April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:17pm
Ask an Atheist
- Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:12pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:04pm
Trump
- Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:02pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:01pm
NY Times Strands
- Bill_J - Apr 24, 2024 - 1:36pm
NYTimes Connections
- Bill_J - Apr 24, 2024 - 11:32am
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:22am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl?
- rgio - Apr 24, 2024 - 8:44am
TV shows you watch
- Beaker - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:32am
Joe Biden
- black321 - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:30am
The Obituary Page
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 24, 2024 - 6:54am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:47am
The Moon
- haresfur - Apr 23, 2024 - 9:29pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- Bill_J - Apr 23, 2024 - 7:15pm
China
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 5:35pm
Israel
- black321 - Apr 23, 2024 - 2:24pm
Economix
- islander - Apr 23, 2024 - 12:11pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 11:05am
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
Ukraine
- haresfur - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:19pm
songs that ROCK!
- Steely_D - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:50pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- q4Fry - Apr 22, 2024 - 11:57am
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:59am
Republican Party
- R_P - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:36am
Mini Meetups - Post Here!
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2024 - 8:59am
Malaysia
- dcruzj - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:30am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:02am
Canada
- westslope - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:23am
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:03am
Broccoli for cats - you gotta see this!
- Bill_J - Apr 21, 2024 - 6:16pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 21, 2024 - 3:06pm
What's that smell?
- oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 1:59pm
Main Mix Playlist
- thisbody - Apr 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
George Orwell
- oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 11:36am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 20, 2024 - 7:44pm
What Did You See Today?
- Welly - Apr 20, 2024 - 4:50pm
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou...
- victory806 - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:11pm
Libertarian Party
- R_P - Apr 20, 2024 - 11:18am
Remembering the Good Old Days
- kurtster - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:37am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:21pm
The Abortion Wars
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:07pm
Words I didn't know...yrs ago
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:59pm
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:51pm
MILESTONES: Famous People, Dead Today, Born Today, Etc.
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:44pm
2024 Elections!
- steeler - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:49pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
When I need a Laugh I ...
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
WTF??!!
- rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
Australia has Disappeared
- haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
Earthquake
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
It's the economy stupid.
- miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
Eclectic Sound-Drops
- thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
Synchronization
- ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
Other Medical Stuff
- geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
Dear Bill
- oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
USA/Canada »
Race in America
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51 ... 72, 73, 74 Next |
DD gypsyman
Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006 Gender:
|
Posted:
Aug 22, 2013 - 8:46pm |
|
aflanigan wrote: hey, flanigan!... hope you are well.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
|
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 28, 2013 - 10:54am |
|
RichardPrins wrote:The election of Barack Obama failed to usher in a post-racial US, with a new poll showing that 51 percent of Americans hold explicitly anti-black views. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2008, the year America elected its first black president. Those expressing implicit anti-black attitudes also spiked from 49 percent to 56 percent over the same four-year period, the Associated Press found in a poll released Saturday. Racial prejudice against blacks cut clearly across America’s left-right political divide, despite perceptions to the contrary. While 79 percent of Republicans willingly expressed racial prejudice when answering questions measuring explicit racism (as opposed to 32 percent among Democrats), the implicit racism test showed that a majority of Republicans (64 percent) and Democrats (55 percent) held implicit anti-black feelings. According to the survey, political independents were the least racist, with 49 percent exhibiting implicit anti-black feelings. The poll also found that a majority of respondents (57 percent) held implicitly negative views about Hispanics, up 51 percent from an AP poll taken last year. All of the surveys were conducted online, with research showing that the likelihood of respondents expressing taboo opinions increased when the poll was taken on a computer, as opposed to speaking with an interviewer. The explicit racism component of the test asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements concerning blacks and Hispanics. The survey also asked how they associated blacks, whites and Hispanics with a range of adjectives including 'friendly, ' 'hardworking, ' 'violent' and 'lazy. ' The implicit test entailed showing the same respondents a neutral image of a Chinese character on the screen. The image of a black, white or Hispanic male would flash immediately before the character appeared. Respondents were then asked to rate their feeling towards the Chinese character, with previous research suggesting that people transfer their feelings about the photograph onto the character. The technique is described by psychologists as 'affect misattribution. ' In this way, researchers believe they can measure racist sentiments the respondent might be harboring, even if they are consciously or unconsciously suppressed. (. . . )
I have to wonder if the use of a Chinese character is as neutral as the researchers think it is. If Hillary runs in 2016, I'm voting for her. Her husband(who I expect she's still mad at) would be the best adviser possible. Our demon POTUS has used her as a lackey, and used racism to defeat the person who should have been our first female POTUS. I'm all in if she runs. But hey, if you can't get a BJ at home, whats the problem? I think she'd be a great POTUS.
