[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - Jul 30, 2021 - 6:24am
 
Automotive Lust - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 30, 2021 - 6:21am
 
The Rpeeps Favorite Guitarists Thread - sirdroseph - Jul 30, 2021 - 4:49am
 
ISO Android app usage guide - kbs - Jul 30, 2021 - 3:45am
 
Little known information...maybe even facts - haresfur - Jul 30, 2021 - 2:20am
 
Baseball, anyone? - kurtster - Jul 29, 2021 - 11:27pm
 
Surfing! - whatshisname - Jul 29, 2021 - 11:14pm
 
COVID-19 - kurtster - Jul 29, 2021 - 8:24pm
 
What is the meaning of this? - oldviolin - Jul 29, 2021 - 8:06pm
 
The Obituary Page - Steely_D - Jul 29, 2021 - 7:51pm
 
TV shows you watch - Steely_D - Jul 29, 2021 - 7:50pm
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jul 29, 2021 - 7:28pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - Manbird - Jul 29, 2021 - 7:18pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - halogen - Jul 29, 2021 - 3:51pm
 
Zappa - black321 - Jul 29, 2021 - 1:56pm
 
Environment - R_P - Jul 29, 2021 - 1:40pm
 
Back to the 70's - ColdMiser - Jul 29, 2021 - 12:58pm
 
All Dogs Go To Heaven - Dog Pix - black321 - Jul 29, 2021 - 12:46pm
 
Race in America - R_P - Jul 29, 2021 - 11:46am
 
Hot Dog... it's Summer! - Proclivities - Jul 29, 2021 - 10:54am
 
Things You Thought Today - rhahl - Jul 29, 2021 - 10:47am
 
Music documentaries - Ohmsen - Jul 29, 2021 - 10:02am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - black321 - Jul 29, 2021 - 8:47am
 
Philosophy (Meaty Metaphysical Munchables!) - sirdroseph - Jul 29, 2021 - 7:57am
 
That's good advice - sirdroseph - Jul 29, 2021 - 4:46am
 
Derplahoma! - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 28, 2021 - 10:39pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Red_Dragon - Jul 28, 2021 - 6:11pm
 
The Military Industrial Complex - westslope - Jul 28, 2021 - 5:36pm
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 28, 2021 - 4:07pm
 
Celebrity Deaths - _Bruce_ - Jul 28, 2021 - 3:51pm
 
Tech & Science - Red_Dragon - Jul 28, 2021 - 3:42pm
 
What did you have for lunch? - oldviolin - Jul 28, 2021 - 1:32pm
 
Live Music - R_P - Jul 28, 2021 - 12:42pm
 
~ Have a good joke you can post? ~ - oldviolin - Jul 28, 2021 - 8:27am
 
how do you feel right now? - Antigone - Jul 28, 2021 - 8:22am
 
Today in History - ColdMiser - Jul 28, 2021 - 6:51am
 
The Chomsky / Zinn Reader - rhahl - Jul 28, 2021 - 6:32am
 
Poetry Forum - ScottN - Jul 28, 2021 - 6:09am
 
Living in America - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 27, 2021 - 11:04pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 27, 2021 - 8:35pm
 
Trump - Red_Dragon - Jul 27, 2021 - 4:58pm
 
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes. - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 27, 2021 - 4:47pm
 
HALF A WORLD - Ohmsen - Jul 27, 2021 - 3:48pm
 
I swing therefore I am. - rhahl - Jul 27, 2021 - 12:46pm
 
Beer - the_jake - Jul 27, 2021 - 10:29am
 
Olympics - Is anybody interested - sirdroseph - Jul 27, 2021 - 9:10am
 
MQA Stream Coming to BLUOS - Cebolla - Jul 27, 2021 - 9:00am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 26, 2021 - 9:23pm
 
