Australia has Disappeared
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 2:41pm
April 2024 Photo Theme - Happenstance
- Alchemist - Apr 26, 2024 - 2:00pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Apr 26, 2024 - 1:55pm
NY Times Strands
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 26, 2024 - 1:38pm
If not RP, what are you listening to right now?
- westslope - Apr 26, 2024 - 1:18pm
Israel
- R_P - Apr 26, 2024 - 12:53pm
Breaking News
- kcar - Apr 26, 2024 - 11:17am
Radio Paradise sounding better recently
- firefly6 - Apr 26, 2024 - 10:39am
Neil Young
- Steely_D - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:20am
NYTimes Connections
- geoff_morphini - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:08am
Wordle - daily game
- geoff_morphini - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:02am
SCOTUS
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:01am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Apr 26, 2024 - 9:01am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Apr 26, 2024 - 6:03am
Radio Paradise Comments
- miamizsun - Apr 26, 2024 - 5:09am
Environmental, Brilliance or Stupidity
- miamizsun - Apr 26, 2024 - 5:07am
The Obituary Page
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 26, 2024 - 3:47am
Trump
- kcar - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:53pm
Joe Biden
- kurtster - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:24pm
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum
- islander - Apr 25, 2024 - 2:28pm
Things You Thought Today
- Manbird - Apr 25, 2024 - 2:12pm
Poetry Forum
- Manbird - Apr 25, 2024 - 12:30pm
Ask an Atheist
- R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 11:02am
Mixtape Culture Club
- miamizsun - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:36am
Afghanistan
- R_P - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:26am
Science in the News
- Red_Dragon - Apr 25, 2024 - 10:00am
What the hell OV?
- miamizsun - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:46am
The Abortion Wars
- Isabeau - Apr 25, 2024 - 9:27am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- ColdMiser - Apr 25, 2024 - 7:15am
What's that smell?
- Manbird - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:27pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:20pm
260,000 Posts in one thread?
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 24, 2024 - 10:55am
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl?
- rgio - Apr 24, 2024 - 8:44am
TV shows you watch
- Beaker - Apr 24, 2024 - 7:32am
The Moon
- haresfur - Apr 23, 2024 - 9:29pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- Bill_J - Apr 23, 2024 - 7:15pm
China
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 5:35pm
Economix
- islander - Apr 23, 2024 - 12:11pm
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Apr 23, 2024 - 11:05am
One Partying State - Wyoming News
- sunybuny - Apr 23, 2024 - 6:53am
YouTube: Music-Videos
- Red_Dragon - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:42pm
Ukraine
- haresfur - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:19pm
songs that ROCK!
- Steely_D - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:50pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- q4Fry - Apr 22, 2024 - 11:57am
Republican Party
- R_P - Apr 22, 2024 - 9:36am
Mini Meetups - Post Here!
- ScottFromWyoming - Apr 22, 2024 - 8:59am
Malaysia
- dcruzj - Apr 22, 2024 - 7:30am
Canada
- westslope - Apr 22, 2024 - 6:23am
Russia
- NoEnzLefttoSplit - Apr 22, 2024 - 1:03am
Broccoli for cats - you gotta see this!
- Bill_J - Apr 21, 2024 - 6:16pm
Name My Band
- DaveInSaoMiguel - Apr 21, 2024 - 3:06pm
Main Mix Playlist
- thisbody - Apr 21, 2024 - 12:04pm
George Orwell
- oldviolin - Apr 21, 2024 - 11:36am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Apr 20, 2024 - 7:44pm
What Did You See Today?
- Welly - Apr 20, 2024 - 4:50pm
Radio Paradise on multiple Echo speakers via an Alexa Rou...
- victory806 - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:11pm
Libertarian Party
- R_P - Apr 20, 2024 - 11:18am
Remembering the Good Old Days
- kurtster - Apr 20, 2024 - 2:37am
Words I didn't know...yrs ago
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 7:06pm
Things that make you go Hmmmm.....
