Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- fractalv - Apr 27, 2025 - 4:17pm
April 2025 Photo Theme - Red
- oldviolin - Apr 27, 2025 - 4:05pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Apr 27, 2025 - 4:00pm
Birthday wishes
- GeneP59 - Apr 27, 2025 - 3:59pm
Trump
- steeler - Apr 27, 2025 - 3:49pm
TV shows you watch
- Steely_D - Apr 27, 2025 - 3:23pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- ptooey - Apr 27, 2025 - 3:07pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - Apr 27, 2025 - 2:25pm
NY Times Strands
- ptooey - Apr 27, 2025 - 11:38am
Wordle - daily game
- ptooey - Apr 27, 2025 - 11:22am
NYTimes Connections
- ptooey - Apr 27, 2025 - 11:09am
Baseball, anyone?
- Proclivities - Apr 27, 2025 - 10:48am
RP app for LG OLED TV
- tmarko - Apr 27, 2025 - 5:48am
NASA & other news from space
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 26, 2025 - 9:32pm
New Music
- R_P - Apr 26, 2025 - 9:11pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 26, 2025 - 8:44pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- winter - Apr 26, 2025 - 8:16pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 26, 2025 - 12:45pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 26, 2025 - 10:37am
M.A.G.A.
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2025 - 9:27am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2025 - 7:32am
Mixtape Culture Club
- Steely_D - Apr 26, 2025 - 7:27am
The Obituary Page
- rgio - Apr 26, 2025 - 5:22am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- Isabeau - Apr 26, 2025 - 5:22am
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 25, 2025 - 10:21pm
Graphs, Charts & Maps
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 25, 2025 - 6:42pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Apr 25, 2025 - 4:13pm
Anti-War
- R_P - Apr 25, 2025 - 4:04pm
Who is singing?
- ledzeplisa - Apr 25, 2025 - 2:08pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- R567 - Apr 25, 2025 - 1:54pm
Got a Good (True) Ghost Story?
- Isabeau - Apr 25, 2025 - 1:27pm
Ukraine
- Coaxial - Apr 25, 2025 - 5:53am
President(s) Musk/Trump
- Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2025 - 5:44pm
Recommended devices
- bluewolverine - Apr 24, 2025 - 5:17pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Apr 24, 2025 - 4:11pm
China
- R_P - Apr 24, 2025 - 3:18pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2025 - 3:17pm
Economix
- Isabeau - Apr 24, 2025 - 2:55pm
Freedom of speech?
- R_P - Apr 24, 2025 - 1:00pm
Russia
- Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2025 - 9:36am
Breaking News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 24, 2025 - 8:15am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- Steely_D - Apr 24, 2025 - 7:28am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 10:00pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 5:01pm
Commercializing Facebook
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 2:29pm
BRING OUT YOUR DEAD
- Isabeau - Apr 23, 2025 - 2:22pm
Business as Usual
- R_P - Apr 23, 2025 - 1:05pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- Steely_D - Apr 23, 2025 - 9:38am
Radio Paradise Staion Break
- geoff_morphini - Apr 23, 2025 - 8:16am
Geeky funny
- Proclivities - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:42am
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey
- dischuckin - Apr 23, 2025 - 7:13am
Things You Thought Today
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2025 - 9:45pm
Real Time with Bill Maher
- R_P - Apr 22, 2025 - 1:51pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- Lazy8 - Apr 22, 2025 - 12:27pm
Happy Earth Day
- R_P - Apr 22, 2025 - 12:26pm
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc)
- islander - Apr 22, 2025 - 10:03am
Thimerosal Vaccines linked to neurological disorders
- islander - Apr 21, 2025 - 8:48pm
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- GeneP59 - Apr 21, 2025 - 8:40am
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:45pm
::yesterday::
- Red_Dragon - Apr 20, 2025 - 3:35pm
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - Apr 20, 2025 - 8:43am
Favourite Scriptures
- black321 - Apr 20, 2025 - 8:30am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Apr 20, 2025 - 7:55am
I Thought Earth Had Only One Moon
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2025 - 5:06pm
The war on funk is over!
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 4:02pm
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:43pm
Quick! I need a chicken...
- Isabeau - Apr 19, 2025 - 1:00pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - Apr 19, 2025 - 12:45pm
Best Song Comments.
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 19, 2025 - 11:15am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:59am
Mars
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:53am
Lyrics That Remind You of Someone
- oldviolin - Apr 19, 2025 - 9:32am
Immigration
- R_P - Apr 18, 2025 - 7:05pm
Need A Thread Killed?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 6:25pm
Music Videos
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2025 - 5:19pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Other Medical Stuff
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 51, 52, 53 ... 60, 61, 62 Next |
jagdriver

