Crazy conspiracy theories
- Proclivities - May 13, 2025 - 6:32am
Breaking News
- Steely_D - May 13, 2025 - 6:30am
Trump
- black321 - May 13, 2025 - 6:14am
NY Times Strands
- maryte - May 13, 2025 - 6:01am
NYTimes Connections
- maryte - May 13, 2025 - 5:58am
Wordle - daily game
- maryte - May 13, 2025 - 5:48am
Earthquake
- Coaxial - May 13, 2025 - 5:26am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- Coaxial - May 13, 2025 - 5:23am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Coaxial - May 13, 2025 - 5:20am
Media Matters
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 6:29pm
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2025 - 5:33pm
Album recommendation for fans of pop music
- Steely_D - May 12, 2025 - 4:59pm
Artificial Intelligence
- R_P - May 12, 2025 - 4:19pm
May 2025 Photo Theme - Action
- Isabeau - May 12, 2025 - 2:22pm
Israel
- R_P - May 12, 2025 - 11:19am
Global Warming
- miamizsun - May 12, 2025 - 11:00am
Framed - movie guessing game
- Steely_D - May 12, 2025 - 10:20am
Today in History
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:47am
Celebrity Face Recognition
- islander - May 12, 2025 - 8:07am
No TuneIn Stream Lately
- rgio - May 12, 2025 - 5:46am
New Music
- miamizsun - May 12, 2025 - 3:47am
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- winter - May 11, 2025 - 8:41pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - May 11, 2025 - 6:47pm
The Dragons' Roost
- triskele - May 11, 2025 - 5:58pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Manbird - May 11, 2025 - 5:26pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- epsteel - May 11, 2025 - 12:30pm
Ukraine
- R_P - May 11, 2025 - 11:03am
Things You Thought Today
- GeneP59 - May 11, 2025 - 9:52am
Strips, cartoons, illustrations
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 2:16pm
Real Time with Bill Maher
- R_P - May 10, 2025 - 12:21pm
No Rock Mix on Alexa?
- epsteel - May 10, 2025 - 9:45am
Kodi Addon
- DaveInSaoMiguel - May 10, 2025 - 9:19am
What Makes You Laugh?
- Isabeau - May 10, 2025 - 5:53am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 9, 2025 - 9:34pm
Immigration
- R_P - May 9, 2025 - 5:35pm
Basketball
- GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:58pm
The Obituary Page
- GeneP59 - May 9, 2025 - 4:45pm
Pink Floyd
- miamizsun - May 9, 2025 - 3:52pm
Freedom of speech?
- R_P - May 9, 2025 - 2:19pm
Questions.
- kurtster - May 8, 2025 - 11:56pm
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - May 8, 2025 - 9:08pm
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously
- R_P - May 8, 2025 - 7:27pm
Save NPR and PBS - SIGN THE PETITION
- R_P - May 8, 2025 - 3:32pm
How about a stream of just the metadata?
- ednazarko - May 8, 2025 - 11:22am
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - May 8, 2025 - 9:23am
no-money fun
- islander - May 8, 2025 - 7:55am
UFO's / Aliens blah blah blah: BOO !
- dischuckin - May 8, 2025 - 7:03am
Into The Wild
- Red_Dragon - May 7, 2025 - 7:34pm
Get the Money out of Politics!
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 5:06pm
What Makes You Sad?
- Antigone - May 7, 2025 - 2:58pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 2:33pm
The Perfect Government
- Proclivities - May 7, 2025 - 2:05pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - May 7, 2025 - 10:13am
Living in America
- islander - May 7, 2025 - 9:38am
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- JimTreadwell - May 7, 2025 - 8:08am
Pakistan
- Red_Dragon - May 6, 2025 - 2:21pm
SCOTUS
- R_P - May 6, 2025 - 1:53pm
Canada
- R_P - May 6, 2025 - 11:00am
Solar / Wind / Geothermal / Efficiency Energy
- ColdMiser - May 6, 2025 - 10:00am
Lyrics that strike a chord today...
