[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Things You Thought Today - black321 - Sep 28, 2020 - 9:02am
 
Trump - rgio - Sep 28, 2020 - 9:01am
 
COVID-19 - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 28, 2020 - 8:56am
 
RP App for Android - bevgerry - Sep 28, 2020 - 8:52am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Sep 28, 2020 - 8:00am
 
Radio Paradise NFL Pick'em Group - miamizsun - Sep 28, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Sep 28, 2020 - 7:53am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - buckshot - Sep 28, 2020 - 5:30am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Sep 28, 2020 - 5:13am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Sep 28, 2020 - 3:06am
 
Climate Change - R_P - Sep 28, 2020 - 12:05am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Sep 27, 2020 - 8:02pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Sep 27, 2020 - 6:26pm
 
What Did You Do Today? - oldviolin - Sep 27, 2020 - 6:09pm
 
The American Dream - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2020 - 4:02pm
 
Crazy conspiracy theories - Red_Dragon - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:58pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:50pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - haresfur - Sep 27, 2020 - 2:33pm
 
Classical Music - R_P - Sep 27, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Twitter's finest moment - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 11:23am
 
KUDOS for BillG - miamizsun - Sep 27, 2020 - 9:04am
 
What are you reading now? - rhahl - Sep 27, 2020 - 7:48am
 
Dial 1 for English - westslope - Sep 27, 2020 - 7:45am
 
Supreme Court: Who's Next? - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 5:02pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Sep 26, 2020 - 4:27pm
 
Khruangbin - Red_Dragon - Sep 26, 2020 - 3:36pm
 
Strips, cartoons, illustrations - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 2:19pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Sep 26, 2020 - 12:19pm
 
2020 Elections - Steely_D - Sep 26, 2020 - 11:10am
 
How's the weather? - westslope - Sep 26, 2020 - 7:20am
 
Looting & vandalism isn't protest - Red_Dragon - Sep 25, 2020 - 1:17pm
 
Integration of RP app with Apple Music playlists - BillG - Sep 25, 2020 - 12:14pm
 
Canada - westslope - Sep 25, 2020 - 12:03pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Sep 25, 2020 - 10:58am
 
This is Odd, Gross and a good excuse to be late for work - miamizsun - Sep 25, 2020 - 10:08am
 
Amazing animals! - rhahl - Sep 25, 2020 - 8:11am
 
Drop the Puck! NHL Lockout Ends! - sunybuny - Sep 25, 2020 - 5:35am
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Sep 24, 2020 - 7:35pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 24, 2020 - 4:32pm
 
Animal Resistance - R_P - Sep 24, 2020 - 4:13pm
 
Bluesound Sound Dropouts - BillG - Sep 24, 2020 - 12:02pm
 
Language - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 10:12am
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - miamizsun - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:59am
 
Film & Video Production - rgio - Sep 24, 2020 - 5:11am
 
Quotes: Your Favorite Comedians - Ohmsen - Sep 24, 2020 - 1:07am
 
Questions. - whatshisname - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:10pm
 
American Justice - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 6:09pm
 
Your favourite conspiracy theory? - R_P - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:56pm
 
*** PUNS *** ASTRONOMY - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:24pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - buddy - Sep 23, 2020 - 4:21pm
 
The Obituary Page - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:56am
 
It's the economy stupid. - Red_Dragon - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
how do you feel right now? - Steely_D - Sep 23, 2020 - 10:27am
 
WikiLeaks - Ohmsen - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:58am
 
Favorite Quotes - Coaxial - Sep 23, 2020 - 7:39am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Sep 22, 2020 - 9:16pm
 
Evolution! - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 8:50pm
 
Trump Lies - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 2:45pm
 
Brazil - R_P - Sep 22, 2020 - 1:57pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 22, 2020 - 7:49am
 
Things I'd LIKE to find at my house. - Antigone - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:31pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Steely_D - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:13pm
 
RP Main Mix on TuneIn unavailable? - DianaLipka - Sep 21, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Best Song Comments. - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Sep 21, 2020 - 5:37am
 
Trolls at RP - Steely_D - Sep 20, 2020 - 4:41pm
 
Facebook Tips - Ohmsen - Sep 20, 2020 - 2:37pm
 
Environment - R_P - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:56am
 
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone - oldviolin - Sep 20, 2020 - 9:15am
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 7:29am
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - miamizsun - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:46am
 