Location: Now in Lobster Land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 4:12pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
There is no such thing as one size fits all with eyeglasses. You could indeed be causing more harm than good with OTC readers. They do not take into account the distance between your pupils. The stronger the lenses, the more critical the measurement. The lenses will pull your eyes and the muscles in the direction of the optical center. They can make you cross eyed if too narrow and wall eyed if too wide. Each eyeball has 6 muscles and you are making them do things that they were not made to do when you wear poorly measured glasses. Besides all that, rarely does someone have the same vision in both eyes, which these ready readers assume. So you get what you pay for, and at 5 bucks a pair, you ain't getting much more than a headache.
And for me, my eyes focus on two distinctly different planes. (It must have been all of that LDS back in '60s, and watching the sun comin' up paisley.)
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 4:10pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
There is no such thing as one size fits all with eyeglasses. You could indeed be causing more harm than good with OTC readers. They do not take into account the distance between your pupils. The stronger the lenses, the more critical the measurement. The lenses will pull your eyes and the muscles in the direction of the optical center. They can make you cross eyed if too narrow and wall eyed if too wide. Each eyeball has 6 muscles and you are making them do things that they were not made to do when you wear poorly measured glasses. Besides all that, rarely does someone have the same vision in both eyes, which these ready readers assume. So you get what you pay for, and at 5 bucks a pair, you ain't getting much more than a headache.
If I had health insurance for glasses, I would get Rx lenses.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 4:09pm |
|
Manbird wrote: Me to. I have permanent spasms throughout my neck, shoulders and back from leaning forward to try and see my monitor. Just a few months ago I could see it fine without these cheap OTC glasses but now I can't see anything without them - and Ironically I think it's wearing them that's making me blind.
There is no such thing as one size fits all with eyeglasses. You could indeed be causing more harm than good with OTC readers. They do not take into account the distance between your pupils. The stronger the lenses, the more critical the measurement. The lenses will pull your eyes and the muscles in the direction of the optical center. They can make you cross eyed if too narrow and wall eyed if too wide. Each eyeball has 6 muscles and you are making them do things that they were not made to do when you wear poorly measured glasses. Besides all that, rarely does someone have the same vision in both eyes, which these ready readers assume. So you get what you pay for, and at 5 bucks a pair, you ain't getting much more than a headache.
|
|
Manbird

Location: La Villa Toscana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 3:58pm |
|
jagdriver wrote: Ditto. Roger. Ibid. Although in my case I probably look like a turtle with my head tilted up (in order to peer through my progressive lenses). Can't be doing my back any good, either. Me to. I have permanent spasms throughout my neck, shoulders and back from leaning forward to try and see my monitor. Just a few months ago I could see it fine without these cheap OTC glasses but now I can't see anything without them - and Ironically I think it's wearing them that's making me blind.
|
|
jagdriver

Location: Now in Lobster Land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 3:57pm |
|
kurtster wrote: Remember, a mechanic is only as good as his (her) tools. Most people who end up getting these lenses find them to be liberating and a quality of life improvement.
{Insert amusing retort here.}
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 3:54pm |
|
jagdriver wrote: Ditto. Roger. Ibid. Although in my case I probably look like a turtle with my head tilted up (in order to peer through my progressive lenses). Can't be doing my back any good, either.
No, its killing your neck and your back. Ergonomically, progressives are designed so that you need to look down at about a 15 degree angle from horizontal for them to work comfortably. The proper placement for a computer monitor should be with the top of the monitor at eye level so you look down at that angle. Any time you deal in multi-focal lenses you are compromising. If you spend more than an hour at the computer, you should have a pair of these office lenses. They are a bona fide work tool. Remember, a mechanic is only as good as his (her) tools. Most people who end up getting these lenses find them to be liberating and a quality of life improvement.
|
|
jagdriver

