Beyond mix
- LordQuercia - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:37pm
NY Times Strands
- geoff_morphini - Jul 11, 2025 - 9:50pm
A motivational quote
- steeler - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:58pm
Beyond...
- GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:35pm
Radio Paradise Comments
- GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:06pm
The Marie Antoinette Moment...
- GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 5:47pm
M.A.G.A.
- R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 4:36pm
July 2025 Photo Theme - Stone
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 11, 2025 - 3:44pm
Trump
- bobrk - Jul 11, 2025 - 2:47pm
Democratic Party
- Isabeau - Jul 11, 2025 - 1:52pm
Protest Songs
- R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 12:38pm
Wordle - daily game
- Isabeau - Jul 11, 2025 - 12:08pm
True Confessions
- oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:56am
USA! USA! USA!
- R_P - Jul 11, 2025 - 11:40am
• • • The Once-a-Day • • •
- oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:47am
What the hell OV?
- oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:34am
Live Music
- oldviolin - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:13am
Bug Reports & Feature Requests
- Coaxial - Jul 11, 2025 - 10:01am
Great Old Songs You Rarely Hear Anymore
- GeneP59 - Jul 11, 2025 - 9:50am
NYTimes Connections
- ptooey - Jul 11, 2025 - 9:43am
Today in History
- Red_Dragon - Jul 11, 2025 - 8:04am
It seemed like a good idea at the time
- ptooey - Jul 11, 2025 - 6:10am
Country Up The Bumpkin
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:13pm
TV shows you watch
- R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:31pm
Wasted Money
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:22pm
Baseball, anyone?
- kcar - Jul 10, 2025 - 5:06pm
Rock mix / repitition
- walk2k - Jul 10, 2025 - 4:31pm
Name My Band
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:24pm
How's the weather?
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:21pm
Climate Change
- R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 12:52pm
Israel
- R_P - Jul 10, 2025 - 11:55am
Random Solutions - Random Advice
- oldviolin - Jul 10, 2025 - 10:11am
Spambags on RP
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 10, 2025 - 9:02am
misheard lyrics
- GeneP59 - Jul 10, 2025 - 6:30am
New Song Submissions system
- Teja - Jul 10, 2025 - 3:36am
TEXAS
- Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 5:57pm
DQ (as in 'Daily Quote')
- black321 - Jul 9, 2025 - 11:33am
Fascism In America
- ColdMiser - Jul 9, 2025 - 10:23am
Republican Party
- Red_Dragon - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:50am
Economix
- oldviolin - Jul 9, 2025 - 7:45am
Outstanding Covers
- oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 9:29pm
Trump Lies™
- R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 7:14pm
Musky Mythology
- R_P - Jul 8, 2025 - 5:43pm
Photography Forum - Your Own Photos
- Alchemist - Jul 8, 2025 - 11:45am
What is the meaning of this?
- islander - Jul 8, 2025 - 10:11am
Love & Hate
- oldviolin - Jul 8, 2025 - 8:15am
Artificial Intelligence
- Red_Dragon - Jul 8, 2025 - 6:45am
Anti-War
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 6:45pm
Environment
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 5:38pm
(Big) Media Watch
- R_P - Jul 7, 2025 - 12:04pm
The Grateful Dead
- black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 11:17am
Music Videos
- black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 9:00am
Mixtape Culture Club
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:59am
Immigration
- black321 - Jul 7, 2025 - 8:02am
Russia
- Red_Dragon - Jul 7, 2025 - 7:39am
Triskele and The Grateful Dead
- geoff_morphini - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:33pm
Hey Baby, It's The 4th O' July
- GeneP59 - Jul 6, 2025 - 9:42pm
Customize a shirt with my favorite album
- 2644364236 - Jul 6, 2025 - 7:20pm
Those Lovable Policemen
- R_P - Jul 6, 2025 - 10:56am
Beer
- SeriousLee - Jul 6, 2025 - 6:54am
Iran
- R_P - Jul 5, 2025 - 9:01pm
What are you doing RIGHT NOW?
- Coaxial - Jul 5, 2025 - 6:48pm
New vs Old RP App (Android)
- mhamann123 - Jul 5, 2025 - 5:41am
Britain
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 1:41pm
Ukraine
- R_P - Jul 4, 2025 - 11:10am
Best Song Comments.
- 2644364236 - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:32pm
The Obituary Page
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 3, 2025 - 11:27am
Documentaries
- Proclivities - Jul 3, 2025 - 9:31am
Annoying stuff. not things that piss you off, just annoyi...
- Steely_D - Jul 3, 2025 - 8:36am
Copyright and theft
- black321 - Jul 3, 2025 - 6:48am
Fox Spews
- islander - Jul 2, 2025 - 10:39am
New Music
- ScottFromWyoming - Jul 2, 2025 - 7:30am
Carmen to Stones
- KurtfromLaQuinta - Jul 1, 2025 - 7:44pm
President(s) Musk/Trump
- VV - Jul 1, 2025 - 8:10am
June 2025 Photo Theme - Arches
- Alchemist - Jun 30, 2025 - 9:10pm
|
Index »
Radio Paradise/General »
General Discussion »
Trump
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 1252, 1253, 1254 ... 1350, 1351, 1352 Next |
rotekz


