[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]
Carole King — Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?
Album: Tapestry
Avg rating:
7.5

Your rating:
Total ratings: 410









Released: 1971
Length: 4:05
Plays (last 30 days): 0
share tweet wikiwebsitesearchamg
cd
mp3
search
Tonight you're mine completely
You give your love so sweetly
Tonight the light of love is in your eyes
But will you love me tomorrow?

Is this a lasting treasure
Or just a moment's pleasure?
Can I believe the magic in your sighs?
Will you still love me tomorrow?

Tonight with words unspoken
You said that I'm the only one
But will my heart be broken
When the night (When the night)
Meets the morning sun?

I'd like to know that your love
Is love I can be sure of
So tell me now and I won't ask again
Will you still love me tomorrow?
Will you still love me tomorrow?
Comments (26)add comment
Love you tomorrow?  Carole, I will love you forever.. xx
Posted 1 year ago by GingerandMe    [ Reply ]
glorious, Carol King's voice slices me open.
Posted 1 year ago by jkforde    [ Reply ]
Posted 1 year ago by jkforde    [ Reply ]





“Years of love have been forgot, In the hatred of a minute.”


~Poe
Posted 2 years ago by cosmicjoe54    [ Reply ]
It's always been that bare foot and that cat looking at the camera as if he's trying to read the make, lol.
Posted 2 years ago by tinypriest    [ Reply ]
Carole's version puts back the soul into this song (which she wrote, of course). It's a soul song, which Phil Spector knew nothing about, notwithstanding "You've Lost That Loving Feeling", which was too infused with soul even for Spector to erase it.
Posted 2 years ago by tinypriest    [ Reply ]
9
Posted 4 years ago by norbertZ    [ Reply ]
 (anonymous) wrote:
another sleeper- are you asleep at the wheel overthere? edited by lbrc at 3:03 pm on 4/21/2003
 

Funny how we all run by different clocks, so many comments about the tempo. Come on guys, slow down yourselves a bit.
Posted 5 years ago by sgaustein    [ Reply ]
 Wallyman wrote:
The song's place in pop history is not in question, but this version actually seems to s-l-o-w it's tempo as it goes along and strikes no responsive chord in me.
 
Maybe it's just because of my personal situation right now, that let's say touches upon the themes of this song, love, but also the vulnerabilities of getting older, wondering where you'll be 10 years from now, and whether you'll be there alone or not... but from this perspective, the song is very, very moving and performed just right.
Posted 5 years ago by user4176    [ Reply ]

 
Carole King by Yahoo!7 - Sunrise Family
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sunrisefamily/

Copyright All rights reserved

.


Posted 14 years ago by calypsus_1    [ Reply ]
I like Carole's version better. In the Shirelles bouncy version, it's easy to miss the seriousness of the message. So Carole slows it down, so the solemnity of her words becomes clear. The Shirelles seem to be talking about a kiss after the junior high school dance. Carole's lullubye is sung in bed. It's an intimacy that Carole doesn't take lightly, but he is her one-and-only. Hence the weighty slowness of the song.
Posted 20 years ago by robinesque    [ Reply ]
Originally Posted by Wallyman: The song's place in pop history is not in question, but this version actually seems to s-l-o-w it's tempo as it goes along and strikes no responsive chord in me.
i agree. dirge-like, i'm afraid.
Posted 21 years ago by mperry    [ Reply ]
Originally Posted by Leslie: I never thought I would say this, but I actually think Linda Ronstadt's version of this is better. It's peppier for certain.
The Shirlles's version is even better; much better than this.
Posted 21 years ago by ndanger666    [ Reply ]
I never thought I would say this, but I actually think Linda Ronstadt\'s version of this is better. It\'s peppier for certain.
Posted 21 years ago by Leslie    [ Reply ]
Boring as all hell
Posted 21 years ago by KevinM    [ Reply ]
Guess there\'s songwriting, and there\'s performance: maybe she wrote it, but the Shirelles sing it so much better...
Posted 21 years ago by Max    [ Reply ]
The song\'s place in pop history is not in question, but this version actually seems to s-l-o-w it\'s tempo as it goes along and strikes no responsive chord in me.
Posted 21 years ago by Wallyman    [ Reply ]
Great song, but I like the Shirelles and the Phil Spector Wall of Sound version.
Posted 21 years ago by haybaler    [ Reply ]
I lost all interest in Carole back in the 70s. However, gotta give her credit for having penned this classic. I would prefer the Shirelles\' version, however. That would be a sweet tweak, Bill
Posted 21 years ago by tonypf    [ Reply ]
That is a quiestion I say sometimes
Posted 21 years ago by Revel    [ Reply ]
Originally Posted by catsoup: OK, but how am I supposed to stay awake after lunch, and now this?
Exactly...may be a classic, but its a yawner.
Posted 21 years ago by andrewgd    [ Reply ]
OK, but how am I supposed to stay awake after lunch, and now this?
Posted 21 years ago by catsoup    [ Reply ]