The Obituary Page
- Antigone - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:21am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:20am
Wordle - daily game
- maryte - Mar 29, 2024 - 8:15am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:15am
March 2024 Photo Theme - Many
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:11am
Photos you have taken of your walks or hikes.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:09am
Breaking News
- rgio - Mar 29, 2024 - 6:03am
Trump
- haresfur - Mar 29, 2024 - 5:40am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - Mar 29, 2024 - 4:30am
Main Mix Playlist
- R567 - Mar 29, 2024 - 4:08am
Ukraine
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:51pm
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:27pm
Derplahoma!
- Red_Dragon - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:11pm
Uploading Music
- macadavy - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:18pm
Baseball, anyone?
- zevon - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:17pm
Oldest Rock song on RP
- johkir - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:07pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:28pm
Live Music
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 3:10pm
Orbiting Earth
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:19pm
YouTube: Music-Videos
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:17pm
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:13pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- oldviolin - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:06pm
Israel
- R_P - Mar 28, 2024 - 2:03pm
Irony 101
- MrDill - Mar 28, 2024 - 12:21pm
RP automation with iOS Shortcuts App
- pradler4kant - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:57am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Mar 28, 2024 - 11:27am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Beaker - Mar 28, 2024 - 9:30am
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:37am
Business as Usual
- black321 - Mar 28, 2024 - 8:09am
Outstanding Covers
- thisbody - Mar 28, 2024 - 5:51am
Today in History
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 28, 2024 - 4:28am
Little known information...maybe even facts
- haresfur - Mar 27, 2024 - 6:21pm
RightWingNutZ
- R_P - Mar 27, 2024 - 3:48pm
Please Don't Post Here
- Red_Dragon - Mar 27, 2024 - 11:02am
Motivational Office Cliches...
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 26, 2024 - 10:20pm
(Big) Media Watch
- Red_Dragon - Mar 26, 2024 - 6:18pm
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- islander - Mar 26, 2024 - 8:00am
Is there any DOG news out there?
- Beez - Mar 26, 2024 - 7:24am
Food
- Steely_D - Mar 26, 2024 - 1:41am
Frequent drop outs (The Netherlands)
- kingen - Mar 25, 2024 - 2:43pm
China
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:59am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Mar 25, 2024 - 11:20am
Play history seems to indicate that I"m streaming 24/7, b...
- jarro - Mar 25, 2024 - 10:44am
April 8th Partial Solar Eclipse
- Coaxial - Mar 24, 2024 - 6:22pm
New Music
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 24, 2024 - 5:07pm
Dental Floss Tycoons, and other Montana Myths, Facts, and...
- Red_Dragon - Mar 24, 2024 - 12:32pm
Basketball
- oldviolin - Mar 23, 2024 - 2:50pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 23, 2024 - 1:54pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Mar 23, 2024 - 11:17am
Technical Streaming Note for Nerdy RP DIYers
- sjagminas1 - Mar 23, 2024 - 10:16am
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Proclivities - Mar 23, 2024 - 8:56am
Other Medical Stuff
- Antigone - Mar 22, 2024 - 3:06pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- oldviolin - Mar 22, 2024 - 11:06am
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- Red_Dragon - Mar 22, 2024 - 9:17am
Memorials - Remembering Our Loved Ones
- Bill_J - Mar 21, 2024 - 8:54pm
Can you afford to retire?
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 21, 2024 - 2:15pm
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 21, 2024 - 11:10am
What Did You See Today?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Mar 20, 2024 - 5:13pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- ScottFromWyoming - Mar 20, 2024 - 4:31pm
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- Antigone - Mar 20, 2024 - 3:10pm
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Mar 20, 2024 - 11:44am
2024 Elections!
- Lazy8 - Mar 20, 2024 - 7:26am
Economix
- R_P - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:36pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:53am
Delicacies: a..k.a.. the Gross Food forum
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Mar 19, 2024 - 10:12am
New Forum Member on "What Makes RP Great"
- miamizsun - Mar 19, 2024 - 4:38am
Cache stopped working on old Android Phone
- Eisenwindel - Mar 19, 2024 - 1:50am
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing
- Bill_J - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:23pm
Damn Dinosaurs!
