[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Breaking News - R_P - May 1, 2024 - 9:46pm
 
Russia - Lazy8 - May 1, 2024 - 9:23pm
 
And the good news is.... - Bill_J - May 1, 2024 - 6:30pm
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - ladron - May 1, 2024 - 6:22pm
 
Unquiet Minds - Mental Health Forum - haresfur - May 1, 2024 - 5:49pm
 
Things you would be grating food for - Manbird - May 1, 2024 - 3:58pm
 
What Makes You Sad? - Isabeau - May 1, 2024 - 3:17pm
 
The Obituary Page - ScottFromWyoming - May 1, 2024 - 3:08pm
 
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful - Isabeau - May 1, 2024 - 3:02pm
 
Questions. - black321 - May 1, 2024 - 2:34pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - miamizsun - May 1, 2024 - 2:15pm
 
NYTimes Connections - n4ku - May 1, 2024 - 2:13pm
 
Today in History - R_P - May 1, 2024 - 12:29pm
 
Economix - black321 - May 1, 2024 - 12:19pm
 
Name My Band - DaveInSaoMiguel - May 1, 2024 - 9:56am
 
Joe Biden - VV - May 1, 2024 - 9:24am
 
NY Times Strands - Proclivities - May 1, 2024 - 8:47am
 
RightWingNutZ - rgio - May 1, 2024 - 7:57am
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - May 1, 2024 - 7:54am
 
USA! USA! USA! - haresfur - Apr 30, 2024 - 8:46pm
 
I Heart Huckabee - NOT! - Manbird - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:49pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Apr 30, 2024 - 6:34pm
 
Democratic Party - R_P - Apr 30, 2024 - 4:01pm
 
Oh, The Stupidity - haresfur - Apr 30, 2024 - 3:30pm
 
Israel - R_P - Apr 30, 2024 - 2:25pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - VV - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:46pm
 
Canada - black321 - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:37pm
 
What Did You See Today? - Isabeau - Apr 30, 2024 - 1:15pm
 
Trump - R_P - Apr 30, 2024 - 11:25am
 
Mixtape Culture Club - miamizsun - Apr 30, 2024 - 7:02am
 
Food - Bill_J - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:46pm
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Apr 29, 2024 - 1:11pm
 
New Music - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 11:36am
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - ScottFromWyoming - Apr 29, 2024 - 8:34am
 
Tesla (motors, batteries, etc) - rgio - Apr 29, 2024 - 7:37am
 
Photos you haven't taken of yourself - Antigone - Apr 29, 2024 - 5:03am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Apr 28, 2024 - 5:37pm
 
Britain - R_P - Apr 28, 2024 - 10:47am
 
Birthday wishes - GeneP59 - Apr 28, 2024 - 9:56am
 
If not RP, what are you listening to right now? - Beaker - Apr 28, 2024 - 9:47am
 
SCOTUS - Steely_D - Apr 28, 2024 - 1:44am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 27, 2024 - 9:53pm
 
Classical Music - miamizsun - Apr 27, 2024 - 1:23pm
 
LeftWingNutZ - Lazy8 - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:46pm
 
Things You Thought Today - Red_Dragon - Apr 27, 2024 - 12:17pm
 
The Moon - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:08pm
 
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance - fractalv - Apr 26, 2024 - 8:59pm
 
Musky Mythology - Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 7:23pm
 
Mini Meetups - Post Here! - Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 4:02pm
 
Australia has Disappeared - Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 2:41pm
 
Radio Paradise sounding better recently - firefly6 - Apr 26, 2024 - 10:39am
 
Neil Young - Steely_D - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:20am
 
Country Up The Bumpkin - KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:01am
 
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity - miamizsun - Apr 26, 2024 - 5:07am
 
Poetry Forum - Manbird - Apr 25, 2024 - 12:30pm
 
Ask an Atheist - R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 11:02am
 
Afghanistan - R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:26am
 
Science in the News - Red_Dragon - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:00am
 