|
|
kcar


|
Posted:
Jun 5, 2016 - 11:41pm |
|
rotekz wrote:My Endorsement for President of the United StatesPosted June 5th, 2016 @ 10:11am in #Trump #clinton2016
I’ve decided to come off the sidelines and endorse a candidate for President of the United States. I’ll start by reminding readers that my politics don’t align with any of the candidates. My interest in the race has been limited to Trump’s extraordinary persuasion skills. But lately Hillary Clinton has moved into the persuasion game – and away from boring facts and policies – with great success. Let’s talk about that. This past week we saw Clinton pair the idea of President Trump with nuclear disaster, racism, Hitler, the Holocaust, and whatever else makes you tremble in fear. That is good persuasion if you can pull it off because fear is a strong motivator. It is also a sharp pivot from Clinton’s prior approach of talking about her mastery of policy details, her experience, and her gender. Trump took her so-called “woman card” and turned it into a liability. So Clinton wisely pivoted. Her new scare tactics are solid-gold persuasion. I wouldn’t be surprised if you see Clinton’s numbers versus Trump improve in June, at least temporarily, until Trump finds a counter-move. The only downside I can see to the new approach is that it is likely to trigger a race war in the United States. And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms. (I’m called an “apologist” on Twitter, or sometimes just Joseph Goebbels). If Clinton successfully pairs Trump with Hitler in your mind – as she is doing – and loses anyway, about a quarter of the country will think it is morally justified to assassinate their own leader. I too would feel that way if an actual Hitler came to power in this country. I would join the resistance and try to take out the Hitler-like leader. You should do the same. No one wants an actual President Hitler. So I’ve decided to endorse Hillary Clinton for President, for my personal safety. Trump supporters don’t have any bad feelings about patriotic Americans such as myself, so I’ll be safe from that crowd. But Clinton supporters have convinced me – and here I am being 100% serious – that my safety is at risk if I am seen as supportive of Trump. So I’m taking the safe way out and endorsing Hillary Clinton for president. As I have often said, I have no psychic powers and I don’t know which candidate would be the best president. But I do know which outcome is most likely to get me killed by my fellow citizens. So for safety reason, I’m on team Clinton. My prediction remains that Trump will win in a landslide based on his superior persuasion skills. But don’t blame me for anything President Trump does in office because I endorse Clinton. The rest of you are on your own. Good luck. I think Scott Adams got lost in the pretzel-logic world of his cartoons. 1. Did Clinton explicitly " pair the idea of President Trump with...Hitler"? or the Holocaust? Not in her latest speech, as far as I can tell.
http://time.com/4355797/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-foreign-policy-speech-transcript/
1a. She did call Trump "temperamentally unfit" to be President and pointed numerous instances of his lack of understanding about current events and policies. Most adults who've been paying attention would agree with her.
1b. Although I've just skimmed the speech, I can't see where she implied that a President Trump would be a dictator.
2. Clinton's speech wasn't a great departure from her earlier speeches, as far as I can tell. She did contrast her knowledge of and experience in foreign and domestic policy with Trump's deficiencies in those areas, and did so to great effect. She did touch on Trump being thin-skinned and rash.
3. If Clinton's numbers do go up in June, it may be in part because she gave a great speech that exposed Trump as a rambling, know-nothing, hate-filled ranter. Any rise in popularity may also be due to an apparent shortage in Trump's campaign funds for the next month or so.
Scott next loses his tenuous grasp on reality.
4. "The only downside I can see to the new approach is that it is likely to trigger a race war in the United States."
Wait, what?
How did Scott jump from Hillary supposedly fear-mongering about Trump all the way to an imminent race war?!?!? Does Scott seriously think that people are going to start killing each other if someone says that Trump is temperamentally unfit to be POTUS? Are non-whites supposed to start fighting with whites over Trump's thinning scalp?
5. "And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms..."
         
