NY Times Strands
- GeneP59 - Jul 3, 2025 - 5:28pm
NYTimes Connections
- GeneP59 - Jul 3, 2025 - 5:01pm
Wordle - daily game
- GeneP59 - Jul 3, 2025 - 4:23pm
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2025 - 4:04pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2025 - 3:49pm
Democratic Party
- rgio - Jul 3, 2025 - 2:28pm
M.A.G.A.
- islander - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:53pm
Immigration
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 1:23pm
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:23am
Israel
- R_P - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:10am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Jul 3, 2025 - 10:35am
Documentaries
- Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:15am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:40am
Love & Hate
- miamizsun - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:15am
Radio Paradise Comments
- miamizsun - Jul 3, 2025 - 7:09am
Copyright and theft
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
Trump
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:47am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- wossName - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:30am
Britain
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 11:04pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 5:01pm
Best Song Comments.
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 3:41pm
Outstanding Covers
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:38pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:20pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:11pm
Fox Spews
- islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
Republican Party
- ColdMiser - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:14am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:02am
Economix
- rgio - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:37am
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
Carmen to Stones
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 1, 2025 - 5:27pm
Baseball, anyone?
- rgio - Jul 1, 2025 - 11:06am
Artificial Intelligence
- drucev - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:58am
President(s) Musk/Trump
- VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches
- Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
Please help me find this song
- LazyEmergency - Jun 30, 2025 - 8:42pm
Forum Posting Guidelines
- rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
Thanks William!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
Living in America
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
Gardeners Corner
- marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
Comics!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
Birthday wishes
- Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
Global Mix renaming
- frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
Iran
- R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 8:56pm
Live Music
- Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 6:53pm
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 28, 2025 - 9:52am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 3:00pm
Know your memes
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 11:41am
What Makes You Sad?
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:41am
Calling all Monty Python fans!
- FeydBaron - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:30am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:23am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2025 - 8:30am
Framed - movie guessing game
- Proclivities - Jun 27, 2025 - 6:25am
Yummy Snack
- Proclivities - Jun 26, 2025 - 1:17pm
Parents and Children
- kurtster - Jun 26, 2025 - 11:32am
What Makes You Laugh?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:36pm
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 12:06pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 11:30am
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 10:32am
Astronomy!
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 8:58am
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 7:13am
Billionaires
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:57pm
Great guitar faces
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:15pm
Buying a Cell Phone
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 3:05pm
Anti-War
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 12:57pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jun 24, 2025 - 10:40am
RIP Mick Ralphs
- geoff_morphini - Jun 23, 2025 - 10:40pm
Congress
- maryte - Jun 23, 2025 - 1:39pm
Europe
- R_P - Jun 23, 2025 - 11:30am
the Todd Rundgren topic
- ColdMiser - Jun 23, 2025 - 7:58am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Climate Change
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 124, 125, 126 ... 132, 133, 134 Next |
oldviolin

Location: esse quam videri Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:27am |
|
BasmntMadman wrote: Uh-oh. He's got records on you, pal. Expect some....Links!!...gasp....
first smartass who posts a pic of sausages gets a wedgie, or deserves one, anyway
Oh, what the heck... 
|
|
oldviolin

Location: esse quam videri Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:26am |
|
steeler wrote:
What is the vastly expensive and intrusive program? I have not heard of a specific plan.
I do not hear a debate about what should be done. As you say, one side of the spectrum is arguing that nothing should be done. That can only be justified if no problem exists or the problem that exists has no possible solution.
I expect we'll be hearing about specifics soon enough.
|
|
Monkeysdad

Location: Simi Valley, CA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:24am |
|
steeler wrote:
What is the vastly expensive and intrusive program? I have not heard of a specific plan.
I do not hear a debate about what should be done. As you say, one side of the spectrum is arguing that nothing should be done. That can only be justified if no problem exists or the problem that exists has no possible solution.
But is there a solution?
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:20am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail. What is the vastly expensive and intrusive program? I have not heard of a specific plan. I do not hear a debate about what should be done. As you say, one side of the spectrum is arguing that nothing should be done. That can only be justified if no problem exists or the problem that exists has no possible solution.
|
|
BasmntMadman

