Ukraine
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:51pm
Wordle - daily game
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 10:54pm
Breaking News
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:31pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:27pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:11pm
NYTimes Connections
- n4ku - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:03pm
Uploading Music
- macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
Baseball, anyone?
- zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:15pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:31am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:07am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
Radio Paradise Comments
- pilgrim - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:19am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Trump
- rgio - Mar 28, 2024 - 7:29am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
What makes you smile?
- Steely_D - Mar 16, 2024 - 7:31pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
NASA & other news from space
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 Next |
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Aug 5, 2011 - 12:41pm |
|
Beaker wrote: aflanigan wrote:All you trekheads out there (including the original) will of course remember the episode that broached the subject of whether humans were essential to space exploration, THE ULTIMATE COMPUTER. Predictably, the plot involves demonstrating that computers are not fit to pilot star ships without humans. My opinion is that, given the basic assumptions of the star trek series (a universe populated by numerous sentient life forms strewn about the galaxies), it probably would be impossible to avoid sending humans into space. We've been sending diplomats across borders for millenia; it's hard to imagine that an advanced robotic computer might be developed that could replace humans in tact and judgement any time soon (maybe something like the replicants from Blade Runner?). In terms of the need for humans to pilot exploration ships in the real universe, where for all intents and purposes we're the only sentient life around, Captain Kirk (or "Captain Dunsail", as Commodore Wesley calls Kirk) has, I believe, already been made obsolete. fyt
Captain Dunsel Not a typo. Dunsel is how transcript writers heard it, but I believe dunsail is the correct spelling ( cf stunsail, pronounced "stuns'l")
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 25, 2011 - 8:26am |
|
hobiejoe wrote:Crikey, that is an extraordinary trajectory. I'd always imagined a somewhat more glider-like gentle descent. And as for the "airglow", well... it's well known that in favourable conditions on an open sea a lucky sailor will see the "green flash" across the western horizon moments after the sun has set. Not seen one yet You can actually see them over land as well. We occasionally get them from the deck here with the sun setting over the peninsula. It has to be VERY dry though, and almost no surrounding clouds.
|
|
Umberdog
Location: In my body. Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:36pm |
|
This is a cool picture too. Anyone wanna take a swim in the Bahamas? We'll need a diving board.
|
|
hobiejoe
Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light. Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:28pm |
|
Zep wrote:Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind." Crikey, that is an extraordinary trajectory. I'd always imagined a somewhat more glider-like gentle descent. And as for the "airglow", well... it's well known that in favourable conditions on an open sea a lucky sailor will see the "green flash" across the western horizon moments after the sun has set. Not seen one yet
|
|
Umberdog
Location: In my body. Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:12pm |
|
Zep wrote:Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind." I could write a sci-fi novel about that evil dark cloud in the upper right corner. Very interesting picture.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:10pm |
|
Zep wrote:Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind." very cool pic.
|
|
Zep
Location: Funkytown
|
Posted:
Jul 24, 2011 - 3:06pm |
|
Atlantis returns to Earth, as seen from the International Space Station. Details here. "The green band of light in the background is called "airglow." Airglow is a luminous bubble that surounds our entire planet, decorating the top of the atmosphere with aurora-like color. Although airglow resembles the aurora borealis, its underlying physics is different. Airglow is caused by an assortment of chemical reactions in the upper atmosphere driven mainly by solar ultraviolet radiation; auroras, on the other hand, are prompted by gusts of solar wind."
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 2:22pm |
|
justlistening wrote:I shared Coaxial's link with a few people here at work and one of them sent me this photo. Thought I'd share. Gene Roddenbery came to our highschool in 1976 when I was a freshman. He screened a blooper reel from Star Trek and fielded questions about the upcoming (rumored) Star Trek movie (it was still three years away). Still haven't figured out how they arranged for him to visit our dinky school. My graduating class only had 120 kids in it - I don't think we had more than about 500 total. It was a highlight though and he was a nice guy. He stuck around and spoke to people in the hallway after the presentation. All you trekheads out there (including the original) will of course remember the episode that broached the subject of whether humans were essential to space exploration, THE ULTIMATE COMPUTER. Predictably, the plot involves demonstrating that computers are not fit to pilot star ships without humans. My opinion is that, given the basic assumptions of the star trek series (a universe populated by numerous sentient life forms strewn about the galaxies), it probably would be impossible to avoid sending humans into space. We've been sending diplomats across borders for millenia; it's hard to imagine that an advanced robotic computer might be developed that could replace humans in tact and judgement any time soon (maybe something like the replicants from Blade Runner?). In terms of the need for humans to pilot exploration ships in the real universe, where for all intents and purposes we're the only sentient life around, Captain Kirk (or "Captain Dunsail", as Commodore Wesley calls Kirk) has, I believe, already been made obsolete.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:51pm |
|
Xeric wrote: Yeah. But. No kid was ever inspired to become an astronaut (or an aerospace engineer or a poet) by a datastream from a robot. The reasons to do personed flight may indeed be more emotional than rational: that fact does not necessarily tender those reasons invalid.
