at a time when MIddle-Eastern troops are being brought home etc.

Maybe it's to be filled with Antifa and BLM and election riggers? Maybe the Zuck too, but he'll probably get a little section to himself.

Interesting times ahead, for sure!
 
Jiggz,

Aren’t you too old to be believing in fairy tales? 



R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Dec 20, 2020 - 10:35am

Trump Weighed Naming Election Conspiracy Theorist as Special Counsel
In a meeting at the White House on Friday, President Trump weighed appointing Sidney Powell, who promoted conspiracy theories about rigged voting machines, to investigate voter fraud.
President Trump on Friday discussed naming Sidney Powell, who as a lawyer for his campaign team unleashed conspiracy theories about a Venezuelan plot to rig voting machines in the United States, to be a special counsel overseeing an investigation of voter fraud, according to two people briefed on the discussion.

It was unclear if Mr. Trump will move ahead with such a plan.

Most of his advisers opposed the idea, two of the people briefed on the discussion said, including Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer. In recent days Mr. Giuliani has sought to have the Department of Homeland Security join the campaign’s efforts to overturn Mr. Trump’s loss in the election.

Mr. Giuliani joined the discussion by phone initially, while Ms. Powell was at the White House for a meeting that became raucous and involved people shouting at each other at times, according to one of the people briefed on what took place.

Ms. Powell’s client, retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, the former national security adviser whom the president recently pardoned, was also there, two of the people briefed on the meeting said. Some senior administration officials drifted in and out of the meeting.

During an appearance on the conservative Newsmax channel this week, Mr. Flynn pushed for Mr. Trump to impose martial law and deploy the military to “rerun” the election. At one point in the meeting on Friday, Mr. Trump asked about that idea. (...)

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 118, 119, 120  Next