kurtster wrote: 
That depends on what the stone-throwers consume to provide their bodies energy to throw the stones. And how did they get to the stone-throwing site? Walk? Ride donkeys? Drive a 1969 Ford Galaxy 500? Are the stones man-made? Were they transported there or do they occur naturally in the immediate area? 

 buzz wrote: 
You know, you are quite right about that.  It is carbon neutral.  Perhaps, I was too hasty.

 kurtster wrote: 
cant we just make one little exception for honor killings? and maybe just one more so we can stone people to death. it is way more green than electrocution.

 kurtster wrote:  NFL

 buzz wrote: 

No, definitely not good for our country either.  Besides, I love women. 

Probably overkill because The US Constitution already guarentees a seperation between Church and State, which Sharia Law is clearly not in keeping with that.  That would be a State endorsement of a particular religion.

But you never know, cause most politicians wipe their posterior with the Constitution.

 buzz wrote: 
That is a tough question.

 kurtster wrote: 
what? you dont think Sharia law is a good thing?

 kurtster wrote:  UhOh.

Good for Oklahoma.  This should be the United States' next Constitutional Amendment.

Oklahoma International Law Amendment, State Question 755 (2010)

The Oklahoma International Law Amendment will appear on the November 2, 2010 general election ballot in the state of Oklahoma as a legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The measure would require that courts rely on federal or state laws when handing down decisions concerning cases and would prohibit them from using international law or Sharia law when making rulings.