What the hell OV? - miamizsun - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:46am
 
The Abortion Wars - Isabeau - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:27am
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - ColdMiser - Apr 25, 2024 - 7:15am
 
What's that smell? - Manbird - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:27pm
 
Song of the Day - oldviolin - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:20pm
 
260,000 Posts in one thread? - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
 
TV shows you watch - Beaker - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:32am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - Bill_J - Apr 23, 2024 - 7:15pm
 
China - R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 5:35pm
 
One Partying State - Wyoming News - sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
 
Ukraine - haresfur - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:19pm
 
songs that ROCK! - Steely_D - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:50pm
 
Republican Party - R_P - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:36am
 
Malaysia - dcruzj - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:30am
 
Broccoli for cats - you gotta see this! - Bill_J - Apr 21, 2024 - 6:16pm
 
Main Mix Playlist - thisbody - Apr 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » Latin America » Guantánamo Resorts & Other Fun Trips Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
Post to this Topic
dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 22, 2009 - 7:14pm

 RichardPrins wrote: 

A sad chapter in US history closing. As Etta James's voice reminded us at the inaugural balls, "At Last."
R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jan 22, 2009 - 5:08pm

Obama moves to reshape US policy by closing Gitmo
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 10:28am

 edieraye wrote:

Scarily, I read it the way you meant it.   {#Eek}
 
Does that mean we are starting to think alike? {#Stop}

 
And yes, I am still avoiding my massive to-do list.  So far I've managed to make myself a mocha shake, feed the cat again, update my flickr page, and accomplish absolutely nada.
 

{#Eek}

You better hope not.  That would bode ill for you. {#Doh}
edieraye

edieraye Avatar



Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 9:47am

 steeler wrote:

{#Whisper} I, of course, meant to state "asylum" in my previous post, not "amnesty".  Correction made.     

 
Scarily, I read it the way you meant it.   {#Eek}
 
Does that mean we are starting to think alike? {#Stop}

 
And yes, I am still avoiding my massive to-do list.  So far I've managed to make myself a mocha shake, feed the cat again, update my flickr page, and accomplish absolutely nada.

steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 9:29am

 edieraye wrote:
 

One thing that the President-Elect has in his favor that the current administration is sorely lacking is the goodwill of those countries who might take in those freed.  I think one of the problems has been that many countries in Europe and elsewhere have refused to accept released detainees.  So for the safety of the prisoners they continue to be held.  (Obviously I am not talking about all of them or trying to justify continued incarceration.  Just pointing out that this is one of the logistical nightmares which make the entire problem incredibly difficult and murky.)

My understanding is that security is another big problem.  Where are we going to incarcerate those found guilty?

There is a large segment of the Guantanamo Bay population - guilty and innocent - that no one wants.

Hopefully the Obama administration can capitalize its popularity worldwide to find hosts for freed detainees.  With assurances that the freed detainees will be monitored on the one hand for their own safety (deter reprisals) and on the other to assure that they will not participate in future terrorist activities.

 

Maybe.  Unclear where these folk are supposed to go if not their country of origin.  

{#Whisper} I, of course, meant to state "asylum" in my previous post, not "amnesty".  Correction made.     
edieraye

edieraye Avatar



Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 8:37am

 steeler wrote:

It would be interesting to see what would happen if one of the G-Bay prisoners, upon release, filed for amnesty, claiming he would be be subject to persecution if returned to a particular country.            

  

One thing that the President-Elect has in his favor that the current administration is sorely lacking is the goodwill of those countries who might take in those freed.  I think one of the problems has been that many countries in Europe and elsewhere have refused to accept released detainees.  So for the safety of the prisoners they continue to be held.  (Obviously I am not talking about all of them or trying to justify continued incarceration.  Just pointing out that this is one of the logistical nightmares which make the entire problem incredibly difficult and murky.)

My understanding is that security is another big problem.  Where are we going to incarcerate those found guilty?

