Servo wrote: 
Fey? It suits you.

 LowPhreak wrote: 
and yet you'll still waste all our time by posting, I'll bet you a dime.

 oldslabsides wrote: 
I thought I was accidentally back in the Obama thread.

 buzz wrote: 
I knew how this thread would turn out, given Servo's history on this topic and for example, his blind devotion to Obama and the Dems. But at least now there is no doubt to his utter lack of credibility.

 LowPhreak wrote: 
you could have saved all a lot of time and bandwidth if you realized this earlier.

 Servo wrote: 
I've already shown many of your responses to be so far-fetched as to not merit further reply. One example is your claim that, "I'm told that this person was never an FBI employee...". Even the most rabid shill for the gov't/MSM version of events I've yet encountered has not denied Edmonds' former role as an FBI translator, given that the court that issued the gag order knew she was. To deny any of this is patently idiotic.

And now with the garbage above we have yet another example. I haven't "alleged" anything, since it is an established fact that Bush stipulated Cheney be with him in the interview, and so on. Apparently, you've never as much as glanced at the 9/11 Commission Report or the hearings. You pretend not to understand the quite obvious reasons why Bush/Cheney did not want recordings or transcripts of the interview, or why they did not want to be placed under oath, and why in any honest investigation that would be unacceptable. Or you do know this, but are simply obfuscating and being extremely disingenuous.

But then, you do use the typical truth denier tactic of claiming that the sky really isn't blue, or that the sun doesn't rise in the east, or that 2 + 2 somehow does not equal 4. That well-established physics, long held US defense protocols and US law, or years of observed and documented experience somehow uniquely do not apply to 9/11. This line of "reasoning" is straight out of a George Orwell novel.

You can continue to chase your tail here, Servo. It isn't worth my time to further indulge it.

 duchamp wrote: 
goes on here every day.

  That's the funniest thing I have seen in a long time.  thanks