NYTimes Connections
- ScottFromWyoming - May 16, 2024 - 1:29pm
Other Medical Stuff
- pilgrim - May 16, 2024 - 1:06pm
Your Local News
- Proclivities - May 16, 2024 - 12:51pm
USA! USA! USA!
- thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 12:27pm
Today in History
- ScottFromWyoming - May 16, 2024 - 12:20pm
Alexa Show
- thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 12:15pm
What can you hear right now?
- thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 11:00am
Things You Thought Today
- thisbody - May 16, 2024 - 10:25am
NY Times Strands
- Bill_J - May 16, 2024 - 9:00am
Radio Paradise Comments
- Bill_J - May 16, 2024 - 8:41am
Wordle - daily game
- islander - May 16, 2024 - 7:13am
Joe Biden
- Steely_D - May 16, 2024 - 1:02am
Climate Change
- R_P - May 15, 2024 - 9:38pm
Strange signs, marquees, billboards, etc.
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:13pm
how do you feel right now?
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 15, 2024 - 4:10pm
China
- R_P - May 15, 2024 - 1:40pm
Dialing 1-800-Manbird
- oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 1:13pm
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 12:38pm
Israel
- R_P - May 15, 2024 - 12:16pm
Song of the Day
- oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:50am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:48am
Science is bullsh*t
- oldviolin - May 15, 2024 - 11:44am
NASA & other news from space
- Beaker - May 15, 2024 - 9:29am
Artificial Intelligence
- thisbody - May 15, 2024 - 8:25am
Human Rights (Can Science Point The Way)
- miamizsun - May 15, 2024 - 5:50am
Play the Blues
- Steely_D - May 15, 2024 - 1:50am
Music library
- mbellenberg - May 15, 2024 - 1:01am
Animal Resistance
- R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:37pm
2024 Elections!
- R_P - May 14, 2024 - 6:00pm
May 2024 Photo Theme - Peaceful
- fractalv - May 14, 2024 - 5:02pm
Fascism In America
- Red_Dragon - May 14, 2024 - 4:27pm
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- cptbuz - May 14, 2024 - 3:31pm
punk? hip-hop? metal? noise? garage?
- thisbody - May 14, 2024 - 1:27pm
The Obituary Page
- thisbody - May 14, 2024 - 12:41pm
Social Media Are Changing Everything
- Red_Dragon - May 14, 2024 - 8:08am
Internet connection
- ai63 - May 14, 2024 - 7:53am
Congress
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:22pm
Ukraine
- R_P - May 13, 2024 - 5:50pm
What The Hell Buddy?
- oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 1:25pm
Surfing!
- KurtfromLaQuinta - May 13, 2024 - 1:21pm
Bad Poetry
- oldviolin - May 13, 2024 - 11:38am
What Did You See Today?
- kurtster - May 13, 2024 - 10:35am
See This Film
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 8:35am
Podcast recommendations???
- ColdMiser - May 13, 2024 - 7:50am
News of the Weird
- Red_Dragon - May 13, 2024 - 5:05am
Mixtape Culture Club
- Lazy8 - May 12, 2024 - 10:26pm
Trump
- Steely_D - May 12, 2024 - 3:35pm
Those Lovable Policemen
- R_P - May 12, 2024 - 11:31am
Vinyl Only Spin List
- kurtster - May 12, 2024 - 9:16am
The All-Things Beatles Forum
- Steely_D - May 12, 2024 - 9:04am
Baseball, anyone?
- Red_Dragon - May 12, 2024 - 6:52am
Poetry Forum
- ScottN - May 12, 2024 - 6:32am
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- miamizsun - May 11, 2024 - 10:37am
Upcoming concerts or shows you can't wait to see
- oldviolin - May 11, 2024 - 8:43am
Beer
- ScottFromWyoming - May 10, 2024 - 8:58pm
It's the economy stupid.
- thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 3:21pm
Oh dear god, BEES!
- R_P - May 10, 2024 - 3:11pm
Tornado!