OK, but that's why we have guys like Richard Branson. He can afford to spend extravagantly on manned spaceflight projects for romantic reasons! We really can't.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:42pm |
|
bokey wrote: Wow.Just wow.We should stagnate as a nation and a race in order to squander our resources on being world cops and bombing other countries that haven't done a frigging thing to us,rather than try to advance ourselves?
Where do you see me advocating the above? Wasting money comes in many forms, including fighting pointless wars. The point is, sending human flesh into space is inefficient; we can employ contractors and generate economic growth by being smart about utilizing our space flight capability and produce much more meaningful "science" along the lines of projects like Pioneer, Voyager, Mariner, etc. You get much more bang for your buck regarding advancing the frontiers of science and knowledge when you stop insisting on sending humans into space to evacuate their bowels and vomit in zero gravity. Stagnating is what we basically have been doing with our inefficient approach to space exploration.
|
|
GeneP59
Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday. Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:32pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:Cool. It says 2014 "or later" now... I never looked up who Ad Astra was. I've seen the name and just skimmed over it. Things are still awesome up there. The guy who's the head of the company is a former astronaut for NASA with a PHD in Science. Hope his technology works.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:23pm |
|
GeneP59 wrote:There was supposed to be a test fire of a new plasma engine on the Space Station next year and I never heard anything more about it. This new engine is suppose to knock 6 months off the trip to Mars down to a 39-day mission to Mars. If this is feasible, the new technology will make going to Mars and further a return trip not a one way ride. Cool. It says 2014 "or later" now... I never looked up who Ad Astra was. I've seen the name and just skimmed over it. Things are still awesome up there.
|
|
GeneP59
Location: On the edge of tomorrow looking back at yesterday. Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 1:00pm |
|
There was supposed to be a test fire of a new plasma engine on the Space Station next year and I never heard anything more about it. This new engine is suppose to knock 6 months off the trip to Mars down to a 39-day mission to Mars. If this is feasible, the new technology will make going to Mars and further a return trip not a one way ride.
|
|
justlistening
Location: So. California Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:42pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: "...besides, it's cold as hell" (That simile always bothered me - hell is supposed to be hot.) I see your point about setting up an outpost or settlement; that'll probably happen someday. I just figure picking the first guy could be a little troublesome. You're probably right about a lot of the westward expansion people not expecting to come back - the same is probably true for many of the early trans-Atlantic sailors.
Not to mention dust storms that blanket the planet and radiation due to lack of atmosphere. (got your continued reference though)
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:36pm |
|
Zep wrote: The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning.
Think too of the opportunity to start all over again, another common theme in history.
Still, I get your point. 200 million miles is a lot of road. And Mars ain't the kind of place to raise a kid.
"...in fact, it's cold as hell" (That simile always bothered me - I thought hell is supposed to be hot.)
I see your point about setting up an outpost or settlement; that'll probably happen someday. I just figure picking the first guy could be a little troublesome. You're probably right about a lot of the westward expansion people not expecting to come back - the same is probably true for many of the early trans-Atlantic sailors.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming
Location: Powell Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:36pm |
|
Zep wrote: The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning.
*pictures Kevin Costner making coffee for a little green man*
|
|
hippiechick
Location: topsy turvy land Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:24pm |
|
Zep wrote: The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning.
Think too of the opportunity to start all over again, another common theme in history.
Still, I get your point. 200 million miles is a lot of road. And Mars ain't the kind of place to raise a kid.
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it. (Got your Rocket Man ref)
|
|
Zep
Location: Funkytown
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:22pm |
|
Proclivities wrote:Well, one might wonder as to the mental health of someone who is willing to travel 200 million miles to be stranded on some cold, little planet. It's a little beyond what test pilots do. The mission would not be to strand the astronauts, but to give them enough resources to start a new outpost. Humans have done this on faith for generations. It's likely many who went west during the U.S. expansion thought very little about returning. Think too of the opportunity to start all over again, another common theme in history. Still, I get your point. 200 million miles is a lot of road. And Mars ain't the kind of place to raise a kid.
|
|
Zep
Location: Funkytown
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:18pm |
|
GeneP59 wrote:Hell you'd never go. No baseball. Good point. Beer, Babes, Baseball ... no easy balancing act, that one.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 22, 2011 - 12:17pm |
|
justlistening wrote:I was listening the other night and there was someone talking about a one-way flight to Mars. This is not the same segment I heard, but echoes the ideas. The speakers argument was that there have already been people who were willing to risk to fly on a shuttle known to be highly dangerous so there will be people willing to go on a one way mission to Mars. Unfortunately Nasa and the government look at it as a suicide mission rather than scientific exploration and would probably never do it. Well, one might wonder as to the mental health of someone who is willing to travel 200 million miles to be stranded on some cold, little planet. It's a little beyond what test pilots do.
|
|
|