The Obituary Page
- Steely_D - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:49pm
Please help me find this song
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:30pm
Trump
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:17pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:09pm
NY Times Strands
- GeneP59 - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:08pm
NYTimes Connections
- GeneP59 - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:01pm
Wordle - daily game
- GeneP59 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:55pm
Climate Change
- VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:50pm
Forum Posting Guidelines
- rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
Name My Band
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:54pm
Thanks William!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
USA! USA! USA!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 4:50pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:20pm
Living in America
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 12:50pm
Carmen to Stones
- timothy_john - Jun 30, 2025 - 12:07pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 11:34am
Gardeners Corner
- marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
Comics!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
Mixtape Culture Club
- ColdMiser - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:37am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:01am
Birthday wishes
- Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches
- fractalv - Jun 29, 2025 - 8:08pm
Music Videos
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 29, 2025 - 4:09pm
Global Mix renaming
- frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
Iran
- R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 8:56pm
Live Music
- Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 6:53pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 12:05pm
Israel
- R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 12:04pm
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 28, 2025 - 9:52am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 3:00pm
Know your memes
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 11:41am
What Makes You Sad?
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:41am
Calling all Monty Python fans!
- FeydBaron - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:30am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:23am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2025 - 8:30am
Framed - movie guessing game
- Proclivities - Jun 27, 2025 - 6:25am
Democratic Party
- R_P - Jun 26, 2025 - 8:40pm
Immigration
- R_P - Jun 26, 2025 - 2:22pm
Yummy Snack
- Proclivities - Jun 26, 2025 - 1:17pm
Parents and Children
- kurtster - Jun 26, 2025 - 11:32am
New Music
- miamizsun - Jun 26, 2025 - 6:45am
What Makes You Laugh?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:36pm
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 12:06pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 11:30am
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 10:32am
Baseball, anyone?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:09am
Astronomy!
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 8:58am
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 7:13am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Jun 24, 2025 - 10:24pm
Billionaires
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:57pm
Great guitar faces
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:15pm
Buying a Cell Phone
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 3:05pm
Anti-War
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 12:57pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jun 24, 2025 - 10:40am
RIP Mick Ralphs
- geoff_morphini - Jun 23, 2025 - 10:40pm
Congress
- maryte - Jun 23, 2025 - 1:39pm
Europe
- R_P - Jun 23, 2025 - 11:30am
Republican Party
- islander - Jun 23, 2025 - 8:38am
the Todd Rundgren topic
- ColdMiser - Jun 23, 2025 - 7:58am
What are you doing RIGHT NOW?
- GeneP59 - Jun 21, 2025 - 6:14pm
Rock & Roll Facts
- Coaxial - Jun 21, 2025 - 6:10pm
Poetry Forum
- SeriousLee - Jun 21, 2025 - 5:20pm
And the good news is....
- Red_Dragon - Jun 21, 2025 - 3:39pm
Gaje Gipsy Swing
- bartanandor - Jun 21, 2025 - 10:53am
Way Cool Video
- Steely_D - Jun 21, 2025 - 8:46am
What Did You Have For Breakfast?
- miamizsun - Jun 21, 2025 - 8:14am
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey
- miamizsun - Jun 21, 2025 - 8:10am
Gotta Get Your Drink On
- Antigone - Jun 21, 2025 - 7:53am
PUNS - The BEATLES
- oldviolin - Jun 20, 2025 - 3:57pm
RP NEW player error
- jk.richards - Jun 20, 2025 - 10:35am
RP App for Android
- jk.richards - Jun 20, 2025 - 10:32am
Fascism In America
- GeneP59 - Jun 20, 2025 - 8:29am
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
About RP »
Vinyl vs CD
|
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next |
SeriousLee

Location: Dans l'milieu d'deux milles livres 
|
Posted:
Jan 18, 2020 - 10:40am |
|
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
May 24, 2017 - 9:40am |
|
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel

Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 2:26pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: A little off-topic for this thread, but I wonder why they would have named an orange-flavored soft-drink "Green Spot".
Maybe thats what it looks like a few days after its spilled on a carpet and it has time to mold up...
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:55pm |
|
DaveInVA wrote: The console in that pic probably belonged to the owner of the company and the models were probably his kids.
A little off-topic for this thread, but I wonder why they would have named an orange-flavored soft-drink "Green Spot".
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel

Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:31pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: Nice.
The console in that pic probably belonged to the owner of the company and the models were probably his kids.
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:25pm |
|
DaveInVA wrote:As McIntosh was a high end manufacturer there were several companies building their stuff into custom cabinets for people with the bucks. The Thorens TD-124 was considered an audiophool grade table at the time and was available with a factory arm or a blank board so you could mount the arm of your choice on it (most ended up with Shure SME 3009 arms on them). These tables are much sought after today and get stupid money on Flea-Bay. Here is a better pick of the turntable: Nice.
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel

Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:25pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: Oh, and thats a Baird Emerson "Wondergram" from around 1960...
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel

Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:15pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: Would the tuner and pre-amp have been available together in a console like that back then? It's an interesting looking turntable - it looks like the base is made of metal.
As McIntosh was a high end manufacturer there were several companies building their stuff into custom cabinets for people with the bucks. The Thorens TD-124 was considered an audiophool grade table at the time and was available with a factory arm or a blank board so you could mount the arm of your choice on it (most ended up with Shure SME 3009 arms on them). These tables are much sought after today and get stupid money on Flea-Bay. Here is a better pic of the turntable:
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:08pm |
|
DaveInVA wrote: A McIntosh C20 pre-amp, McIntosh MR67 Tuner and a Thorens TD-124 Turntable. Owned them all years ago. Would the tuner and pre-amp have been available together in a console like that back then? It's an interesting looking turntable - it looks like the base is made of metal.
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel

Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:05pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: A McIntosh C20 pre-amp, McIntosh MR67 Tuner and a Thorens TD-124 Turntable. Owned them all years ago.
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 27, 2014 - 12:00pm |
|
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 27, 2013 - 1:22pm |
|
|
|
islander

Location: West coast somewhere Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 4:06pm |
|
Beaker wrote: I've been an audio nerd for a long long time. Except that, I've generally avoided the super crazy esoteric stuff. I was reminded just how blinded some aficionados can become when visiting a friend's audio store long ago. He just had to show me how much better *any* set of speakers sounded when this pricey little gold colored wire triangle was placed upon them. That sealed the deal for me. He may have been well aware of the concept of double-blind tests, but clearly wasn't interested in real world action.
Like anything in this world, once you reach a certain point, investing $, energy, or effort beyond that results in severely diminishing returns - and returns that are often imaginary, as the audio buff has too much invested financially or especially emotionally, to call into question whether the effort or claimed improvement made any appreciable (or measurable) difference.
My favorite is still the super duper fantastic signal integrity digital cables. I get so tired of seeing. those half digits in the binary stream.
|
|
Servo

Location: Down on the Farm Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 2:12pm |
|
black321 wrote:I've invested a few hundred in cables, and noticed some nice nuances in performance, but seriously, $9,900, let alone $20,000 new, for a 2 meter cable?
Think that's bad? How about a $1000 IEC power cable that uses, of all things, litz wire!?!  I'd have no problem outfitting a transcription turntable with silver litz wire from the cartridge to the phono preamp. But what kind of fool would pay extra to allow in frequencies other than the 60VAC that's the only acceptable "signal" for wall power. What a scam!
|
|
Servo

