[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance - Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:17pm
 
Ask an Atheist - Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:12pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:04pm
 
Trump - Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:02pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Isabeau - Apr 24, 2024 - 3:01pm
 
NY Times Strands - Bill_J - Apr 24, 2024 - 1:36pm
 
NYTimes Connections - Bill_J - Apr 24, 2024 - 11:32am
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:22am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - rgio - Apr 24, 2024 - 8:44am
 
TV shows you watch - Beaker - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:32am
 
Joe Biden - black321 - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:30am
 
The Obituary Page - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 24, 2024 - 6:54am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2024 - 5:47am
 
The Moon - haresfur - Apr 23, 2024 - 9:29pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - Bill_J - Apr 23, 2024 - 7:15pm
 
China - R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 5:35pm
 
Israel - black321 - Apr 23, 2024 - 2:24pm
 
Economix - islander - Apr 23, 2024 - 12:11pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 11:05am
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
 
Ukraine - haresfur - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:19pm
 
songs that ROCK! - Steely_D - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:50pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - q4Fry - Apr 22, 2024 - 11:57am
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:59am
 
Republican Party - R_P - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:36am
 
Mini Meetups - Post Here! - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2024 - 8:59am
 
Malaysia - dcruzj - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:30am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:02am
 
Canada - westslope - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:23am
 
Russia - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:03am
 
Broccoli for cats - you gotta see this! - Bill_J - Apr 21, 2024 - 6:16pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 21, 2024 - 3:06pm
 
What's that smell? - oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 1:59pm
 
Main Mix Playlist - thisbody - Apr 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
 
George Orwell - oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 11:36am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Apr 20, 2024 - 7:44pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Welly - Apr 20, 2024 - 4:50pm
 
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou... - victory806 - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:11pm
 
Libertarian Party - R_P - Apr 20, 2024 - 11:18am
 
Remembering the Good Old Days - kurtster - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:37am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:21pm
 
The Abortion Wars - Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 9:07pm
 
Words I didn't know...yrs ago - Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06pm
 
Things that make you go Hmmmm..... - Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:59pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:51pm
 
MILESTONES: Famous People, Dead Today, Born Today, Etc. - Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:44pm
 
2024 Elections! - steeler - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:49pm
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:55am
 
how do you feel right now? - miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
 
When I need a Laugh I ... - miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
 
What Makes You Laugh? - oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
 
Robots - miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
 
Museum Of Bad Album Covers - Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
 
Europe - haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
 
Business as Usual - black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:26pm
 
Science in the News - Red_Dragon - Apr 17, 2024 - 11:14am
 
Magic Eye optical Illusions - Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
 
Just for the Haiku of it. . . - oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
 
HALF A WORLD - oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
 
Little known information... maybe even facts - R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
 
WTF??!! - rgio - Apr 16, 2024 - 5:23am
 
Australia has Disappeared - haresfur - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:58am
 
Earthquake - miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:46am
 
It's the economy stupid. - miamizsun - Apr 16, 2024 - 4:28am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - thisbody - Apr 14, 2024 - 11:27am
 
Synchronization - ReggieDXB - Apr 13, 2024 - 11:40pm
 
Other Medical Stuff - geoff_morphini - Apr 13, 2024 - 7:54am
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:50pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Apr 12, 2024 - 3:05pm
 
Poetry Forum - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:45am
 
Dear Bill - oldviolin - Apr 12, 2024 - 8:16am
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Race in America Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51 ... 72, 73, 74  Next
Post to this Topic
DD gypsyman

DD gypsyman Avatar

Location: Joined Nov 27, 2006
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 22, 2013 - 8:46pm

 aflanigan wrote:
The map at the link below is pretty amazing. How diverse is your neighborhood?

US Population Distribution by Race, 2010 Census Block Data

 
hey, flanigan!... hope you are well.
aflanigan

aflanigan Avatar

Location: At Sea
Gender: Male


Posted: Aug 16, 2013 - 9:02am

The map at the link below is pretty amazing. How diverse is your neighborhood?

US Population Distribution by Race, 2010 Census Block Data
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 28, 2013 - 10:54am

 RichardPrins wrote:

The election of Barack Obama failed to usher in a post-racial US, with a new poll showing that 51 percent of Americans hold explicitly anti-black views. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2008, the year America elected its first black president.

­Those expressing implicit anti-black attitudes also spiked from 49 percent to 56 percent over the same four-year period, the Associated Press found in a poll released Saturday.