One Reason I Don't Trust the Police - Red_Dragon - Jul 26, 2021 - 7:54pm
 
KUDOS for BillG - kenmo - Jul 26, 2021 - 4:34pm
 
Climate Change - Red_Dragon - Jul 26, 2021 - 3:48pm
 
Get the Quote - Proclivities - Jul 26, 2021 - 1:02pm
 
Gotta Get Your Drink On - haresfur - Jul 25, 2021 - 8:14pm
 
Fake News*  ?  ! - R_P - Jul 25, 2021 - 5:04pm
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - Steely_D - Jul 25, 2021 - 2:40pm
 
Nobel Prize Literature - rhahl - Jul 25, 2021 - 2:36pm
 
Comics! - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 25, 2021 - 2:01pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Jul 25, 2021 - 11:40am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 25, 2021 - 11:35am
 
It's fine - rhahl - Jul 25, 2021 - 9:34am
 
Property rights and violence in the USA - westslope - Jul 25, 2021 - 9:27am
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - Antigone - Jul 25, 2021 - 4:32am
 
Bob Dylan - Steely_D - Jul 24, 2021 - 10:58pm
 
Outstanding Covers - Steely_D - Jul 24, 2021 - 10:41pm
 
The Future is here! - Red_Dragon - Jul 24, 2021 - 4:58pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - Manbird - Jul 24, 2021 - 2:40pm
 
Getting disconnected/paused at bumper time - coding_to_music - Jul 24, 2021 - 11:41am
 
Drones - Prodigal_SOB - Jul 24, 2021 - 11:37am
 
Webcasting rates going up again cry - kenmo - Jul 24, 2021 - 9:56am
 
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage? - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 6:14am
 
The War On You - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:25am
 
Media Bias - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:16am
 
LeftWingNutZ - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:09am
 
Joe Biden - sirdroseph - Jul 24, 2021 - 5:02am
 
What The Hell Buddy? - oldviolin - Jul 23, 2021 - 8:07pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » Far East » China Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Post to this Topic
rhahl

rhahl Avatar



Posted: Jul 22, 2021 - 6:56am

The United States Underestimates China’s Economic Challenge at Its Own Peril

Today, the challenge offered by China to the United States and indeed the capitalist world economy is a model that departs sharply from the private laissez-faire model of capitalism that has prevailed in global capitalism to date. In the latter model, the government is called in (à la Keynes) only when crises hit and threaten private capitalism. And then the government’s economic interventions are constricted in scope and reach and are temporary in time. Minimal government regulation and minimal direct production of goods and services by government are the key rules.

In contrast, in China, the Communist Party and the state intervene much more in economic affairs by regulating private businesses (foreign and domestic) more and also by having the state own and operate businesses. What results for the party and the state is an overarching control of economic development. That control, in its extent and duration, far exceeds the governments’ role in western Europe, North America, and Japan. Having the party and state as collaborative entities pushing determined policies enables the regular mobilization of most private and public resources to achieve agreed goals. Chief among the goals has been economic development to escape the endemic poverty of southern Asia.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jul 19, 2021 - 12:18pm

Eisenhower rejected military chiefs’ demand for nuclear war on China, classified account of ’58 Taiwan Strait crisis reveals
Fearing a new conflict over Taiwan, Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg has released a shocking account showing how the Joint Chiefs pressed Eisenhower to launch a nuclear war on China.

A May 22 New York Times report on the account offered only general details of the role the US Joint Chiefs of Staff played in the run-up to the 1958 Taiwan crisis. However, it is now clear from the original highly classified documents as well as other evidence now available that from the beginning, the Joint Chiefs aimed first and foremost to exploit the tensions to carry out nuclear strikes against Chinese nuclear military targets deep in highly-populated areas.

Chiang Kai-shek’s nationalist Kuomintang regime and the Joint Chiefs were allies in wanting to embroil the United States in a war with China. (...)

According to the account authored by Halperin, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Air Force Gen. Nathan Twining, told State Department officials in an August meeting that the third phase would require nuclear strikes on Chinese bases as far north as Shanghai.

The Joint Chiefs played down the threat to civilian casualties from such tactical atomic weapons, emphasizing that an airburst of tactical atomic explosions would generate little radioactive fallout. But the account indicates that they provided no concrete information on expected civilian casualties.

