Radio Paradise

too late friendo, body scanning is already here
like made-to-measure, scanatic, etc.
pretty sure there's even an app you put on your phone to scan your meat sac
and a shirt that fits like a glove shows up on your doorstep what's next? everyone speaking the same language? the same standards in math/engineering?
btw, my latest radioparadise tshirt was true to size
donned it this weekend!

Aha! A true believer! I knew it!

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male

Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 9:41am

Red_Dragon wrote:

Someone needs to create a clothing size Gaspacho to establish and enforce standardization of all clothing, not just shirts. There, I said it.

too late friendo, body scanning is already here
like made-to-measure, scanatic, etc.
pretty sure there's even an app you put on your phone to scan your meat sac
and a shirt that fits like a glove shows up on your doorstep

what's next? everyone speaking the same language? the same standards in math/engineering?
btw, my latest radioparadise tshirt was true to size
donned it this weekend!

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan

Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 8:27am
Someone needs to create a clothing size Gaspacho to establish and enforce standardization of all clothing, not just shirts. There, I said it.

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male

Posted: Feb 22, 2022 - 7:54am

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male

Posted: Mar 25, 2015 - 10:34am

pigtail

pigtail Avatar

Location: Southern California
Gender: Female

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 10:36am
ricguy wrote: LOVE 'EM pt !!! I knew you would.....lol

ricguy

ricguy Avatar

Location: between gigs...in the OC, CA
Gender: Male

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 10:28am
pigtail wrote: These are so you! LOVE 'EM pt !!!

pigtail

pigtail Avatar

Location: Southern California
Gender: Female

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 10:26am
ricguy wrote: These are so you!

ricguy

ricguy Avatar

Location: between gigs...in the OC, CA
Gender: Male

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 10:20am
Proclivities wrote: re: pants

hobiejoe

hobiejoe Avatar

Location: Still in the tunnel, looking for the light.
Gender: Male

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 9:55am
pigtail wrote: orange pants? YIKES RUN AWAY!!! Could be worse - could be red f*****g trousers. (Caution, title of blog alone is NSFW)

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 9:27am
pigtail wrote: orange pants? YIKES RUN AWAY!!! "Forward Fashion Looks" indeed!

pigtail

pigtail Avatar

Location: Southern California
Gender: Female

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 9:15am
Proclivities wrote: orange pants? YIKES RUN AWAY!!!

Proclivities

Proclivities Avatar

Location: Paris of the Piedmont
Gender: Male

Posted: Aug 15, 2013 - 8:06am

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 10:29am

Prodigal_SOB wrote:

I've always thought of 220 as pretty much the ideal weight. I don't think I've seen 180 since junior high school.

Weight is a funny thing in relation to individuals different body types. Especially on display when you watch the MMA fights and they have these lightweight dudes (155lbs.) that are enormously muscled. You're like, how does that guy only weigh 155 pounds?! {#Eek}

220 is my ideal weight as well, that is what my body naturally gravitates to when I am staying in shape and eating properly.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 10:27am
Prodigal_SOB wrote: I've always thought of 220 as pretty much the ideal weight. I don't think I've seen 180 since junior high school. Yes, but you're taller than the average bleacher bum.

Prodigal_SOB

Prodigal_SOB Avatar

Location: Back Home Again in Indiana
Gender: Male

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 10:25am
Red_Dragon wrote: Yes, 220 is then new 180. I've always thought of 220 as pretty much the ideal weight. I don't think I've seen 180 since junior high school.

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar

Location: Dumbf*ckistan

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 10:17am
Manbird wrote: They are just adjusting their sizes to fit the average McAmerican with cheese and a large fries. Yes, 220 is then new 180.

sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 10:15am
Manbird wrote: They are just adjusting their sizes to fit the average McAmerican with cheese and a large fries. And because of improved nutrition, healthcare and numerous growth and performance enhancing drugs if we are not fat we are still big, ugly Americans!

Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: ? ? ?
Gender: Male

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 9:59am

islander wrote:

I just had to return some shirts to LL Bean. They have finally succumbed to size creep. My new "large" was a good 1-2 inches bigger in every dimension than the exact same shirt in large from a couple years ago. The replacement Medium I got was close to the old large, but it's now about an inch to narrow across the shoulders. I'm apparently a non-standard size - skinny (relatively so), short (ish), apparently fairly broad shoulders, and I want the waist of my jeans to be somewhere close to the waist of my body (or at least above my hips).

They are just adjusting their sizes to fit the average McAmerican with cheese and a large fries.

Manbird

Manbird Avatar

Location: ? ? ?
Gender: Male

Posted: May 28, 2013 - 9:53am
ScottFromWyoming wrote: People collect those Tommy Bahama shirts like baseball cards. Weird. They have cool silk shirts at Costco for $20 and the XL is way XL. By the way. Mine is a Jason Agave. 99% of them are ugly as hell. I just happen to wander across the one good looking shirt they make.

Page: 1, 2 Next