And I bet when it's the eleventh time you'll have to take off your shoes to keep count and when it is the 21st time you'll have to lower your zipper ...
OBTW ... the flu kills many more than does pancreatic cancer. They are both deadly.
It's surprising how analytical you can be... to avoid discussing Project 2025. You just keep dodging that one...
Yeah, well your side's plan for us is the Green New Deal, most recently disguised as the (cough) Inflation Reduction Act. How's that working out ?
This is the second time you've compared the Green New Deal and Project 2025. It's like comparing Pancreatic cancer and the flu.
And I bet when it's the eleventh time you'll have to take off your shoes to keep count and when it is the 21st time you'll have to lower your zipper ...
OBTW ... the flu kills many more than does pancreatic cancer. They are both deadly.
So within its own article it says that predictions are a waste of time:
FTA âIn 2016 most pundits found it unfathomable that a manifestly unqualified candidate like Mr Trump could win the presidency. This bias was reinforced by polls that consistently put Hillary Clinton in the lead. Now, after a presidency that yielded two impeachments and a riot at the Capitol, the prospect that voters might willingly return to office a man recently convicted of 34 felonies seems nearly as outlandish. Yet surveys suggest it is more likely than not.â
Your TL;DR cherry-picked takeaway. Obviously pundits as well as models have limitations (as further elaborated).
Yet surveys suggest it is more likely than not.The Economistâs statistical model
of the electionâwhich relies solely on polls, past results and economic
data, and knows nothing of Mr Trumpâs record in office or in the
courtsâgives Mr Biden a one-in-three chance of re-election. That means a
victory for Mr Biden would count as only a mild surprise, somewhat more
likely than the 30% share of days on which it rains in London. Four
years ago this week this model gave Mr Biden an 83% chance.
So within its own article it says that predictions are a waste of time:
FTA âIn 2016 most pundits found it unfathomable that a manifestly unqualified candidate like Mr Trump could win the presidency. This bias was reinforced by polls that consistently put Hillary Clinton in the lead. Now, after a presidency that yielded two impeachments and a riot at the Capitol, the prospect that voters might willingly return to office a man recently convicted of 34 felonies seems nearly as outlandish. Yet surveys suggest it is more likely than not.â