Given the fact that both the Chinese gun emplacements across the Taiwan Strait and a key airbase serving the Chinese military forces in any conflict over the offshore islands would have been located close to significant population centers, such atomic explosions would have certainly caused civilian casualties on a massive scale. (...)

When Secretary of State John Foster Dulles warned that Japan would object strongly to using nuclear weapons against the Chinese mainland, and forbid the launching of nuclear weapons from their territory, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Arleigh Burke suggested that the opposition to nuclear weapons in Japan was “inspired by the Communists,” and that foreign leaders would soon recognize that the use of nuclear weapons by the US “was in their interests”.

Burke closed his argument by claiming that if the US did not maintain the threat of tactical nuclear weapons in conflicts, it would “lose the entire world within three years.” That obviously absurd argument suggests that the intense desire among the Joint Chiefs to use nuclear weapons against China was less motivated by any threat from Communist Chinese than by their own institutional interests. (...)

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: Jul 10, 2021 - 5:36am

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2021 - 2:31pm

But more frequently than not, the companies comply with law enforcement demands. And that underlines an awkward truth: As their products become more central to people’s lives, the world’s largest tech companies have become surveillance intermediaries and crucial partners to authorities, with the power to arbitrate which requests to honor and which to reject.

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 12, 2021 - 6:13pm

Biden Tries to Rally G7 Nations to Counter China’s Influence
The president urged the leaders of wealthy democracies to offer hundreds of billions in loans to developing nations in a direct challenge to Beijing’s Belt-and-Road Initiative.
But the White House cited no financial commitments, and there is sharp disagreement among the United States and its allies about how to respond to China’s rising power.

Mr. Biden has made challenging a rising China and a disruptive Russia the centerpiece of a foreign policy designed to build up democracies around the world as a bulwark against spreading authoritarianism. Beijing, for its part, has pointed to the poor U.S. response to the pandemic and divisive American politics — particularly the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol — as signs that democracy is failing.
Biden seems to have picked up another Trump trick: get other people to pay for your pet projects.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 8, 2021 - 2:37pm

The Senate is expected to pass industrial policy legislation to counter China.
Faced with an urgent competitive threat from China, the Senate is poised to pass the most expansive industrial policy legislation in U.S. history, blowing past partisan divisions over government support for private industry to embrace a nearly quarter-trillion-dollar investment in building up America’s manufacturing and technological edge.

The legislation, which is scheduled for a vote on Tuesday afternoon, is expected to pass by a  large margin. That alone is a testament to how commercial and military competition with Beijing has become one of the few issues that can unite both political parties.

It is an especially striking shift for Republicans, who are following the lead of former President Donald J. Trump and casting aside what was once their party’s staunch opposition to government intervention in the economy. Now, both parties are embracing an enormous investment in semiconductor manufacturing, artificial intelligence research, robotics, quantum computing and a range of other technologies.

And while the bill’s sponsors are selling it in part as a jobs plan, the debate over its passage has been laced with Cold War references and warnings that a failure to act would leave the United States perilously dependent on its biggest geopolitical adversary.
The CPA (Capitalist Party of America) supports The People's Industries to counter foreign imperialism!
Ms. Fazili said that cabinet departments had embarked on a governmentwide effort “to really diagnose the problems, understand what’s going on out there in these markets, and see what actions can be taken to close those vulnerabilities.”

As part of the initiative, the Department of Agriculture has allocated more than $4 billion to bolster “a resilient food supply chain” that would prevent or lessen shortages, she added.

The initiative was bundled with the creation of “trade strike force” targeting China and other countries to push back “on unfair foreign competition, unfair foreign subsidies and other trade practices that have adversely impacted U.S. manufacturing.”

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 6, 2021 - 11:49am

Accountability and reparations! For others...

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 4, 2021 - 10:51am

 miamizsun wrote:

forced labor? from the ccp? 

human rights isn't in the the party's dictionary


As a China SJW, do you still remember your cheap Chinese imports and iPhone factories? Or the local business practices?

PS: The irony of rightist concerns with collective labor rights.
PPS: The irony of a "socialist" government having poor labor rights.

