Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Aug 23, 2021 - 6:47pm
The counting began on April 23 and Logan expected it to take 16 days, but it has instead been ongoing all summer. Cyber Ninja contractors have, among other things, inspected the ballotsfor traces of bamboo, which supporters of the audit say would prove they were smuggled from China.
makes sense that would explain the dreams of fruh german belching wearing a black turtle neck and shorts/lederhosen
and how many voting machines will fit into a standard raelien recon class ufo?
preliminary nano data indicates signal to noise ratio at or near peak...no wait...recalibration indicates that the words voting and machine are mutually inclusive so I guess it's a matter of no matter...
i don't know... i look at the video, pics, russian satellite positioning and trump's horoscope and i see a precision surgical like strike force maneuver how could the fbi miss this?
this may partisan, alt-something, disturbing, enlightening, controversial or from another planet but i believe the 2020 elections are over, that they were in the past there, i said it
this may sound partisan, alt-something, disturbing, enlightening, controversial or from another planet but i believe the 2020 elections are over, that they were in the past there, i said it
When I was there, one of the auditors showed me an example of a ballot that was flagged as suspicious because every single oval was filled out perfectly, without a single stray mark â something that would be easy for a machine to accomplish, but is almost impossible to do by hand.
Impossible!
I'll take a photo of my next ballot. The scanners are less sensitive these days but 20+ years ago when I operated them on election night, stray marks and half-assed ovals would kick the ballot out. The first scan on election night would mark that ballot as a non-vote and keep scanning. The results would go to the secretary of state as Unofficial, then the next day they'd rescan ballots with the sensors set to kill—every anomalous ballot (stray marks, poorly filled ovals, non-votes and over votes) would be kicked out and manually reviewed by a team of dem/rep evaluators. If you want your vote to not be subject to the whims of that board, keep your paper clean and mark your ovals carefully.
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
Posted:
Aug 23, 2021 - 5:52am
islander wrote:
From your article:
When I was there, one of the auditors showed me an example of a ballot that was flagged as suspicious because every single oval was filled out perfectly, without a single stray mark â something that would be easy for a machine to accomplish, but is almost impossible to do by hand.
So what's the allegation here? That the Democrats had a machine that was so good (including handling and alignment) that they used it complete ballots for people? Or that the ballots were pre-printed? Or ?
And even if they do manage to find discrepancies, and even if they are severe enough to alter the outcome, then what? The time for recounts has past, and the recounts were already done in accordance with the election rules. And even if you flip AZ to Trump, Biden still wins. So what exactly are you hoping for here?
That has been the undoing of these fraud claims all along â at least for rational folk. Instances of fraud do not equate with this claim of massive fraud orchestrated across several states to swing the election from Trump to Biden. There always are irregularities and, yes, instances of fraudulently cast votes in elections. The Trumpers want to string together any and all irregularities and say: See, we were right!
...
And even if they do manage to find discrepancies, and even if they are severe enough to alter the outcome, then what? The time for recounts has past, and the recounts were already done in accordance with the election rules. And even if you flip AZ to Trump, Biden still wins. So what exactly are you hoping for here?
This is about A) giving Trump a platform to never say he lost, and B) providing the foundation to reject every result that you don't like.
There will be no proof, just plenty of statements that the tribe can interpret and spin. "There was a ballot with perfect circles?" Is it more likely that one person spent way too much time making sure their vote would count, or that the Dems built a machine to fill in the dots that delivered one ballot that was picked up by the audit? You don't need answers or proof...you just raise issues so folks like Kurt can say "how do you explain it".
When I was there, one of the auditors showed me an example of a ballot that was flagged as suspicious because every single oval was filled out perfectly, without a single stray mark â something that would be easy for a machine to accomplish, but is almost impossible to do by hand.
So what's the allegation here? That the Democrats had a machine that was so good (including handling and alignment) that they used it complete ballots for people? Or that the ballots were pre-printed? Or ??
And even if they do manage to find discrepancies, and even if they are severe enough to alter the outcome, then what? The time for recounts has past, and the recounts were already done in accordance with the election rules. And even if you flip AZ to Trump, Biden still wins. So what exactly are you hoping for here?