|
|
pjcle
Location: Sticks Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 28, 2013 - 10:20am |
|
RichardPrins wrote:The election of Barack Obama failed to usher in a post-racial US, with a new poll showing that 51 percent of Americans hold explicitly anti-black views. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2008, the year America elected its first black president. Those expressing implicit anti-black attitudes also spiked from 49 percent to 56 percent over the same four-year period, the Associated Press found in a poll released Saturday. Racial prejudice against blacks cut clearly across America’s left-right political divide, despite perceptions to the contrary. While 79 percent of Republicans willingly expressed racial prejudice when answering questions measuring explicit racism (as opposed to 32 percent among Democrats), the implicit racism test showed that a majority of Republicans (64 percent) and Democrats (55 percent) held implicit anti-black feelings. According to the survey, political independents were the least racist, with 49 percent exhibiting implicit anti-black feelings. The poll also found that a majority of respondents (57 percent) held implicitly negative views about Hispanics, up 51 percent from an AP poll taken last year. All of the surveys were conducted online, with research showing that the likelihood of respondents expressing taboo opinions increased when the poll was taken on a computer, as opposed to speaking with an interviewer. The explicit racism component of the test asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements concerning blacks and Hispanics. The survey also asked how they associated blacks, whites and Hispanics with a range of adjectives including 'friendly,' 'hardworking,' 'violent' and 'lazy.' The implicit test entailed showing the same respondents a neutral image of a Chinese character on the screen. The image of a black, white or Hispanic male would flash immediately before the character appeared. Respondents were then asked to rate their feeling towards the Chinese character, with previous research suggesting that people transfer their feelings about the photograph onto the character. The technique is described by psychologists as 'affect misattribution.' In this way, researchers believe they can measure racist sentiments the respondent might be harboring, even if they are consciously or unconsciously suppressed. (...)
I have to wonder if the use of a Chinese character is as neutral as the researchers think it is. I know of a lot of studies like that. In one, researchers walked up to random people and showed them a picture. They asked the people to then rate the likeability of the person in the photo. Then, they changed one thing. Some of the researchers would walk up to people, and before showing them the picture, asking them casually "can you hold my drink for a minute". The people who held a warm drink rated the likeability of the person in the photo higher than those that held nothing, and much higher than those that held a cold beverage. There are a million surveys done like this to show that our first impressions to people are emotional, and depend upon our own mood. I would submit to you that at least some adults are mature enough to put their own emotions aside at some point. It's one thing to have a first impression, it's another to never be able to step back from your own tainted reaction, to modify it. I think the housing market collapsed before the election, the banking system before the inauguration, and people's reactions to Obama reflected the state of mind they had at the time. Fox was screaming that he was a bad President before he was elected, and a lot of people are still carrying around that cold glass of water.
