[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Apr 12, 2021 - 6:40am
 
Immigration - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 6:35am
 
Race in America - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 6:03am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:31am
 
Race/Ethnicity-Genetics Connection - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:25am
 
Media Bias - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:16am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Apr 12, 2021 - 5:12am
 
Guns - sirdroseph - Apr 12, 2021 - 4:37am
 
The Netherlands - second - Blackbirds - Apr 12, 2021 - 2:42am
 
Two sexes or ? Gender as a non-binary concept - Jiggz - Apr 12, 2021 - 1:55am
 
A Brave Woman - Jiggz - Apr 12, 2021 - 1:48am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Apr 11, 2021 - 7:49pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - Lazy8 - Apr 11, 2021 - 4:02pm
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 3:16pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 2:54pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Apr 11, 2021 - 2:16pm
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 8:41am
 
Poetry Forum - GeneP59 - Apr 11, 2021 - 8:28am
 
Death Metal - westslope - Apr 11, 2021 - 8:21am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Apr 11, 2021 - 7:01am
 
Extraordinary Machine - miamizsun - Apr 11, 2021 - 6:50am
 
Iran - Red_Dragon - Apr 11, 2021 - 6:48am
 
Bring Back the New RP Fonts! - GeneP59 - Apr 10, 2021 - 7:56pm
 
Play the Blues - rhahl - Apr 10, 2021 - 4:50pm
 
Tech & Science - R_P - Apr 10, 2021 - 2:37pm
 
New Music - R_P - Apr 10, 2021 - 11:30am
 
Live Music - sirdroseph - Apr 10, 2021 - 5:53am
 
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes (and Taxes) - rhahl - Apr 10, 2021 - 5:27am
 
Economix - sirdroseph - Apr 10, 2021 - 4:50am
 
Freedom of speech? - sirdroseph - Apr 10, 2021 - 4:11am
 
So, where do you go, what happens? - oldviolin - Apr 9, 2021 - 6:15pm
 
Automotive Lust - R_P - Apr 9, 2021 - 3:07pm
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - scoots_mcgoo - Apr 9, 2021 - 3:05pm
 
Funny Videos - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 9, 2021 - 2:56pm
 
First World Problems - Lindo525 - Apr 9, 2021 - 2:45pm
 
COVID-19 - miamizsun - Apr 9, 2021 - 2:22pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - haresfur - Apr 9, 2021 - 12:47pm
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Apr 9, 2021 - 10:47am
 
The War On You - sirdroseph - Apr 9, 2021 - 8:44am
 
Things You Thought Today - oldviolin - Apr 9, 2021 - 8:34am
 
Trump - R_P - Apr 9, 2021 - 7:21am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - miamizsun - Apr 9, 2021 - 4:49am
 
Joe Biden - sirdroseph - Apr 9, 2021 - 4:08am
 
What Did You Do Today? - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 8, 2021 - 9:36pm
 
KEEP YOUR MONEY! - haresfur - Apr 8, 2021 - 2:37pm
 
Recommended documentaries - Red_Dragon - Apr 8, 2021 - 2:24pm
 
partial incompatibility with Symantec's Moon Mind2? - BillG - Apr 8, 2021 - 9:51am
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - sirdroseph - Apr 8, 2021 - 5:06am
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:36pm
 
A designers worst nightmare - kcar - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:00pm
 
Beer - GeneP59 - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:29am
 
Breaking News - Red_Dragon - Apr 7, 2021 - 10:00am
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - cc_rider - Apr 7, 2021 - 8:08am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - rhahl - Apr 7, 2021 - 6:22am
 
Questions. - R_P - Apr 6, 2021 - 8:07pm
 
Unusual News - haresfur - Apr 6, 2021 - 5:15pm
 
Is there any DOG news out there? - kcar - Apr 6, 2021 - 4:15pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - GeneP59 - Apr 6, 2021 - 2:58pm
 
workplaces that work - sirdroseph - Apr 6, 2021 - 4:05am
 
And the good news is.... - haresfur - Apr 5, 2021 - 8:50pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Apr 5, 2021 - 5:32pm
 
RP via Bluesound - Lagging - jarro - Apr 5, 2021 - 4:33pm
 
In My Room - kcar - Apr 5, 2021 - 2:50pm
 
RP Daily Trivia Challenge - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 5, 2021 - 11:23am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Apr 5, 2021 - 10:33am
 
