NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - May 4, 2024 - 10:26am
NYTimes Connections
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 4, 2024 - 10:25am
Other Medical Stuff
- kurtster - May 4, 2024 - 10:24am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - May 4, 2024 - 10:09am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - May 4, 2024 - 9:43am
Israel
- R_P - May 4, 2024 - 9:26am
What Did You See Today?
- miamizsun - May 4, 2024 - 9:03am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - May 4, 2024 - 8:58am
SCOTUS
- Steely_D - May 4, 2024 - 8:04am
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- MrDill - May 4, 2024 - 1:09am
Trump
- kurtster - May 3, 2024 - 11:04pm
What can you hear right now?
- haresfur - May 3, 2024 - 10:42pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 3, 2024 - 7:32pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 4:51pm
The Dragons' Roost
- GeneP59 - May 3, 2024 - 3:53pm
Favorite Quotes
- black321 - May 3, 2024 - 3:38pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 3:04pm
RightWingNutZ
- islander - May 3, 2024 - 11:55am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- MrDill - May 3, 2024 - 11:41am
Poetry Forum
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:46am
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:36am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 3, 2024 - 9:24am
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- R_P - May 3, 2024 - 7:54am
Derplahoma!
- sunybuny - May 3, 2024 - 4:56am
Unquiet Minds - Mental Health Forum
- miamizsun - May 3, 2024 - 4:36am
What Makes You Laugh?
- miamizsun - May 3, 2024 - 4:31am
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - May 3, 2024 - 3:38am
Main Mix Playlist
- R567 - May 3, 2024 - 12:06am
Who Killed The Electric Car??? -- The Movie
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 2, 2024 - 9:51pm
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 5:56pm
Joe Biden
- R_P - May 2, 2024 - 5:07pm
What Makes You Sad?
- thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 3:35pm
songs that ROCK!
- thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 3:07pm
Breaking News
- thisbody - May 2, 2024 - 2:57pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:27am
Questions.
- oldviolin - May 2, 2024 - 9:13am
The Obituary Page
- Proclivities - May 2, 2024 - 7:42am
And the good news is....
- Bill_J - May 1, 2024 - 6:30pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- ladron - May 1, 2024 - 6:22pm
Things you would be grating food for
- Manbird - May 1, 2024 - 3:58pm
Economix
- black321 - May 1, 2024 - 12:19pm
I Heart Huckabee - NOT!
- Manbird - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:49pm
Democratic Party
- R_P - Apr 30, 2024 - 4:01pm
Oh, The Stupidity
- haresfur - Apr 30, 2024 - 3:30pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:46pm
Canada
- black321 - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:37pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:02am
Food
- Bill_J - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:46pm
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 11:36am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 8:34am
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc)
- rgio - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:37am
Photos you haven't taken of yourself
- Antigone - Apr 29, 2024 - 5:03am
Britain
- R_P - Apr 28, 2024 - 10:47am
Birthday wishes
- GeneP59 - Apr 28, 2024 - 9:56am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 27, 2024 - 9:53pm
Classical Music
- miamizsun - Apr 27, 2024 - 1:23pm
LeftWingNutZ
- Lazy8 - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:46pm
Things You Thought Today
- Red_Dragon - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:17pm
The Moon
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:08pm
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- fractalv - Apr 26, 2024 - 8:59pm
Musky Mythology
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 7:23pm
Mini Meetups - Post Here!
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 4:02pm
Australia has Disappeared
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 2:41pm
Radio Paradise sounding better recently
- firefly6 - Apr 26, 2024 - 10:39am
Neil Young
- Steely_D - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:20am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:01am
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity
- miamizsun - Apr 26, 2024 - 5:07am
Ask an Atheist
- R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 11:02am
Afghanistan
- R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:26am
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:00am
The Abortion Wars
- Isabeau - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:27am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- ColdMiser - Apr 25, 2024 - 7:15am
What's that smell?
- Manbird - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:27pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
TV shows you watch
- Beaker - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:32am
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
USA/Canada »
Thoughtful Suggestions for Improving America
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12, 13 Next |
dionysius
Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:48pm |
|
javahnagila wrote:one word: tolerance
I will not just tolerate your new av, I will wholeheartedly support it.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:30pm |
|
maryte wrote: Wha? I didn't say "state's rights."
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:28pm |
|
maryte wrote: Not parsing for you? Works for me.
