[ ]   [ ]   [ ]                        [ ]      [ ]   [ ]

Automotive Lust - Coaxial - Jul 7, 2022 - 5:48am
 
Wordle - daily game - marko86 - Jul 7, 2022 - 5:43am
 
Radio Paradise Comments - sunybuny - Jul 7, 2022 - 5:25am
 
Counting with Pictures - ScottN - Jul 7, 2022 - 5:19am
 
Supreme Court Rulings - R_P - Jul 7, 2022 - 12:31am
 
RightWingNutZ - kurtster - Jul 6, 2022 - 11:44pm
 
Mixtape Culture Club - ColdMiser - Jul 6, 2022 - 4:42pm
 
Things that make you happy - GeneP59 - Jul 6, 2022 - 11:35am
 
The Grateful Dead - black321 - Jul 6, 2022 - 8:36am
 
Today in History - Red_Dragon - Jul 6, 2022 - 6:01am
 
RP Metadata and Album Art - Dan888 - Jul 6, 2022 - 1:25am
 
Bug Reports & Feature Requests - Dan888 - Jul 6, 2022 - 1:23am
 
Guns - haresfur - Jul 5, 2022 - 5:19pm
 
Today, I learned... - Manbird - Jul 5, 2022 - 2:49pm
 
Name My Band - GeneP59 - Jul 5, 2022 - 2:27pm
 
Favorite Quotes - NoEnzLefttoSplit - Jul 5, 2022 - 7:32am
 
seriously? - oldviolin - Jul 4, 2022 - 9:03pm
 
Dialing 1-800-Manbird - oldviolin - Jul 4, 2022 - 9:00pm
 
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •  - haresfur - Jul 4, 2022 - 7:13pm
 
Things You Thought Today - steeler - Jul 4, 2022 - 9:51am
 
Radio Paradise for Android Automotive - jens547 - Jul 4, 2022 - 7:42am
 
Poetry Forum - Antigone - Jul 4, 2022 - 7:38am
 
Porcupine Tree to tour in late 2022 - kurtster - Jul 3, 2022 - 9:37pm
 
What is the meaning of this? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 3, 2022 - 5:54pm
 
• • •  What's For Dinner ? • • •  - Antigone - Jul 3, 2022 - 5:46pm
 
Gentle Giant - Steely_D - Jul 3, 2022 - 6:26am
 
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos - Alchemist - Jul 2, 2022 - 3:42pm
 
US Empire - R_P - Jul 2, 2022 - 2:56pm
 
Mind Control - Manbird - Jul 2, 2022 - 2:39pm
 
Tech & Science - GeneP59 - Jul 2, 2022 - 1:29pm
 
Trump - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2022 - 12:03pm
 
Living in America - Red_Dragon - Jul 2, 2022 - 8:14am
 
Religion - Red_Dragon - Jul 1, 2022 - 8:15pm
 
Joe Biden - Bill_J - Jul 1, 2022 - 4:49pm
 
Derplahoma! - Red_Dragon - Jul 1, 2022 - 3:06pm
 
Climate Change - R_P - Jul 1, 2022 - 1:51pm
 
Ratings - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 1, 2022 - 1:10pm
 
Baseball, anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Jul 1, 2022 - 9:24am
 
Things for which you would sell ManBird's soul - islander - Jul 1, 2022 - 8:57am
 
Lyrics that strike a chord today... - ColdMiser - Jul 1, 2022 - 8:52am
 
d'oh! or what I would've said if I'd had a half hour to t... - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 30, 2022 - 8:44pm
 
Cryptic Posts - Leave Them Guessing - oldviolin - Jun 30, 2022 - 8:30pm
 
Ukraine - R_P - Jun 30, 2022 - 8:12pm
 
Procrastinators Anonymous - oldviolin - Jun 30, 2022 - 3:36pm
 
New Song Submissions system - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 30, 2022 - 3:21pm
 
Hockey + Fantasy Hockey - black321 - Jun 30, 2022 - 12:48pm
 
The Obituary Page - kurtster - Jun 30, 2022 - 12:18pm
 
The Abortion Wars - R_P - Jun 30, 2022 - 11:31am
 
True Confessions - oldviolin - Jun 29, 2022 - 10:19pm
 
Pernicious Pious Proclivities Particularized Prodigiously - Red_Dragon - Jun 29, 2022 - 3:54pm
 
