[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Trump - kurtster - Feb 7, 2023 - 9:42pm
 
Name My Band - oldviolin - Feb 7, 2023 - 6:15pm
 
Radio Paradise Comments - Coaxial - Feb 7, 2023 - 5:56pm
 
Wordle - daily game - geoff_morphini - Feb 7, 2023 - 5:41pm
 
Earthquake - miamizsun - Feb 7, 2023 - 5:19pm
 
February 2023 Photo Theme - Odd Perspectives - fractalv - Feb 7, 2023 - 4:15pm
 
Ukraine - kurtster - Feb 7, 2023 - 3:14pm
 
American History - Isabeau - Feb 7, 2023 - 3:02pm
 
New Music - R_P - Feb 7, 2023 - 12:27pm
 
Happy Birthday!!! - Bill_J - Feb 7, 2023 - 10:38am
 
Nobody panic - sunybuny - Feb 7, 2023 - 7:36am
 
Capitalism and Consumerism... now what? - Red_Dragon - Feb 7, 2023 - 7:36am
 
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests - Bill_J - Feb 7, 2023 - 6:08am
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - Feb 6, 2023 - 7:35pm
 
Terrorist Watch! - Red_Dragon - Feb 6, 2023 - 6:23pm
 
Better Playlist - KurtfromLaQuinta - Feb 6, 2023 - 4:50pm
 
USA! USA! USA! - Isabeau - Feb 6, 2023 - 3:25pm
 
Omitted from Rock and Roll Hall of Fame - oldviolin - Feb 6, 2023 - 1:18pm
 
Earworm - Steely_D - Feb 6, 2023 - 9:59am
 
Messages in a bottle. - Isabeau - Feb 6, 2023 - 9:37am
 
The Dragons' Roost - GeneP59 - Feb 6, 2023 - 7:23am
 
Are you ready for some football? - GeneP59 - Feb 6, 2023 - 7:20am
 
I want an iPhone!!! - GeneP59 - Feb 6, 2023 - 7:16am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - huib - Feb 6, 2023 - 2:54am
 
Live Music - thisbody - Feb 6, 2023 - 1:45am
 
Counting with Pictures - yuel - Feb 6, 2023 - 12:47am
 
Things You Thought Today - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 5, 2023 - 9:44pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - R_P - Feb 5, 2023 - 12:23pm
 
• • • BRING OUT YOUR DEAD • • •  - oldviolin - Feb 5, 2023 - 11:36am
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Feb 5, 2023 - 9:23am
 
Republican Party - Red_Dragon - Feb 5, 2023 - 9:02am
 
What Did You Do Today? - GeneP59 - Feb 5, 2023 - 8:44am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Feb 5, 2023 - 7:58am
 
Things I Saw Today... - KurtfromLaQuinta - Feb 4, 2023 - 9:17pm
 
RP app for LG OLED TV - jarro - Feb 4, 2023 - 6:59pm
 
Remembering Duane Allman - oldviolin - Feb 4, 2023 - 5:59pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - oldviolin - Feb 4, 2023 - 5:07pm
 
Audio Settings - 2020xradio - Feb 4, 2023 - 4:54pm
 
China - Red_Dragon - Feb 4, 2023 - 2:58pm
 
Immigration - R_P - Feb 4, 2023 - 11:56am
 
The Abortion Wars - R_P - Feb 4, 2023 - 11:32am
 
COVID-19 - Red_Dragon - Feb 4, 2023 - 10:53am
 
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi... - Coaxial - Feb 4, 2023 - 9:31am
 