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 4, 2021 - 5:58am

forced labor? from the ccp? 

human rights isn't in the the party's dictionary



Chinese workers allege forced labor, abuses in Xi’s ‘Belt and Road’ program





For months, Ding was locked in a 170-square-foot workers’ dormitory near a Chinese smelting facility in Konawe, Indonesia, where he had been assigned to carry out one of his country’s vaunted “Belt and Road” projects.

The 40-year-old native of China’s Henan province, who gave only his surname out of security fears, said a guard kept watch at his door. When the coronavirus ravaged the dorm in November, he developed a 102-degree fever. Still, he could not leave.

Finally, earlier this year, Ding pulled apart the plastic bars on a rear window and climbed out, fleeing on a motorbike driven by a friend. “It was like I went to hell and back,” he said. “I had no other choice but to escape.”  

Interviews with labor rights advocates and a dozen Chinese workers employed by state-owned companies and subcontractors reflect a pattern of abuse that threatens to undermine China’s ambitious bid for diplomatic and economic influence, a mission closely tied to the legacy of leader Xi Jinping. Many spoke on the condition of full or partial anonymity, fearing retribution.

New York-based China Labor Watch asserts in a new report that overseas Chinese workers are victims of human trafficking and forced labor. Workers described being held against their will, forced to work while infected with the coronavirus and deceived into working illegally. Their passports were seized, they said, and most had gone months without pay. Some said they were beaten for protesting conditions or forced into “thought training.”

“The entire Belt and Road initiative is based on forced labor,” said Li Qiang, director of China Labor Watch, whose report was drawn from interviews with workers in six countries. “Chinese authorities want the Belt and Road projects for political gain and need to use these workers.”




R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 26, 2021 - 9:05pm

 kurtster wrote:

You have your interests and I have mine.

They do not seem to intersect anywhere on this.


Or almost anything else.

Back to hawkishness (financially and rhetorically) and globalism (with the blessing of EverTrumpers)!
kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: May 26, 2021 - 8:54pm

Have fun, dude.    We are rooting for two different teams.  

You have your interests and I have mine.

They do not seem to intersect anywhere on this.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 26, 2021 - 8:44pm

In 2020, a bipartisan group of senators and Admiral Davidson established a new fund for militarism in the Asia-Pacific, the Pacific Deterrence Initiative, or PDI. In March of this year, Davidson asked for $27 billion for PDI to pay for new airfields, long-range missiles, space-based surveillance radars, joint exercises, and more. President Biden’s initial budget, released last month, signals “most, if not all” of these PDI requests will be funded; identifies China as the top “threat”; increases defense spending by 1.6 percent; and allocates half of our nation’s discretionary budget toward defense.

Richard Falk, professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University, notes, “Biden is very much a creature of Cold War bipartisanship. His comfort zone was established by this western alliance against the Soviet Union and communism. Therefore I was worried during the campaign that (Biden) was going to try to reconstitute bipartisanship in foreign policy while pursuing a more partisan agenda domestically. That’s precisely what has happened.”

This summer, the Senate will likely pass a broad, bipartisan package to counter China, including the Strategic Competition Act, which contains a number of hardline stances, some inserted by Senator Marco Rubio. The act expands unilateral sanctions on China, requires referring to Taiwan as a government, and strikes references to “One China” policy. According to Tang, the act also appropriates $100 million annually for 2022 through 2026 for the U.S. Agency for Global Media—including government propaganda programs, such as Voice of America and CIA-backed Radio Free Asia—to spread information on “the negative impact of activities related to (China’s) Belt and Road Initiative.”

Tang speculates the Belt and Road Initiative is targeted because it isolates U.S. trade power and therefore reduces U.S. sanction power. The appropriation is part of a larger $1.5 billion Countering Chinese Influence Fund to combat the “malign influence of the Chinese Communist Party globally.” The act also requires that the Committee of Foreign Investment review any higher institution donation above $1 million for fear of espionage. Senator Mitt Romney recently said he’s “very, very reluctant to bring in students from China ... here to steal technology.”