Israel - westslope - Apr 5, 2021 - 7:22am
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Apr 4, 2021 - 8:10am
 
RP song titles in cache - conkyjoe - Apr 4, 2021 - 7:37am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Blackbirds - Apr 4, 2021 - 6:07am
 
Iphone app "my favourites" - BillG - Apr 3, 2021 - 9:14pm
 
FLAC Streaming - jarro - Apr 3, 2021 - 1:04pm
 
Latin Music - R_P - Apr 3, 2021 - 12:03pm
 
MIXES - miamizsun - Apr 3, 2021 - 6:33am
 
Electronic Music - Manbird - Apr 2, 2021 - 7:44pm
 
Derplahoma! - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 2, 2021 - 1:31pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Impeachment Time: Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 57, 58, 59  Next
Post to this Topic
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 11, 2021 - 10:24am



 rgio wrote:
It is interesting that we on day 3 of the 4th impeachment of a President in our history, and not a single comment on this thread.  

I assume that's because nobody believes any opinions will change, and the Republicans afraid of Trump and his base will ignore the obvious and vote to acquit.  
 Yeah, it's pretty interesting. Republicans are in a bad spot. If they vote to acquit, they will violate their oath of office - there's no other way to put it. If they vote to convict, the base, goaded by Trump, is quite likely to start more violence. GOP Senators who vote to convict are certain to get death threats, if not attempts.

The only way around it is a secret ballot, which I'm not sure the Dems want - they may want Republicans on the record.

Either way, the GOP laid down with a dog. Now they wonder why they have fleas.
c.


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Feb 11, 2021 - 10:24am



 rgio wrote:
It is interesting that we on day 3 of the 4th impeachment of a President in our history, and not a single comment on this thread.  

I assume that's because nobody believes any opinions will change, and the Republicans afraid of Trump and his base will ignore the obvious and vote to acquit.  
 

Pretty much.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 11, 2021 - 10:16am

It is interesting that we on day 3 of the 4th impeachment of a President in our history, and not a single comment on this thread.  

I assume that's because nobody believes any opinions will change, and the Republicans afraid of Trump and his base will ignore the obvious and vote to acquit.  
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jan 13, 2021 - 2:49pm


rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 12, 2021 - 4:59pm



 steeler wrote:


 rgio wrote:


 steeler wrote:
She was staking out an anti-Trump position before January 6. Now it is solidified. Frankly, I am surprised more potential 2024 candidates have not done so. She now appears to be in the vanguard. 

 
The race is on.  With Mitch on board now...the rats are running for the portals.

 
When Mitch stakes out a position, you know where the momentum lies.

 
It's a very good political move.  If everyone holds hands and runs away, the Republicans can put Trump in a box that he can't really get out of.  Sure, he'll complain about everyone, but then he just seems like an angry loser.  The Q folks and those who are hard-line right will be seen as nuts, and eventually lose voters for being aligned with the mad king.

Mitch has done the math, and if history holds he'll be the majority leader again in 2 years.  If that happens, he'll have 3+ years in control leading up to his campaign in 2026.

What's amazing is how easy Trump is making it for them.
Ohmsen

Ohmsen Avatar

Location: Valhǫll
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 12, 2021 - 4:55pm

miamizsun wrote:
Trump's Power Doubles After Absorbing Impeachment Attack
 

As often, satire keeps telling truths, mostly unheard of.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Jan 12, 2021 - 4:52pm



 rgio wrote:


 steeler wrote:
She was staking out an anti-Trump position before January 6. Now it is solidified. Frankly, I am surprised more potential 2024 candidates have not done so. She now appears to be in the vanguard. 

 
The race is on.  With Mitch on board now...the rats are running for the portals.

 
When Mitch stakes out a position, you know where the momentum lies.

rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 12, 2021 - 4:45pm



 steeler wrote:
She was staking out an anti-Trump position before January 6. Now it is solidified. Frankly, I am surprised more potential 2024 candidates have not done so. She now appears to be in the vanguard. 