It's the economy stupid. - Isabeau - Feb 4, 2023 - 4:07am
 
Casting from the app.... - cbemoore - Feb 4, 2023 - 1:30am
 
Linking to "What's Playing" - ladron - Feb 3, 2023 - 6:41pm
 
Out the window - GeneP59 - Feb 3, 2023 - 2:17pm
 
TV shows you watch - kcar - Feb 3, 2023 - 1:31pm
 
Love is... - Isabeau - Feb 3, 2023 - 1:12pm
 
Music To Get A Haircut To - Red_Dragon - Feb 3, 2023 - 11:58am
 
R.I.P. Jeff Beck - black321 - Feb 3, 2023 - 11:53am
 
Eclectic Sound-Drops - Peyote - Feb 3, 2023 - 9:54am
 
Outstanding Covers - miamizsun - Feb 3, 2023 - 3:54am
 
Evolution! - R_P - Feb 2, 2023 - 5:29pm
 
Guns - westslope - Feb 2, 2023 - 3:42pm
 
Canada - westslope - Feb 2, 2023 - 3:19pm
 
RightWingNutZ - Isabeau - Feb 2, 2023 - 1:18pm
 
More reggae, less Marley please - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Feb 2, 2023 - 10:30am
 
Podcast recommendations??? - marko86 - Feb 2, 2023 - 8:51am
 
Let's build a city - Red_Dragon - Feb 2, 2023 - 8:46am
 
How to Sync to Current Feed? - otto802 - Feb 2, 2023 - 8:13am
 
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see - Antigone - Feb 2, 2023 - 7:13am
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - Steve - Feb 2, 2023 - 6:40am
 
Work - sunybuny - Feb 2, 2023 - 5:53am
 
Race in America - R_P - Feb 1, 2023 - 8:42pm
 
NASA & other news from space - Steely_D - Feb 1, 2023 - 8:03pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Steely_D - Feb 1, 2023 - 7:50pm
 
Derplahoma! - ScottFromWyoming - Feb 1, 2023 - 7:30pm
 
RP App for Android - nickferrante10 - Feb 1, 2023 - 11:11am
 
The end of the world - miamizsun - Feb 1, 2023 - 7:17am
 
January 2023 Photo Theme - Friends - Coaxial - Feb 1, 2023 - 5:30am
 
Lyrics that are stuck in your head today... - oldviolin - Jan 31, 2023 - 6:23pm
 
Revelation,Armageddon, the end of the world (we can stop ... - oldviolin - Jan 31, 2023 - 6:16pm
 
• • • Things Magicians Exclaim • • •  - oldviolin - Jan 31, 2023 - 5:37pm
 
What Makes You Cry :) ? - oldviolin - Jan 31, 2023 - 4:33pm
 
Index » Radio Paradise/General » General Discussion » Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 23, 24, 25  Next
Post to this Topic
beamends

beamends Avatar



Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 9:14am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

Most definitely. Australia is a lot denser than that.
 
{#Roflol}

NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 9:13am

 beamends wrote:

I think it should be noted that some of these figures, particularly for Australia, are open to debate.
 
Most definitely. Australia is a lot denser than that.

beamends

beamends Avatar



Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 9:00am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Estimated world thorium resources1 

(Reasonably assured and inferred resources recoverable at
up to $80/kg Th)
Country Tonnes % of total
Australia
489,000
19
USA
400,000
15
Turkey
344,000
13
India
319,000
12
Venezuela
300,000
12
Brazil
302,000
12
Norway
132,000
5
Egypt
100,000
4
Russia
75,000
3
Greenland
54,000
2
Canada
44,000
2
South Africa
18,000
1
Other countries
33,000
1
World total 
2,610,000 
 

 
I think it should be noted that some of these figures, particularly for Australia, are open to debate.

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 8:55am

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

Estimated world thorium resources1 

(Reasonably assured and inferred resources recoverable at
up to $80/kg Th)
Country Tonnes % of total
Australia
489,000
19
USA
400,000
15
Turkey
344,000
13
India
319,000
12
Venezuela
300,000
12
Brazil
302,000
12
Norway
132,000
5
Egypt
100,000
4
Russia
75,000
3
Greenland
54,000
2
Canada
44,000
2
South Africa
18,000
1
Other countries
33,000
1
World total 
2,610,000 
 

 

Great, here come the Canadians....
And heavy water breeder reactors using thorium are a fantastic energy source.  Politics is the only reason we don't have them running everywhere.


ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 8:51am

 beamends wrote:

Thorium looks like a less problematic solution, though I don't doubt it will have it's own problems. Inevitably there's only one way to find out {#Wink}

In answer to the question : Saviour - with reservations.

