Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 2470
Length: 4:26
Plays (last 30 days): 0
It's no secret that our world is in darkness tonight
They say the sun is sometimes eclipsed by the moon
Y' know I don't see you when she walks in the room
It's no secret that a friend is someone who lets you help
It's no secret that a liar won't believe anyone else
They say a secret is something you tell one other person
So I'm telling you, child
Gospel Voice
Love, we shine like a
Burning star
We're falling from
The sky... tonight
Low Voice
A man will beg
A man will crawl
On the sheer face of love
Like a fly on a wall
It's no secret at all
It's no secret that a conscience can sometimes be a pest
It's no secret ambition bites the nails of success
Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief
All kill their inspiration and sing about the grief
Gospel Voice
Love, we shine like a
Burning star
We're falling from
The sky... tonight
Low Voice
A man will rise
A man will fall
From the sheer face of love
Like a fly from a wall
It's no secret at all
Gospel Voice
Love, we shine like a burning star
We're falling from the sky tonight
Love, we shine like a
Burning star
We're falling from
The sky... tonight
It's no secret that the stars are falling from the sky
The universe exploding 'cos-a one man's lie
Look I gotta go
Yeah, I'm running outta change
There's a lot of things
If I could I'd rearrange
Would LOVE to see the Sphere experience. Anyone that can share some details..? I'm just glad I got to see this tour when it came out. Mind blowing show, especially at that time.
The Sphere was a completely different venue than I have ever experienced. I don't think it is hyperbole to say its next generation and not just in a music venue but in human engineering in general. Can't wait to see Phish next!
U2 are back, The Fly is incredible especially in a Las Vegas Sphere!
Would LOVE to see the Sphere experience. Anyone that can share some details..? I'm just glad I got to see this tour when it came out. Mind blowing show, especially at that time.
Not my favourite track. But super fabulous album. Played it to death.
They traveled a huge distance musically going from "Joshua Tree" to "Achtung Baby"...
Hey, come on, let's be nice here. People can have different opinions.
Yeah, but that was in response to a NASTY comment! "crap racket"? ..eh? ...appropriate response!!! .
If you don't like it, hit the SKIP BUTTON, skippy! ...and shut up!!
Hey, come on, let's be nice here. People can have different opinions.
Crap racket
If you don't like it, hit the SKIP BUTTON, skippy! ...and shut up!!
I used to live for U2 (well, after REM) - but at some point in my life, I started to find their earnestness exhausting. There are still some of their songs that I will listen to forever, but that list is shorter than it used to be.
Both bands became so self-important and made no secret of it.
Early career: fantastic stuff; later career: would rather not listen to it.
Ikr? I played this song non-stop when I was a teenager. When I say non stop, I mean like getting to sleep and waking up with this song.
"Hey, there's a song named after you."
"Really? There's a song called "Fred"?"
I think this is when their sound 'gelled' into their distinctive 'U2 Sound'. Everything came together. Lyrics, guitar, harmonies, drumming... the Edge and his sonic experiments sound like no one else
People should try separating the artist from the art. Sometimes the two are inextricably linked and there isn't a possible separation. I don't think that's the case with U2 though.
Just like the Beatles and Rolling Stones and Jimi Hendrix. They're in good company.
I, I, I, my, my, my, you, you, you. Listen to yourself drone on and on... self important much? Vote with yourratings. Mute the volume. Better yet, go do something else.
H8rhater, not to be a pain in the arse, but didn't Byron directly state he already does what you so wisely suggest in his original post? Just sayin'. Additionally, I tend to agree with what Byronape says here about U2 and other bands, that while they may be immensely popular, I never developed a particular taste for despite said popularity. To each his/her own. No?
No pain received. I think you missed the point of my (Byron)ape-ing those suggestions from the OP as a a setup for the "Better yet".
So true CJ... especially that they never make the same song twice. This is so different from their early stuff yet it has the braggadocio and swagger that we want them to give us but only the greatest bands can deliver.
Maybe you should quit huffing paint thinner.
I really like your comment. However to experience this live in the open air with the lightning flashes of a thunder storm coming in from the distance was an unforgettable experience for me.
I agree, this tour was fabulous.
I really like your comment. To experience this live in the open air with the lightning flashes of a thunder storm coming in from the distance was an unforgettable experience for me.