Beer - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 29, 2022 - 3:08pm
 
Education - Isabeau - Jun 29, 2022 - 2:47pm
 
Android 11 lock screen widget - jkforde - Jun 29, 2022 - 1:58pm
 
Marijuana: Baked News. - oldviolin - Jun 29, 2022 - 12:38pm
 
China - R_P - Jun 29, 2022 - 12:32pm
 
Breaking News - R_P - Jun 29, 2022 - 11:20am
 
Chemosabe, the further adventures of ... - kurtster - Jun 29, 2022 - 9:04am
 
Art Show - oldviolin - Jun 28, 2022 - 9:52pm
 
Highly stylized photos that you've taken - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 28, 2022 - 2:54pm
 
Russia - miamizsun - Jun 28, 2022 - 1:00pm
 
Nuclear power - saviour or scourge? - miamizsun - Jun 28, 2022 - 11:58am
 
Fiverr Anyone? - ScottFromWyoming - Jun 28, 2022 - 11:27am
 
Love is... - Steely_D - Jun 28, 2022 - 9:55am
 
You might be getting old if...... - kurtster - Jun 28, 2022 - 7:31am
 
Fascism American-style - R_P - Jun 27, 2022 - 11:09pm
 
YouTube: Music-Videos - Steely_D - Jun 27, 2022 - 9:56pm
 
I am Thinking of: - maryte - Jun 27, 2022 - 2:14pm
 
Vinyl Only Spin List - kurtster - Jun 27, 2022 - 1:27pm
 
Talk Behind Their Backs Forum - GeneP59 - Jun 27, 2022 - 10:39am
 
Economix - R_P - Jun 27, 2022 - 10:14am
 
M.A.G.A. - R_P - Jun 27, 2022 - 9:43am
 
Using Words to Frame a Political Issue - oldviolin - Jun 27, 2022 - 8:52am
 
Britain - Red_Dragon - Jun 27, 2022 - 8:40am
 
Words, acronyms, whatever, that changed meaning - Proclivities - Jun 27, 2022 - 7:43am
 
Would you drive this car for dating with ur girl? - KurtfromLaQuinta - Jun 26, 2022 - 3:55pm
 
Index » Regional/Local » USA/Canada » Those lovable acronym guys & gals Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27, 28  Next
Post to this Topic
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 2:47pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
The Demonization Machine Cranks Up Against Edward Snowden

It certainly has been amusing (and a bit unexpected from some individuals) to see how (viciously) some people have reacted (which in my case is based primarily on FB and some of the news I have read).

And since the ever-so-delicious topic of hypocrisy came up:

American exceptionalism, seen through the prism of American blunders | Ian Bremmer

  Perhaps you can help label me so others will feel more comfortable.{#Wink} I seem to agree with most of yours and maybe Miamizsuns positions the most. Ready for loaded question; what does that make me?{#Eek}


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 2:26pm

The Demonization Machine Cranks Up Against Edward Snowden

It certainly has been amusing (and a bit unexpected from some individuals) to see how (viciously) some people have reacted (which in my case is based primarily on FB and some of the news I have read).

And since the ever-so-delicious topic of hypocrisy came up:

American exceptionalism, seen through the prism of American blunders | Ian Bremmer
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 2:23pm

 islander wrote:

No, you stated that the Progressives were " more hypocritical " and "Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable".  And does it matter that the Republicans somehow did more analysis before changing their views (I'm not sure how you quantify that)? 

 
Wow, you are working overtime trying to see some praise for the Republicans in what I wrote.  Perhaps I can be more clear: the Republican party has been petty, obstructionists and downright mean not to mention on the wrong side of most social and civil rights issues for the past 50 years or more which is why even though I voted for a couple of Republican presidents over the years, I have never voted for a Republican senator or representative and have never considered myself a Republican. Quite frankly because of their untenable social issue positions, I have completely written them off for the most part for some time. I explained quite clearly why I thought they (progressives) were more hypocritical and more unforgivable imo.  However as Richard pointed out semantically and technically it is incorrect because hypocrisy is hypocrisy.  Now the unforgivable is my personal opinion and I have quite clearly explained why that is.  If you want to think that I am somehow choosing sides in this horrible display of partisan politics from the 2 loser parties, you go right ahead if it makes you feel better.  I am merely expressing why I feel the way I do, whether you think it is because I am some kind of closet Republican or not does not change my feelings on this subject instead makes me wonder why it is so important for you to find that somewhere and what you are even trying to argue.{#Stupid}


islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 2:11pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Holy misinterpretation Batman! I clearly state that both Republicans and Democrats are equally hypocritical in this matter, but I expect more from progressives not to be because the issues that progressives usually champion are matters of morality and compassion whereas it is pretty clear that Republicans are usually more analytical and cold hearted in regards to a lot of their positions on issues. I am clearly stating that yes, Virginia it is incredibly stupid to shift your view based on the person in power without question.  I am just more surprised, disappointed and quite frankly disgusted with the progressive partisans for changing their opinion on such a basic issue as individual freedoms vs. aggressively pursuing Muslims and the rest of us through increased surveillance.  Where you get that I think the Republicans are a "winner" in all this is beyond me.  I just think the Democrats are a bigger "loser" in this epic fail loser match because I expected more from progressives on this.