 
The race is on.  With Mitch on board now...the rats are running for the portals.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Jan 12, 2021 - 4:30pm



 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

U.S. Representative Cheney says will vote to impeach Trump


She's so running for president. The locals around here call her a RINO along with her dad, so she might have trouble if some Tea Party nob gets in the race in 2022. But anyway, it's weird to be cheering her.
 

 
She was staking out an anti-Trump position before January 6. Now it is solidified. Frankly, I am surprised more potential 2024 candidates have not done so. She now appears to be in the vanguard. 

ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 12, 2021 - 4:24pm


U.S. Representative Cheney says will vote to impeach Trump


She's so running for president. The locals around here call her a RINO along with her dad, so she might have trouble if some Tea Party nob gets in the race in 2022. But anyway, it's weird to be cheering her.
 

rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 6, 2021 - 12:07pm

It's only a few weeks....but it's time Donnie goes away, for good.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 11:15am

Trump's Power Doubles After Absorbing Impeachment Attack
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 11:11am

 rgio wrote:


 kurtster wrote:
If Romney was secure in his faith, one would think it unnecessary to cite it as a justification for acting.

From Tuesdays State of the Union address:

"My administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the constitutional right to pray in public schools," he said. "In America, we don't punish prayer. We don't tear down crosses. We don't ban symbols of faith. We don't muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith, we cherish religion, we lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the glory of God."

If the administration believed that, wouldn't they celebrate Mitt's apparent relationship with his creator?  Trump defends the right to practice religion in publicly funded institutions, but if that reflection leads to your not agreeing with him, you are to be punished and ostracized?  

Since you are"bumping" old comments, somewhere here in the past few weeks I asked you if you really trust Trump.  Deep down, you do believe Trump to be an honest, good, solid, religious guy? 
 
Overall, I do trust Trump to be working on the things that I consider important, more than anyone else is working on those things.

Do I think Trump's personal position on religion to be solid ?  I have my doubts.  I did read up on that during the campaign, that he was a follower of Norman Vincent Peale and attended his church.  What I do see Trump doing with religion is more the party platform than anything that he personally believes, but I can only guess and wonder about that.  And the party platform may be consistent with his own beliefs or not.

During the campaign I stated that I thought Trump was not really interested in social issues and would mostly pay lip service to those.  Earlier he had been a pro choice person for example as in it is none of the government's business.  It is a personal choice within reason and medical safety. 

His real priorities would be on economic and national security issues.  The social stuff would be a side show.
rgio

rgio Avatar

Location: West Jersey
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 9:52am



 kurtster wrote:
If Romney was secure in his faith, one would think it unnecessary to cite it as a justification for acting.

From Tuesdays State of the Union address:

"My administration is also defending religious liberty, and that includes the constitutional right to pray in public schools," he said. "In America, we don't punish prayer. We don't tear down crosses. We don't ban symbols of faith. We don't muzzle preachers and pastors. In America, we celebrate faith, we cherish religion, we lift our voices in prayer, and we raise our sights to the glory of God."

If the administration believed that, wouldn't they celebrate Mitt's apparent relationship with his creator?  Trump defends the right to practice religion in publicly funded institutions, but if that reflection leads to your not agreeing with him, you are to be punished and ostracized?  

Since you are"bumping" old comments, somewhere here in the past few weeks I asked you if you really trust Trump.  Deep down, you do believe Trump to be an honest, good, solid, religious guy? 
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 9:49am



 kurtster wrote:

Ah, I see that you have since edited your post while I was composing this reply, no matter ...

Warning ... rant on.

If you want to put it that way.

You labeled it; partly why I saw no need to respond. Also because my previous posts already had addressed points you had made about Romney’s motivations and his references to his faith and his sworn oath.

However, I see it more, as being a politician, trying to have his cake and eat it, too. If Romney was secure in his faith, one would think it unnecessary to cite it as a justification for acting. Senator Collins cited her conscience and stopped at that. So Trump is correct. He did use his faith as a crutch as I see it.

As I said in previous posts, Romney did not reference God or his faith as telling him to vote to convict. Rather, he stated that the sworn oath to be impartial in serving as an impeachment juror was made under God and he was going to honor that oath of impartiality. He then explained why his review of the evidence led him to the conclusion he had reached. I am not religious, so I do not make references to a faith or God, but many people do without being accused of using either as a crutch — which implies weakness of an individual in need of cover. Trump made numerous references to God in his SOTU. Lastly, I do not understand your comment about having his cake and eating it, too.