Location: Off-White Gardens 
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:20am |
|
islander wrote: Yes argumentative. That is what you do here. You would take a contrary position to just about anything on the other side of your agenda/ideology and prepare a 27 post dissertation w/ the graphs, supporting blogs, commentary, 4 part harmony, and a reserve of any likely opponents posting history to throw back at them on a moments notice. Hyper-partisan hackery is your tagline.
Uh-oh. He's got records on you, pal. Expect some....Links!!...gasp.... first smartass who posts a pic of sausages gets a wedgie, or deserves one, anyway
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:18am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process.  This Every issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail. Typo/fixed.
|
|
oldviolin

Location: esse quam videri Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:17am |
|
Lazy8 wrote: steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail. Why can't I say it like that? I must be lost in my own BS or something. I've tried to say this very thing, only to fall between the cracks in my philosophy...
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:17am |
|
islander wrote: Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings.
My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem.
Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
The oil example is a good one. We should be able to agree that oil is a finite resource that has been seriously depleted, and that there is a need to develop alternative energy sources. Yet, we do not agree on that. Instead, we get sidetracked into convoluted, labyrinthinian arguments about who is trying to manipulate whom and for what reasons (usually unspecified). Once the discussions focus more on motivations than upon substances, the rabbit hole opens ever wider, eventually swallowing reason. I think you frame this issue fairly well. I would frame it as follows: We agree there is climate change, but we disagree as to its causes. Primarily, this boils down to those who say that climate change occurs naturally and inevitably, so we should not do anything to interefere. In sum: don't worry about it. On the other side are those who believe that the writing is on the wall, and that human consumption has contributed immensely to the current state. I say, even if human consumption has not knocked the whole natural order of things out of whack, we still have to know that something is happening that can be and likely will be threatening to human and animal life. Yesterday I cited the Ice Age as an example of something that occurred and wiped out species. The earth survived, sure, but a lot of species did not. That, alone, seems to me to provide ample reason for concern. So, why we should be looking for answers, we're bogged down on whether there, in fact, is a problem. Wonder if the dinosaurs had the same conversations?
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:14am |
|
Beaker wrote: Argumentative? Excuse me. I'm merely responding to Dio's alarmist drama of implicating skeptics of global warming as being directly equatable with the now well known lies of tobacco companies. Dishonest discussion such at that of Dio deserves to be called out for what it is: hyper-partisan hackery.
Yes argumentative. That is what you do here. You would take a contrary position to just about anything on the other side of your agenda/ideology and prepare a 27 post dissertation w/ the graphs, supporting blogs, commentary, 4 part harmony, and a reserve of any likely opponents posting history to throw back at them on a moments notice. Hyper-partisan hackery is your tagline.
|
|
dionysius

Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:13am |
|
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:12am |
|
steeler wrote:Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
Not such a surprise, really. One side pitches a vastly expensive and intrusive program of government involvement in every aspect of our lives, the other pitches business as usual. If the solutions to the problems had been framed differently it could have turned out very differently, but neither side wants to solve the problem unless it means vanquishing the other side in the process. This issue is being used to push other agendas. Suspicion of those other agendas is driving resistance to an honest assessment of the problem and a rational discussion of solutions. Both sides have their hammers and see the issue as a nail.
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:11am |
|
hobiejoe wrote: Will you marry me? love MrsHJ.
The day Mrs.Islander tires of me.
|
|
hobiejoe

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light. Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:09am |
|
islander wrote: Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings.
My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem.
Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
Will you marry me? love MrsHJ.
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:04am |
|
Beaker wrote: How very hyper-partisan of you. I truly hope you end up eating those words.
how very argumentative of you. What if he's right (as the majority of valid scientific opinion indicates), and we really should be doing something to minimize our impact on climate change? Doesn't matter, it would be much better if you got to win the argument and got to sing the "nah, nah, nah, nah" song while doing your victory dance.
|
|
oldviolin