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:22pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote: A state has no rights, only people have rights. That so many of them choose to give them up to the state is very disturbing to me.
oldslabsides wrote: They all assume responsibilities that are not those of the national government. They all represent the abdication of rights and state responsibilities. They are all financed by a confiscatory system of robbery called taxation. They are all backed by the police power of the national government.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:13pm |
|
maryte wrote:
Of course I accept that about you! I sure as hell can't change how you feel. Although I've got to wonder about your concerns that the poor state is having its rights usurped. Oklahoma must be heaven, because state gubmint in Texas imposes on its citizenry far worse than the federal gubmint...
A state has no rights, only people have rights. That so many of them choose to give them up to the state is very disturbing to me.
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:11pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote: Acceptance, say, of the fact that some of us feel very threatened by the power of the state? That some of us just want to be left alone to take responsibility for ourselves without the intrusions of a nanny state? Just askin'...
Of course I accept that about you! I sure as hell can't change how you feel. Although I've got to wonder about your concerns that the poor state is having its rights usurped. Oklahoma must be heaven, because state gubmint in Texas imposes on its citizenry far worse than the federal gubmint...
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 2:03pm |
|
maryte wrote:
better: Acceptance
Acceptance, say, of the fact that some of us feel very threatened by the power of the state? That some of us just want to be left alone to take responsibility for ourselves without the intrusions of a nanny state? Just askin'...
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:59pm |
|
javahnagila wrote:one word: tolerance
better: Acceptance
|
|
javahnagila
Location: Spaced Coast of Florida Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:55pm |
|
one word: tolerance
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:55pm |
|
zipper wrote: I so love your communication skills and your ability to grasp the details and apply them to the big picture in a way that anyone can comprehend.
That makes at least two of us.
|
|
zipper
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:53pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote:kurtster wrote:If the only end user of your product is the government, then it makes sense to me. The landscaper in Waukegan probably isn't netting more than $400K. And what if it isn't? The burden of compliance would fall on anyone doing business with the feds at any level. Or do you want to add yet another accounting/compliance requirement: state what portion of your company's income comes from federal contracting as well, documented with this form and that table and audited by this certified accounting agency, paid for out of overhead. None of which cuts the grass. It doesn't matter that the guy cutting the grass doesn't make more than $471,000/year (and as far as I'm concerned, bully for him if he does)— he has to prove he doesn't, and proving he doesn't takes time and money. It means there's no point taking on a federal contract for a small job—you'll lose money. You need to take on lots of federal contracts or charge more for them, putting you at a disadvantage to a company that does nothing but. You're accomplishing the opposite of your intent. You might consider this feel good legislation, where as I see it as a backlash to the outragous missuse of the TARP fund and similar proposals. A line must be drawn somewhere. I consider it both: a misguided attempt to fix a problem caused by red tape with more red tape. Motivating it by a desire to punish those who took advantage of the system Congress put in place doesn't change the outcome or punish those truly responsible. The guy cutting grass didn't get any TARP money. Imagine the impact on Major League Baseball, which exists in its present form by an Act of Congress as an Anti Trust exempt organization. Sure, there will be ways to seek out loopholes, there always are. But just putting this out there for consideration should make people shudder, especially those who have been milking at the governments teet for far to long. I can imagine the impact on MLB: none at all. An exemption from antitrust law can be undone separately, at any time. So do that, and leave the lawn maintenance guy alone. Wouldn't you love to see the wages at Haliburton affected by this approach ? Or how about the wages at Exxon Mobil if they sell fuel to the government ? Let these companies reinvest the difference in their companies or pay dividends to the stock holders and pay more taxes on earnings not diverted to the same. I realize this isn't perfect, but do you have a better idea ? Trillions of dollars have disappeared down ratholes overnight and no one seems to have a meaningful idea as to how to stop it.
No, I wouldn't. I'd rather see each company's owners set compensation based on the value added by the employee, or the scarcity and necessity of the work s/he does. Or whatever the owners of the company want to use—it's none of our business. If they pay too much the cost of their goods and services will go up and somebody who pays less gets the job. You want my idea? Scrap the requirements irrelevant to the actual work. Eliminate the intrusive and burdensome accounting rules that govern every minute detail of doing business with the government; rules that bloat administration within companies and make them uncompetitive with non-governmental customers. As for TARP and other such boondoggles: even easier. Don't do it. Admit there are problems government is helpless against, and concentrate on the ones it can help with, and should help with. I so love your communication skills and your ability to grasp the details and apply them to the big picture in a way that anyone can comprehend.
