hippiechick wrote: 
Glad you deleted your first answer, Colin Powell.  He is definitely not on the right side of the aisle any longer, he did endorse BHO for POTUS.

Well the discusion is over,  all the credibility comes from the left.  There is no other valid point of view.  Finally, we agree.

 kurtster wrote: 
When it comes to congress, I do my best to remain unbiased:  I don't believe anything any of them says.

 kurtster wrote: 
Well, I wish he would redistribute some wealth in my direction, I could use some. Really, I don't think you have a thing to worry about.

No, can't say that I can think of a one. How about you?

 hippiechick wrote: 

Read:  redistribution of wealth.

By the way ?

Find any credible information sources on the right side of the aisle ?

I knew you would skirt that issue because you don't believe anything from the right side of the aisle is credible.

 kurtster wrote: 
Oh yeah? Whose wealth is getting redistributed, the people who lose their temporary tax breaks, which, btw, aren't paid for, and the amount is huge.

You like the greedy running your company? To me, that is much worse than Marxism, which is a wonderful theory but doesn't work, because people are GREEDY! Our country is now a corporatocracy, and the ideas that fill your head are being brought to you by the likes of very rich powerful people who want things the way they were because it made them rich.

I am sorry that you are unable to get what Obama is trying to do, which is to bring back some balance in this country. Otherwise the Middle Class, of which I assume you belong, is going to go down the drain. And we will continue to slide as a country into the gutter. Do you know that 1.2 million high school kids drop out every year?

And since I realize that you are prolly just looking for someone to argue with you, and I am not interested in doing that, I am done with this conversation.

 hippiechick wrote: 
Hint :  redistribution of wealth

 kurtster wrote: 
I don't get what you are trying to say. What is the proof? Nothing that he does, that I can see, matches the definition of Marxism.

 hippiechick wrote: 
The proof is all around.  One just needs to open their eyes.

Besides, name one credible source from the right that would be worthy of consideration.

Bet you can't name one.

 kurtster wrote: 
What is the proof? What are instances that point in that direction? Wall St alone is a good example that he is not.

Appropriate place for this question, eh ?

So what if Glenn Beck is right about his take on BHO on his march to Marxism ?

Don't expect an answer though, cause most people here favor Marxism.

Although there is Fidel, who recently woke up and cried Bullshit !

They eat their own:

Bill O'Reilly: Christine O'Donnell Said Some 'Crazy Stuff' On My Show (VIDEO)

 mzpro5 wrote:  This is the part that slays me: "Being gay, he started to realize, needn’t condemn him to a life of seedy anonymous hookups, drug abuse, and nihilism."

Damn strai... I mean, damn right. Gays don't have a monopoly on seedy anonymous hookups, drug abuse, and nihilism. Heteros seem perfectly able to hold their own in those departments too.

 mzpro5 wrote: 
No shit!

 hippiechick wrote: 

My Ex-Gay Life With the Tea Party Queen

Scary isn't it.

This is the direction our country is headed?

Christine O'Donnell Slams Welfare, Pop Culture: You Can Legislate Morality (VIDEO)

 nuggler wrote:
  Unless he's on fire.

 hippiechick wrote: 

Piss on Glenn Beck.

Anybody going?

Glenn Beck Rally Will Be Like Moon Landing, Wright Brothers, & Rosa Parks All Rolled Into One Massive Orgasm Of American History

 kurtster wrote: 

The Patriot Act did make for some strange alliances on either side — but then so did NAFTA years ago.

 hippiechick wrote: 
Yet a very strange partnership exists ...

(David) Koch, along with his brother Charles, George Soros, the Ford Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation, each contributed $10 million to the American Civil Liberties Union to defeat parts of the USA PATRIOT Act.^<