- ColdMiser - May 6, 2025 - 8:06am
What's your mood today?
- GeneP59 - May 6, 2025 - 6:57am
China
- R_P - May 5, 2025 - 6:01pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - May 5, 2025 - 5:50pm
Song of the Day
- rgio - May 5, 2025 - 5:33am
Love the Cinco de Mayo celebration!
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:53am
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:49am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - May 5, 2025 - 3:48am
The Bucket List
- Red_Dragon - May 4, 2025 - 1:08pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- winter - May 4, 2025 - 9:28am
Australia
- R_P - May 3, 2025 - 11:37pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - May 3, 2025 - 6:52pm
Democratic Party
- Isabeau - May 3, 2025 - 5:04pm
Philly
- Proclivities - May 3, 2025 - 6:26am
Race in America
- R_P - May 2, 2025 - 12:01pm
Multi-Room AirPlay using iOS app on Mac M
- downbeat - May 2, 2025 - 8:11am
|
Index »
Regional/Local »
USA/Canada »
"Him Too"
|
Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Next |
miamizsun

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Oct 24, 2018 - 5:09am |
|

Seneca Valley School District in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is facing a lawsuit from a former male student who was forced out of school—and investigated for sexual assault—due to a series of false accusations made by female students. The girls—dubbed "mean girls" in the lawsuit, a reference to the 2004 Lindsay Lohan film—admitted on tape that they made up the assault story. One said, "I just don't like him" and " would do anything to get him expelled," according to The Toronto Sun. The false allegations were life-derailing for the accused, who is referred to as "T.F." in the lawsuit. On October 3, 2017, one of the girls told other students that T.F. had sexually assaulted her at a pool; a Seneca Valley guidance counselor overheard the accusation, and reported it to Childline, the state's child abuse prevention agency, as required by law. T.F. was swiftly charged with indecent assault and harassment, and received six months of probation as part of a plea deal. Months later, in March of 2018, T.F. was again falsely accused, according to the lawsuit. Another girl invited him over to a house party; a few days later, she told the school guidance counselor that T.F. had broken into her home and sexually assaulted her. The lawsuit claims she was coached by T.F.'s first accuser. As a result of this accusation, T.F. was charged with assault and criminal trespassing. He was removed from school in leg and wrist shackles, and spent 9 days in juvenile detention.
|
|
meower

Location: i believe, i believe, it's silly, but I believe Gender:  
|
Posted:
Sep 25, 2018 - 11:53am |
|
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 13, 2018 - 5:53pm |
|
The report says women in science, engineering, or medicine who are harassed may abandon leadership opportunities to dodge perpetrators, leave their institutions, or leave science altogether. It also highlights the ineffectiveness of ubiquitous, online sexual harassment training and notes what is likely massive underreporting of sexual harassment by women who justifiably fear retaliation. To retain the talents of women in science, the authors write, will require true cultural change rather than “symbolic compliance” with civil rights laws.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 17, 2017 - 3:16pm |
|
steeler wrote: And I acknowledged that politics probably played some role in the timing. You specified the timing of the allegations coming out in the general election instead of the primary. We all know that in elections for high offices that there often are attempts to dig up dirt on the opposing candidate. What point are you trying to make?
That these events just don't pop up spontaneously. One way to consider the chronology is that the victims were more interested in going after an entire party than the individual. If the individual should be stopped, why not as soon as possible ? Why let them advance ? So you wait and bring this up right after the ballots are locked, you get the entire party because its now too late to find someone else or even change the ballots. So just how offended were you by this individual ? Not enough to take only him down, but enough to go after an entire party ? Ok, if that's the case then admit it. If its not the reason for the timing then just what is going on that would make the timing entirely innocent as we are told to believe ? If one was honestly interested in the integrity of the election process and getting the best candidates forward on all sides, then don't sit on evidence that revealing as soon as possible would benefit all, not just one side. That is the problem and my point. Is this a problem in your mind ?
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Dec 17, 2017 - 12:36pm |
|
kurtster wrote: I made it quite clear that my point was not about that.