Republican Party - sirdroseph - Sep 20, 2020 - 6:14am
 
FLAC Streaming - gsbaronnier - Sep 20, 2020 - 3:24am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 4:57pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Sep 19, 2020 - 2:17pm
 
TV shows you watch - KurtfromLaQuinta - Sep 19, 2020 - 12:57pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » 2020 Elections Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
Post to this Topic
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: May 25, 2020 - 12:38pm

I read this on the innerwebs and I laugh:  

“lesser-of-two-rapists”


cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: May 14, 2020 - 10:14am



 oldviolin wrote:


 miamizsun wrote:


you've got my vote
 
Lights at the end of the barrel, brah. Watch for the break. Beware the undertoad...

 And keep passing the open windows...

c.



kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: drifting
Gender: Male


Posted: May 14, 2020 - 4:13am

 cc_rider wrote:


 JrzyTmata wrote:


 Jared scares me more than Trump

 Agreed.
c.
 
That is three of us.  I have never been a fan of him at any level and wished he was gone from the beginning.
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 12:15pm



 miamizsun wrote:


you've got my vote
 
Lights at the end of the barrel, brah. Watch for the break. Beware the undertoad...

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 10:00am

 oldviolin wrote:

I think I'll just show up and surf the wallflowers...

 

you've got my vote
oldviolin

oldviolin Avatar

Location: esse quam videri
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 8:41am



 Lazy8 wrote:
islander wrote:

Jared Kushner clarifies after saying he’s ‘not sure’ he can commit to date for presidential election



https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/05/13/jared-kushner-presidential-election


That's ok, I'll take someone else.
 
I think I'll just show up and surf the wallflowers...

Lazy8

Lazy8 Avatar

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 8:22am

islander wrote:

Jared Kushner clarifies after saying he’s ‘not sure’ he can commit to date for presidential election



https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/05/13/jared-kushner-presidential-election


That's ok, I'll take someone else.
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 7:55am



 JrzyTmata wrote:


 

 
Jared scares me more than Trump

 Agreed.
c.


JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: May 13, 2020 - 7:51am



 cc_rider wrote:


 islander wrote:

Jared Kushner clarifies after saying he’s ‘not sure’ he can commit to date for presidential election



https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/05/13/jared-kushner-presidential-election


 
I am so glad Mr. Kushner has taken control of the entire United States government, including deciding when (and if) we will hold elections. I feel much safer now.
c.

 
Jared scares me more than Trump

cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 7:50am



 islander wrote:

Jared Kushner clarifies after saying he’s ‘not sure’ he can commit to date for presidential election



https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/05/13/jared-kushner-presidential-election


 
I am so glad Mr. Kushner has taken control of the entire United States government, including deciding when (and if) we will hold elections. I feel much safer now.
c.

rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 7:17am



 islander wrote:

Jared Kushner clarifies after saying he’s ‘not sure’ he can commit to date for presidential election



https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/05/13/jared-kushner-presidential-election



 
So we need to hurry up and get everyone back to work....but we're not sure if we can organize a safe election in 5.5 months.  Seems reasonable.

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: May 13, 2020 - 6:55am

Jared Kushner clarifies after saying he’s ‘not sure’ he can commit to date for presidential election



https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/05/13/jared-kushner-presidential-election



Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Apr 27, 2020 - 6:47am

AP-NORC poll: Rising support for mail voting amid pandemic
KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Apr 12, 2020 - 10:37am

Joe Biden Said He Believes All Women. Does He Believe Tara Reade?

A former staffer says he sexually assaulted her in 1993.


https://reason.com/2020/03/26/joe-biden-tara-reade-sexual-assault-me-too-believe-women/


“C’mon man, I heard you liked me.”



Creepy Joe 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-woman-who-accused-biden-of-sexual-assault-files-criminal-complaint-with-police/


KarmaKarma

KarmaKarma Avatar



Posted: Apr 10, 2020 - 12:48pm

Creepy Joe.

Biden Cuts Hole In Mask So He Can Still Sniff People's Hair


https://babylonbee.com/news/bi...

cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 10, 2020 - 8:43am



 steeler wrote:



 
We are on the proverbial slippery slope. 