In the last 3 songs I read this same comment from you LOL
Had a hard time enjoying this album when it first came out (was expecting another Joshua Tree) but I'd agree with you now about that ranking. This is one of my all-time fave U2 songs. The ZooTV live version is outstanding.
My how you do cry like a babe.
I didn't think so.
Keep your uninformed character assassinations to yourself.
Thank you.
So tired of these Bono-obsessed whiners.
So have you met Bono? Chatted with him or his friends to find out how he thinks of himself? Read interviews from reliable sources maybe?
I didn't think so.
Keep your uninformed character assassinations to yourself.
ditto, Scott.
yes. definitely!
When an artist lives up to its historic period and adapts to change it is when real art is produced. I'll give them that.
thanks for the psd function
Couldn't agree more
This was the first U2 album that really grabbed my attention personally. Their work in the '90s was really groundbreaking, IMHO.
Interesting. I thought the had their cutting-edge moments in the 80s as well, or at least albums that induced a lot of copy-cat bands like The Alarm. Unforgettable Fire shook people up when it came out. I remember listening to Joshua Tree in early '87 and thinking that it might be of one the best rock albums of all time. These days JT and Achtung Baby are my faves, although it's easier to get into AB. Music has changed drastically since the 80s...
U2's success in both decades had a lot to do with Brian Eno--the guy often changes bands for the better IMO. I missed the fire and passion of 80s U2 when stuff like Zooroopa came out, although I like that album. You have to give credit to the band for staying ahead of fans' preferences for a while and for not getting stuck in a rut.
thanks for the psd function
A lot of U2 fans hated this album at first because they wanted the band to make more "Joshua Tree"-like music. The guys kinda shot themselves in the foot with the bland and self-congratulatory "Rattle and Hum."
It took me quite a while to warm up to this album but it's one of my U2 faves. The video from the ZooTV tour is greatgreatgreat.
This was the first U2 album that really grabbed my attention personally. Their work in the '90s was really groundbreaking, IMHO.
A lot of U2 fans hated this album at first because they wanted the band to make more "Joshua Tree"-like music. The guys kinda shot themselves in the foot with the bland and self-congratulatory "Rattle and Hum."
It took me quite a while to warm up to this album but it's one of my U2 faves. The video from the ZooTV tour is greatgreatgreat.
Ok, I'm something of a hater so I'll go ahead and hate on...
Popular and good (by my standards since the music is going into my ear holes and my opinion is the only one that counts to me) have little to do with each other. If you look at a top ten list of the highest grossing concerts in history, you will see a lot of the same names. The Rolling Stones (I don't really like them), ACDC (eh, depends on my mood), Madonna (don't even get me started), The Police (depends on the song), and Bon Jovi (hatehatehate...) So, I offer this list up as evidence that good and popular do not always have a connection.
Besides, spouting numbers at me or telling me how popular a band is will do nothing to change my opinion of of the music. I'm either going to like it, love it, hate it, or be indifferent to it. Nothing you say will change that and nothing that everyone else likes will influence me one way or another.
For the most part, I know I'm in the minority of RP listeners when it comes to U2. I'm ok with that. I vote with my ratings and if I don't like what I'm hearing, I mute the volume or go do something else.
Please don't make the assumption that facts have anything to do with something as subjective as taste in music. If I'm the only one on the planet that doesn't like something, then it just means that it didn't do happy things for my ears. Maybe that makes me strange or my tastes questionable, but I don't care. My tastes are mine and I don't feel compelled to tell anyone why they are wrong. Doing so would gain me nothing and only lower me to the level of the people that think sales or popularity should define my tastes.
I, I, I, my, my, my, you, you, you. Listen to yourself drone on and on... self important much? Vote with yourratings. Mute the volume. Better yet, go do something else.
H8rhater, not to be a pain in the arse, but didn't Byron directly state he already does what you so wisely suggest in his original post? Just sayin'. Additionally, I tend to agree with what Byronape says here about U2 and other bands, that while they may be immensely popular, I never developed a particular taste for despite said popularity. To each his/her own. No?
Ok, I'm something of a hater so I'll go ahead and hate on...
