Britain
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 11:04pm
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- Alchemist - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:38pm
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 9:23pm
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:48pm
Israel
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:22pm
Trump
- Red_Dragon - Jul 2, 2025 - 5:35pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 5:01pm
Country Up The Bumpkin
- buddy - Jul 2, 2025 - 4:06pm
Best Song Comments.
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 3:41pm
NY Times Strands
- maryte - Jul 2, 2025 - 3:37pm
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - Jul 2, 2025 - 3:28pm
Outstanding Covers
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:38pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:20pm
Name My Band
- oldviolin - Jul 2, 2025 - 2:11pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- bobrk - Jul 2, 2025 - 1:16pm
Democratic Party
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 2, 2025 - 1:04pm
Fox Spews
- islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
Immigration
- R_P - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:29am
Republican Party
- ColdMiser - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:14am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 2, 2025 - 8:02am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:59am
Economix
- rgio - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:37am
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 2, 2025 - 6:59am
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:34pm
Carmen to Stones
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
The Obituary Page
- sunybuny - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:03pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 1, 2025 - 5:27pm
Baseball, anyone?
- rgio - Jul 1, 2025 - 11:06am
Artificial Intelligence
- drucev - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:58am
President(s) Musk/Trump
- VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches
- Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
Please help me find this song
- LazyEmergency - Jun 30, 2025 - 8:42pm
Forum Posting Guidelines
- rickylee123 - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:17pm
Thanks William!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:49pm
USA! USA! USA!
- buddy - Jun 30, 2025 - 4:50pm
Living in America
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 3:15pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - Jun 30, 2025 - 12:50pm
Gardeners Corner
- marko86 - Jun 30, 2025 - 10:39am
Comics!
- Red_Dragon - Jun 30, 2025 - 7:59am
Birthday wishes
- Coaxial - Jun 30, 2025 - 6:36am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- VV - Jun 30, 2025 - 5:39am
Global Mix renaming
- frazettaart - Jun 29, 2025 - 9:23am
Iran
- R_P - Jun 28, 2025 - 8:56pm
Live Music
- Steely_D - Jun 28, 2025 - 6:53pm
What Are You Going To Do Today?
- ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2025 - 10:17am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jun 28, 2025 - 9:52am
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 3:00pm
Know your memes
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 11:41am
What Makes You Sad?
- oldviolin - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:41am
Calling all Monty Python fans!
- FeydBaron - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:30am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - Jun 27, 2025 - 10:23am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2025 - 8:30am
Framed - movie guessing game
- Proclivities - Jun 27, 2025 - 6:25am
Yummy Snack
- Proclivities - Jun 26, 2025 - 1:17pm
Parents and Children
- kurtster - Jun 26, 2025 - 11:32am
What Makes You Laugh?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jun 25, 2025 - 9:36pm
PUNS- Political Punditry and so-called journalism
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 12:06pm
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 11:30am
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - Jun 25, 2025 - 10:32am
Astronomy!
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 8:58am
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jun 25, 2025 - 7:13am
Billionaires
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:57pm
Great guitar faces
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 4:15pm
Buying a Cell Phone
- Steely_D - Jun 24, 2025 - 3:05pm
Anti-War
- R_P - Jun 24, 2025 - 12:57pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jun 24, 2025 - 10:40am
RIP Mick Ralphs
- geoff_morphini - Jun 23, 2025 - 10:40pm
Congress
- maryte - Jun 23, 2025 - 1:39pm
Europe
- R_P - Jun 23, 2025 - 11:30am
the Todd Rundgren topic
- ColdMiser - Jun 23, 2025 - 7:58am
What are you doing RIGHT NOW?
- GeneP59 - Jun 21, 2025 - 6:14pm
Rock & Roll Facts
- Coaxial - Jun 21, 2025 - 6:10pm
Poetry Forum
- SeriousLee - Jun 21, 2025 - 5:20pm
And the good news is....
- Red_Dragon - Jun 21, 2025 - 3:39pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
NEED A COMPUTER GEEK!
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 ... 237, 238, 239 Next |
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 14, 2024 - 11:19pm |
|
kurtster wrote:
ntldr is missing windows xp
Check BIOS settings to see if your primary boot device is setup correctly and/or that you have a diskette/cd-rom inserted from which it is trying to boot instead.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Feb 14, 2024 - 10:43pm |
|
ntldr is missing windows xp
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2023 - 7:56am |
|
westslope wrote:
Help please.
I am looking for an 'App' that would allow text communication between an iPad and an Android smartphone or Windows 10 PC Workstation.
The owner of the iPad does not have an iPhone. I mention this because apparently if you have an iPhone, you can sync to an iPad and get WhatsApp to work.
The owner of the iPad lives in a provincial hospice, lost both legs to a CN freight train a couple of years ago and has limited use of his hands. I occasionally visit this man and bring him edibles.
I am the one with the android and windows devices and would rather not have to buy an iPhone.
Suggestions?
If the iPad owner has a cellphone they can text from the iPad if they're logged into their Apple ID *and* have enabled SMS messaging in the "Messages" app.
|
|
rgio