And I acknowledged that politics probably played some role in the timing. You specified the timing of the allegations coming out in the general election instead of the primary. We all know that in elections for high offices that there often are attempts to dig up dirt on the opposing candidate. What point are you trying to make?
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 17, 2017 - 12:22pm |
|
steeler wrote: Did politics enter into the timing? I think so. Does that make the allegations untrue? I think not.
I made it quite clear that my point was not about that.
|
|
steeler

Location: Perched on the precipice of the cauldron of truth 
|
Posted:
Dec 17, 2017 - 9:24am |
|
kurtster wrote:One more thought about Roy Moore. I have not seen this thought about the timing of the revelations of his conduct mentioned anywhere. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm concerned about why the revelations of his past were not made during the runoff between Strange and Moore. That would have been the appropriate time to bring it up. He was a real contender then. Why not then and only a month or so later after he was the final choice was it brought up. That is what smells to me as pure political malevolence. Surely those who were violated by Moore were just as concerned during the runoff as they were after he was the final choice. What, it didn't bother them until he was a real possibility just a month later as opposed to a possible possibility ? This just smells real bad.
And no, in no way do I think that Moore should get a pass on anything and am relieved that he didn't get elected.
My only remaining concern is about the timing of how this played out. My thought is that if Moore had lost the runoff, we would never had heard one peep from his victims.
Did politics enter into the timing? I think so. Does that make the allegations untrue? I think not.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 17, 2017 - 8:57am |
|
One more thought about Roy Moore. I have not seen this thought about the timing of the revelations of his conduct mentioned anywhere. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'm concerned about why the revelations of his past were not made during the runoff between Strange and Moore. That would have been the appropriate time to bring it up. He was a real contender then. Why not then and only a month or so later after he was the final choice was it brought up. That is what smells to me as pure political malevolence. Surely those who were violated by Moore were just as concerned during the runoff as they were after he was the final choice. What, it didn't bother them until he was a real possibility just a month later as opposed to a possible possibility ? This just smells real bad.
And no, in no way do I think that Moore should get a pass on anything and am relieved that he didn't get elected.
My only remaining concern is about the timing of how this played out. My thought is that if Moore had lost the runoff, we would never had heard one peep from his victims.
|
|
Steely_D

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2017 - 2:57pm |
|
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2017 - 12:22pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:This is an odd case; seems she published a novel at the same time she made the accusation. it's all odd hastings has weathered a lot folks here liken him to marion barry he's teflon
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2017 - 12:17pm |
|
miamizsun wrote:in my own backyard! WASHINGTON The phrase “I believe the women” has become a motto for lawmakers in the wake of career-ending sexual harassment allegations against Rep. John Conyers and Sen. Al Franken. But when sexual harassment allegations against South Florida Democratic Rep. Alcee Hastings from 2011 resurfaced last week, the reaction was different. “I believe him,” said Rep. Frederica Wilson, a Miami Gardens Democrat. Capitol Hill news outlet Roll Call reported on Friday that a woman who accused Hastings of unwanted touching and lewd remarks in 2011 received a $220,000 taxpayer-funded settlement, the largest amount reported since a wave of sexual harassment allegations began sweeping through Congress. The 81-year-old Hastings denies the allegations and said he had no previous knowledge that taxpayer funds were paid out to Winsome Packer, a congressional staffer who worked for a commission that studies security and cooperation in Europe. Court documents show that he was removed from the sexual harassment lawsuit in 2012. Packer continued the lawsuit against the commission after Hastings was removed, and the payment was made in 2014, according to Roll Call. This is an odd case; seems she published a novel at the same time she made the accusation.