Location: Down on the Farm Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 2:04pm |
|
black321 wrote:a good vinyl setup will beat a standard 44.1khz/16-bit cd anytime. The cd takes bits of the analog sound, and doesnt represent the full wavelength (the vinyl losses less information).
Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's simply not true. Although the physical "analog" realm offers infinite data points in theory, it's a long way from theory and reality. First off, there are hard and fast quantum limits, laws of nature that no mortal can break. That alone busts the premise of that argument. At a practical level, there are cost and technological limits to the tools that make the equipment that records and plays records. Ditto for the tape recording equipment that typically plays a very large role in modern music, which spends a lot of time in the studio before it ever sees a disk mastering lab. On the production side the equipment is built to tolerances that are deemed to exceed the hearing capacity of most people, but still meets price points that allow profits to be made by the studios, labels and artists. The "high-end" sector of the consumer audio industry likes to pretend that the pursuit of perfection is a valid, even noble goal. The truth is that it's nothing more than marketing hype. Pouring money into fancy (and hideously expensive) playback equipment cannot extract what is not there. There is nothing that's substantively better than pro audio gear. Dragging a diamond stylus through an undulating groove in vinyl leads to an inevitable result: lost vinyl. And lost vinyl means lost music content. So the truth is that vinyl records lose information quite rapidly. Take care of a CD, and it will lose no information. When it comes to longer wavelengths, CDDA is a hands-down winner. 44.1k/16 exceeds the limits of human hearing by a substantial margin. In contrast, vinyl records rely on kludges like RIAA filters to squash bass notes into the allotted space on the disk, and the skill of the mastering engineer to make the best compromise to fit the most music in a fixed area. At the other end of the audio spectrum, the size of the lathe cutting head and the playback stylus place physical limitations on high frequency information. And because of that friction, the HF is the first to go. A good DAC helps adjust for this deficiency of 44.1/16 cds. Again, sorry but no. A good DAC is certainly one of the best audiophile investments (second only to loudspeakers) around. But they cannot create new data. I'm guessing that you're referring to so-called "oversampling" DACs that have become commonplace these days. In fact this modulation scheme is used to improve on the physical limitations of 1st generation DACs that relied on "brick wall" analog filters to remove ultrasonic artifacts that come with D-A conversion regardless of the storage medium. The "oversampling" misnomer refers to the much faster clock rates, as much as 256x the Nyquist frequency that are the key to getting inexpensive, high quality analog output. A simple process known as interpolation can be used to create new data points to smooth out the rough edges. But make no mistake, interpolated data points do NOT contain ANY original data. You cannot recreate data that isn't there. Higher resolution formats like DVD-audio and SACD(96khz/24-bit and 192kHz/24-bit), in my opinion, outshine the vinyl. I cant imagine its that costly to issue more high res cds...might even help promote sales of more units...but alas, both DVD-A and SACD are mostly dead, except for some high end shops. SACD was a non-starter because its 1-bit/2.8MHz storage format wasn't compatible with existing digital audio handling standards, and there was no incentive to build new gear to accommodate its native format. It's a sound principle, but a loser in practice. Since digital music production uses AES/EBU standard 24-bit/96kHz data paths, it only follows that using the same format for consumer playback, requiring no conversion, is the optimal way to go. Sadly the RIAA's greed/paranoia about releasing grand master quality audio to consumers does not bode well for the long term.
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 11:43am |
|
DaveInVA wrote:I've been into audio as long as I can remember. My Dad was am engineer in the business and had worked for companies such as Grommes and Knight etc so there was always audio gear around. In High School I worked for Fender doing warranty repair and worked for Musicraft as a repair tech while in college as well as being an engineer at 2 FM stations. Even after I got into computer engineering as a career I also ran a mobile recording studio and did sound for a couple of night clubs as a 2nd career just to help keep closer to music, I like listening to music the most and can enjoy it about anywhere especially live. But while in my own home environment I like trying to get the best sound quality I can within reason. I have always liked designing and building some of my own equipment as well as repairing old equipment especially old studio quality recording equipment. I believe that you can only go so far with accurate sound reproduction until you start running to limits of technology and room acoustics. At some point the price for each 1% of improvement gets algorithmically more expensive. I don't go for the snake oil stuff like $5000 speaker cables etc. I do make my own cables though and it doesn't cost much to build top notch cables. I prefer vinyl to CD for most serious listening. I am sad that SACD and DVD-A didn't take off as I could have accepted them as a replacement to vinyl though it would suck to have to replace the vinyl with thousands of new shiny discs. At home I don't care about the convenience factor so much and in fact for me there is something therapeutic to the ritual of the proper care and feeding of vinyl. I do still enjoy listening to CD's also. I also dont believe everything on vinyl is automatically better than CD or vise versa. Sometimes one is simply mastered better than the other and sometimes something I really want is only available on one or the other and not both. I listen to RP pretty much all day when not doing a serious listening session and enjoy it immensely even though it not what would be considered audiophile quality. It doesn't matter because the music is (generally) really good. But sometimes I like listening to music in a higher quality. Its kind of like a cheap (well maybe not that cheap) thrill but without much risk (unless I play it to loud that is). To me audio can be like getting used to finer wines and better beers, The cheap still will still get you just as drunk but its more fun for me if I enjoy the process of it also...
Hey, you can find some of those thousand dollar cables real cheap on audiogon.com, like this one more than 50% off: http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?cablintr&1315760800&/Nordost-Odin-Supreme-Reference I've invested a few hundred in cables, and noticed some nice nuances in performance, but seriously, $9,900, let alone $20,000 new, for a 2 meter cable?
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 10:58am |
|
i'm an 8-track myself
|
|
DaveInSaoMiguel