Racial prejudice against blacks cut clearly across America’s left-right political divide, despite perceptions to the contrary. While 79 percent of Republicans willingly expressed racial prejudice when answering questions measuring explicit racism (as opposed to 32 percent among Democrats), the implicit racism test showed that a majority of Republicans (64 percent) and Democrats (55 percent) held implicit anti-black feelings.

According to the survey, political independents were the least racist, with 49 percent exhibiting implicit anti-black feelings. The poll also found that a majority of respondents (57 percent) held implicitly negative views about Hispanics, up 51 percent from an AP poll taken last year.

All of the surveys were conducted online, with research showing that the likelihood of respondents expressing taboo opinions increased when the poll was taken on a computer, as opposed to speaking with an interviewer.

The explicit racism component of the test asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements concerning blacks and Hispanics. The survey also asked how they associated blacks, whites and Hispanics with a range of adjectives including 'friendly, ' 'hardworking, ' 'violent' and 'lazy. '

The implicit test entailed showing the same respondents a neutral image of a Chinese character on the screen. The image of a black, white or Hispanic male would flash immediately before the character appeared. Respondents were then asked to rate their feeling towards the Chinese character, with previous research suggesting that people transfer their feelings about the photograph onto the character. The technique is described by psychologists as 'affect misattribution. '

In this way, researchers believe they can measure racist sentiments the respondent might be harboring, even if they are consciously or unconsciously suppressed. (. . . )

I have to wonder if the use of a Chinese character is as neutral as the researchers think it is.

 
If Hillary runs in 2016, I'm voting for her. Her husband(who I expect
she's still mad at) would be the best adviser possible.

Our demon POTUS has used her as a lackey, and used racism to defeat the person who should have been our first female POTUS.

I'm all in if she runs.

 But hey, if you can't get a BJ at home, whats the problem?
I think she'd be a great POTUS.
pjcle

pjcle Avatar

Location: Sticks
Gender: Female


Posted: Jul 28, 2013 - 10:20am

 RichardPrins wrote:

The election of Barack Obama failed to usher in a post-racial US, with a new poll showing that 51 percent of Americans hold explicitly anti-black views. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2008, the year America elected its first black president.

­Those expressing implicit anti-black attitudes also spiked from 49 percent to 56 percent over the same four-year period, the Associated Press found in a poll released Saturday.

Racial prejudice against blacks cut clearly across America’s left-right political divide, despite perceptions to the contrary. While 79 percent of Republicans willingly expressed racial prejudice when answering questions measuring explicit racism (as opposed to 32 percent among Democrats), the implicit racism test showed that a majority of Republicans (64 percent) and Democrats (55 percent) held implicit anti-black feelings.

According to the survey, political independents were the least racist, with 49 percent exhibiting implicit anti-black feelings. The poll also found that a majority of respondents (57 percent) held implicitly negative views about Hispanics, up 51 percent from an AP poll taken last year.

All of the surveys were conducted online, with research showing that the likelihood of respondents expressing taboo opinions increased when the poll was taken on a computer, as opposed to speaking with an interviewer.

The explicit racism component of the test asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements concerning blacks and Hispanics. The survey also asked how they associated blacks, whites and Hispanics with a range of adjectives including 'friendly,' 'hardworking,' 'violent' and 'lazy.'

The implicit test entailed showing the same respondents a neutral image of a Chinese character on the screen. The image of a black, white or Hispanic male would flash immediately before the character appeared. Respondents were then asked to rate their feeling towards the Chinese character, with previous research suggesting that people transfer their feelings about the photograph onto the character. The technique is described by psychologists as 'affect misattribution.'

In this way, researchers believe they can measure racist sentiments the respondent might be harboring, even if they are consciously or unconsciously suppressed. (...)

I have to wonder if the use of a Chinese character is as neutral as the researchers think it is.

 

I know of a lot of studies like that.  In one, researchers walked up to random people and showed them a picture.  They asked the people to then rate the likeability of the person in the photo.  Then, they changed one thing.  Some of the researchers would walk up to people, and before showing them the picture, asking them casually "can you hold my drink for a minute".  The people who held a warm drink rated the likeability of the person in the photo higher than those that held nothing, and much higher than those that held a cold beverage.  There are a million surveys done like this to show that our first impressions to people are emotional, and depend upon our own mood.  I would submit to you that at least some adults are mature enough to put their own emotions aside at some point.  It's one thing to have a first impression, it's another to never be able to step back from your own tainted reaction, to modify it.

I think the housing market collapsed before the election, the banking system before the inauguration, and people's reactions to Obama reflected the state of mind they had at the time.  Fox was screaming that he was a bad President before he was elected, and a lot of people are still carrying around that cold glass of water.