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:59pm
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:51pm
MILESTONES: Famous People, Dead Today, Born Today, Etc.
- Bill_J - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:44pm
2024 Elections!
- steeler - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:49pm
how do you feel right now?
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 6:02am
When I need a Laugh I ...
- miamizsun - Apr 19, 2024 - 5:43am
Live Music
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 3:24pm
What Makes You Laugh?
- oldviolin - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:49pm
Robots
- miamizsun - Apr 18, 2024 - 2:18pm
Museum Of Bad Album Covers
- Steve - Apr 18, 2024 - 6:58am
Europe
- haresfur - Apr 17, 2024 - 6:47pm
Business as Usual
- black321 - Apr 17, 2024 - 1:48pm
Magic Eye optical Illusions
- Proclivities - Apr 17, 2024 - 10:08am
Just for the Haiku of it. . .
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 9:01am
HALF A WORLD
- oldviolin - Apr 17, 2024 - 8:52am
Little known information... maybe even facts
- R_P - Apr 16, 2024 - 3:29pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Congress
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 ... 10, 11, 12 Next |
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 7, 2015 - 5:23am |
|
|
|
ScottN
Location: Half inch above the K/T boundary Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2015 - 9:32am |
|
From the Epic Facebook Statuses thread: haresfur wrote:Pope visits the sick.
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 5, 2015 - 7:47am |
|
muzik wrote:Hilarious!
|
|
muzik
Location: Montana Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 4, 2015 - 7:16pm |
|
Proclivities wrote: Hilarious!
|
|
Proclivities
Location: Paris of the Piedmont Gender:
|
Posted:
Nov 4, 2015 - 10:18am |
|
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Jun 27, 2015 - 2:28am |
|
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Feb 26, 2015 - 10:39am |
|
Americans Favor Legalizing Pot and Criminalizing Congress - The New Yorker By a huge majority, Americans support laws legalizing marijuana and criminalizing Congress, according to a poll released on Thursday.While the poll reflects a relaxation of attitudes about recreational pot use, it also suggests that many Americans now view membership in Congress as a problem ravaging the nation. Harland Dorrinson, an activist who has spent years mobilizing support for the criminalization of Congress, said that “this poll reinforces what many of us have been saying for a long time: Congress destroys lives.” “I’ve seen productive members of society get involved with Congress and completely lose the will to work,” he said. “They just sit there, totally numb and out of touch with reality.” He noted that the once prevalent view that membership in Congress was “harmless” is now being discredited. “If you look at what happens to someone’s brain after ten, twenty, or even thirty years in Congress, it’s devastating,” he said. “There is severe impairment.” Additionally, he warned that Congress is a “gateway elective office” that leads many to try running for President.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 12, 2014 - 2:26pm |
|
miamizsun wrote:the problem with shut downs is that they aren't shutting down the corruption
it is as if the masses are blind to it Surveys/polls on the functioning of politicians (esp. Congress) suggest other— wise. Not so much blind as (at times) powerless.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 12, 2014 - 7:08am |
|
sirdroseph wrote:This time I actually think that the Democrats should shut down the government. The provisions the Republicans stuck into the spending bill are unacceptable. More importantly as usual I think the issue is systemic and this screams more the need for line item veto or some other method to insure that bills are separate entities with issues held tightly together, not lobbyist Christmas trees that they get to gleefuly hang their ornaments on. Neither you or miami were part of the group my comment was directed at, by the way. I agree with the reasons stated so far to not pass the Cromnibus and there are some other things I object to in it. The line item veto would do so much to move things along and also for legislators to cast votes and commit to individual issues eliminating the cover that comprehensive bills provide individual legislators on revealing their actual positions. The other thing needed is term limits. Both require a constitutional amendment.
|
|
miamizsun
Location: (3283.1 Miles SE of RP) Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 12, 2014 - 5:05am |
|
the problem with shut downs is that they aren't shutting down the corruption
it is as if the masses are blind to it
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 12, 2014 - 4:30am |
|
kurtster wrote:Here we go. Another threatened government shut down. Damn Tea Party ...