 

Estimated world thorium resources1 

(Reasonably assured and inferred resources recoverable at
up to $80/kg Th)
Country Tonnes % of total
Australia
489,000
19
USA
400,000
15
Turkey
344,000
13
India
319,000
12
Venezuela
300,000
12
Brazil
302,000
12
Norway
132,000
5
Egypt
100,000
4
Russia
75,000
3
Greenland
54,000
2
Canada
44,000
2
South Africa
18,000
1
Other countries
33,000
1
World total 
2,610,000 
 


miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 6:40am

 bokey wrote:

What's with the '70's porn music background? I keep waiting for the plumber to show up so the housewife with the huge,unshaved bush on her crotch can open the door with her negligee all askew.{#Lol}
 
I almost mentioned that. It definitely scored points with me. {#Lol}
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 5:50am

 miamizsun wrote:

ok, i stayed up late and got up early reading and watching some info on what may be is a very viable alternative to this situation.

In a word, Thorium. (It's cheap, plentiful, way more efficient and you can't make bombs/weapons with it, which is why I believe the powers that be have worked to squelch it. )

Here's some easy to understand vids from howstuffworks. com


the political angle
please feel free to comment.
 
What's with the '70's porn music background? I keep waiting for the plumber to show up so the housewife with the huge, unshaved bush on her crotch can open the door with her negligee all askew. {#Lol}

beamends

beamends Avatar



Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 5:47am

 miamizsun wrote:

ok, i stayed up late and got up early reading and watching some info on what may be is a very viable alternative to this situation.

In a word, Thorium. (It's cheap, plentiful, way more efficient and you can't make bombs/weapons with it, which is why I believe the powers that be have worked to squelch it.
 
Thorium looks like a less problematic solution, though I don't doubt it will have it's own problems. Inevitably there's only one way to find out {#Wink}

In answer to the question : Saviour - with reservations.
miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 23, 2011 - 5:11am

 miamizsun wrote:

There are some pretty decent reviews on Blees book on Amazon as well.

I don't know enough about this subject and I'd like to read his book, however my reading list is six books on my desk right now.

Regards
 
ok, i stayed up late and got up early reading and watching some info on what may be is a very viable alternative to this situation.

In a word, Thorium. (It's cheap, plentiful, way more efficient and you can't make bombs/weapons with it, which is why I believe the powers that be have worked to squelch it.)

Here's some easy to understand vids from howstuffworks.com






the political angle



please feel free to comment.

Umberdog

Umberdog Avatar

Location: In my body.
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2011 - 8:07pm

If it wasn't for all the money involved I'm pretty sure it would be illegal to threaten the public health like nuclear power has potential, not to mention what kinds of disasters it can cause. But when it comes to comfort, convenience, and money, everything else seems expendable.

I say it's a scourge. 

nuggler

nuggler Avatar

Location: RU Sirius ?
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2011 - 5:49pm




"The nuclear bomb, does that bother you? I just want you to think big, Henry, for chrissakes. The only place where you and I disagree is with regard to the bombing. You’re so goddamned concerned about civilians, and I don’t give a damn. I don’t care." ~ Nixon to Kissinger April 25, 1972

miamizsun

miamizsun Avatar

Location: (3261.3 Miles SE of RP)
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2011 - 4:39pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:

If the claims are true (99.5% efficiency, use of spent fuel from water-cooled reactors, nuclear waste with a half-life of 200 years, enough fuel already there (i.e. no new mining) for a thousand or more years), then we don't need to wait for fusion... or at the least it will give us another 1000 years development time..
Sounds pretty good to me!
 
There are some pretty decent reviews on Blees book on Amazon as well.

I don't know enough about this subject and I'd like to read his book, however my reading list is six books on my desk right now.

Regards

MrsHobieJoe

MrsHobieJoe Avatar

Location: somewhere in Europe
Gender: Female


Posted: Mar 22, 2011 - 11:28am

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
Georges Monbiot has really put the cat among the pigeons today with his article favoring nuclear power.