- oldviolin - Mar 18, 2024 - 8:16pm
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- geoff_morphini - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:58pm
Great guitar faces
- skyguy - Mar 18, 2024 - 3:33pm
Despots, dictators and war criminals
- R_P - Mar 18, 2024 - 12:41pm
Media Matters
- thisbody - Mar 18, 2024 - 10:03am
NASA & other news from space
- miamizsun - Mar 18, 2024 - 4:13am
MEALTICKET
- drinpt - Mar 17, 2024 - 4:13am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Climate Change
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 117, 118, 119 ... 125, 126, 127 Next |
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:33am |
|
steeler wrote:
I surely do not know.
My framework in approaching anything, however, is to first identify the problem — if there is one. There are those denying that there is a problem. So, we are stuck on that. Only after a problem has been identified, can we be in position to try to find solutions. How does one find a solution to a problem one does not recognize as a problem?
That's why I find it frustrating to read stuff that assails those who are providing "evidence" of a problem.
Now, I think Lazy8 and others are saying that even if there is a solution, which we have not yet determined, it may not be feasible in economic terms. However, if the problem is the fate of the earth itself — or at least certain species on it, including humans — than can any cost be too great?
What proof is there that there is no problem, or that if there is a problem, it is not worth trying to find a solution?
There are some who still claim the earth is flat. Do we wait for them to come around, or do we build ships and sail for new lands? At what point do we stop the study? How much evidence is enough? We could literally study this one to death, but I doubt that's a good approach.
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:29am |
|
Monkeysdad wrote:
But is there a solution?
I surely do not know. My framework in approaching anything, however, is to first identify the problem — if there is one. There are those denying that there is a problem. So, we are stuck on that. Only after a problem has been identified, can we be in position to try to find solutions. How does one find a solution to a problem one does not recognize as a problem? That's why I find it frustrating to read stuff that assails those who are providing "evidence" of a problem, implying that their motives are nefarious and unpure. Now, I think Lazy8 and others are saying that even if there is a solution, which we have not yet determined, it may not be feasible in economic terms. However, if the problem is the fate of the earth itself — or at least certain species on it, including humans — than can any cost be too great? What proof is there that there is no problem, or that if there is a problem, it is not worth trying to find a solution?
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:27am |
|
Monkeysdad wrote:
But is there a solution?
Well, a significant majority of the peer reviewed science indicates that we are at least accelerating the problem with our carbon emissions. So a reasonable solution would be to limit our carbon emissions. Everyone is free to continue to get a significant majority of the peer reviewed science to change their mind and say that there is no impact, but until then it seems prudent that we do what we can instead of continuing the same behaviors that that appear to be driving the problem.
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:27am |
|
BasmntMadman wrote: Uh-oh. He's got records on you, pal. Expect some....Links!!...gasp....
first smartass who posts a pic of sausages gets a wedgie, or deserves one, anyway
Oh, what the heck...
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:26am |
|
steeler wrote:
What is the vastly expensive and intrusive program? I have not heard of a specific plan.
I do not hear a debate about what should be done. As you say, one side of the spectrum is arguing that nothing should be done. That can only be justified if no problem exists or the problem that exists has no possible solution.
I expect we'll be hearing about specifics soon enough.
|
|
Monkeysdad
Location: Simi Valley, CA Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:24am |
|
steeler wrote:
What is the vastly expensive and intrusive program? I have not heard of a specific plan.
I do not hear a debate about what should be done. As you say, one side of the spectrum is arguing that nothing should be done. That can only be justified if no problem exists or the problem that exists has no possible solution.
But is there a solution?
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:20am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail. What is the vastly expensive and intrusive program? I have not heard of a specific plan. I do not hear a debate about what should be done. As you say, one side of the spectrum is arguing that nothing should be done. That can only be justified if no problem exists or the problem that exists has no possible solution.
|
|
BasmntMadman
Location: Off-White Gardens
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:20am |
|
islander wrote: Yes argumentative. That is what you do here. You would take a contrary position to just about anything on the other side of your agenda/ideology and prepare a 27 post dissertation w/ the graphs, supporting blogs, commentary, 4 part harmony, and a reserve of any likely opponents posting history to throw back at them on a moments notice. Hyper-partisan hackery is your tagline.