Location: Now in Lobster Land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 3:37pm |
|
hippiechick wrote: I need a pair of those. I have been wearing the cheap reading glasses, which work ok, but not specific enough for my needs.
Ditto. Roger. Ibid. Although in my case I probably look like a turtle with my head tilted up (in order to peer through my progressive lenses). Can't be doing my back any good, either.
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 3:06pm |
|
romeotuma wrote:More from Kurtster on this subject... this is great stuff—
If she has good results, she might want to consider getting computer / office lenses for her new glasses. They provide correction for mid length or arms length distance (2 to 3 feet) on the top and upclose (12 to 18 inches) on the bottom. They are no line progressive style lenses and a modern update for music glasses, which were a lined bifocal with the same properties. The sheet music is where the monitor is and the keyboard is, well, its in the same place. The lenses are much less expensive then standard progressives and she should also get them with anti reflective coating as well. Most importanly, she should purchase a real good pair of polarized sunglasses.What is really cool about these office lenses is that they require very little posture adjustments to use. Look straight out to see the computer and look down to see the keyboard. They are also great for reading, crafts, sewing and even when going out to a restaurant. You can see people across the table clearly and read the menu and see your food. Also excellent for playing cards for the same reasons. They are not a one trick pony. I need a pair of those. I have been wearing the cheap reading glasses, which work ok, but not specific enough for my needs.
|
|
(former member)

Location: hotel in Las Vegas Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 19, 2010 - 11:31am |
|
romeotuma wrote:Kurtster just PMed me this as advice for my mother, and I asked him if I could post it here in my favorite forum... he said I could, which is good, because this data he offers is fantastic—
Cataract surgery is pretty much routine and very safe provided there are no retinal or pathological issues such as diabetes. Assuming the eye is healthy other than cataracts, the primary issue is finding a qualified doctor to perform the surgery. Do the necessary homework, as the surgeon is the single most important part of the process. The implants and tools are pretty much standard. Here are the things to avoid. Do not get the implants that claim to offer variable focus. The present one available here in the US is disappointing at best and many have been removed. I have talked to several ophthalmologists about this as I have a cataract in progress from either my cancer or chemo. Our place is where the doc's in town get their glasses so I get to pick the minds of the cream of the crop. The goal of cataract surgery should be to replace the crystalline lens with an implant and restore the patient's distance vision to plano or no correction. There are some doc's who want to offer mono vision in the process. This is the condition where one eye sees far and the other near. They promise no glasses in the outcome. The drawback is that the patient loses depth perception. This is a real problem for navigating elders in the case of driving, walking and negotiating stairs. I feel very strongly opposed to this. It can be overcome with distance only glasses to neutralize the effect, but I would rather have perfect distance at all times and use glasses for reading. The patient is going to need glasses for something so it might as well be reading, rather than successfully getting around without crashing, tripping and stumbling. Medicare pays for most all of the surgery, it is a universal medical condition and pretty much a standard procedure which Medicare is geared to facilitate. Medicare also has a once in a life time benefit where the post op patient is entitled to get coverage for a complete pair of new glasses after surgery. That is a new frame and a lens for each eye. Surgery done on one eye, get a new frame and one of the two lenses is covered. Second eye done and the new lens for that eye is covered. The difficulty is during the time in between having the other eye operated on. Old lenses will no longer be appropriate or useful. Most optical dispensaries will accept Medicare payments for the new glasses, but the benefit will pay most but not all the cost, unless you get the most primitive glasses. Get what is needed, comfortable and make the patient happy and pay the difference. More than likely these frames will be around for a long time. You can change lenses in the existing frame as time goes on. So choose the frame wisely. After the surgery, the eye's vision is unsettled for some six months and the new Rx given in the first few days is going to be pretty different from the one six months later when the patient usually goes in for follow up care. So when buying glasses, find out what the store's policy is regarding Rx changes. Stay away from the chains. Most offices offer a 2 to 6 month window for a one time no charge replacement due to an Rx change or error. You can find out by calling and make sure you get some written assurance. This is also challenging for the patient as it does require a lot of running around and time to get things done. But that's the way it is. Also find out if the store can replace the lenses without your mom having to leave them behind during the wait while they grind the new lens.. Most should be able to order the lens and then she can go in and have it cut to fit while she waits in about a half an hour. Stay away from places that do not have that capability. So fear not about the surgery and don't allow it to be put off. When it's done properly, it is an immediate quality of life improvement, in spite of all the running around required. One of the first comments post op patients have is I can see the true colors again. They are no longer looking through a cloudy yellow tinged lens. So get your mom thinking about doing it and not putting it off. When picking the ophthalmologist, the more experience the better. Have your mom find out whose surgeries went well and whose went south. I'm sure she has had some of those conversations already and that could be a factor in her hesitance to get it done. But it must be done. The alternative is a dog and a cane. Hope this gives you enough to get the ball rolling. Please ask me any questions that you may have as they come up. No question is stupid or silly as you know. More from Kurtster on this subject... this is great stuff—
If she has good results, she might want to consider getting computer / office lenses for her new glasses. They provide correction for mid length or arms length distance (2 to 3 feet) on the top and upclose (12 to 18 inches) on the bottom. They are no line progressive style lenses and a modern update for music glasses, which were a lined bifocal with the same properties. The sheet music is where the monitor is and the keyboard is, well, its in the same place. The lenses are much less expensive then standard progressives and she should also get them with anti reflective coating as well. Most importanly, she should purchase a real good pair of polarized sunglasses.What is really cool about these office lenses is that they require very little posture adjustments to use. Look straight out to see the computer and look down to see the keyboard. They are also great for reading, crafts, sewing and even when going out to a restaurant. You can see people across the table clearly and read the menu and see your food. Also excellent for playing cards for the same reasons. They are not a one trick pony.
|
|
(former member)