I have no answers. Just a sense of foreboding.

 John Roberts has a lot to answer for. His court has undermined the foundations of our democracy. I fear we will reap what he has sown.
c.


steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 10, 2020 - 8:41am



 islander wrote:


 steeler wrote:


 islander wrote:


 haresfur wrote:


 
I thought Garland was a compromise choice that Obama thought he could get confirmed by the senate

 

He was. And the senate, led by that mealy fuckwit mitch mcconnell jr. blocked him for no legitimate reason.  Supreme court nominees should be a compromise. They should be people that we all agree can make rational decisions that would fairly consider the reasoning from 'our' side, no matter which side that is.  It's fine if they are conservative, or liberal, but they should be acceptable to all.  And Garland should have been. He was a good choice (even if the reason was compromise). He deserves that seat.   I know it won't happen because politics and the culture war we are in demands that we put the youngest possible person in place to have a reliable vote for the longest time. But that reasoning just gives the other side (no matter which side) reasons to question the legitimacy of the court, and it does it ofr the longest time. 

It's really important that people have faith in their government. The problems of the electoral college, and the disproportionate senate representational power are looming along with a growing distrust of the court. If nothing is done, we will eventually reach a tipping point where a sizable portion of the populace won't feel they have any recourse through the system they live under. When that happens what are their options?  If they can't get a 'bernie' style person into the system, they will want to opt out of the system. Then the only recourse the system has is violence to get them to comply.   I don't see how that ends well. Compromise has to happen somewhere. It may need to be forced. I would have given the fuckwit mcconnell jr. credit if he had accepted the olive branch that was offered, but he didn't. So I say offer it a 2nd time. If it Garland gets appointed it shows that at least one side is willing to not go full war political. If it isn't reciprocated later, then there is always time for a real revolution later.

 
Past giants of the Supreme Court would have no chance of getting on the court today. That should speak for itself. Sadly, it does not. A poignant example of reap and sow. 

 
The road we are on goes to a bad place. Some one has to tap the brakes and try and find an exit. Right now everyone is sleeping with a coke can taped to the steering wheel to trick the autopilot mode. What could go wrong?

 
We are on the proverbial slippery slope. 

I have no answers. Just a sense of foreboding.

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 10, 2020 - 8:27am



 steeler wrote:


 islander wrote:


 haresfur wrote:


 
I thought Garland was a compromise choice that Obama thought he could get confirmed by the senate

 

He was. And the senate, led by that mealy fuckwit mitch mcconnell jr. blocked him for no legitimate reason.  Supreme court nominees should be a compromise. They should be people that we all agree can make rational decisions that would fairly consider the reasoning from 'our' side, no matter which side that is.  It's fine if they are conservative, or liberal, but they should be acceptable to all.  And Garland should have been. He was a good choice (even if the reason was compromise). He deserves that seat.   I know it won't happen because politics and the culture war we are in demands that we put the youngest possible person in place to have a reliable vote for the longest time. But that reasoning just gives the other side (no matter which side) reasons to question the legitimacy of the court, and it does it ofr the longest time. 

It's really important that people have faith in their government. The problems of the electoral college, and the disproportionate senate representational power are looming along with a growing distrust of the court. If nothing is done, we will eventually reach a tipping point where a sizable portion of the populace won't feel they have any recourse through the system they live under. When that happens what are their options?  If they can't get a 'bernie' style person into the system, they will want to opt out of the system. Then the only recourse the system has is violence to get them to comply.   I don't see how that ends well. Compromise has to happen somewhere. It may need to be forced. I would have given the fuckwit mcconnell jr. credit if he had accepted the olive branch that was offered, but he didn't. So I say offer it a 2nd time. If it Garland gets appointed it shows that at least one side is willing to not go full war political. If it isn't reciprocated later, then there is always time for a real revolution later.

 
Past giants of the Supreme Court would have no chance of getting on the court today. That should speak for itself. Sadly, it does not. A poignant example of reap and sow. 

 
The road we are on goes to a bad place. Some one has to tap the brakes and try and find an exit. Right now everyone is sleeping with a coke can taped to the steering wheel to trick the autopilot mode. What could go wrong?

