[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Jul 12, 2025 - 10:39pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Jul 12, 2025 - 9:16pm
 
What the hell OV? - oldviolin - Jul 12, 2025 - 8:39pm
 
Europe - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 6:30pm
 
Trump - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 6:10pm
 
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 12, 2025 - 5:14pm
 
The Marie Antoinette Moment... - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 12, 2025 - 4:40pm
 
Are they married yet? YES THEY ARE! - triskele - Jul 12, 2025 - 3:50pm
 
Why atheists swallow, - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 2:37pm
 
Israel - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 1:50pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Jul 12, 2025 - 1:37pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - machar - Jul 12, 2025 - 12:34pm
 
Beyond mix - Steely_D - Jul 12, 2025 - 11:29am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - hydrus - Jul 12, 2025 - 9:18am
 
NY Times Strands - ptooey - Jul 12, 2025 - 9:01am
 
NYTimes Connections - islander - Jul 12, 2025 - 8:37am
 
A motivational quote - steeler - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:58pm
 
Beyond... - GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:35pm
 
M.A.G.A. - R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 4:36pm
 
Protest Songs - R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 12:38pm
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:56am
 
USA! USA! USA! - R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:40am
 
Jess Roden - legendary UK vocalist - and "Seven Windows" ... - J_C - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:22am
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:47am
 
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore - chieromancer1 - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:34am
 
Live Music - oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:13am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 11, 2025 - 8:04am
 
It seemed like a good idea at the time - ptooey - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:10am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:13pm
 
TV shows you watch - R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:31pm
 
Wasted Money - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:22pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - kcar - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:06pm
 
Rock mix / repitition - walk2k - Jul 10, 2025 - 4:31pm
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:24pm
 
How's the weather? - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:21pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 12:52pm
 
Random Solutions - Random Advice - oldviolin - Jul 10, 2025 - 10:11am
 
Spambags on RP - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:02am
 
misheard lyrics - GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:30am
 
New Song Submissions system - Teja - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:36am
 
TEXAS - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 5:57pm
 
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote') - black321 - Jul 9, 2025 - 11:33am
 
Fascism In America - ColdMiser - Jul 9, 2025 - 10:23am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:50am
 
Economix - oldviolin - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:45am
 
Outstanding Covers - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 9:29pm
 
Trump Lies™ - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 7:14pm
 
Musky Mythology - R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 5:43pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Jul 8, 2025 - 11:45am
 
What is the meaning of this? - islander - Jul 8, 2025 - 10:11am
 
Love & Hate - oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 8:15am
 
Artificial Intelligence - Red_Dragon - Jul 8, 2025 - 6:45am
 
Anti-War - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 6:45pm
 
Environment - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 5:38pm
 
(Big) Media Watch - R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 12:04pm
 
The Grateful Dead - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 11:17am
 
Music Videos - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 9:00am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:59am
 
Immigration - black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:02am
 
Russia - Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2025 - 7:39am
 
Triskele and The Grateful Dead - geoff_morphini - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:33pm
 
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July - GeneP59 - Jul 6, 2025 - 9:42pm
 
Customize a shirt with my favorite album - 2644364236 - Jul 6, 2025 - 7:20pm
 
Those Lovable Policemen - R_P - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:56am
 
Beer - SeriousLee - Jul 6, 2025 - 6:54am
 
Iran - R_P - Jul 5, 2025 - 9:01pm
 
What are you doing RIGHT NOW? - Coaxial - Jul 5, 2025 - 6:48pm
 
New vs Old RP App (Android) - mhamann123 - Jul 5, 2025 - 5:41am
 
Britain - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:41pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:10am
 
Best Song Comments. - 2644364236 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:32pm
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
 
Documentaries - Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
 
Copyright and theft - black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
 
Index » Regional/Local » Europe » Ukraine Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 68, 69, 70 ... 122, 123, 124  Next
Post to this Topic
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:14pm

 black321 wrote:
Whether liberal democracy or Putin's form of corruption is better is another argument. 
 
um, it's not actually. This all comes back to what gives a government - any government - legitimacy. In Putin's world it is naked power and coercion and mass indoctrination. Given his popular support, he's justified in thinking that is how it is done.

Most other countries have different histories to draw on. 
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:14pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Sorry, Richard but that is another piece of crap that posits all the little nations as just pawns between major powers as though they had no will of their own.

People from little nations like me give a shit about this kind of dialectic. We are quite able to decide how we want to live, who we want to be aligned with and what values we want to live by. 

In other words, it was not the US that weaponised (poor passive, submissive) Ukraine but Ukrainians who (quite right as it turns out) had an existential fear of being overrun, who looked for any way to protect themselves.

I already understand your narrative. I can read it in most Western newspapers.

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:11pm

 R_P wrote:
 steeler wrote:
And we have continued to impose an economic blockade that I oppose and I recognize that it is coercive.