There is a large segment of the Guantanamo Bay population - guilty and innocent - that no one wants.

Hopefully the Obama administration can capitalize its popularity worldwide to find hosts for freed detainees.  With assurances that the freed detainees will be monitored on the one hand for their own safety (deter reprisals) and on the other to assure that they will not participate in future terrorist activities.
steeler

steeler Avatar

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 8:02am

 edieraye wrote:
Guantanamo Closure Called Obama Priority


Normally I don't like quoting long articles - I figure if you want to read that much you'll follow the link.  But the Washington Post requires a (free) registration so I posted more than usual.
The rest of the article outlines some of the problems the new administration will face as it constructs a policy for dealing with terrorist suspects.  There are no easy answers.  It sounds simple enough - close Guantanamo.  But the logistics will be incredibly complicated.  And what to do with those released?  Their lives are ruined.  Do we have a responsibility to aid them?  To what extent?  I don't think you can live in those conditions and not sustain some lasting damage.  So there is the human cost.  There is also the fact that being held will make them suspect if they were to be returned home.  Who will take them in?  And what about those who are prosecuted?  What are we going to do with them? 

And perhaps the biggest question of all, what will the policy be for future terrorist suspects?

 
It is a maze. 

There was talk of compensation for Japanese-Americans who were rounded up and put in camps during WWII.  I doubt we'll hear anything about that for any of these folk.

This is why the lack of judicial proceedings was so critical an issue.  Essentially, the prisoners fell into a legal and political black hole.  The administration did not want to concede that some of these folk were not actually dangerous because that would be tantamount to admitting they should not have been rounded up in the first place. 

It would be interesting to see what would happen if one of the G-Bay prisoners, upon release, filed for political asylum, claiming he would be be subject to persecution if returned to a particular country.            


hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 7:48am

 edieraye wrote:
Guantanamo Closure Called Obama Priority
By Peter Finn
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
The Obama administration will launch a review of the classified files of the approximately 250 detainees at Guantanamo Bay immediately after taking office, as part of an intensive effort to close the U.S. prison in Cuba, according to people who advised the campaign on detainee issues.

Announcing the closure of the controversial detention facility would be among the most potent signals the incoming administration could send of its sharp break with the Bush era, according to the advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak for the president-elect. They believe the move would create a global wave of diplomatic and popular goodwill that could accelerate the transfer of some detainees to other countries.

But the advisers, as well as outside national security and legal experts, said the new administration will face a thicket of legal, diplomatic, political and logistical challenges to closing the prison and prosecuting the most serious offenders in the United States — an effort that could take many months or longer. Among the thorniest issues will be how to build effective cases without using evidence obtained by torture, an issue that attorneys for the detainees will almost certainly seek to exploit.

Moreover, the new administration will face hard decisions regarding not just the current Guantanamo Bay detainees but also how it will handle future captures of terrorism suspects. It is unclear whether President-elect Barack Obama would consider holding some suspects without charge on national security grounds. His transition team denied reports this week that it was contemplating some form of preventive detention backed by a new civilian national security court. The idea has been a staple of legal debates over the future of Guantanamo Bay for the past year, but Obama advisers believe it would meet fierce congressional resistance.

"A great deal of attention has been focused on Guantanamo, as it should be, but Guantanamo is a symptom of a much larger question: Where and how is the U.S. going to detain and interrogate terrorist suspects it continues to pick up in combating al-Qaeda?" said Matthew Waxman, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs and now a law professor at Columbia University.
...

Normally I don't like quoting long articles - I figure if you want to read that much you'll follow the link.  But the Washington Post requires a (free) registration so I posted more than usual.
The rest of the article outlines some of the problems the new administration will face as it constructs a policy for dealing with terrorist suspects.  There are no easy answers.  It sounds simple enough - close Guantanamo.  But the logistics will be incredibly complicated.  And what to do with those released?  Their lives are ruined.  Do we have a responsibility to aid them?  To what extent?  I don't think you can live in those conditions and not sustain some lasting damage.  So there is the human cost.  There is also the fact that being held will make them suspect if they were to be returned home.  Who will take them in?  And what about those who are prosecuted?  What are we going to do with them? 