Popular and good (by my standards since the music is going into my ear holes and my opinion is the only one that counts to me) have little to do with each other. If you look at a top ten list of the highest grossing concerts in history, you will see a lot of the same names. The Rolling Stones (I don't really like them), ACDC (eh, depends on my mood), Madonna (don't even get me started), The Police (depends on the song), and Bon Jovi (hatehatehate...) So, I offer this list up as evidence that good and popular do not always have a connection.
Besides, spouting numbers at me or telling me how popular a band is will do nothing to change my opinion of of the music. I'm either going to like it, love it, hate it, or be indifferent to it. Nothing you say will change that and nothing that everyone else likes will influence me one way or another.
For the most part, I know I'm in the minority of RP listeners when it comes to U2. I'm ok with that. I vote with my ratings and if I don't like what I'm hearing, I mute the volume or go do something else.
Please don't make the assumption that facts have anything to do with something as subjective as taste in music. If I'm the only one on the planet that doesn't like something, then it just means that it didn't do happy things for my ears. Maybe that makes me strange or my tastes questionable, but I don't care. My tastes are mine and I don't feel compelled to tell anyone why they are wrong. Doing so would gain me nothing and only lower me to the level of the people that think sales or popularity should define my tastes.
it could be my favourite guitar solo, and it's the weird bits that I like.
Actually, it's an unusually rhythmic solo, with lot's of fun call-and-response within the solo. And when Bono's vocals layers over at the end...
Ok, I'm something of a hater so I'll go ahead and hate on...
Popular and good (by my standards since the music is going into my ear holes and my opinion is the only one that counts to me) have little to do with each other. If you look at a top ten list of the highest grossing concerts in history, you will see a lot of the same names. The Rolling Stones (I don't really like them), ACDC (eh, depends on my mood), Madonna (don't even get me started), The Police (depends on the song), and Bon Jovi (hatehatehate...) So, I offer this list up as evidence that good and popular do not always have a connection.
Besides, spouting numbers at me or telling me how popular a band is will do nothing to change my opinion of of the music. I'm either going to like it, love it, hate it, or be indifferent to it. Nothing you say will change that and nothing that everyone else likes will influence me one way or another.
For the most part, I know I'm in the minority of RP listeners when it comes to U2. I'm ok with that. I vote with my ratings and if I don't like what I'm hearing, I mute the volume or go do something else.
Please don't make the assumption that facts have anything to do with something as subjective as taste in music. If I'm the only one on the planet that doesn't like something, then it just means that it didn't do happy things for my ears. Maybe that makes me strange or my tastes questionable, but I don't care. My tastes are mine and I don't feel compelled to tell anyone why they are wrong. Doing so would gain me nothing and only lower me to the level of the people that think sales or popularity should define my tastes.
I, I, I, my, my, my, you, you, you. Listen to yourself drone on and on... self important much? Vote with your ratings. Mute the volume. Better yet, go do something else.
If we are honest, we have to admit that U2 is half the good band
we think they are!
THE EDGE is a mediocre guitar-player without his machines
On bass is an amateur
Voice is great and drums are OK!
Still - 10 great songs is not much for a band of that status being 30 years
in business!
So Bono, how long have you been using this "MiracleDrug" handle?
Really, you're not fooling anyone. ; )
ROFL
So Bono, how long have you been using this "MiracleDrug" handle?
Really, you're not fooling anyone. ; )
Well, except for the reason that fewer of their fans would have gotten to see them, most likely, as playing multiple smaller venues per city would have resulted in fewer cities being visited. (Or maybe a 4 year tour.)
and in addition the real point in all this is:
THEY ARE WILDLY POPULAR and HAVE BEEN FOR DECADES
if you don't happen to agree with the millions of us world-wide that do like their music...
that's fine...
just be aware your opinion is a minority view...
Well, congratulations, they made sh*tloads of cash; so did Justin Bieber and Kim Kardashian.
Further to Byronape's insightful comments below, the reason the tour was "high-grossing" is because they charged ridiculously high prices for the honour of seeing them in massive, soulless football stadiums where the sound and view suck beyond all hope (trust me, I made the mistake of seeing them on said tour). There's no reason (other than greed) they couldn't play multiple nights in smaller venues. I like U2 as much as the next guy, but they lost my respect when they started putting profits ahead of their fans.