- miamizsun - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
The 1960s
- kcar - May 10, 2024 - 2:49pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - May 10, 2024 - 9:35am
Marko Haavisto & Poutahaukat
- thisbody - May 10, 2024 - 7:57am
Living in America
- Proclivities - May 10, 2024 - 6:45am
Virginia News
- Red_Dragon - May 10, 2024 - 5:42am
Outstanding Covers
- Steely_D - May 10, 2024 - 12:56am
Democratic Party
- R_P - May 9, 2024 - 3:06pm
RP on HomePod mini
- RPnate1 - May 9, 2024 - 10:52am
Interesting Words
- Proclivities - May 9, 2024 - 10:22am
Positive Thoughts and Prayer Requests
- islander - May 9, 2024 - 7:21am
Breaking News
- maryte - May 9, 2024 - 7:17am
Guns
- Red_Dragon - May 9, 2024 - 6:16am
Spambags on RP
- Steely_D - May 8, 2024 - 2:30pm
Suggestion for new RP Channel: Modern / Family
- Ruuddie - May 8, 2024 - 11:46am
Gaming, Shopping, and More? Samsung's Metaverse Plans for...
- alexhoxdson - May 8, 2024 - 7:00am
SLOVENIA
- novitibo - May 8, 2024 - 1:38am
Reviews and Pix from your concerts and shows you couldn't...
- haresfur - May 7, 2024 - 10:46pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Trump
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1136, 1137, 1138 ... 1147, 1148, 1149 Next |
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 3:55pm |
|
rotekz wrote:At the 2015 general election the pollsters got it completely wrong. It destroyed their reputations. Yet you have linked a Telegraph news story that is based on these pre-election polls. The news story and predictions within have no credibility now. It may very well have been wrong, but we don't know because we don't have the actual numbers. There was a decline from 2005 to 2010 in Labour votes (68%) among migrants and it may have persisted. Or it may not have.
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 3:47pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:I didn't say they preferred Tory, merely that the Tories won and that migrants were moving away from Labour. Indecisiveness, along with the rest of the electorate, would have to mean less loyalty to Labour, no? At the 2015 general election the pollsters got it completely wrong. It destroyed their reputations. Yet you have linked a Telegraph news story that is based on these pre-election polls. The news story and predictions within have no credibility now.
|
|
kurtster
Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 3:30pm |
|
aflanigan wrote: So I take it that you will not mind us all referring to you as an illegal American?
Sure, why not. I bet that most are thinking of me as a nazi since I support Trump based on what has been posted earlier. Doesn't change the issue however. Seeings how your an open border guy an all, I bet that you have long ago removed all the locks on your doors to show support for that cause.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 3:14pm |
|
rotekz wrote:The part you quoted was not from the conclusion section and cannot be described as the conclusion of the report. Also crucial part of your quoted section is as follows: There is no evidence that BAME support is shifting decisively in the direction of a different political party. Rather, many BAME voters are now as unsure about which way to vote as the rest of the electorate. It is a prediction of INDECISIVENESS and nothing more. There is no evidence or data to show that migrants now prefer to vote Tory. You're right, it was from patterns and intentions, just before the conclusion. I didn't say they preferred Tory, merely that the Tories won and that migrants were moving away from Labour. Indecisiveness, along with the rest of the electorate, would have to mean less loyalty to Labour on their part, no?
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 3:09pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: No, I already pointed out that the report reached a different conclusion then you did. I did not and would not say they no longer vote for Labour. The majority probably still does, but the report, once again, makes the case that the trend is away from Labour. The tables (as well as the list of minority MPs) already showed there is some (limited) variety.
Well, the BBC does make up stuff on occasion, but that's not really relevant here.
The part you quoted was not from the conclusion section and cannot be described as the conclusion of the report. Also the crucial part of your quoted section is as follows: There is no evidence that BAME support is shifting decisively in the direction of a different political party. Rather, many BAME voters are now as unsure about which way to vote as the rest of the electorate. It is a prediction of INDECISIVENESS and nothing more. There is no evidence or data to show that migrants now prefer to vote Tory.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:52pm |
|
rotekz wrote:The first two sets of data were from the report that YOU linked. Are you trying to say your report is no good? The BBC report used 2010 election data. Do you accuse the BBC of making stuff up? The fourth set of data came from the electoral commission after the 2005 election. Again are you trying to say they got it wrong? This smacks of desperation.
Now. Produce 2015 data that shows migrants no longer vote Labour. Until you do the figures that we have are those of the 2005 and 2010 general election that show migrants overwhelmingly voting for Labour. If you are going to say they no longer do you have to back it up with figures that show it. No, I already pointed out that the report reached a different conclusion then you did. I did not and would not say they no longer vote for Labour. The majority probably still does, but the report, once again, makes the case that the trend is away from Labour. The tables (as well as the list of minority MPs) already showed there is some (limited) variety. Well, the BBC does make up stuff on occasion, but that's not really relevant here.