|
|
miamizsun

Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2017 - 12:07pm |
|
in my own backyard! WASHINGTON The phrase “I believe the women” has become a motto for lawmakers in the wake of career-ending sexual harassment allegations against Rep. John Conyers and Sen. Al Franken. But when sexual harassment allegations against South Florida Democratic Rep. Alcee Hastings from 2011 resurfaced last week, the reaction was different. “I believe him,” said Rep. Frederica Wilson, a Miami Gardens Democrat. Capitol Hill news outlet Roll Call reported on Friday that a woman who accused Hastings of unwanted touching and lewd remarks in 2011 received a $220,000 taxpayer-funded settlement, the largest amount reported since a wave of sexual harassment allegations began sweeping through Congress. The 81-year-old Hastings denies the allegations and said he had no previous knowledge that taxpayer funds were paid out to Winsome Packer, a congressional staffer who worked for a commission that studies security and cooperation in Europe. Court documents show that he was removed from the sexual harassment lawsuit in 2012. Packer continued the lawsuit against the commission after Hastings was removed, and the payment was made in 2014, according to Roll Call.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 15, 2017 - 11:39am |
|
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 8:08pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: I take choice B also. Of course the world is gray, and very soon we're going to have to get back to some sort of due process. The problem is, dick cheese like Moore would force his accusers to sit in a courtroom and spell out exactly what happened and then he'd say they're lying and attack them... all the classic reasons women haven't come forward. We can't go back to that. If we discover that a weeping discharge like Roger Stone did coach Al Franken's accusers, he should be punished as severely as the person wrongly accused. If Al's charged with rape and that charge carries a 20-year sentence, then Stone's meddling should also carry a 20-year sentence. The downside to bearing false witness has to be as crushing as the wrongful prosecution is to the convicted. Of course, this too means women will hesitate to come forward with a wavering accusation.
So we're entering a phase of puritanism that will ruin some innocents' lives. The pendulum swings. I'm over here out of the way, I hope, and I know that for now, it's worth it. It's important to get to a point where people don't just think twice about being a creepy power junkie, they don't even think about it. Being thought of as a creep has to become unacceptable again. For too long now, it's seemed like a badge of honor for some people. I said choose your poison because there are losers either way. Is being falsely accused, 2 decades after the fact, terrible? Sure. More terrible than being raped and feeling like you need to keep quiet about it? No.
Ok, I can agree with you on this, especially the bolded. The pendulum is definitely moving again to be certain.
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 6:46pm |
|
kurtster wrote: I'll take the second choice if I have to pick. Since you asked and I answered, which one do you pick ?
I take choice B also. Of course the world is gray, and very soon we're going to have to get back to some sort of due process. The problem is, dick cheese like Moore would force his accusers to sit in a courtroom and spell out exactly what happened and then he'd say they're lying and attack them... all the classic reasons women haven't come forward. We can't go back to that. If we discover that a weeping discharge like Roger Stone did coach Al Franken's accusers, he should be punished as severely as the person wrongly accused. If Al's charged with rape and that charge carries a 20-year sentence, then Stone's meddling should also carry a 20-year sentence. The downside to bearing false witness has to be as crushing as the wrongful prosecution is to the convicted. Of course, this too means women will hesitate to come forward with a wavering accusation. So we're entering a phase of puritanism that will ruin some innocents' lives. The pendulum swings. I'm over here out of the way, I hope, and I know that for now, it's worth it. It's important to get to a point where people don't just think twice about being a creepy power junkie, they don't even think about it. Being thought of as a creep has to become unacceptable again. For too long now, it's seemed like a badge of honor for some people. I said choose your poison because there are losers either way. Is being falsely accused, 2 decades after the fact, terrible? Sure. More terrible than being raped and feeling like you need to keep quiet about it? No.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 6:19pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: I was referring to allowing leniency for things that happened some time ago: might be motivated only by politics (not just "political" politics but office politics too) or revenge when the original incident wasn't actually as described so maybe we should take it easy there. Ramifications: Leaving rapists/molesters in a position to continue raping or simply go unpunished
OR go after all of the accused, possibly sweeping out good people who were not guilty as would-have-been charged, or people who have long since turned a corner and are no longer deserving of further punishment I offered Kurt the opportunity to choose his poison, meant in all seriousness. I don't think he really is suggesting we look the other way if someone's accused of rape. But the feeling that he's saying all the accusers of Roy Moore are just political pawns (but Al Franken's victims are not) does suggest he should stop digging. Because at least half of his posts here continue to qualify for a WTF are you kidding me? response.