Let me be plain and clear; I expect this from the Republicans, they have not exactly been the party of compromise for the past 30 years or so. I have always thought of Democrat liberal partisans as sometimes naive and misguided, but usually well meaning and voting on principle.  I know this is probably silly, but that is how I viewed it and hate to see that myth shattered with stuff like this.

 
No, you stated that the Progressives were " more hypocritical " and "Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable".  And does it matter that the Republicans somehow did more analysis before changing their views (I'm not sure how you quantify that)? 
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:56pm

 RichardPrins wrote:
Arguable, for one see Jonathan Haidt's research on "values". I thought "compassion" and "morality" were also "conservative" values. As well as being staunch defendants of "liberty" and small gov. To me there is no real difference in the hypocrisy or opportunism.

As for hawkishness: it would appear (in the current climate) to be a requirement in order to get the power.

 
Good point, I  was actually thinking of all that as I was typing it and yes when it comes down to it, hypocrisy is hypocrisy.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:54pm

 islander wrote:

wait, what?

Isn't it equally stupid to shift your view based on the person in power? And what exactly are the Republicans choosing their opinions on?  Both sides here look pretty silly/hypocritical to me, and I think the reason has as much to to with "well it's okay when we do it because we're better/smarter/more responsible... blah, blah, blah" self rationalizing bullshit than any moral/compassionate re-evaluation.  Picking a winner in this pig wrestling match says more about your personal alignment.   

 
Holy misinterpretation Batman! I clearly state that both Republicans and Democrats are equally hypocritical in this matter, but I expect more from progressives not to be because the issues that progressives usually champion are matters of morality and compassion whereas it is pretty clear that Republicans are usually more analytical and cold hearted in regards to a lot of their positions on issues. I am clearly stating that yes, Virginia it is incredibly stupid to shift your view based on the person in power without question.  I am just more surprised, disappointed and quite frankly disgusted with the progressive partisans for changing their opinion on such a basic issue as individual freedoms vs. aggressively pursuing Muslims and the rest of us through increased surveillance.  Where you get that I think the Republicans are a "winner" in all this is beyond me.  I just think the Democrats are a bigger "loser" in this epic fail loser match because I expected more from progressives on this.

Let me be plain and clear; I expect this from the Republicans, they have not exactly been the party of compromise for the past 30 years or so. I have always thought of Democrat liberal partisans as sometimes naive and misguided, but usually well meaning and voting on principle.  I know this is probably silly, but that is how I viewed it and hate to see that myth shattered with stuff like this.


R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:53pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yep, that has been getting my goat whenever the privacy issue comes up.  It is a pet peeve of mind how partisans can so quickly shift their "values" dependent upon which party is in power.  Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this as the chart shows, but the so called progressives that turned into terrorist hawks overnight are more hypocritical because they are supposed to be choosing their opinions on issues based on compassion and morality more so than Republicans so imo the Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable. 

Arguable, for one see Jonathan Haidt's research on "values". I thought "compassion" and "morality" were also "conservative" values. As well as being staunch defendants of "liberty" and small gov. To me there is no real difference in the hypocrisy or opportunism.

As for hawkishness: it would appear (in the current climate) to be a requirement in order to get the power.
islander

islander Avatar

Location: Seattle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:45pm

 sirdroseph wrote:

Yep, that has been getting my goat whenever the privacy issue comes up.  It is a pet peeve of mind how partisans can so quickly shift their "values" dependent upon which party is in power.  Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this as the chart shows, but the so called progressives that turned into terrorist hawks overnight are more hypocritical because they are supposed to be choosing their opinions on issues based on compassion and morality more so than Republicans so imo the Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable.

 
wait, what?