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:44pm |
|
aflanigan wrote:So you consider a single photo which may well have been photoshopped as comprehensive data to establish the voting habits of a certain class of people? EDIT: Richard caught this as well. They were screenshots of the report that Richard himself linked in the first place. Read it.
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:44pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: I might have missed it, but what was your (cold) hard data? Surely not the article by "Migrant Watch"? Or, for that matter, the tables from the report that conclude that there is a trend away from Labour among migrants?
The main winners in the elections were UKIP (like Trump, not likely to be supported by migrants) and the SNP. Big losers: LibDems, and Labour in Scotland (likely due to the SNP).
Until we have data for 2015, your air is as hot as mine.
The first two sets of data were from the report that YOU linked. Are you trying to say your report is no good? The BBC report used 2010 election data. Do you accuse the BBC of making stuff up? The fourth set of data came from the electoral commission after the 2005 election. Again are you trying to say they got it wrong? This smacks of desperation. Now. Produce 2015 data that shows migrants no longer vote Labour. Until you do the figures that we have are those of the 2005 and 2010 general election that show migrants overwhelmingly voting for Labour. If you are going to say they no longer do you have to back it up with figures that show it.
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:31pm |
|
rotekz wrote: I am the only person using actual data. So you consider a single photo which may well have been photoshopped as comprehensive data to establish the voting habits of a certain class of people? EDIT: Richard caught this as well.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:28pm |
|
rotekz wrote:I am the only person using actual data. You are talking about a theoretical trend for indecisiveness. It amounts to nothing whilst all the voting data shows overwhelming support for Labour. You have nothing to show that migrants changed their previous propensity to vote Labour. Produce voting figures to show migrants no longer favour Labour. I might have missed it, but what was your (cold) hard data? Surely not the article by "Migrant Watch"? Or, for that matter, the tables from the report that conclude that there is a trend away from Labour among migrants? The main winners in the elections were UKIP (like Trump, not likely to be supported by migrants) and the SNP. Big losers: LibDems, and Labour in Scotland (likely due to the SNP). Until we have data for 2015, your air is as hot as mine.
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:17pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:The report already showed the trend based on a study up to 2015 (you would need to look at the cited study). I don't know if there's concrete data for 2015 post-election w.r.t. minorities/migrants. More data will likely not convince you anyway. And that's based on the trend of your previous posts. . I am the only person using actual data. You are talking about a theoretical trend for indecisiveness. It amounts to nothing whilst all the voting data shows overwhelming support for Labour. You have nothing to show that migrants changed their previous propensity to vote Labour. Produce voting figures to show migrants no longer favour Labour.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:10pm |
|
rotekz wrote:Please provide figures that show migrants no longer overwhelmingly vote Labour. Actual data. Until you do it's all hot air.
This is a presumption and is not followed up with any data. Hard data is needed. All previous data shows overwhelming migrant support for Labour. The report already showed the trend based on a study up to 2015 (you would need to look at the cited study). I don't know if there's concrete data for 2015 post-election w.r.t. minorities/migrants. More data will likely not convince you anyway. And that's based on the trend of your previous posts.
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 2:07pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:There is no evidence that BAME support is shifting decisively in the direction of a different political party. Rather, many BAME voters are now as unsure about which way to vote as the rest of the electorate. .............................................................
And you ended up with Tories again... This is a presumption and is not followed up with any data. All data produced so far shows overwhelming migrant support for Labour. Saying they were unsure who to vote for before the 2015 election does not in any way mean they were going to vote Conservative.
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 1:58pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote: rotekz wrote:Was Mass Immigration a Conspiracy?
Election 2015: Migrant voters 'could be decisive' The first article talks about what happened before 2005 (in conspiratorial terms no less). That was addressed in the earlier report. A different trend with regards to voting has been apparent. It's no secret that migrants were and are allowed to migrate to European countries. It's been happening since the 60s. It was, and still is, relatively cheap labour. That's fine by most when the economy is doing well (and certain jobs, often low-paid, can't be filled easily). It then becomes a problem when this is no longer the case. The second article said their vote might be decisive, and it turned out to be either false (if you counted on them to vote Labour) or true (if they decided to vote something else esp. Tory). As mentioned earlier, the Tories won anyway (and if I remember correctly most polls got it wrong). Please provide figures that show migrants no longer overwhelmingly vote Labour. Actual data. Until you do it's all hot air.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 1:54pm |
|
rotekz wrote:Was Mass Immigration a Conspiracy?
