Although your credentials are impressive, we unfortunately do not have an opening for you at this time because we already have a crazy, billionaire demagogue on staff.
Always room for more one.
Take two; theyâre small.
Although your credentials are impressive, we unfortunately do not have an opening for you at this time because we already have a crazy, billionaire demagogue on staff.
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Dec 3, 2022 - 11:44am
Mr. Elon Musk,
Although your credentials are impressive, we unfortunately do not have an opening for you at this time because we already have a crazy, billionaire demagogue on staff.
James Woods@RealJamesWoodsTo my friends in the Republican Party: If your patriotism is genuine, not all bluff and bluster, let loose the dogs of war. Because true patriots will no longer stand to see our rights trampled by the DNC and its slimy cronies in media and the bowels of government. #Twitter1:04 PM · Dec 3, 2022Seems rational . . . Now where have I heard rhetoric like that before . . .
Buckle up buttercups cause this was on Tucker so you know it is the real deal.
If your patriotism is genuine, not all bluff and bluster, let loose the dogs of war.
Because true patriots will no longer stand to see our rights trampled by the DNC and its slimy cronies in media and the bowels of government. #Twitter1:04 PM · Dec 3, 2022
Seems rational . . . Now where have I heard rhetoric like that before . . .
Okay, so first, if there is something actually criminal, is Matt Taibbi the correct channel?
So what does that have to do with 1st amendment? Aren't private companies free to do as they choose with their properties? ... the DNC (and RNC) are private organizations.
You need to do some catching up. Things are much more complicated than you seem to think.
The government itself was involved in suppressing / censoring news. That is criminal.
Are we having fun yet ? Seems that Elon has turned over thousands of internal documents to reporter Matt Taibbi.
I also heard comments by James Woods who has been repeatedly victimized by Twitter over the years and who has also successfully sued over issues regarding Twitter. He has gone on the record stating that he intends to sue the DNC and adds the possibility of a class action lawsuit against the DNC, that if successful could effectively bankrupt the party and maybe even permanently cripple it or even better yet, kill it. The DNC is everything it has accused everyone else of, including being completely a fascist organization as will soon be revealed.
Buckle up buttercups.
Okay, so first, if there is something actually criminal, is Matt Taibbi the correct channel?
Second, Woods suing the DNC.... where to start... (no I didn't read more than a couple of lines from the google search because of the sources)... Isn't Twitter private/ non government? So what does that have to do with 1st amendment? Aren't private companies free to do as they choose with their properties? Twitter has recent banned Ye, after unbanning trump. which one of them get's to sue? Likewise, the DNC (and RNC) are private organizations.
Still, I've got my popcorn standing by. I'd love to see the DNC and/or the RNC dismantled, but I doubt James woods and Elon are the guys to do it.
Are we having fun yet ? Seems that Elon has turned over thousands of internal documents to reporter Matt Taibbi.
I also heard comments by James Woods who has been repeatedly victimized by Twitter over the years and who has also successfully sued over issues regarding Twitter. He has gone on the record stating that he intends to sue the DNC and adds the possibility of a class action lawsuit against the DNC, that if successful could effectively bankrupt the party and maybe even permanently cripple it or even better yet, kill it. The DNC is everything it has accused everyone else of, including being completely a fascist organization as will soon be revealed.
And the corporate media have been relying on Twitter for their so-called "news" all the time.
Not really unless you meant "news stories." Real institutions (e.g., NYT) aren't quoting Twitter as their source - but do report on what's going on over there, which is fair.
Have to agree on that.
Yet I'm glad, Elon Musk is bringing up free speech, and taking on corporate media censorship. The Twitter community is behind him on that in vast majorities. And the corporate media have been relying on Twitter for their so-called "news" all the time. Against all premonitions of Twitter going down by the media, users have grown substantially sincehe took over.
Have to agree on that.
Yet I'm glad, Elon Musk is bringing up free speech, and taking on corporate media censorship. The Twitter community is behind him on that in vast majorities. And the corporate media have been relying on Twitter for their so-called "news" all the time. Against all premonitions of Twitter going down by the media, users have grown substantially since he took over.
I'm not familiar with this guy, but I will say that anyone trying to make a serious argument one way or another loses self respect and listeners to his argument when he or she backs said arguments by references to "licking the sweat off a mans balls". Just saying.
One should choose their words wisely. It matters.
Not sure what your're trying to get at, honestly. I said he raises some great points, and what I meant was in regards to free and open-source soft-, and hardware. These points are beyond anyone's liking or disliking of Elon Musk.
Anything else I didn't get?
- - - - -
EDIT:
- - - - - Got it! ....
. You never fail to amuse.