Before everyone starts ditching the idea of nuclear power, take a look at this design and I'd appreciate if anyone could tell me what the drawbacks are..

(I know there must be some but the concept looks damn good to me. The danger in this is that I am neither an engineer nor a physicist so I'm not really qualified to judge)

 

Yes, I read the article in the Guardian today.

My only comment is about the title of the thread- why does it have to be "saviour or scourge?"- this isn't the X factor.  It's a useful tool but not without some significant drawbacks.
NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 22, 2011 - 11:15am

Georges Monbiot has really put the cat among the pigeons today with his article favoring nuclear power.

Before everyone starts ditching the idea of nuclear power, take a look at this design and I'd appreciate if anyone could tell me what the drawbacks are..

(I know there must be some but the concept looks damn good to me. The danger in this is that I am neither an engineer nor a physicist so I'm not really qualified to judge)
(former member)

(former member) Avatar

Location: hotel in Las Vegas
Gender: Male


Posted: Mar 20, 2011 - 3:04pm



nuclear emergency plan

 

Red_Dragon

Red_Dragon Avatar



Posted: Dec 8, 2009 - 10:10pm

 ScottFromWyoming wrote:

huge manatees all over the place?
 

snerk.
ScottFromWyoming

ScottFromWyoming Avatar

Location: Powell
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 8, 2009 - 10:09pm

 islander wrote:

one word: Balloons.

 
huge manatees all over the place?

islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 8, 2009 - 9:49pm

 NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:
The other thing that excites me about some of these GenIV designs is that they can be used to produce hydrogen thermochemically in addition to the electricity they produce.

I know hydrogen has major problems all of its own (transport, storage, etc.) but at least it's clean.

 
one word: Balloons.


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 8, 2009 - 9:29pm

The other thing that excites me about some of these GenIV designs is that they can be used to produce hydrogen thermochemically in addition to the electricity they produce.

I know hydrogen has major problems all of its own (transport, storage, etc.) but at least it's clean.


NoEnzLefttoSplit

NoEnzLefttoSplit Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Dec 8, 2009 - 8:06pm

 cptbuz wrote:
I hate getting involved in these discussions but...

I have been inspecting nuke plants for over 20 years, to me they are a safe and viable energy option. One of the big concerns that people bring up is what to do about the radiological waste. By far the majority (volume-wise) of radioactive waste produced at a nuke plant is very low level contaminated trash. The good news is that over the past 20 years the amount of contaminated trash created at nuke plants has dropped significantly through better planning, the reuse of materials/tools etc. in contaminated areas. The source of high level waste is spent fuel. Sites have spent fuel storage pools, but they are fast filling up (due to operating license extentions). Dry cask storage, an above ground shielded storage 'pod', allows for safe on-site storage of spent fuel and is a system used at many sites already. Dry cask storage has created a public uproar at some sites that could potentially cause a plant to shutdown prior to the end of its licensing.

Many people argue that wind and solar are "green" energy sources while nuke power, because of the waste and potential of contamination, should not be considered 'green'.  What these arguements don't consider is the climate damage created in the manufacture of items such as fiberglass for fan blades of a wind farm, or manufacture of the panels for solar collectors. Yes, the concrete and steel used in the manufacture of a nuke plant adds a size or two to the ol' carbon foot print too, but unlike wind and solar farms, the concrete structures of a nuke plant do not need to be routinely replaced.

Finally, ground has been broken in the U.S. for a new nuke plant @ the Vogtle site in Georgia. The hope is for the new unit (one of 7 planned in the US) to be on the grid by 2017...and one last thing, nuclear power plants are not run by baffoons as depicted in movies like 'China System', or  (UGH!) the made for TV abomination 'Atomic Twister'.
 

I'm glad you joined the discussion cptbuz! What is your opinion on fast breeders? Are their claims realistic?
They seem to have pretty good fail-safes built into them and the waste has a half-life of 200 years (or low level for hundreds of thousands but so low it's not a major issue).  I don't know why we are wringing our hands looking for alternative energy sources to replace fossil fuels when this technology is just sitting there unused.

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 23, 24, 25  Next