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 10, 2020 - 8:21am



 islander wrote:


 haresfur wrote:


 islander wrote:


 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
Can Biden choose Obama as veep?
 
Yes, and the strict constitutionalists seem to agree that Obama could serve as president via succession. 

Edit: but my assumption is that Biden will appoint Obama to the Supreme Court.

 

I'm not opposed to this, but just to drive the point home I would love to see Merrick Garland get the nod as RBG steps down.  I know, politics, younger, seats, control blah blah blah.  I want to see a little justices for the justice. 
 
I thought Garland was a compromise choice that Obama thought he could get confirmed by the senate

 

He was. And the senate, led by that mealy fuckwit mitch mcconnell jr. blocked him for no legitimate reason.  Supreme court nominees should be a compromise. They should be people that we all agree can make rational decisions that would fairly consider the reasoning from 'our' side, no matter which side that is.  It's fine if they are conservative, or liberal, but they should be acceptable to all.  And Garland should have been. He was a good choice (even if the reason was compromise). He deserves that seat.   I know it won't happen because politics and the culture war we are in demands that we put the youngest possible person in place to have a reliable vote for the longest time. But that reasoning just gives the other side (no matter which side) reasons to question the legitimacy of the court, and it does it ofr the longest time. 

It's really important that people have faith in their government. The problems of the electoral college, and the disproportionate senate representational power are looming along with a growing distrust of the court. If nothing is done, we will eventually reach a tipping point where a sizable portion of the populace won't feel they have any recourse through the system they live under. When that happens what are their options?  If they can't get a 'bernie' style person into the system, they will want to opt out of the system. Then the only recourse the system has is violence to get them to comply.   I don't see how that ends well. Compromise has to happen somewhere. It may need to be forced. I would have given the fuckwit mcconnell jr. credit if he had accepted the olive branch that was offered, but he didn't. So I say offer it a 2nd time. If it Garland gets appointed it shows that at least one side is willing to not go full war political. If it isn't reciprocated later, then there is always time for a real revolution later.

 
Past giants of the Supreme Court would have no chance of getting on the court today. That should speak for itself. Sadly, it does not. A poignant example of reap and sow. 

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 10, 2020 - 7:48am



 haresfur wrote:


 islander wrote:


 ScottFromWyoming wrote:


 Red_Dragon wrote:
Can Biden choose Obama as veep?
 
Yes, and the strict constitutionalists seem to agree that Obama could serve as president via succession. 

Edit: but my assumption is that Biden will appoint Obama to the Supreme Court.

 

I'm not opposed to this, but just to drive the point home I would love to see Merrick Garland get the nod as RBG steps down.  I know, politics, younger, seats, control blah blah blah.  I want to see a little justices for the justice. 
 
I thought Garland was a compromise choice that Obama thought he could get confirmed by the senate

 

He was. And the senate, led by that mealy fuckwit mitch mcconnell jr. blocked him for no legitimate reason.  Supreme court nominees should be a compromise. They should be people that we all agree can make rational decisions that would fairly consider the reasoning from 'our' side, no matter which side that is.  It's fine if they are conservative, or liberal, but they should be acceptable to all.  And Garland should have been. He was a good choice (even if the reason was compromise). He deserves that seat.   I know it won't happen because politics and the culture war we are in demands that we put the youngest possible person in place to have a reliable vote for the longest time. But that reasoning just gives the other side (no matter which side) reasons to question the legitimacy of the court, and it does it ofr the longest time. 

It's really important that people have faith in their government. The problems of the electoral college, and the disproportionate senate representational power are looming along with a growing distrust of the court. If nothing is done, we will eventually reach a tipping point where a sizable portion of the populace won't feel they have any recourse through the system they live under. When that happens what are their options?  If they can't get a 'bernie' style person into the system, they will want to opt out of the system. Then the only recourse the system has is violence to get them to comply.   I don't see how that ends well. Compromise has to happen somewhere. It may need to be forced. I would have given the fuckwit mcconnell jr. credit if he had accepted the olive branch that was offered, but he didn't. So I say offer it a 2nd time. If it Garland gets appointed it shows that at least one side is willing to not go full war political. If it isn't reciprocated later, then there is always time for a real revolution later.

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 24, 25, 26  Next