Uh-oh. He's got records on you, pal. Expect some....Links!!...gasp.... first smartass who posts a pic of sausages gets a wedgie, or deserves one, anyway
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:18am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This Every issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail. Typo/fixed.
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:17am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail. Why can't I say it like that? I must be lost in my own BS or something. I've tried to say this very thing, only to fall between the cracks in my philosophy...
|
|
steeler
Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:17am |
|
islander wrote: Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings.
My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem.
Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
The oil example is a good one. We should be able to agree that oil is a finite resource that has been seriously depleted, and that there is a need to develop alternative energy sources. Yet, we do not agree on that. Instead, we get sidetracked into convoluted, labyrinthinian arguments about who is trying to manipulate whom and for what reasons (usually unspecified). Once the discussions focus more on motivations than upon substances, the rabbit hole opens ever wider, eventually swallowing reason. I think you frame this issue fairly well. I would frame it as follows: We agree there is climate change, but we disagree as to its causes. Primarily, this boils down to those who say that climate change occurs naturally and inevitably, so we should not do anything to interefere. In sum: don't worry about it. On the other side are those who believe that the writing is on the wall, and that human consumption has contributed immensely to the current state. I say, even if human consumption has not knocked the whole natural order of things out of whack, we still have to know that something is happening that can be and likely will be threatening to human and animal life. Yesterday I cited the Ice Age as an example of something that occurred and wiped out species. The earth survived, sure, but a lot of species did not. That, alone, seems to me to provide ample reason for concern. So, why we should be looking for answers, we're bogged down on whether there, in fact, is a problem. Wonder if the dinosaurs had the same conversations?
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:14am |
|
Beaker wrote: Argumentative? Excuse me. I'm merely responding to Dio's alarmist drama of implicating skeptics of global warming as being directly equatable with the now well known lies of tobacco companies. Dishonest discussion such at that of Dio deserves to be called out for what it is: hyper-partisan hackery.
Yes argumentative. That is what you do here. You would take a contrary position to just about anything on the other side of your agenda/ideology and prepare a 27 post dissertation w/ the graphs, supporting blogs, commentary, 4 part harmony, and a reserve of any likely opponents posting history to throw back at them on a moments notice. Hyper-partisan hackery is your tagline.
|
|
dionysius
Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:13am |
|
|
|
Lazy8
Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:12am |
|
steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail.
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:11am |
|
hobiejoe wrote: Will you marry me? love MrsHJ.
The day Mrs.Islander tires of me.
|
|
hobiejoe
Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light. Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:09am |
|
islander wrote: Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings.
My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem.
Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
Will you marry me? love MrsHJ.
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:04am |
|
Beaker wrote: How very hyper-partisan of you. I truly hope you end up eating those words.
how very argumentative of you. What if he's right (as the majority of valid scientific opinion indicates), and we really should be doing something to minimize our impact on climate change? Doesn't matter, it would be much better if you got to win the argument and got to sing the "nah, nah, nah, nah" song while doing your victory dance.
|
|
oldviolin
Location: esse quam videri Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:04am |
|
islander wrote: Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings.
My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem.
Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
Thank you, P.
|
|
islander
Location: Seattle Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:02am |
|
dionysius wrote: If you're equating the two sides in this "debate" then I'm mystified. There's no equivalence. Climate change denial is every bit as honest, rational and respectable as the campaign to cast doubt on the harmful effects of tobacco. Remember that? (Indeed, it has many of the same motives and many of the same people behind it.) All they can do is delay the inevitable, but this delay is fatal, when we urgently need to be accomplishing something. Denial and footdragging hurts everyone, and that's hard to forgive.
Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings. My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem. Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
|
|
MrsHobieJoe
Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:25am |
|
I'm just getting pissed off at what are clearly concerted attempts to derail Copenhagen. Grrrrrrrrrrr. Decision time folks. This is the point to opt in as citizens of the world.
|
|
|