Yes, that's absolutely right. I think America is going to be taken over by a right-wing dictator, so I'm going to jump into a race war. And a cartoonist whose cultural influence definitely peaked a while ago is on my Top Ten List of Assassination Targets just because he admires Trump's "persuasion skills."
5a. Who knew that Democrats were such vicious Red Guard types ready to kill at the bidding of Madame Hillary. Lynch the capitalist-lackey cartoonist!
6. "Trump supporters don’t have any bad feelings about patriotic Americans such as myself, so I’ll be safe from that crowd."
They're never violent. All that hitting and punching and dragging of protesters during a Trump rally? All staged. They're practicing for the WWE.
7. "As I have often said, I have no psychic powers and I don’t know which candidate would be the best president." Scott, if you think you need psychic powers to figure that out, you're sorely lacking in other mental capacities.
I will do my level best to get you into the nicest re-indoctrination/labor camps when Chairman Hill assumes power.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
|
Steely_D

Location: The foot of Mount Belzoni Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 5, 2016 - 7:43pm |
|
made that one myself
|
|
rotekz


|
Posted:
Jun 5, 2016 - 3:03pm |
|
My Endorsement for President of the United StatesPosted June 5th, 2016 @ 10:11am in #Trump #clinton2016
I’ve decided to come off the sidelines and endorse a candidate for President of the United States. I’ll start by reminding readers that my politics don’t align with any of the candidates. My interest in the race has been limited to Trump’s extraordinary persuasion skills. But lately Hillary Clinton has moved into the persuasion game – and away from boring facts and policies – with great success. Let’s talk about that. This past week we saw Clinton pair the idea of President Trump with nuclear disaster, racism, Hitler, the Holocaust, and whatever else makes you tremble in fear. That is good persuasion if you can pull it off because fear is a strong motivator. It is also a sharp pivot from Clinton’s prior approach of talking about her mastery of policy details, her experience, and her gender. Trump took her so-called “woman card” and turned it into a liability. So Clinton wisely pivoted. Her new scare tactics are solid-gold persuasion. I wouldn’t be surprised if you see Clinton’s numbers versus Trump improve in June, at least temporarily, until Trump finds a counter-move. The only downside I can see to the new approach is that it is likely to trigger a race war in the United States. And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms. (I’m called an “apologist” on Twitter, or sometimes just Joseph Goebbels). If Clinton successfully pairs Trump with Hitler in your mind – as she is doing – and loses anyway, about a quarter of the country will think it is morally justified to assassinate their own leader. I too would feel that way if an actual Hitler came to power in this country. I would join the resistance and try to take out the Hitler-like leader. You should do the same. No one wants an actual President Hitler. So I’ve decided to endorse Hillary Clinton for President, for my personal safety. Trump supporters don’t have any bad feelings about patriotic Americans such as myself, so I’ll be safe from that crowd. But Clinton supporters have convinced me – and here I am being 100% serious – that my safety is at risk if I am seen as supportive of Trump. So I’m taking the safe way out and endorsing Hillary Clinton for president. As I have often said, I have no psychic powers and I don’t know which candidate would be the best president. But I do know which outcome is most likely to get me killed by my fellow citizens. So for safety reason, I’m on team Clinton. My prediction remains that Trump will win in a landslide based on his superior persuasion skills. But don’t blame me for anything President Trump does in office because I endorse Clinton. The rest of you are on your own. Good luck.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 5, 2016 - 2:43pm |
|
|
|
rotekz


|
Posted:
Jun 5, 2016 - 3:32am |
|
Former attorney general: Trump is right to question Trump University judge’s fairness hill.cm/KXDO5l0
|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 4, 2016 - 5:33am |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote: I thought he was shooting for the vatican?
Trump is evil alright, but he is not Pope evil. That is a whole other level of evil built up over a thousand years.
|
|
Rod