Location: No longer in a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 10:57am |
|
I've been into audio as long as I can remember. My Dad was am engineer in the business and had worked for companies such as Grommes and Knight etc so there was always audio gear around. In High School I worked for Fender doing warranty repair and worked for Musicraft as a repair tech while in college as well as being an engineer at 2 FM stations. Even after I got into computer engineering as a career I also ran a mobile recording studio and did sound for a couple of night clubs as a 2nd career just to help keep closer to music, I like listening to music the most and can enjoy it about anywhere especially live. But while in my own home environment I like trying to get the best sound quality I can within reason. I have always liked designing and building some of my own equipment as well as repairing old equipment especially old studio quality recording equipment. I believe that you can only go so far with accurate sound reproduction until you start running to limits of technology and room acoustics. At some point the price for each 1% of improvement gets algorithmically more expensive. I don't go for the snake oil stuff like $5000 speaker cables etc. I do make my own cables though and it doesn't cost much to build top notch cables. I prefer vinyl to CD for most serious listening. I am sad that SACD and DVD-A didn't take off as I could have accepted them as a replacement to vinyl though it would suck to have to replace the vinyl with thousands of new shiny discs. At home I don't care about the convenience factor so much and in fact for me there is something therapeutic to the ritual of the proper care and feeding of vinyl. I do still enjoy listening to CD's also. I also dont believe everything on vinyl is automatically better than CD or vise versa. Sometimes one is simply mastered better than the other and sometimes something I really want is only available on one or the other and not both. I listen to RP pretty much all day when not doing a serious listening session and enjoy it immensely even though it not what would be considered audiophile quality. It doesn't matter because the music is (generally) really good. But sometimes I like listening to music in a higher quality. Its kind of like a cheap (well maybe not that cheap) thrill but without much risk (unless I play it to loud that is). To me audio can be like getting used to finer wines and better beers, The cheap still will still get you just as drunk but its more fun for me if I enjoy the process of it also...
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 10:00am |
|
islander wrote: I used to be a hardcore audio nerd. I rebuilt all my amps with better components (even better solder), I wound my own speaker wire, I did all the audio tricks. Then I realized I was listening to the sound, and not the music. Their not mutually exclusive goals, but you can get too focused on sound reproduction pretty easily.
Garbage in, garbage out. The equipment is only as good as its source ultimately. The best equipment cannot make a poorly recorded mixed or mastered effort any better. I have chased my tail for years with half speed vinyl and other things. As I improve the source, the equipment sounds better. Just for S & G's, here is my remaster of a vinyl rip of Springsteen's Tunnel of Love I did a month ago. I posted it over in the journals. Anyway, download it and give it a listen and and remember that its source is vinyl. Its at 320k from wav so it should still sound pretty good.
|
|
black321

Location: An earth without maps Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jul 29, 2011 - 9:42am |
|
 islander wrote: I used to be a hardcore audio nerd. I rebuilt all my amps with better components (even better solder), I wound my own speaker wire, I did all the audio tricks. Then I realized I was listening to the sound, and not the music. Their not mutually exclusive goals, but you can get too focused on sound reproduction pretty easily.Â
Â
I fall victim to that sometimes. Then again, all that tweaking is rewarding in its own way...like a surfer looking for the perfect wave...when you find the right sound for the music.
|
|
|