Location: hotel in Las Vegas Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 17, 2010 - 10:22am |
|
Kurtster just PMed me this as advice for my mother, and I asked him if I could post it here in my favorite forum... he said I could, which is good, because this data he offers is fantastic—
Cataract surgery is pretty much routine and very safe provided there are no retinal or pathological issues such as diabetes. Assuming the eye is healthy other than cataracts, the primary issue is finding a qualified doctor to perform the surgery. Do the necessary homework, as the surgeon is the single most important part of the process. The implants and tools are pretty much standard. Here are the things to avoid. Do not get the implants that claim to offer variable focus. The present one available here in the US is disappointing at best and many have been removed. I have talked to several ophthalmologists about this as I have a cataract in progress from either my cancer or chemo. Our place is where the doc's in town get their glasses so I get to pick the minds of the cream of the crop. The goal of cataract surgery should be to replace the crystalline lens with an implant and restore the patient's distance vision to plano or no correction. There are some doc's who want to offer mono vision in the process. This is the condition where one eye sees far and the other near. They promise no glasses in the outcome. The drawback is that the patient loses depth perception. This is a real problem for navigating elders in the case of driving, walking and negotiating stairs. I feel very strongly opposed to this. It can be overcome with distance only glasses to neutralize the effect, but I would rather have perfect distance at all times and use glasses for reading. The patient is going to need glasses for something so it might as well be reading, rather than successfully getting around without crashing, tripping and stumbling. Medicare pays for most all of the surgery, it is a universal medical condition and pretty much a standard procedure which Medicare is geared to facilitate. Medicare also has a once in a life time benefit where the post op patient is entitled to get coverage for a complete pair of new glasses after surgery. That is a new frame and a lens for each eye. Surgery done on one eye, get a new frame and one of the two lenses is covered. Second eye done and the new lens for that eye is covered. The difficulty is during the time in between having the other eye operated on. Old lenses will no longer be appropriate or useful. Most optical dispensaries will accept Medicare payments for the new glasses, but the benefit will pay most but not all the cost, unless you get the most primitive glasses. Get what is needed, comfortable and make the patient happy and pay the difference. More than likely these frames will be around for a long time. You can change lenses in the existing frame as time goes on. So choose the frame wisely. After the surgery, the eye's vision is unsettled for some six months and the new Rx given in the first few days is going to be pretty different from the one six months later when the patient usually goes in for follow up care. So when buying glasses, find out what the store's policy is regarding Rx changes. Stay away from the chains. Most offices offer a 2 to 6 month window for a one time no charge replacement due to an Rx change or error. You can find out by calling and make sure you get some written assurance. This is also challenging for the patient as it does require a lot of running around and time to get things done. But that's the way it is. Also find out if the store can replace the lenses without your mom having to leave them behind during the wait while they grind the new lens.. Most should be able to order the lens and then she can go in and have it cut to fit while she waits in about a half an hour. Stay away from places that do not have that capability. So fear not about the surgery and don't allow it to be put off. When it's done properly, it is an immediate quality of life improvement, in spite of all the running around required. One of the first comments post op patients have is I can see the true colors again. They are no longer looking through a cloudy yellow tinged lens. So get your mom thinking about doing it and not putting it off. When picking the ophthalmologist, the more experience the better. Have your mom find out whose surgeries went well and whose went south. I'm sure she has had some of those conversations already and that could be a factor in her hesitance to get it done. But it must be done. The alternative is a dog and a cane. Hope this gives you enough to get the ball rolling. Please ask me any questions that you may have as they come up. No question is stupid or silly as you know.
|
|
hippiechick

Location: topsy turvy land Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 23, 2009 - 7:36am |
|
The_End wrote: My POSSLQ and I were just discussing this yesterday. Good site!
|
|
rosedraws