Location: West Jersey Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2023 - 5:17am |
|
westslope wrote:
Help please.
I am looking for an 'App' that would allow text communication between an iPad and an Android smartphone or Windows 10 PC Workstation.
The owner of the iPad does not have an iPhone. I mention this because apparently if you have an iPhone, you can sync to an iPad and get WhatsApp to work.
The owner of the iPad lives in a provincial hospice, lost both legs to a CN freight train a couple of years ago and has limited use of his hands. I occasionally visit this man and bring him edibles.
I am the one with the android and windows devices and would rather not have to buy an iPhone.
Suggestions?
I used Pulse for several years, and it worked great.
https://home.pulsesms.app/over...
Instructions on setting up an IOS alternative are here: https://home.pulsesms.app/over...
|
|
thisbody

Location: out of space Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jan 5, 2023 - 2:08am |
|
westslope wrote:
Help please.
I am looking for an 'App' that would allow text communication between an iPad and an Android smartphone or Windows 10 PC Workstation.
The owner of the iPad does not have an iPhone. I mention this because apparently if you have an iPhone, you can sync to an iPad and get WhatsApp to work.
The owner of the iPad lives in a provincial hospice, lost both legs to a CN freight train a couple of years ago and has limited use of his hands. I occasionally visit this man and bring him edibles.
I am the one with the android and windows devices and would rather not have to buy an iPhone.
Suggestions?
What about good old Email?
Other than that, you could install Whatsapp on your Android (provided it is installed on the iPad and phone).
Same goes for Signal Messenger, as well as other messenger apps.
|
|
westslope

Location: BC sage brush steppe 
|
Posted:
Jan 4, 2023 - 4:05pm |
|
Help please.
I am looking for an 'App' that would allow text communication between an iPad and an Android smartphone or Windows 10 PC Workstation.
The owner of the iPad does not have an iPhone. I mention this because apparently if you have an iPhone, you can sync to an iPad and get WhatsApp to work.
The owner of the iPad lives in a provincial hospice, lost both legs to a CN freight train a couple of years ago and has limited use of his hands. I occasionally visit this man and bring him edibles.
I am the one with the android and windows devices and would rather not have to buy an iPhone.
Suggestions?
|
|
Manbird

Location: La Villa Toscana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 3, 2022 - 3:18pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:
Well even more basic than that. The "missing" color book from Adobe that is the biggie is Pantone Solid Coated. That is a recipe book âliterallyâ for printers to mix a wide range of spot color inks. Using a palette of uniform base colors, you would weigh out 3 parts Rubine, 1 part black, 1 part cobalt blue and get, I dunno, Pantone 498. The customer in Schenectady and the designer in LA and the printer in Taos are all looking at the same swatch in their (expensive) Pantone guides, so there are no surprisesâas long as the guy mixing the ink knows how to use a scale and do a drawdown.
Pantone came out with a Process formula book that was all CMYK values, but it was different from Solid Coated and everyone referred to Solid Color numbers even though those were supposed to be spot colors only. Anyway, computers allowed people to export CMYK renditions of Solid Coated spot colors and everyone was happy even though those conversions aren't valid: your CMS settings can play havoc with how they're converted. So now rather than use the Process book, design firms specify a PMS color (Solid Coated) and then give what they want as a CMYK equivalent. So yes, access to Pantone for most designers is not needed; we only need that CMYK formula. Which should change depending on the paper used, but absolutely zero agencies address this, so I guess no one is as anal retentive about consistency as they used to be in the 80s when designers got flown around the world to do press checks. Before my time, unfortunately, but I have a friend who works for âAdobeâ and she still gets to go on press checks in Vietnam.
I almost got to go somewhere East when I was doing the watery bum cleaning toilet attachment work but after almost 2 years of paying me 70/hour they put someone on the payroll full time. I wasn't offered the job. I couldn't have commuted that far anyway. Story of my life. Lucky they tolerated me such as they did.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 3:35pm |
|
rgio wrote:Pantone was founded in the 1960's to standardize color naming and application so businesses could share an understanding of the exact same thing without having to be in the same room. They don't own the colors, but if you want to use their language you need to pay for it...especially in business. There are plenty of other ways to share color now (RGB, Hex, etc,), but if you want to use their naming scheme, you have to pay for it
Well even more basic than that. The "missing" color book from Adobe that is the biggie is Pantone Solid Coated. That is a recipe book âliterallyâ for printers to mix a wide range of spot color inks. Using a palette of uniform base colors, you would weigh out 3 parts Rubine, 1 part black, 1 part cobalt blue and get, I dunno, Pantone 498. The customer in Schenectady and the designer in LA and the printer in Taos are all looking at the same swatch in their (expensive) Pantone guides, so there are no surprisesâas long as the guy mixing the ink knows how to use a scale and do a drawdown.
Pantone came out with a Process formula book that was all CMYK values, but it was different from Solid Coated and everyone referred to Solid Color numbers even though those were supposed to be spot colors only. Anyway, computers allowed people to export CMYK renditions of Solid Coated spot colors and everyone was happy even though those conversions aren't valid: your CMS settings can play havoc with how they're converted. So now rather than use the Process book, design firms specify a PMS color (Solid Coated) and then give what they want as a CMYK equivalent. So yes, access to Pantone for most designers is not needed; we only need that CMYK formula. Which should change depending on the paper used, but absolutely zero agencies address this, so I guess no one is as anal retentive about consistency as they used to be in the 80s when designers got flown around the world to do press checks. Before my time, unfortunately, but I have a friend who works for âAdobeâ and she still gets to go on press checks in Vietnam.
|
|
thisbody