Isn't it equally stupid to shift your view based on the person in power? And what exactly are the Republicans choosing their opinions on?  Both sides here look pretty silly/hypocritical to me, and I think the reason has as much to to with "well it's okay when we do it because we're better/smarter/more responsible... blah, blah, blah" self rationalizing bullshit than any moral/compassionate re-evaluation.  Picking a winner in this pig wrestling match says more about your personal alignment.   
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:33pm

 RichardPrins wrote: 
Yep, that has been getting my goat whenever the privacy issue comes up.  It is a pet peeve of mind how partisans can so quickly shift their "values" dependent upon which party is in power.  Both Democrats and Republicans are guilty of this as the chart shows, but the so called progressives that turned into terrorist hawks overnight are more hypocritical because they are supposed to be choosing their opinions on issues based on compassion and morality more so than Republicans so imo the Democratic partisanship is more unforgivable.
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 14, 2013 - 1:05pm

Greenwald: On PRISM, partisanship and propaganda

NEW TIME POLL: Support for the Leaker—and His Prosecution | TIME.com
ErikX

ErikX Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 6:37pm

70% of the NSA budget goes to private contractor spy agencies


haresfur

haresfur Avatar

Location: The Golden Triangle
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 5:59pm

My cell phone is made by Huawei so the Chinese probably know at least as much about me as the Americans.  It's only fair...{#Think}
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 4:25pm

Anonymous trolls NSA with ‘keywords of terror,’ disables website


Why 'I Have Nothing to Hide' Is the Wrong Way to Think About Surveillance | Wired Opinion | Wired.com
R_P

R_P Avatar



Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 12:26pm


kurtster

kurtster Avatar

Location: where fear is not a virtue
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 9:10am

 sirdroseph wrote:


On the Daily Show, John Oliver made a great comment about this. Paraphrasing; "Mr. President, we are not accusing you of breaking any laws, we just think it is strange that you didn't have to!"   {#Eek} This sums it up nicely. 
 

Now on a broader note, I would not be concerned so much that the NSA is listening to anything we are saying. They probably are not. They are just compiling mountains and mountains of ALL data having it ready when they need it.  If they then have reason to suspect someone, they can then go into the mountain and compile ALL data on that individual they need.  Where the real danger lies is the potential for the many nefarious things the Government could do to you if they were so inclined.

 

That is the heart of the matter.  And who will be in charge of what 5, 10 or 20 years from now.

This discussion is more about our future than our present, although the present ain't looking to good either.
DaveInVA

DaveInVA Avatar

Location: In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:38am

 black321 wrote:

Done!  Thanks for sharing.  {#Lol}

 
I feel sorry for whoever they assign to watch me as they will be bored to tears pretty fast...
black321

black321 Avatar

Location: An earth without maps
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:34am

 DaveInVA wrote:
They wont get me that way either as I have never owned a cell phone. I also don't leave microphones or webcams hooked up to my computers and I also don't own a laptop. So they will have to use old school tech on me and tap my phone or put a gps locator on my car.

 
Done!  Thanks for sharing.  {#Lol}
bokey

bokey Avatar

Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:32am

 DaveInVA wrote:
They wont get me that way either as I have never owned a cell phone. I also don't leave microphones or webcams hooked up to my computers and I also don't own a laptop. So they will have to use old school tech on me and tap my phone or put a gps locator on my car.

 
I just use mine to order a pizza on the road or in case I need to contact EMS for Pops during a power outage. Assuming the cell towers are backed up the the -48 volt or whatever system. I don't know about that though.


DaveInVA

DaveInVA Avatar

Location: In a hovel in effluent Damnville, VA
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:30am

They wont get me that way either as I have never owned a cell phone. I also don't leave microphones or webcams hooked up to my computers and I also don't own a laptop. So they will have to use old school tech on me and tap my phone or put a gps locator on my car.
sirdroseph

sirdroseph Avatar

Location: Not here, I tell you wat
Gender: Male


Posted: Jun 13, 2013 - 8:27am

 Red_Dragon wrote:
Story on NPR the other day about what the recent whistle blower incident does to the confidence of the "national security leadership" in it's employees. Perhaps it should have been about why people feel a whistle needs blowing. Perhaps because the gubment is overstepping its authority? Maybe? Huh?

 

On the Daily Show, John Oliver made a great comment about this. Paraphrasing; "Mr. President, we are not accusing you of breaking any laws, we just think it is strange that you didn't have to!"   {#Eek} This sums it up nicely. 
 

Now on a broader note, I would not be concerned so much that the NSA is listening to anything we are saying. They probably are not. They are just compiling mountains and mountains of ALL data having it ready when they need it.  If they then have reason to suspect someone, they can then go into the mountain and compile ALL data on that individual they need.  Where the real danger lies is the potential for the many nefarious things the Government could do to you if they were so inclined.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 25, 26, 27, 28  Next