Just one example of exerting influence in the name of a "rules-based order". There are many more directed at both foes and allies.
 
No doubt. but can't you see you are trying to justify one wrong by listing the wrongs of the supposed adversary? Is it so difficult to simply say both suck?
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:10pm

The last three decades, we assured ourselves that liberal democracy won, case closed., and went about aggressively spreading the good word. 
For years Putin has been saying, not so fast. Do what you want in your world, but not mine...and I suppose we did listen to an extent, to the point we paused the Nato issue, but we paused it, and did not cancel. 

Whether liberal democracy or Putin's form of corruption is better is another argument. 

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:09pm

 steeler wrote:
And we have continued to impose an economic blockade that I oppose and I recognize that it is coercive.

Just one example of exerting influence in the name of a "rules-based order". There are many more directed at both foes and allies.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:08pm

 R_P wrote: 
Sorry, Richard but that is another piece of crap that posits all the little nations as just pawns between major powers as though they had no will of their own.

People from little nations like me give a shit about this kind of dialectic. We are quite able to decide how we want to live, who we want to be aligned with and what values we want to live by. 

In other words, it was not the US that weaponised (poor passive, submissive) Ukraine but Ukrainians who (quite right as it turns out) had an existential fear of being overrun, who looked for any way to protect themselves.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 2:03pm

 black321 wrote:


Hmm, a bit naive, no? 
The West are just innocent bystanders, that never got politically involved?
We should have ignored Cuba? 
Venezuela?


 No, I said that the West did support and encourage those transitions, and I am sure there was politicking involved. Not at all sure, though, that the free will of those countries was contravened. 
.
That the US has had a sketchy foreign policy (“sketchy” is putting it mildly, especially when looking at Central and South America) does not mean that the transition of these former Soviet republics was coerced. 
.
As for Cuba, to my knowledge, we have not invaded since the Bay of Pigs fiasco!  We did come to near war over Russian missiles being installed in Cuba, though, which is what you are referencing. And we have continued to impose an economic blockade that I oppose and I recognize that it is coercive. I get the notion that having NATO on its doorstep can be seen by Russia as threatening. Again, however, it has been 30 years in some cases. The only country in Europe I see that has “invaded” militarily other European countries in that time has been Russia.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:58pm

 black321 wrote:
 steeler wrote:

This reasoning seems to be that if the US and Western European countries had not allowed Eastern European countries, formerly within the USSR, into NATO and not supported/encouraged democratic transitions in those countries, then Putin would have had no reason to invade. No argument there, but it would have required the US and the Western European countries to essentially refuse to recognize those Eastern European countries as sovereign nations and to acquiesce to Russia’s insistence that those countries remain satellites. The disintegration of the USSR was 30 years ago, and, as noenz has noted, those are sovereign nations that made choices and are unlikely to voluntarily return to Russia’s sphere of influence.
Hmm, a bit naive, no? 
The West are just innocent bystanders, that never got politically involved?
We should have ignored Cuba? 
Venezuela?
 
This is, once again, giving Russia more slack because the US has done the same in the past. I can understand where you are coming from but not being from the States myself I find the argument bizarre. 

and btw I don't think the analogy to the Cuban missile crisis holds water, though I realize the Russians are peddling this line. But think of the differences: The Cuban missile crisis was predominantly based on the technological advantage that the proximity of Cuba afforded back in the day. Ukraine does not occupy the same position. Its threat to Russia is political. 
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:52pm

 black321 wrote:
Hmm, a bit naive, no? 
The West are just innocent bystanders, that never got politically involved?
We should have ignored Cuba? 
Venezuela?

Venezuela & Cuba are obviously major threats to U.S. national security/interests...

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:50pm

‘Gods of War’: How the US weaponized Ukraine against Russia
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:49pm

 black321 wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

My Lithuanian neighbour has been saying that from the beginning. Personally, I don't think he's going to have the firepower left to do it. And the fear of NATO will stop him. Quite frankly, I think the EU should be arming Ukraine to the hilt. Call his bluff on the nuclear threat and drive him out of  Ukraine. That would leave two options: Putin decides to nuke his way to victory in Ukraine
or
he concedes defeat Both are kind of unattractive propositions for him whatever way you look at it. 
but that doesn't seem likely, as the "sphere of influence" argument seems to be holding.
 