Location: out of space Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 12:41pm |
|
rgio wrote:
...
There are plenty of other ways to share color now (RGB, Hex, etc,), but if you want to use their naming scheme, you have to pay for it.
They aren't selling water in the desert, they're selling sand with names on it. If you don't want theirs, grab some of the free stuff.
Ayupp.
|
|
thisbody

Location: out of space Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 12:36pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:
So you clearly don't understand the problem that Pantone solves. Or how the dying dead-trees printing industry means fewer people have that problem. Pantone will likely die in our lifetimes and maybe Adobe is putting a boot to their neck deliberately, but it's not surprising that Pantone would try to come up with a way to keep their income up. Do I wish Adobe would have kept up? Sure. And like I said, I don't know why they haven't. Probably a sweetheart deal from decades ago that Pantone wasn't making any money off of. The short version is: I don't need Pantone. It's nice, but not $20/month nice, and I'm sure 95% of Adobe users haven't ever thought about it. But that 5% who do need it? $20/month is a no-brainer. Pantone's probably done their math and said something like "If we were getting 50¢/month per user on the old contract, then $20/month for 5% of all users will double our income." It's not greed, it's just numbers.
Saying it's a thing that can't be owned is like saying "how can they charge for cookbooks when I already have all the ingredients?" and then complaining when your chocolate chip cookies taste terrible because you put chicken in them.
I do understand what calibrating of device colors (sreen, printer) means. I have no preferences there, as you seem to. I don't publish anything, anymore nowadays. But I do know, Adobe, as well as Pantone aren't needed if one is serious about professional output in desktop publishing. It only may seem more comfortable, and that comfort comes with a price.
Regardless of - that's the way we've been used to doing it on Windows for decades...
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 12:10pm |
|
thisbody wrote:
Just calling out man's greediness! Making money of things that can't really be owned by one, or a group of people via patents.
So you clearly don't understand the problem that Pantone solves. Or how the dying dead-trees printing industry means fewer people have that problem. Pantone will likely die in our lifetimes and maybe Adobe is putting a boot to their neck deliberately, but it's not surprising that Pantone would try to come up with a way to keep their income up. Do I wish Adobe would have kept up? Sure. And like I said, I don't know why they haven't. Probably a sweetheart deal from decades ago that Pantone wasn't making any money off of. The short version is: I don't need Pantone. It's nice, but not $20/month nice, and I'm sure 95% of Adobe users haven't ever thought about it. But that 5% who do need it? $20/month is a no-brainer. Pantone's probably done their math and said something like "If we were getting 50¢/month per user on the old contract, then $20/month for 5% of all users will double our income." It's not greed, it's just numbers.
Saying it's a thing that can't be owned is like saying "how can they charge for cookbooks when I already have all the ingredients?" and then complaining when your chocolate chip cookies taste terrible because you put chicken in them.
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 11:59am |
|
thisbody wrote:
So the question remains, what is the difference between "patenting" and just "buying the rights"?
Morally?
EDIT: I was yet editing my post... down there...
I was not debating the moral implications or analogies; I was referring to the literal meaning of the word. Words matter, semantics matter - well, they do to me. There's already more than enough reckless exaggeration and arbitrary redefinition out there.
|
|
rgio

Location: West Jersey Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 11:46am |
|
thisbody wrote:
Not intending to thread-jack. Only answering to Scott's question?
A bit late to the dance, but patents have created the environment that you benefit from countless times every day.
Only when your efforts can be rewarded (and not stolen), is it worth toiling to create something new. Capitalism thrives on innovation, which would stop if people had to share their efforts with whoever decided to use them without having to pay. Computer innovation over the past 40 years has been absolutly amazing, and mostly due to the pursuit of financial reward by inventors.
Pantone was founded in the 1960's to standardize color naming and application so businesses could share an understanding of the exact same thing without having to be in the same room. They don't own the colors, but if you want to use their language you need to pay for it...especially in business. There are plenty of other ways to share color now (RGB, Hex, etc,), but if you want to use their naming scheme, you have to pay for it.
They aren't selling water in the desert, they're selling sand with names on it. If you don't want theirs, grab some of the free stuff.
|
|
thisbody