Sorry, that was just too open ended of a question the way you presented it to even try and speculate an answer. But since you clarified it a little bit better I'll offer up this ... I'm still a little butt hurt as you say that anyone would even think that I think rape is ok at any level for starters, let alone look the other way for any reason. The Franken and Moore do compare. Both are old enough and without photo proof of Franken, I doubt that it would have gone very far. Both of their victims are victims and since this went public, they are all political pawns, imo. We have left the court of law and gone into the court of public opinion. I'll take the second choice if I have to pick. Since you asked and I answered, which one do you pick ?
|
|
Coaxial

Location: Comfortably numb in So Texas Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 5:34pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote: I was referring to allowing leniency for things that happened some time ago: might be motivated only by politics (not just "political" politics but office politics too) or revenge when the original incident wasn't actually as described so maybe we should take it easy there. Ramifications: Leaving rapists/molesters in a position to continue raping or simply go unpunished
OR go after all of the accused, possibly sweeping out good people who were not guilty as would-have-been charged, or people who have long since turned a corner and are no longer deserving of further punishment I offered Kurt the opportunity to choose his poison, meant in all seriousness. I don't think he really is suggesting we look the other way if someone's accused of rape. But the feeling that he's saying all the accusers of Roy Moore are just political pawns (but Al Franken's victims are not) does suggest he should stop digging. Because at least half of his posts here continue to qualify for a WTF are you kidding me? response.
Welcome to my world,amigo.
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 3:21pm |
|
aflanigan wrote: If this is an allusion to Moore's many accusers, the initial ones did not "come forward" as his craven, dissembling defenders have suggested. They were approach by reporters working on a story. They were reluctant to tell their story publicly (understandable given how the GOP rage monkeys have reacted) and only agreed to go public after several interviews.
Is that where you're going with this?
No. Its with the hope that we accomplish establishing an atmosphere where victims of sexual transgressions can come forward without fear of disbelief or retaliation and not have to suffer in the shadows forever as has been the case up until now. I really think that these revelations will continue for some time and when it's run its course Moore will barely be remembered just based on the sheer magnitude of people coming forward. If after all of this has run its course and the results make it more comfortable to bring these kinds of things up that there just simply will not be many left and victims begin to deal with attackers in real time. The attackers will have finally lost the ability to intimidate their victims due to the fact that we have established an awareness that these things are no longer acceptable (once again) at any level, not isolated incidents; that these things can no longer be swept under the rug by the powerful or connected. I doubt that we'll ever stop those who are just plain wired wrong, but it would be nice to think that we can stop those who would attempt these things just because they think that they can get away with this stuff based solely upon their power and status. I clearly have bitten off more than I can chew. I'll leave this for the more learned now. I was just trying to figure out exactly who we are talking about here (just women who are victims or everyone) and be optimistic that we can finally get a handle on this, this time around and that this will be the last time around.
|
|
hayduke2

Location: Southampton, NY Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 10:47am |
|
I would show respect and gratitude to anyone who brings to light criminal acts perpetrated by a potential Judge, or Political Representative
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Dec 14, 2017 - 10:47am |
|
aflanigan wrote: The Law of Holes is one that some people are apparently unfamiliar with.
I was referring to allowing leniency for things that happened some time ago: might be motivated only by politics (not just "political" politics but office politics too) or revenge when the original incident wasn't actually as described so maybe we should take it easy there. Ramifications: Leaving rapists/molesters in a position to continue raping or simply go unpunished OR go after all of the accused, possibly sweeping out good people who were not guilty as would-have-been charged, or people who have long since turned a corner and are no longer deserving of further punishment I offered Kurt the opportunity to choose his poison, meant in all seriousness. I don't think he really is suggesting we look the other way if someone's accused of rape. But the feeling that he's saying all the accusers of Roy Moore are just political pawns (but Al Franken's victims are not) does suggest he should stop digging. Because at least half of his posts here continue to qualify for a WTF are you kidding me? response.
|
|
|