Location: close to the edge Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 9:57pm |
|
jadewahoo wrote: Wow! I have several friends with MS. I am always on the lookout for the latest information in understanding and treatment of this debilitating disease. This investigation and treatment is thrilling! I have sent them each a link. Thanks phineas!
I sent the link to my friend and his wife. He's not interested in looking into treatments. And his wife is loonie.
|
|
jadewahoo

Location: Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 7:30pm |
|
phineas wrote:Researcher's labour of love leads to MS breakthroughNew way of thinking about debilitating disease has yielded stunning new treatments – but MS societies urge sufferers to be cautious before experimenting. Link to article on the Globe & Mail web site. Got me thinking of RedBill... Wow! I have several friends with MS. I am always on the lookout for the latest information in understanding and treatment of this debilitating disease. This investigation and treatment is thrilling! I have sent them each a link. Thanks phineas!
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 7:08pm |
|
rosedraws wrote: The initial studies done in Italy were small but the outcomes were dramatic. In a group of 65 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (the most common form) who underwent surgery, the number of active lesions in the brain fell sharply, to 12 per cent from 50 per cent; in the two years after surgery, 73 per cent of patients had no symptoms.This is incredible. One of my dear friends has terrible MS. The results seem to be overwhelmingly positive. It's such a horrible horrible disease. Wow, I hope this turns out to be true.  I also suspect that poor vasculization has a role to play in a host of other ailments as well.
|
|
rosedraws

Location: close to the edge Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 7:07pm |
|
phineas wrote:Researcher's labour of love leads to MS breakthroughNew way of thinking about debilitating disease has yielded stunning new treatments – but MS societies urge sufferers to be cautious before experimenting. Link to article on the Globe & Mail web site. The initial studies done in Italy were small but the outcomes were dramatic. In a group of 65 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (the most common form) who underwent surgery, the number of active lesions in the brain fell sharply, to 12 per cent from 50 per cent; in the two years after surgery, 73 per cent of patients had no symptoms.This is incredible. One of my dear friends has terrible MS. The results seem to be overwhelmingly positive. It's such a horrible horrible disease. Wow, I hope this turns out to be true.
|
|
DownHomeGirl

Location: American Russia Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 7:00pm |
|
phineas wrote:Researcher's labour of love leads to MS breakthroughNew way of thinking about debilitating disease has yielded stunning new treatments – but MS societies urge sufferers to be cautious before experimenting. Link to article on the Globe & Mail web site. Got me thinking of RedBill... That's really interesting, thanks
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 6:49pm |
|
phineas wrote:Researcher's labour of love leads to MS breakthroughNew way of thinking about debilitating disease has yielded stunning new treatments – but MS societies urge sufferers to be cautious before experimenting. Link to article on the Globe & Mail web site. Got me thinking of RedBill...  thanks for this Glerg! really encouraging news!! Now, where are the bio-chemists and neurologists here, for I have a question: The article states: It is well-established that the symptoms of MS are caused by a breakdown of myelin, a fatty substance that coats nerve cells and plays a crucial role in transmitting messages to the central nervous system. When those messages are blurred, nerves malfunction, causing all manner of woes, including blurred eyesight, loss of sensation in the limbs and even paralysis. I thought I had read about myelin in my reading on Alzheimers and I just went hunting for it but couldn't find anything. Is there any connection between Alzheimers and the breakdown of myelin? ...or is my memory impaired?
|
|
phineas


|
Posted:
Nov 22, 2009 - 10:26am |
|
Researcher's labour of love leads to MS breakthroughNew way of thinking about debilitating disease has yielded stunning new treatments – but MS societies urge sufferers to be cautious before experimenting. Link to article on the Globe & Mail web site. Got me thinking of RedBill...
|
|
DownHomeGirl

Location: American Russia Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 2, 2009 - 5:53pm |
|
romeotuma wrote:I have not used this site myself yet, but somebody close to me says this site is excellent, and she highly recommends it for everybody... it supposedly has great prices, plus the huge bonus that you don't have to pay taxes on the products, because this store does not have a physical location... and looking at the site right now, it says if you get over $25 worth of stuff, the shipping is free... (I think with prescription stuff, shipping is free for over $50...) it has everything here, from toothpaste onward etc. etc... if anyone tries this site, let me know what it was like... drugstore We always use drugstore.com to check the "best going rate" on meds. I'd recommend it if you don't mind mail order, but knowing your local pharmacist is always better
|
|
|