Nice pick of the Jets.  

I believe we should all go to a quiet place and consider the fact that ManBirdio put the smackdown on each and every one of us.
NOPE!  I’m curled up in a ball in my dark closet.

Congratulation, Rob.

Did someone check his crystal ball yet.  

 rgio wrote: 
I, too, feel that the problem wasn't my picks, or the picker. The real problem was solely the pickee's...How dare they play like this...Being paid millions...Turible, turible.

 rgio wrote:

Oh sure let’s throw salt on the JETS wound by having Cam as their QB.  

I haven't looked.

But like the Bills, Bengals, and Chiefs, I'm going to learn from my performance and come back stronger than ever.

My goal for the season is to ensure Week 1 isn't included in my year-end totals.

The most interesting question of the morning...who are the Jets going to add as a QB assuming Rogers is done for the year?  Carson Wentz, Nick Foles, Cam Newton, Matt Ryan, Joe Flacco, and Fitzmagic are all available.

Indeed, Nice pick of the Jets.

I believe we should all go to a quiet place and consider the fact that ManBirdio put the smackdown on each and every one of us...Let that sink in. We've all got some 'splainin' to do...

Congratulation, Rob, for showing us all how this game should be played, by golly. I say well done, sir, well done.

But Proclivities picked the Jets! Brave pick.

 Coaxial wrote:


I blush!

 GeneP59 wrote:

Elsewhere I had AR for under 200 yards. 

OK somebody needs to check Manbirdio’s score card and make sure his crystal ball is not an electric plug-in.  

Congrats to Sunybuny for picking the Rams...No one else had the vision nor foresight to do the same.

AR didn’t even make it out of the series. Then again it’s the J. E. T. S. and no matter what they do it just plain wrong.  

 rgio wrote:

Oh yeah, don't get me wrong - We were taking that bus all the way through the ditch into the empty field. I'm just surprised we managed to hit one single fence post along the way when there was half a mile of open space on either side.

 islander wrote:
The difference on your coast was that the game wasn't impacted.  If the Eagles didn't have the extra 3 on the board, the Pats would have kicked a relatively short field goal to most likely win by 1 (it was 25-20 vs. the 22-20 it would have been without the positive doink).   

 rgio wrote:
I was a little curious on this following the Seagulls goal post gong yesterday.  The uprights are 18 feet apart, the posts are 6 inches. If we are generous and add an extra 1/3 deviance to either side that gives us a 30 foot span with 1 foot of goal post in the way. So it's basically 97% open space...   and yet...

 ColdMiser wrote:
No...they're fine.  I like to get my "low score" out of the way in week one.   

The lack of any pre-season play now makes September a total crapshoot, not just for the players...but all of the new coaches/coordinators make some teams almost unwatchable.  The Eagles looked horrible yesterday.  They were literally a toe tap and/or 3 inches (on the field goal that hit the upright and went through) from losing a game they should have handled more easily...because they were outclassed from the sideline.

The Bill’s/Jets game should be entertaining tonight. 

 Coaxial wrote:
I seem to recall week 1 last year was very similar. 

 Coaxial wrote:

I don't know, if I just win 3 or 4 more this week, I'll be okay.

 rgio wrote:
check your AI settings, they might be set for 1976

Yup I started out 3-4 and thought it was going to be that kind of a day. Nice second half recovery.