Oh wait, this time its the Democrats led by Senator Warren D, Ma with the support of Pelosi in the House.
So its total BS when the TP tries it, but its OK if the D's try it ?
I had no problem with the last shut down and am not against another, so no hypocrisy on my part.
So to all you Tea Party haters out there (and there are plenty of you) who spoke up openly and with vitriol against the last shut down, what say you now ?
. My guess is nothing ...
This time I actually think that the Democrats should shut down the government. The provisions the Republicans stuck into the spending bill are unacceptable. More importantly as usual I think the issue is systemic and this screams more the need for line item veto or some other method to insure that bills are separate entities with issues held tightly together, not lobbyist Christmas trees that they get to gleefuly hang their ornaments on.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 11, 2014 - 8:05pm |
|
Here we go. Another threatened government shut down. Damn Tea Party ...
Oh wait, this time its the Democrats led by Senator Warren D, Ma with the support of Pelosi in the House.
So its total BS when the TP tries it, but its OK if the D's try it ?
I had no problem with the last shut down and am not against another, so no hypocrisy on my part.
So to all you Tea Party haters out there (and there are plenty of you) who spoke up openly and with vitriol against the last shut down, what say you now ?
. My guess is nothing ...
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 11, 2014 - 4:56am |
|
sirdroseph wrote: Since it flew out of the House and died in the Senate, once again I say ... Thanks Harry Reid !
|
|
Prodigal_SOB
Location: Back Home Again in Indiana Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 10, 2014 - 12:40pm |
|
sirdroseph wrote:You are absolutely correct on soooo many levels. I didn't even need to read it.
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 10, 2014 - 12:25pm |
|
Prodigal_SOB wrote: I think it's right there in the headline. The reason for the failure was the "meaningful".
You are absolutely correct on soooo many levels.
|
|
Prodigal_SOB
Location: Back Home Again in Indiana Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 10, 2014 - 12:23pm |
|
sirdroseph wrote: I think it's right there in the headline. The reason for the failure was the "meaningful".
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 10, 2014 - 12:12pm |
|
|
|
sirdroseph
Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:
|
Posted:
Dec 10, 2014 - 12:09pm |
|
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jul 26, 2014 - 1:49pm |
|
Wikipedia bans edits from Congressional troublemaker(s) 2*Enough, Congress. Wikipedia has had it with you. The administrators of the collaborative encyclopedia imposed a 10-day ban on edits being made by an anonymous troublemaker (or troublemakers) using a House of Representatives IP address. The edits were first unearthed by @congressedits, an automated Twitter account that linked to all changes made to Wikipedia articles originating from congressional IP addresses (presumably, by Senate and House staffers, although no one has definitively ruled out an elected official doing the editing for his or herself). Following a considerable amount of media coverage, @congressedits has amassed 24,000 followers. Among @congressedits’ most amusing discoveries: the time someone on Capitol Hill implicated the Cuban government in spreading conspiracy theories about the moon landing on the “moon landing conspiracy theories page,” the time that an anonymous user labeled BuzzFeed editor-in-chief Ben Smith “a Smirnoff enthusiast,” or the time that an edit suggested that the blog Mediaite was a “sexist transphobic” news organization “that automatically assumes that someone is male without any evidence,” after Mediaite wrote a post on @congressedits. The 10-day ban, made by the volunteer editors overseeing Wikipedia, only applies to a single IP address making a number of “disruptive edits,” which could affect a number of users, since multiple congressional officers often uses one IP address. One congressional user anonymously made his displeasure known on the Wikipedia page for the blocked IP address. “Out of over 9000 staffers in the House, should we really be banning this whole IP range based on the actions of two or three?" they said. "Some of us here are just making grammatical edits, adding information about birds in Omsk, or showing how one can patch KDE2 under FreeBSD." * For the Al-jazeera-phobic
|
|
|