The Strategic Competition Act—and the rhetoric around it—echoes sinophobia during Cold War McCarthyism, when the FBI banned Chinese Americans from transferring money to their relatives in China who depended on them for survival, tapped phone lines, interrogated an officer of the leftist Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance until he committed suicide, demanded 40 major Chinese American associations produce full records and photographs of their membership within 24 hours, and imprisoned and deported Chinese American intellectuals. When the U.S. is in conflict with another nation, that nation’s diaspora becomes the target of state suspicion and violence here.


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: May 26, 2021 - 8:32pm

 R_P wrote:
Unity!


If you believe that Biden is going to be tough on China, I have a bridge for sale in NYC, cheap.

I will accept Bitcoin.  


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 26, 2021 - 8:08pm

Indeed, the same people and organizations calling China a grave threat nakedly reveal the real reason for American brinkmanship. The Council on Foreign Relations reports in 2015 that “preserving U.S. primacy in the global system ought to remain the central objective ... in the twenty-first century.” President Biden himself wrote in 2020, “The Biden foreign policy agenda will place the U.S. back at the head of the table.… The world does not organize itself.”

China is not a threat because it’s attacking U.S. soil. China is a threat because it threatens American global hegemony. Here the underlying logic of Yellow Peril becomes clear. Proliferating the false idea that China will take over the West rationalizes starting conflict in the Asia-Pacific; this nearly perfectly parallels the geopolitical theater of a century ago. The Yellow Peril, the faceless horde, the ever-growing yellow population, an existential threat to the West, to liberal human rights, to the market economy, to the “rules-based” order, to American primacy.

Who we define as our international enemy, or perhaps just competitor, also becomes our enemy at home. These incidents are not accidents—they are collateral damage—because Yellow Peril and its relatives xenophobia, sinophobia, anti-Asian racism, and McCarthyism have always been tremendously useful in building consensus in the American public.

Grazier describes a military-industrial-congressional complex first warned of by President Eisenhower in 1961. Defense industry money drives increased military budgets in three ways:defense contracts, operating like pork barrel, that impact the districts and constituents of members of congress; political contributions to congressional campaigns and at least $100 million in annual defense lobbying; and the funding of a national security elite, including $1 billion for think tanks such as the Center for New American Security, the Atlantic Council, and the Council on Foreign Relations, which launder industry interests through mainstream media.
Unity!

kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: May 26, 2021 - 7:45pm

 R_P wrote:
The American Victims of Washington’s Anti-China Hysteria
The “Yellow Peril” tropes that may pave the way for a new war abroad have historically fueled anti-Asian hate on these shores.
In the United States, we commonly understand “Yellow Peril” as a xenophobic response to influxes of Chinese laborers. Yellow Peril produced national shames such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which remains the first and only ban on all immigrants from an ethnic group. But the propaganda also supported foreign policy. In the late nineteenth century, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany supposedly dreamed of Buddha seated on a dragon, threatening to invade Europe. He used Yellow Peril (die Gelbe Gefahr) to build alliances with other imperialist nations and justify invading China first lest the East conquer the West. In the Opium Wars of the 1840s, the U.S. and other Western nations killed 30,000 Chinese people so that they could forcibly sell opium to civilians, while notable Americans and elite institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton built their wealth on opium colonialism. This is the foundational moment of U.S.-China relations.

Today, Yellow Peril propaganda is bipartisan and mainstream. Indo-Pacific commander Admiral Phil Davidson’s warning of China’s “pernicious” and “malign” influence, an Atlantic Council report that lengthily describes how “China presents a serious problem for the whole of the democratic world,” Senator Jim Inhofe’s belief that “we’re in the most dangerous time of our lifetime”—these are only the tamest examples of such rhetoric on China. Dan Grazier, the Jack Shanahan Military Fellow at the Center for Defense Information at the Project on Government Oversight, notes that at the Senate confirmation hearings for Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, China was mentioned at least 70 times.