Location: esse quam videri Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:04am |
|
islander wrote: Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings.
My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem.
Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
Thank you, P.
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 10:02am |
|
dionysius wrote: If you're equating the two sides in this "debate" then I'm mystified. There's no equivalence. Climate change denial is every bit as honest, rational and respectable as the campaign to cast doubt on the harmful effects of tobacco. Remember that? (Indeed, it has many of the same motives and many of the same people behind it.) All they can do is delay the inevitable, but this delay is fatal, when we urgently need to be accomplishing something. Denial and footdragging hurts everyone, and that's hard to forgive.
Not at all. I'm very much on the side of Climate change is pretty much settled (as settled as any scientific endeavor ever is). The "not caused by people" side will jump all over the ambiguity there, but that is the scientific method - always open for review, but it doesn't mean that we don't make decisions and take actions based on our current findings. My point on the politics is that on any issue, people simply dig in based on ideology. They refuse to even hear the there evidence, they have decided. I believe climate change to be settled at this point and think we need to be taking actions based on our current assessment. This doesn't meant that I'm not willing to look at alternative views, or entertain the possibility that there is another cause, just show me that evidence. In the mean time, let's go fix the looming problem. Unfortunately this same problem exists on economics, regulation, religion, health care, education..... you name it. Anything that comes up we trench in and go for the win. All the time we spend fighting takes away from time we could be fixing/progressing. Climate change is a grand example. The oil dependent, pollution creating base has been a know problem for decades. Only in the last few years are we really talking about it, and we have trenched in along party lines and the only agreements we have reached are meaningless to the growing problem.
|
|
MrsHobieJoe

Location: somewhere in Europe Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:25am |
|
I'm just getting pissed off at what are clearly concerted attempts to derail Copenhagen. Grrrrrrrrrrr. Decision time folks. This is the point to opt in as citizens of the world.
|
|
dionysius

Location: The People's Republic of Austin Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:24am |
|
islander wrote: There is no longer any issue that will not be polarized into left/right, dem/repub, north/south in this country. It's not about right and wrong anymore it is about win/lose and which team are you on. It's unfortunate and will be our downfall. People truly believe that they can't have theirs if somebody else get's theirs first. We have become a mob scrambling for a dwindling supply of robotic hamsters. I doubt a majority of people even care about the base issue as long as they can win the argument/battle/election/hamster scramble.
Politics has been uglier in the past, but the political system has never been worse. And the trend line that we are following is not good.
If you're equating the two sides in this "debate" then I'm mystified. There's no equivalence. Climate change denial is every bit as honest, rational and respectable as the campaign to cast doubt on the harmful effects of tobacco. Remember that? (Indeed, it has many of the same motives and many of the same people behind it.) All they can do is delay the inevitable, but this delay is fatal, when we urgently need to be accomplishing something. Denial and footdragging hurts everyone, and that's hard to forgive.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:17am |
|
islander wrote: There is no longer any issue that will not be polarized into left/right, dem/repub, north/south in this country. It's not about right and wrong anymore it is about win/lose and which team are you on. It's unfortunate and will be our downfall. People truly believe that they can't have theirs if somebody else get's theirs first. We have become a mob scrambling for a dwindling supply of robotic hamsters. I doubt a majority of people even care about the base issue as long as they can win the argument/battle/election/hamster scramble.
Politics has been uglier in the past, but the political system has never been worse. And the trend line that we are following is not good.
Let's all repeat it together: Zero-sum game. Equals "end game."
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 8, 2009 - 9:14am |
|
steeler wrote:
Just shows how polarized America has become.
One would think that this would be non-partisan issue, but no . . . I'm baffled by that. And it also is why the discussion has degenerated. More dogma than anything else, and it blots out much of the substance. It's become more akin to a reality television show, with people crying fraud and greed, and trying to claim their 15 minutes of notoriety. Sad, really.
There is no longer any issue that will not be polarized into left/right, dem/repub, north/south in this country. It's not about right and wrong anymore it is about win/lose and which team are you on. It's unfortunate and will be our downfall. People truly believe that they can't have theirs if somebody else get's theirs first. We have become a mob scrambling for a dwindling supply of robotic hamsters. I doubt a majority of people even care about the base issue as long as they can win the argument/battle/election/hamster scramble. Politics has been uglier in the past, but the political system has never been worse. And the trend line that we are following is not good.
|
|
|