And perhaps the biggest question of all, what will the policy be for future terrorist suspects?

 
A very thoughtful post, Edie. One of the biggest problems with the Bush Admin is that they went headlong into Iraq without any forethought or planning, and left a huge mess in its wake. This is one of them. If those guys weren't terrorists when they went in, you could believe that they are now.

edieraye

edieraye Avatar



Posted: Nov 12, 2008 - 7:40am

Guantanamo Closure Called Obama Priority
By Peter Finn
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
The Obama administration will launch a review of the classified files of the approximately 250 detainees at Guantanamo Bay immediately after taking office, as part of an intensive effort to close the U.S. prison in Cuba, according to people who advised the campaign on detainee issues.

Announcing the closure of the controversial detention facility would be among the most potent signals the incoming administration could send of its sharp break with the Bush era, according to the advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak for the president-elect. They believe the move would create a global wave of diplomatic and popular goodwill that could accelerate the transfer of some detainees to other countries.

But the advisers, as well as outside national security and legal experts, said the new administration will face a thicket of legal, diplomatic, political and logistical challenges to closing the prison and prosecuting the most serious offenders in the United States — an effort that could take many months or longer. Among the thorniest issues will be how to build effective cases without using evidence obtained by torture, an issue that attorneys for the detainees will almost certainly seek to exploit.

Moreover, the new administration will face hard decisions regarding not just the current Guantanamo Bay detainees but also how it will handle future captures of terrorism suspects. It is unclear whether President-elect Barack Obama would consider holding some suspects without charge on national security grounds. His transition team denied reports this week that it was contemplating some form of preventive detention backed by a new civilian national security court. The idea has been a staple of legal debates over the future of Guantanamo Bay for the past year, but Obama advisers believe it would meet fierce congressional resistance.

"A great deal of attention has been focused on Guantanamo, as it should be, but Guantanamo is a symptom of a much larger question: Where and how is the U.S. going to detain and interrogate terrorist suspects it continues to pick up in combating al-Qaeda?" said Matthew Waxman, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee affairs and now a law professor at Columbia University.
...

Normally I don't like quoting long articles - I figure if you want to read that much you'll follow the link.  But the Washington Post requires a (free) registration so I posted more than usual.
The rest of the article outlines some of the problems the new administration will face as it constructs a policy for dealing with terrorist suspects.  There are no easy answers.  It sounds simple enough - close Guantanamo.  But the logistics will be incredibly complicated.  And what to do with those released?  Their lives are ruined.  Do we have a responsibility to aid them?  To what extent?  I don't think you can live in those conditions and not sustain some lasting damage.  So there is the human cost.  There is also the fact that being held will make them suspect if they were to be returned home.  Who will take them in?  And what about those who are prosecuted?  What are we going to do with them? 

And perhaps the biggest question of all, what will the policy be for future terrorist suspects?


Monkeysdad

Monkeysdad Avatar

Location: Simi Valley, CA
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:31pm

dionysius

dionysius Avatar

Location: The People's Republic of Austin
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:26pm

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:25pm

nuggler

nuggler Avatar

Location: RU Sirius ?
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:24pm

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:22pm

Zep

Zep Avatar

Location: Funkytown


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:19pm

hippiechick

hippiechick Avatar

Location: topsy turvy land
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:14pm

Monkeysdad

Monkeysdad Avatar

Location: Simi Valley, CA
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:14pm

R_P

R_P Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 1:11pm

meower

meower Avatar

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe
Gender: Female


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 12:56pm

nuggler

nuggler Avatar

Location: RU Sirius ?
Gender: Male


Posted: Apr 3, 2008 - 12:55pm

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 14, 15, 16  Next