Election 2015: Migrant voters 'could be decisive' The first article talks about what happened before 2005 (in conspiratorial terms no less). That was addressed in the earlier report. A different trend with regards to voting has been apparent. It's no secret that migrants were and are allowed to migrate to European countries. It's been happening since the 60s. It was, and still is, relatively cheap labour. That's fine by most when the economy is doing well (and certain jobs, often low-paid, can't be filled easily). It then becomes a problem when this is no longer the case. The second article said their vote might be decisive, and it turned out to be either false (if you counted on them to vote Labour) or true (if they decided to vote something else esp. Tory). As mentioned earlier, the Tories won anyway (and if I remember correctly most polls got it wrong).
|
|
aflanigan
Location: At Sea Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 1:33pm |
|
kurtster wrote: I break the law and get caught, I will have to be held accountable. Simple enough.
Get caught being here illegally, then I expect the same for that person as well.
Its so simple really ... don't get caught. Cuz if you do ...
So I take it that you will not mind us all referring to you as an illegal American?
|
|
rotekz
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 1:33pm |
|
RichardPrins wrote:It mentions it is one particular district in Birmingham, and that is was organized by a young Muslim female councillor (along with another councillor). We can't know if they are all (recent) migrants either. However, despite that you can still come up with a massive generalization, despite a report that claims a different trend? A list of ethnic political representatives shows more variety as well. http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/pressArticle/83Was Mass Immigration a Conspiracy?Mass immigration is an entirely different matter. The question now is how did it happen and what can be done about it. Was it all a Labour conspiracy? Was it sheer incompetence in government? Or was it wholesale retreat in front of the race relations lobby? Landmark The strongest evidence for conspiracy comes from one of Labour’s own. Andrew Neather, a previously unheard-of speechwriter for Blair, Straw and Blunkett, popped up with an article in the Evening Standard in October 2009 which gave the game away. Immigration, he wrote, ‘didn’t just happen; the deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000…was to open up the UK to mass immigration’. He was at the heart of policy in September 2001, drafting the landmark speech by the then Immigration Minister Barbara Roche, and he reported ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn’t its main purpose - to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’. That seemed, even to him, a manoeuvre too far. The result is now plain for all to see. Even Blair’s favourite think tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), commented recently: ‘It is no exaggeration to say that immigration under New Labour has changed the face of the country.’ It is not hard to see why Labour’s own apparatchiks supported the policy. Provided that the white working class didn’t cotton on, there were votes in it. Research into voting patterns conducted for the Electoral Commission after the 2005 general election found that 80 per cent of Caribbean and African voters had voted Labour, while only about 3 per cent had voted Conservative and roughly 8 per cent for the Liberal Democrats. The Asian vote was split about 50 per cent for Labour, 10 per cent Conservatives and 15 per cent Liberal Democrats.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-31062699
Election 2015: Migrant voters 'could be decisive'The report highlighted a challenge for the Conservatives, particularly over migrant voters. At the 2010 election, 16% of black and ethnic minority voters chose the Tories; 68% voted Labour. Generations of migrants had formed an image of Labour as the party that "protects migrant and minority interests, in contrast to the Conservatives", the study said. Conservative chairman Grant Shapps acknowledged there was a "big challenge" ahead for his party, but stressed "things were changing". "I am the first to accept that people don't necessarily move to this country and immediately think of voting Conservative.
|
|
R_P
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 1:06pm |
|
rotekz wrote: It mentions it is one particular district in Birmingham, and that is was organized by a young Muslim female councillor (along with another councillor). We can't know if they are all (recent) migrants either. However, despite that you can still come up with a massive generalization, despite a report that claims a different trend? A list of ethnic political representatives shows more variety as well.
|
|
Steely_D
Location: Biscayne Bay Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 12:46pm |
|
kurtster wrote: and DAT'S the name of dat tune!
|
|
bokey
Gender:
|
Posted:
Jan 14, 2016 - 12:45pm |
|
Prodigal_SOB wrote: 22st?
I used to have a friend who according to the signage lived on E. 2th (tooth?) St.
East Saint Louis Toothaloo?
|
|
|