Well, except for the reason that fewer of their fans would have gotten to see them, most likely, as playing multiple smaller venues per city would have resulted in fewer cities being visited. (Or maybe a 4 year tour.)
Well, congratulations, they made sh*tloads of cash; so did Justin Bieber and Kim Kardashian.
Further to Byronape's insightful comments below, the reason the tour was "high-grossing" is because they charged ridiculously high prices for the honour of seeing them in massive, soulless football stadiums where the sound and view suck beyond all hope (trust me, I made the mistake of seeing them on said tour). There's no reason (other than greed) they couldn't play multiple nights in smaller venues. I like U2 as much as the next guy, but they lost my respect when they started putting profits ahead of their fans.
good thing MOST people disagree...
By its conclusion, U2 360° had set records for the highest-grossing concert tour with $736 million in ticket sales, and for the highest-attended tour with over 7.2 million tickets sold.
hate ON haters...
Ok, I'm something of a hater so I'll go ahead and hate on...
Popular and good (by my standards since the music is going into my ear holes and my opinion is the only one that counts to me) have little to do with each other. If you look at a top ten list of the highest grossing concerts in history, you will see a lot of the same names. The Rolling Stones (I don't really like them), ACDC (eh, depends on my mood), Madonna (don't even get me started), The Police (depends on the song), and Bon Jovi (hatehatehate...) So, I offer this list up as evidence that good and popular do not always have a connection.
Besides, spouting numbers at me or telling me how popular a band is will do nothing to change my opinion of of the music. I'm either going to like it, love it, hate it, or be indifferent to it. Nothing you say will change that and nothing that everyone else likes will influence me one way or another.
For the most part, I know I'm in the minority of RP listeners when it comes to U2. I'm ok with that. I vote with my ratings and if I don't like what I'm hearing, I mute the volume or go do something else.
Please don't make the assumption that facts have anything to do with something as subjective as taste in music. If I'm the only one on the planet that doesn't like something, then it just means that it didn't do happy things for my ears. Maybe that makes me strange or my tastes questionable, but I don't care. My tastes are mine and I don't feel compelled to tell anyone why they are wrong. Doing so would gain me nothing and only lower me to the level of the people that think sales or popularity should define my tastes.
good thing MOST people disagree...
By its conclusion, U2 360° had set records for the highest-grossing concert tour with $736 million in ticket sales, and for the highest-attended tour with over 7.2 million tickets sold.
hate ON haters...
and MURDER to hear on RP. What a waste of bandwidth.
Oh good, another magazine i dont have to read.......
such a lame band. WTF, it works !
redmachine wrote:
Hateful middle of the raod rubbish for people who do not understand the real soul of music.
Hateful middle of the raod rubbish for people who do not understand the real soul of music.
I'd rather listen to a singer with real soul as opposed a smug tool like Bonio.
Millions of people like Coldplay or joined the Nazi party, doesn't make it right ;)
That_SOB wrote:
Perhaps a pill will provide a bit of analgesic help for your pain. I happen to like this album very much, and my guess is that there are millions just like me out there. A little tolerance goes a long way.
Perhaps a pill will provide a bit of analgesic help for your pain. I happen to like this album very much, and my guess is that there are millions just like me out there. A little tolerance goes a long way.
Second that. I once bought a DVD from them. Couldn't stand to watch almost 2 hours of Bono taking life very seriously while being very important. So the DVD was a waste of money.
They did. It was called Spiderman, The Musical.
Bono is too busy being a self-appointed ambassador for the U.S. these days for U2 to do anything good anymore.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRIQPCLosWQ
I love the rush, but I hate the Schtick. NO intimacy, no nuance. Maybe if I'd been there, I'd have been swept away by the sheer power of it all, but to watch it on YouTube? I saw tired faces, bored expressions, and cued musical interludes. It was almost like the whole band wanted to be somewhere else. Still, the music was powerful, as always. I love U2, but lately, I think I loved them more when I didn't know anything about them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRIQPCLosWQ
It's 2 decades old.
That's the Edge doing the falsetto vocals.
Remember when it came out thinking how different it sounded from all their previous albums.
Change is good, people!
Just dreadful. Why when there's so much good music out there?
Come on, RP! There is plenty of good music out there.