Based upon my limited religious indoctrination up to 7th grade that was conducted at Thousand Oaks Baptist Church in Berkeley, California which is across the street from Thousand Oaks Elementary School that I attended from K to 3, the same school which the terrified little girl Kamala Harris was forced to go to when the democrats foisted busing upon the city, I'll attempt to pose this metaphor.

Irrelevant personal background information.

Romney, being the politician that he first and foremost is, wants to be the hero, the holiest of the holy and shame everybody else with a tactic from the progressive left with his use of blatant virtue signaling. Romney was attempting to do what the wise old King Solomon wisely refrained from doing ... cut the baby in half. In doing so, he sneeringly and self righteously raised himself above everyone else.

Much ranting here. I will try to decipher. Sure, Romney is a politician, with all that entails. So are all the other Senators. I would say that there obviously are motivations for these Senators to vote along party lines on controversial issues when the parties’ positions are diametrically opposed. We do not get much more controversial than this impeachment. So the pressure to vote with party would be strong on both sides. Bucking that, as Romney did, subjected him to what I previously predicted would be a torrent of abuse. The condemnations of GOP Senators pale in comparison. Is that counterbalanced by praise Romney is receiving from Democrats? Perhaps, but I do not see it as of equal volume and especially not of equal consequence for him. What he did make clear in his floor speech was he did consider how history would view him because of this vote. So, yes, that is a personal calculation, but don’t we want a Senator to consider how history will view his or her actions?


And the left is also trying to use Romney's "courageous and selfless act"™ to shame all the repubs in the same process, challenging their personal faith as nothing more than hollow, hypocritical and phony.

The Democrats are pointing to Romney’s vote. There is political gain in that, sure, but that does not mean Romney did not vote his conscience and based on impartial deliberation. I have not seen attacks on the personal faiths of GOP Senators. I have seen them attacked as voting party line.

You or someone else cited Romney's overt and apparently genuine sincerity as proof enough of his religious convictions ...

I said he sounded sincere in making the statement from the floor. And I said his reasoning behind his vote to convict made sense to me. I did not say either of those proved his religious bonafides. And, see my earlier part of this post response in which I describe how Romney cited his faith in explaining his determination to honor the oath of impartiality — not as the basis for his vote. An important distinction.

I'll up the Groucho quote with this one ...

Politics is show business for ugly people.
Paul Begala

imho, you've been inside the Beltway too long ...

This comes up a lot in political debates everywhere. It is a bullshit phrase devoid of relevance.

Now it's your turn, to tell me that I am delusional and hopelessly blinded by my knee jerk partisan ways.

rant off.

 




kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 8:48am

 kurtster wrote:
steeler wrote:


 kurtster wrote:
 steeler wrote:

 I was questioning your saying he traded on being holier than thou.  For example, Romney today spoke about his sworn oath to God in deciding to vote for conviction. Was this him acting holier than thou?  Being politically expedient working only for his own self interest and self promotion?

  
Yes.
 

So you were questioning his faith. Trump did that, too, today at the National Prayer Conference, denouncing him for using religion as a crutch.
 
Ah, I see that you have since edited your post while I was composing this reply, no matter ...

Warning ... rant on.

If you want to put it that way. 

However, I see it more, as being a politician, trying to have his cake and eat it, too.  If Romney was secure in his faith, one would think it unnecessary to cite it as a justification for acting.  Senator Collins cited her conscience and stopped at that.  So Trump is correct.  He did use his faith as a crutch as I see it.

Based upon my limited religious indoctrination up to 7th grade that was conducted at Thousand Oaks Baptist Church in Berkeley, California which is across the street from Thousand Oaks Elementary School that I attended from K to 3, the same school which the terrified little girl Kamala Harris was forced to go to when the democrats foisted busing upon the city, I'll attempt to pose this metaphor.

Romney, being the politician that he first and foremost is, wants to be the hero, the holiest of the holy and shame everybody else with a tactic from the progressive left with his use of blatant virtue signaling. Romney was attempting to do what the wise old King Solomon wisely refrained from doing ... cut the baby in half.  In doing so, he sneeringly and self righteously raised himself above everyone else.