This sphere of influence thing is not fixed in stone..   there are myriad factors affecting where geopolitical lines get set and they change constantly. I would contend that Russia has overplayed its hand, primarily because it deceived itself about its role in the world (old empires tend to do this sort of thing). The truth of the matter is that the current Russian regime has little to offer that seriously attracts people. It is old, decrepit and defunct. Stripped of its exports of oil & gas, its economic production is abysmal. It can't tolerate plurality and is repressive. The only people it manages to attract are the disaffected far right in the west who see some kind of resolution for their perceived grievances (which IMO are almost entirely imagined) and hold up Russia as some kind of bulwark against (supposed) US hegemony. This is the target group that the Russian troll factories have targeted (surprisingly effectively). But these are negative voices. Voices of protest. They are not constructive and were they to ever gain power, things would fall apart very quickly.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:47pm

 steeler wrote:

This reasoning seems to be that if the US and Western European countries had not allowed Eastern European countries, formerly within the USSR, into NATO and not supported/encouraged democratic transitions in those countries, then Putin would have had no reason to invade. No argument there, but it would have required the US and the Western European countries to essentially refuse to recognize those Eastern European countries as sovereign nations and to acquiesce to Russia’s insistence that those countries remain satellites. The disintegration of the USSR was 30 years ago, and, as noenz has noted, those are sovereign nations that made choices and are unlikely to voluntarily return to Russia’s sphere of influence.



Hmm, a bit naive, no? 
The West are just innocent bystanders, that never got politically involved?
We should have ignored Cuba? 
Venezuela?

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:41pm

 black321 wrote:


In general,  don't disagree with this...but ask, regardless of what the U.S./West did with Ukraine/Nato, would Putin still invade? 
Why bother, if he could have simply kept his puppet leadership? Will he invade Belarus?
We acted as if the cold war was over (same with globalization), and ignored Putin, who clearly thought otherwise.
Putin has insisted for decades Ukraine is not a real country (which he told Bush).




This reasoning seems to be that if the US and Western European countries had not allowed Eastern European countries, formerly within the USSR, into NATO and not supported/encouraged democratic transitions in those countries, then Putin would have had no reason to invade. No argument there, but it would have required the US and the Western European countries to essentially refuse to recognize those Eastern European countries as sovereign nations and to acquiesce to Russia’s insistence that those countries remain satellites. The disintegration of the USSR was 30 years ago, and, as noenz has noted, those are sovereign nations that made choices and are unlikely to voluntarily return to Russia’s sphere of influence.

black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:34pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

My Lithuanian neighbour has been saying that from the beginning. Personally, I don't think he's going to have the firepower left to do it. And the fear of NATO will stop him.

Quite frankly, I think the EU should be arming Ukraine to the hilt. Call his bluff on the nuclear threat and drive him out of  Ukraine. That would leave two options:

Putin decides to nuke his way to victory in Ukraine
or
he concedes defeat

Both are kind of unattractive propositions for him whatever way you look at it. 


but that doesn't seem likely, as the "sphere of influence" argument seems to be holding.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:30pm

 black321 wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 
ok, so to get back to your question, would he have invaded regardless of the NATO expansion issue? Yes, I think he would have.
so latvia, estonia... next?
 
My Lithuanian neighbour has been saying that from the beginning. Personally, I don't think he's going to have the firepower left to do it. And the fear of NATO will stop him.

Quite frankly, I think the EU should be arming Ukraine to the hilt. Call his bluff on the nuclear threat and drive him out of  Ukraine. That would leave two options:

Putin decides to nuke his way to victory in Ukraine
or
he concedes defeat

Both are kind of unattractive propositions for him whatever way you look at it. 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:22pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 
ok, so to get back to your question, would he have invaded regardless of the NATO expansion issue? Yes, I think he would have.


so latvia, estonia... next?
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:11pm

black321 wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Well, he didn't have a puppet government installed there, which was what triggered the problem.
But are you trying to say all satellite states of large states should have puppet governments so that the big neighbour is happy? 
I'm not saying that, Putin is saying that.
 
ok, so to get back to your question, would he have invaded regardless of the NATO expansion issue? Yes, I think he would have.
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 1:09pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Well, he didn't have a puppet government installed there, which was what triggered the problem.
But are you trying to say all satellite states of large states should have puppet governments so that the big neighbour is happy? 


I'm not saying that, Putin is saying that.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 12:19pm

 black321 wrote:
 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
 
In general,  don't disagree with this...but ask, regardless of what the U.S./West did with Ukraine/Nato, would Putin still invade? 
Why bother, if he could have simply kept his puppet leadership? Will he invade Belarus?
We acted as if the cold war was over (same with globalization), and ignored Putin, who clearly thought otherwise.
Putin has insisted for decades Ukraine is not a real country (which he told Bush).
 
Well, he didn't have a puppet government installed there, which was what triggered the problem.
But are you trying to say all satellite states of large states should have puppet governments so that the big neighbour is happy? 
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 7, 2022 - 11:14am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:


In general,  don't disagree with this...but ask, regardless of what the U.S./West did with Ukraine/Nato, would Putin still invade? 
Why bother, if he could have simply kept his puppet leadership? Will he invade Belarus?
We acted as if the cold war was over (same with globalization), and ignored Putin, who clearly thought otherwise.
Putin has insisted for decades Ukraine is not a real country (which he told Bush).



Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 68, 69, 70 ... 122, 123, 124  Next