March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- Proclivities - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:44am
NY Times Strands
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:39am
The Obituary Page
- Antigone - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:21am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:20am
Wordle - daily game
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:15am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:15am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:09am
Breaking News
- rgio - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:03am
Trump
- haresfur - Mar 29, 2024 - 5:40am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Mar 29, 2024 - 4:30am
Main Mix Playlist
- R567 - Mar 29, 2024 - 4:08am
Ukraine
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:51pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:27pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:11pm
Uploading Music
- macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
Baseball, anyone?
- zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Is Wikipedia Objective?
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next |
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 14, 2012 - 9:09am |
|
kurtster wrote:
Its a big deal. Technology's primary goal was to eliminate the printed word. It has now about got the job done.
And one good Coronal Mass Ejection of plasma or an enemy's EMP wipes out everything electronic and those books become priceless.
Its quite a risk we are taking.
Actually, technology's primary goal is one of improvement. In the case of books, they were a technological improvement over carved rocks and papyrus scrolls. More portable, easier to handle, etc. For many years technological advancement facilitated paper-based writing to the point where it became ubiquitous. Now we have the next generation of writing technology. More convenient, portable, etc. than paper-based writing. Remember Farenheit 451? That's how vulnerable paper-based writing was (and the point of the book was, you can't eliminate freedom of thought or literacy by attacking the technology with technology). Worrying that writing and human expression and culture can be wiped out by an electromagnetic pulse strikes me as black helicopter paranoia. If you really are worried, before you head to your cabin in the mountains, wrap a few flash drives with a few million books stored on them in aluminum foil, then put them in a body cavity.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 13, 2012 - 6:05pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses - NYTimes.comAfter 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print.
Those coolly authoritative, gold-lettered reference books that were once sold door-to-door by a fleet of traveling salesmen and displayed as proud fixtures in American homes will be discontinued, company executives said.
In an acknowledgment of the realities of the digital age — and of competition from the Web site Wikipedia — Encyclopaedia Britannica will focus primarily on its online encyclopedias and educational curriculum for schools. The last print version is the 32-volume 2010 edition, which weighs 129 pounds and includes new entries on global warming and the Human Genome Project. (...) Its a big deal. Technology's primary goal was to eliminate the printed word. It has now about got the job done. And one good Coronal Mass Ejection of plasma or an enemy's EMP wipes out everything electronic and those books become priceless. Its quite a risk we are taking.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Mar 13, 2012 - 5:55pm |
|
After 244 Years, Encyclopaedia Britannica Stops the Presses - NYTimes.comAfter 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print.
Those coolly authoritative, gold-lettered reference books that were once sold door-to-door by a fleet of traveling salesmen and displayed as proud fixtures in American homes will be discontinued, company executives said.
In an acknowledgment of the realities of the digital age — and of competition from the Web site Wikipedia — Encyclopaedia Britannica will focus primarily on its online encyclopedias and educational curriculum for schools. The last print version is the 32-volume 2010 edition, which weighs 129 pounds and includes new entries on global warming and the Human Genome Project. (...)
|
|
nuggler
Location: RU Sirius ? Gender:
|
Posted:
Apr 3, 2011 - 1:33pm |
|
|
|
Umberdog
Location: In my body. Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 17, 2011 - 9:07pm |
|
romeotuma wrote: How 'bout you don't ever address me at all, dude... please... if you continue to address me when I have asked you not to, I will consider it harassment...
How about you grow up? Side note: That would make it better for both of us.
|
|
Umberdog
Location: In my body. Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 17, 2011 - 9:01pm |
|
romeotuma wrote:You may be shocked to hear that I am so shocked about something I stumbled on by accident on Wikipedia that I am not going to post the link to it here... yes, a gauche lowbrow like I is squeamish about posting an objectionable link to Wikipedia here... I am caught in a real conundrum because I am interested in seeing you folks discuss possible disgust as you talk about the unspeakable... the site is replete with pictures...
maybe I am just unsophisticated... but it really shocked me... I can say no more... Wikipedia is edited by it's users. I've never trusted it. I'm never shocked by what people do. I've spent too much time in the real world for that.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 19, 2010 - 4:51pm |
|
As Wikipedia celebrates 10 years as an unrivalled source of knowledge, its founder talks to Ian Burrell Jimmy Wales: 'It's not about how many pages. it's about how good they are'It’s not yet the tenth day of Christmas and time for lords to start leaping, but one of the great aristocrats of the internet, Jimmy “Jimbo” Wales, can be forgiven for having a spring in his step as he walks the London streets.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Aug 18, 2009 - 7:18am |
|
Servo wrote:My personal rule of thumb regarding Wikipedia is that it can be a handy way of refreshing my memory about things I already know. Wikipedia articles that I know to be factual can be handy for use in expounding on things I already know. But IMHO it is utterly useless in learning new things.