Steve

Steve Avatar

Location: Around My Corner... and Up Yours
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 28, 2013 - 9:28am


R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 27, 2012 - 2:55pm

The election of Barack Obama failed to usher in a post-racial US, with a new poll showing that 51 percent of Americans hold explicitly anti-black views. That figure is up from 48 percent in 2008, the year America elected its first black president.

­Those expressing implicit anti-black attitudes also spiked from 49 percent to 56 percent over the same four-year period, the Associated Press found in a poll released Saturday.

Racial prejudice against blacks cut clearly across America’s left-right political divide, despite perceptions to the contrary. While 79 percent of Republicans willingly expressed racial prejudice when answering questions measuring explicit racism (as opposed to 32 percent among Democrats), the implicit racism test showed that a majority of Republicans (64 percent) and Democrats (55 percent) held implicit anti-black feelings.

According to the survey, political independents were the least racist, with 49 percent exhibiting implicit anti-black feelings. The poll also found that a majority of respondents (57 percent) held implicitly negative views about Hispanics, up 51 percent from an AP poll taken last year.

All of the surveys were conducted online, with research showing that the likelihood of respondents expressing taboo opinions increased when the poll was taken on a computer, as opposed to speaking with an interviewer.

The explicit racism component of the test asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements concerning blacks and Hispanics. The survey also asked how they associated blacks, whites and Hispanics with a range of adjectives including 'friendly,' 'hardworking,' 'violent' and 'lazy.'

The implicit test entailed showing the same respondents a neutral image of a Chinese character on the screen. The image of a black, white or Hispanic male would flash immediately before the character appeared. Respondents were then asked to rate their feeling towards the Chinese character, with previous research suggesting that people transfer their feelings about the photograph onto the character. The technique is described by psychologists as 'affect misattribution.'

In this way, researchers believe they can measure racist sentiments the respondent might be harboring, even if they are consciously or unconsciously suppressed. (...)

I have to wonder if the use of a Chinese character is as neutral as the researchers think it is.
hobiejoe

hobiejoe Avatar

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light.
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 1:10pm

Reading this thread and "Immigrant Song" plays.
 
Psychic Playlist™ strikes again.
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:57pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

brutal

  What?


Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:53pm

 cc_rider wrote:

Meower has a big ass?

 
brutal
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:44pm

42
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:42pm

 JrzyTmata wrote:

that meowie girl did it with her big-ass-run-on url link

 
Meower has a big ass?
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:41pm

 JrzyTmata wrote:

that meowie girl did it with her big-ass-run-on url link

 
{#Whisper}She's such a trouble-maker...


JrzyTmata

JrzyTmata Avatar



Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:39pm

 Proclivities wrote:

The last U.S. Census (2010) did not classify "Hispanic origins" as "races", and also that "...people who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race."  Technically, the five races now listed are : White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.  There is usually a category for "some other race" on a lot of forms.  It's bizarre semantics really.  
Who, or what, borked this thread?  It's quite wide.

 
that meowie girl did it with her big-ass-run-on url link
MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:36pm

 cc_rider wrote:

The jury is still out...

 



I was going to say even more bonkerers but realised I couldn't spell it.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:36pm

 cc_rider wrote:

The jury is still out...

 
pot/kettle
cc_rider

cc_rider Avatar

Location: Bastrop
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:33pm

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:
Thank you. I wondered if I was going bonkers.

 
The jury is still out...
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:33pm

 Proclivities wrote:

The last U.S. Census (2010) did not classify "Hispanic origins" as "races", and also that "...people who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race."  Technically, the five races now listed are : White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.  There is usually a category for "some other race" on a lot of forms.

 
I refused to answer that particular question. It's racist. We're human beings.
Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:31pm

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:
I was a bit puzzled tonight when I heard a reference to Hispanic as a different race. I just thought it was a different cultural group. It's not a term we use in the UK so could someone define it for me?

 
The last U.S. Census (2010) did not classify "Hispanic origins" as "races", and also that "...people who identify their origin as Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish may be any race."  Technically, the five races now listed are : White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander.  There is usually a category for "some other race" on a lot of forms.  It's bizarre semantics really.  
Who, or what, borked this thread?  It's quite wide.


sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:29pm

 oldslabsides wrote:

To that same racist rabble, basically anyone who isn't of northern European extraction - or at least look as if they are - is some other race.

 

And in some parts of Mississipi considered another species.
Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan


Posted: Oct 24, 2012 - 12:28pm

 MrsHobieJoe wrote:
Thank you. I wondered if I was going bonkers.

 
To that same racist rabble, basically anyone who isn't of northern European extraction - or at least look as if they are - is some other race.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51 ... 72, 73, 74  Next