|
|
Steve
Location: Around My Corner... and Up Yours Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 28, 2013 - 9:28am |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 27, 2012 - 2:55pm |
|
The election of Barack Obama failed to usher in a post-racial US, with a new poll showing that 51 percent of Americans hold explicitly anti-black views. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2008, the year America elected its first black president. Those expressing implicit anti-black attitudes also spiked from 49 percent to 56 percent over the same four-year period, the Associated Press found in a poll released Saturday. Racial prejudice against blacks cut clearly across America’s left-right political divide, despite perceptions to the contrary. While 79 percent of Republicans willingly expressed racial prejudice when answering questions measuring explicit racism (as opposed to 32 percent among Democrats), the implicit racism test showed that a majority of Republicans (64 percent) and Democrats (55 percent) held implicit anti-black feelings. According to the survey, political independents were the least racist, with 49 percent exhibiting implicit anti-black feelings. The poll also found that a majority of respondents (57 percent) held implicitly negative views about Hispanics, up 51 percent from an AP poll taken last year. All of the surveys were conducted online, with research showing that the likelihood of respondents expressing taboo opinions increased when the poll was taken on a computer, as opposed to speaking with an interviewer. The explicit racism component of the test asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements concerning blacks and Hispanics. The survey also asked how they associated blacks, whites and Hispanics with a range of adjectives including 'friendly,' 'hardworking,' 'violent' and 'lazy.' The implicit test entailed showing the same respondents a neutral image of a Chinese character on the screen. The image of a black, white or Hispanic male would flash immediately before the character appeared. Respondents were then asked to rate their feeling towards the Chinese character, with previous research suggesting that people transfer their feelings about the photograph onto the character. The technique is described by psychologists as 'affect misattribution.' In this way, researchers believe they can measure racist sentiments the respondent might be harboring, even if they are consciously or unconsciously suppressed. (...)
I have to wonder if the use of a Chinese character is as neutral as the researchers think it is.
|
|
hobiejoe
Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light. Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 1:10pm |
|
Reading this thread and "Immigrant Song" plays. Psychic Playlist™ strikes again.
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:57pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote: brutal
What?
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:53pm |
|
cc_rider wrote: Meower has a big ass?
brutal
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:44pm |
|
42
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:42pm |
|
JrzyTmata wrote: that meowie girl did it with her big-ass-run-on url link
Meower has a big ass?
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:41pm |
|
JrzyTmata wrote: that meowie girl did it with her big-ass-run-on url link
She's such a trouble-maker...
|
|
JrzyTmata
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:39pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: The last U.S. Census (2010) did not classify "Hispanic origins" as "races", and also that "...people who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race." Technically, the five races now listed are : White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. There is usually a category for "some other race" on a lot of forms. It's bizarre semantics really. Who, or what, borked this thread? It's quite wide.
that meowie girl did it with her big-ass-run-on url link
|
|
MrsHobieJoe
Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:36pm |
|
cc_rider wrote: The jury is still out...
I was going to say even more bonkerers but realised I couldn't spell it.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:36pm |
|
cc_rider wrote: The jury is still out...
pot/kettle
|
|
cc_rider
Location: Bastrop Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:33pm |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:Thank you. I wondered if I was going bonkers.
The jury is still out...
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:33pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: The last U.S. Census (2010) did not classify "Hispanic origins" as "races", and also that "...people who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race." Technically, the five races now listed are : White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. There is usually a category for "some other race" on a lot of forms.
I refused to answer that particular question. It's racist. We're human beings.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:31pm |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:I was a bit puzzled tonight when I heard a reference to Hispanic as a different race. I just thought it was a different cultural group. It's not a term we use in the UK so could someone define it for me?
The last U.S. Census (2010) did not classify "Hispanic origins" as "races", and also that "...people who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race." Technically, the five races now listed are : White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. There is usually a category for "some other race" on a lot of forms. It's bizarre semantics really. Who, or what, borked this thread? It's quite wide.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:29pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote: To that same racist rabble, basically anyone who isn't of northern European extraction - or at least look as if they are - is some other race.
And in some parts of Mississipi considered another species.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2012 - 12:28pm |
|
MrsHobieJoe wrote:Thank you. I wondered if I was going bonkers.
To that same racist rabble, basically anyone who isn't of northern European extraction - or at least look as if they are - is some other race.
|
|
|