I agree that it is largely a site of graffiti and personal opinions, but it is not entirely "useless" for learning new things. Topics which have more to do with Fact and less to do with opinions or aesthetics can be quite useful as learning tools. I find it good for areas of science (chemistry, electronics, etc.) and geography (without political discussion), among other things, but I more often find it a just a handy way of "refreshing my memory" as well.
|
|
Servo
Location: Down on the Farm Gender:
|
Posted:
Aug 17, 2009 - 7:14pm |
|
Wikipedia is just another implementation of Wiki Wiki Web. Wiki Wiki Web is just another markup language. As such, it is neither objective or not.
The relative objectivity is in direct proportion to the authoritative oversight that it gets. In other words, it's only as good as its editorial board. How many people have checked the names on Wikipedia's editorial board to see how many names they recognize? Wikipedia articles that back up all claims with multiple authoritative citations (the same standard that a learned publication would demand) can generally be accepted as "authoritative", as long as the citations are verified as real and authoritative. But even then errors can occur.
My personal rule of thumb regarding Wikipedia is that it can be a handy way of refreshing my memory about things I already know. Wikipedia articles that I know to be factual can be handy for use in expounding on things I already know. But IMHO it is utterly useless in learning new things.
|
|
(former member)
|
Posted:
Aug 17, 2009 - 7:01pm |
|
Wiki is down! I am forced to admit, I refer to it for a lot of things. And right now, I can't access it and I'm sort of annoyed. Dammit.
|
|
n4ku
Location: --... ...--
|
Posted:
Feb 18, 2009 - 11:51am |
|
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Feb 1, 2009 - 2:33pm |
|
|
|
BasmntMadman
Location: Off-White Gardens
|
Posted:
May 7, 2008 - 11:33am |
|
Lazy8 wrote:This left-right conflict misses the point. The problem with the wiki model isn't that it is inherently biased to favor one political faction over another, but that it is inherently biased to favor fanatics with lots of time on their hands who refuse to share intellectual space with other views. I corrected the Wikipedia page for a family member; the original got a historical detail wrong. I went back a week later and the error was back. I suppose I could have made more of an effort to persuade the other editor that his source wasn't as authoritative as mine, but it wasn't worth the effort. And therein lies the problem: no outside observer could tell which of us was correct without doing the research that the wiki article pretended to have already done. The fanatic with bad information wins by repetition over better information less-vigorously defended. I use the heck out of Wikipedia. It's a great starting place, but the articles range from terrifically clear and concise to rambling and incoherent. And occasionally dead wrong. Well, any basic flaws in Wikipedia really are not in the province of the ongoing right-left wrangle. But from what I've seen, the harshest criticism of wiki has come from the right hand side of the political spectrum. It strikes me that wikipedia is regarded as one of those bogeyman institutions, such as the UN. But that's a personal & unscientific view. After all, wikipedia is a leveller kind of concept: that the vast sea of the public can hope to present information of quality even close to that of a traditional encyclopedia relying on a few experts. It's also free, definitely a "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" sort of phenomenon. It's a great boon to those who are too poor to afford a large library of books, subscriptions to many periodicals, or a mainstream encyclopedia. It's also fast. Sure, a determined rightwinger could just as easily edit wikipedia as a leftist with an axe to grind. And from all I've seen, lack of persistance is no defect of the right. Volatility and vulnerability to fanatics are real potential problems with the concept. As others have noted, though, in spite of the drawbacks, when compared to the reference standared Encyclopedia Britannica, wikipedia came out pretty well. And it doesn't seem to be anarchy. Just look up, well, "wikipedia" in wikipedia, for its explanation of its own inner workings. Naturally, they will be a little favorably biased towards the effectiveness of their setup, but I'd trust their explanation of the mechanics. An excerpt: Editors in good standing in the community can run for one of many of levels of volunteer stewardship; this begins with "administrator"<53> and goes up with "steward" and "bureaucrat".<54> Administrators, the largest group of privileged users (1,503 Wikipedians for the English edition on February 23, 2008), have the ability to delete pages, lock articles from being changed in case of vandalism or editorial disputes, and block users from editing. I found a mistake, myself, in an article concerning religion. I forget what argument on what forum led me there. But it gave an analogy to the US Civil War which IIRC made Grant the leader of the Army of the Potomac from the very beginning of the war. At the time I couldn't really believe that such a nobody as myself could actually...edit it.
|
|
duchamp
Location: Florida Panhandle Gender:
|
Posted:
May 7, 2008 - 7:21am |
|
|
|
DD redgiff
Location: Havre de Grace, Maryland Gender:
|
Posted:
May 6, 2008 - 10:37pm |
|
|
|
DD redgiff
Location: Havre de Grace, Maryland Gender:
|
Posted:
May 6, 2008 - 10:24pm |
|
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
May 6, 2008 - 10:17pm |
|
|
|
DD redgiff
Location: Havre de Grace, Maryland Gender:
|
Posted:
May 6, 2008 - 9:14pm |
|
|
|
BasmntMadman
Location: Off-White Gardens
|
Posted:
May 6, 2008 - 7:31pm |
|
|
|
Zukiwi
Location: Montreal's suburb Gender:
|
Posted:
May 6, 2008 - 7:01pm |
|
|
|
|