And the left is also trying to use Romney's "courageous and selfless act"™ to shame all the repubs in the same process, challenging their personal faith as nothing more than hollow, hypocritical and phony.

You or someone else cited Romney's overt and apparently genuine sincerity as proof enough of his religious convictions ...

I'll up the Groucho quote with this one ...

Politics is show business for ugly people.
Paul Begala

imho, you've been inside the Beltway too long ...

Now it's your turn, to tell me that I am delusional and hopelessly blinded by my knee jerk partisan ways.

rant off.
 
*bump*   since you seemed to have missed this.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 8:39am

John E. Sununu just made this point on Meet The Press (I might be paraphrasing the quote but the gist is accurate): “Just because Mitt Romney voted his conscience does not mean the other Republican Senators did not vote their consciences.”

The reverse , then, also would be true. 

So, again, why is Romney being assailed by Trump, other members of the GOP, and many of his supporters?

A Trump tweet from a short time ago this morning, and this one is mild compared to other condemnations of Romney and Manchin:

“They are really mad at Senator Joe Munchkin in West Virginia. He couldn’t understand the Transcripts. Romney could, but didn’t want to!”

See how he belittles Manchin by calling him “Munchkin.” That’s funny — isn’t it? Authentic! ! Manchin’s sin Was his voting for conviction when Trump apparently thought he would break ranks and vote to acquit Trump. As I said, mild for Trump. Nowhere near the humiliation of having Vindman and his twin brother perp walked out of the White House.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 8:16am



 sirdroseph wrote:


 steeler wrote:
Getting lost in the debate about Romney’s motivations and trustworthiness is whether his vote for conviction was correct based on the evidence presented and his explanation of how he saw that evidence.

I also am wondering why Trump and his supporters are so enraged by Romney’s vote if it is easily dismissed as just a sore loser trying to get back at Trump. That outrage and the calls for retribution seem to be way over the top. Yet we should be more concerned about Democrats “fawning” over Romney because of that vote?

The vindictiveness of Trump and many of his supporters should be the focus. Romney. Manchin, Schiff, Vindman, Sondland, Yovanovitch . . .
 

Operative words in your whole statement.  The singularity is what will come back to bite you.
 
Yes, which is more alarming or of more consequence: Romney departing from party to cast the lone GOP vote for conviction or Trump calling for retribution against not only Romney but others, like those I named?

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 8:07am



 steeler wrote:
Getting lost in the debate about Romney’s motivations and trustworthiness is whether his vote for conviction was correct based on the evidence presented and his explanation of how he saw that evidence.

I also am wondering why Trump and his supporters are so enraged by Romney’s vote if it is easily dismissed as just a sore loser trying to get back at Trump. That outrage and the calls for retribution seem to be way over the top. Yet we should be more concerned about Democrats “fawning” over Romney because of that vote?

The vindictiveness of Trump and many of his supporters should be the focus. Romney. Manchin, Schiff, Vindman, Sondland, Yovanovitch . . .
 

Operative words in your whole statement.  The singularity is what will come back to bite you.



Obama's war on whistleblowers leaves administration insiders unscathed



Since Barack Obama entered the White House in 2009, his government has waged a war against  whistleblowers and official leakers.
On his watch, there have been  eight prosecutions under the 1917 Espionage Act – more than double those under all previous presidents combined.



steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Feb 9, 2020 - 8:05am



 sirdroseph wrote:


 steeler wrote:
Getting lost in the debate about Romney’s motivations and trustworthiness is whether his vote for conviction was correct based on the evidence presented and his explanation of how he saw that evidence.

I also am wondering why Trump and his supporters are so enraged by Romney’s vote if it is easily dismissed as just a sore loser trying to get back at Trump. That outrage and the calls for retribution seem to be way over the top. Yet we should be more concerned about Democrats “fawning” over Romney because of that vote?
 

More concern?  No.  Concern?  Yes.  Best to reread what I wrote.  This fawning only makes Trump stronger.  Everyone saw the evidence and make their own subjective opinions on what it means to them,  Romney is no different.   I think you underestimate the craving for authenticity which is a powerful driving force in this country right now.   It gives both Sanders and Trump their strength.   I am not talking about truth,  you can be an authentic liar and Trump has that down to a science.
 
See my added paragraph to my post. 

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 57, 58, 59  Next