Critical to this contemporary promotion of Yellow Peril is the image of China as the military aggressor. But right now, the U.S. has 800 overseas military bases, half of them encircling China. China has one (in Djibouti). The U.S. spends more on defense than the next 10 nations combined, including China. The U.S. has extensively planned for a naval blockade of China, cutting off its oil supply. The U.S. has 20 times the nuclear warheads of China and yet is still spending an additional $100 billion to build up a new nuclear arms arsenal. The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command has stationed 130,000 troops in the region, conducting nearly daily military exercises with drones, missile drills, helicopters, island hopping and more, according to Madison Tang, campaign coordinator at CODEPINK. “These military exercises create accidents. These exercises can be provocations in and of themselves. There’s a lot of military brinkmanship happening where American forward posturing (is being) framed as defensive,” says Tang.
And UFOs are back too... 



Give the Yellow Peril stuff a rest.  Its a smoke screen / dog whistle that people who are friends or supporters of the CCP use to further discord rather than encourage any constructive dialog and agreement on solutions. 

The CCP is not a friend of mine now does it have my country's best interests in its plans for the future.  Nor does it have the best interests of its own citizens in its plans.  And it does not pretend to either.

R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: May 26, 2021 - 6:25pm

The American Victims of Washington’s Anti-China Hysteria
The “Yellow Peril” tropes that may pave the way for a new war abroad have historically fueled anti-Asian hate on these shores.
In the United States, we commonly understand “Yellow Peril” as a xenophobic response to influxes of Chinese laborers. Yellow Peril produced national shames such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which remains the first and only ban on all immigrants from an ethnic group. But the propaganda also supported foreign policy. In the late nineteenth century, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany supposedly dreamed of Buddha seated on a dragon, threatening to invade Europe. He used Yellow Peril (die Gelbe Gefahr) to build alliances with other imperialist nations and justify invading China first lest the East conquer the West. In the Opium Wars of the 1840s, the U.S. and other Western nations killed 30,000 Chinese people so that they could forcibly sell opium to civilians, while notable Americans and elite institutions such as Harvard, Yale, and Princeton built their wealth on opium colonialism. This is the foundational moment of U.S.-China relations.

Today, Yellow Peril propaganda is bipartisan and mainstream. Indo-Pacific commander Admiral Phil Davidson’s warning of China’s “pernicious” and “malign” influence, an Atlantic Council report that lengthily describes how “China presents a serious problem for the whole of the democratic world,” Senator Jim Inhofe’s belief that “we’re in the most dangerous time of our lifetime”—these are only the tamest examples of such rhetoric on China. Dan Grazier, the Jack Shanahan Military Fellow at the Center for Defense Information at the Project on Government Oversight, notes that at the Senate confirmation hearings for Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, China was mentioned at least 70 times.

Critical to this contemporary promotion of Yellow Peril is the image of China as the military aggressor. But right now, the U.S. has 800 overseas military bases, half of them encircling China. China has one (in Djibouti). The U.S. spends more on defense than the next 10 nations combined, including China. The U.S. has extensively planned for a naval blockade of China, cutting off its oil supply. The U.S. has 20 times the nuclear warheads of China and yet is still spending an additional $100 billion to build up a new nuclear arms arsenal. The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command has stationed 130,000 troops in the region, conducting nearly daily military exercises with drones, missile drills, helicopters, island hopping and more, according to Madison Tang, campaign coordinator at CODEPINK. “These military exercises create accidents. These exercises can be provocations in and of themselves. There’s a lot of military brinkmanship happening where American forward posturing (is being) framed as defensive,” says Tang.
And UFOs are back too... 
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Yes
Gender: Male


Posted: May 26, 2021 - 3:48am

haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 27, 2021 - 5:36pm

Iran and China sign 25-year cooperation agreement

Good thing trump was playing 3-dimensional chess when he backed out of the nuclear deal with Iran and increased tensions by killing their general. Because incentivising them to make agreements with the Chinese is clearly a brilliant move to bolster American power. 
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 27, 2021 - 4:44pm


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Mar 24, 2021 - 11:47am

Is China a Competitor, an Adversary or an Enemy?

Page: 1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14  Next