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:47pm |
|
kurtster wrote:If the only end user of your product is the government, then it makes sense to me. The landscaper in Waukegan probably isn't netting more than $400K. And what if it isn't? The burden of compliance would fall on anyone doing business with the feds at any level. Or do you want to add yet another accounting/compliance requirement: state what portion of your company's income comes from federal contracting as well, documented with this form and that table and audited by this certified accounting agency, paid for out of overhead. None of which cuts the grass. It doesn't matter that the guy cutting the grass doesn't make more than $471,000/year (and as far as I'm concerned, bully for him if he does)— he has to prove he doesn't, and proving he doesn't takes time and money. It means there's no point taking on a federal contract for a small job—you'll lose money. You need to take on lots of federal contracts or charge more for them, putting you at a disadvantage to a company that does nothing but. You're accomplishing the opposite of your intent. You might consider this feel good legislation, where as I see it as a backlash to the outragous missuse of the TARP fund and similar proposals. A line must be drawn somewhere. I consider it both: a misguided attempt to fix a problem caused by red tape with more red tape. Motivating it by a desire to punish those who took advantage of the system Congress put in place doesn't change the outcome or punish those truly responsible. The guy cutting grass didn't get any TARP money. Imagine the impact on Major League Baseball, which exists in its present form by an Act of Congress as an Anti Trust exempt organization. Sure, there will be ways to seek out loopholes, there always are. But just putting this out there for consideration should make people shudder, especially those who have been milking at the governments teet for far to long. I can imagine the impact on MLB: none at all. An exemption from antitrust law can be undone separately, at any time. So do that, and leave the lawn maintenance guy alone. Wouldn't you love to see the wages at Haliburton affected by this approach ? Or how about the wages at Exxon Mobil if they sell fuel to the government ? Let these companies reinvest the difference in their companies or pay dividends to the stock holders and pay more taxes on earnings not diverted to the same. I realize this isn't perfect, but do you have a better idea ? Trillions of dollars have disappeared down ratholes overnight and no one seems to have a meaningful idea as to how to stop it.
No, I wouldn't. I'd rather see each company's owners set compensation based on the value added by the employee, or the scarcity and necessity of the work s/he does. Or whatever the owners of the company want to use—it's none of our business. If they pay too much the cost of their goods and services will go up and somebody who pays less gets the job. You want my idea? Scrap the requirements irrelevant to the actual work. Eliminate the intrusive and burdensome accounting rules that govern every minute detail of doing business with the government; rules that bloat administration within companies and make them uncompetitive with non-governmental customers. As for TARP and other such boondoggles: even easier. Don't do it. Admit there are problems government is helpless against, and concentrate on the ones it can help with, and should help with.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:44pm |
|
Beaker wrote:Sorry Schlabby, I wasn't suggesting you were any one persuasion over another, beyond what we already know - a well-armed man with mullet. Yer pressin' yer luck, Canuck.
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:42pm |
|
Beaker wrote:Some are more liberal than others. Waaay more liberal. When the far right does the reacharound and runs into the far left, what do ya call that anyway? Fixed your typo.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:40pm |
|
Beaker wrote:Some are more liberal than others. Waaay more liberal. When the far left does the reacharound and runs into the far right, what do ya call that anyway? I think anyone would be hard pressed to describe my positions as either liberal or conservative. And those libertarians? Too conservative for me.
|
|
Zep
Location: Funkytown
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:39pm |
|
Beaker wrote:Some are more liberal than others. Waaay more liberal. When the far left does the reacharound and runs into the far right, what do ya call that anyway?
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:36pm |
|
maryte wrote:All generalities. Like everyone at RP is a liberal. There are at least two people around here I can think of who are far better at specifics than myself. I don't think I was quite as general as your analogy.
|
|
maryte
Location: Blinding You With Library Science! Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:33pm |
|
oldslabsides wrote: They all assume responsibilities that are not those of the national government. They all represent the abdication of rights and state responsibilities. They are all financed by a confiscatory system of robbery called taxation. They are all backed by the police power of the national government.
All generalities. Like everyone at RP is a liberal.
|
|
Red_Dragon
Location: Dumbf*ckistan
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:29pm |
|
maryte wrote:
Articulate where all of these organizations have done more harm than good. That would be thoughtful.
They all assume responsibilities that are not those of the national government. They all represent the abdication of rights and state responsibilities. They are all financed by a confiscatory system of robbery called taxation. They are all backed by the police power of the national government.
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2009 - 1:27pm |
|
kurtster wrote:Life is not without risk Kurt, in spite of my high ideals, you would know infinitely more about that than I.
|
|
|