Location: out of space Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 11:32am |
|
Proclivities wrote:
Privatizing water supply and delivery systems (as greedy as it could be considered) is not the same as "patenting drinking water".
So the question remains, what is the difference between "patenting" and just "buying the rights"?
Morally?
EDIT: I was yet editing my post... down there...
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 11:26am |
|
thisbody wrote:
Not intending to thread-jack. Only answering to Scott's question?
The documentary "We Feed The World, 2005" explains what I was mentioning.. while it is still worth watching as a whole imo, here's the beef of it in this discussion. Meanwhile, the internet has been cleaned up, and Néstle have done their best to correct that image shown in the film very successfully as your comment shows, for all traces of the upheaval this documentary created then on the net are gone from the internet today (there were tons of pages, back then)...
Privatizing water supply and delivery systems (as greedy as it could be considered) is not the same as "patenting drinking water".
|
|
thisbody

Location: out of space Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 11:17am |
|
Proclivities wrote:
Obvious furthering of a thread-jack but what is this story about Nestle attempting to patent drinking water? I know Nestle drains water for bottling from various places around the world - even some places which have very limited supplies of drinking water, but that's not the same as patenting it. Purification systems, chemical treatments, or extraction methods can be patented, but 'patenting drinking water' sounds like hyperbole.
Not intending to thread-jack. Only answering to Scott's question?
The documentary "We Feed The World, 2005" explains what I was mentioning.. while it is still worth watching as a whole imo, here's the beef of it in this discussion. Meanwhile, the internet has been cleaned up, and Néstle have done their best to correct that image shown in the film very successfully as your comment shows, for all traces of the upheaval this documentary created then on the net are gone from the internet today (there were tons of pages, back then)... thinking... what is the difference between patenting drinking water and buying all the distribution rights?!
There's more: Bottled Life... Can you imagine someone turning ordinary water into a billion dollar business? The secret key to the blue gold lies in the hand of Swiss transnational nutrition company Nestlé.
|
|
Proclivities

Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 10:26am |
|
thisbody wrote:
Just calling out man's greediness!
Making money of things that can't really be owned by one, or a group of people via patents.
So many other examples coming to mind. HIV, COVID meds for the poor, etc. etc.
We cannot really be ok with someone patenting drinking water in the Sahara region (Néstle). Can we?
Watch out for the future, when sunlight will be patented just there by the energy undistry...
Obvious furthering of a thread-jack but what is this story about Nestle attempting to patent drinking water? I know Nestle drains water for bottling from various places around the world - even some places which have very limited supplies of drinking water, but that's not the same as patenting it. Purification systems, chemical treatments, or extraction methods can be patented, but 'patenting drinking water' sounds like hyperbole.
|
|
thisbody

Location: out of space Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 2, 2022 - 9:50am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:
GIMP sucks balls. Interface is as inelegant as possible, probably as a middle finger to people who want things to be nice. Cheap bastards are better off buying Affinity Photo. It's less capable but less user-hostile than GIMP.
Pantone has had a proprietary system for communicating colors for 60 years, it's not a new thing. I don't know what the beef is between Adobe and Pantone but your take on the situation is just weird.
Just calling out man's greediness!
Making money of things that can't really be owned by one, or a group of people via patents.
So many other examples coming to mind. HIV, COVID meds for the poor, etc. etc.
We cannot really be ok with someone patenting drinking water in the Sahara region (Néstle). Can we?
Watch out for the future, when sunlight will be patented just there by the energy undistry...
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 1, 2022 - 4:13am |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:I've tried to do, but nothing is intuitive, and requires having a web browser open so I can search up how to do basic thingsâbut I would do it just to prove it could be done. But now I'm old and am a lot less stubborn about things.
just give me an AI based assistant to get that stuff done
maybe an elevated/genius smart screen
i'm sure deep mind is on it...
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Nov 30, 2022 - 7:10pm |
|
rgio wrote:
I added GIMP, tried it, and deleted it. Then I needed SVGs for a site. After adding it back and using it a bit more...it's OK. It could definitely be easier to use...but once I figured a few things out I've changed my mind.
I've had it available on my machines for 20 years and yeah it works for most things I've tried to do, but nothing is intuitive, and requires having a web browser open so I can search up how to do basic thingsâbut I would do it just to prove it could be done. But now I'm old and am a lot less stubborn about things.
|
|
|