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 9:00pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:I thought he was shooting for the vatican? Not gaudy enough. Not saying he's trying to be pope, but he'd be the most amazing pope ever, you're gonna love it. Bring back the inquisition, the Crusades...make Catholicism great again! He would kick our current low energy pope's ass. It would be embarrassing. Loser.
|
|
Red_Dragon

Location: Gilead 
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 7:37pm |
|
Lazy8 wrote: Not gaudy enough.
Not saying he's trying to be pope, but he'd be the most amazing pope ever, you're gonna love it. Bring back the inquisition, the Crusades...make Catholicism great again!
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 6:25pm |
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit wrote:I thought he was shooting for the vatican? Not gaudy enough. Not saying he's trying to be pope, but he'd be the most amazing pope ever, you're gonna love it. Bring back the inquisition, the Crusades...make Catholicism great again!
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 1:29pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.? No, he'd have to tear the disgusting dump down, because it is a disgrace as left behind by the last tenants, but he'll have it beautifully rebuilt (with lotsa, lotsa gilded kitsch) in no time. It'll be yuge and beautiful, 'cause he knows beautiful. In fact, no one knows beautiful like he does. Oh, and youse are gonna pay for it.
|
|
NoEnzLefttoSplit

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 1:25pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.?
I thought he was shooting for the vatican?
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 1:24pm |
|
ScottFromWyoming wrote:If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.?
Sorry just had to repost this from a couple of months ago 
|
|
ScottFromWyoming

Location: Powell Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 1:20pm |
|
If Trump wins, will he want to downgrade his digs and live in that dump at 1600 Penna.?
|
|
aflanigan

Location: At Sea Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 11:39am |
|
Steely_D wrote:Keith Olbermann: I can’t stand to live in a Trump building anymoreFTA: This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: We’re gonna start winning again! We’re gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! We’re not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!
All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trump’s few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works. I think if Trump were truly courageous he would legally rename himself "Genitalia Supreme".
|
|
sirdroseph

Location: Not here, I tell you wat Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 11:37am |
|
 Lazy8 wrote: Steely_D wrote:Keith Olbermann: I canât stand to live in a Trump building anymoreFTA: This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: Weâre gonna start winning again! Weâre gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! Weâre not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!Â
All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trumpâs few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.
Wow, the hardships he's willing to endure to strike a blow for civil discourse in politics! Oh, it's Keith Olbermann? Never mind. Â
lol You are more polite than I am, Sir!
|
|
kurtster

Location: where fear is not a virtue Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 11:35am |
|
steeler wrote: In earlier times and discussions, you railed against ends-justify-the-means policies. In this context, your support of Trump appears to be based on just that.
Yes, see my reply to Lazy8 3 pages back. Haven't changed my ideals on that, yet it no longer applies in today's world. Now that ideal is seen as obstructionist and as angry old white man. Who is advocating that today ? Absolutely no one except the neocon poseurs of the #no trump group who only give it lip service because it suits their immediate needs, but in doing so is hypocritical. They sold out long ago. Got to play with the hand that is dealt. I still haven't decided if I'm going to do any campaign work this year like I did for Romney, which regardless of the outcome, was a great learning experience.
|
|
Lazy8

Location: The Gallatin Valley of Montana Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 11:35am |
|
Steely_D wrote:Keith Olbermann: I can’t stand to live in a Trump building anymoreFTA: This is the campaign of a PG-rated cartoon character running for president, interrupting a string of insults the rest of us abandoned in the seventh grade only long enough to resume a concurrent string of half-crazed boasts: We’re gonna start winning again! We’re gonna build an eleventy-billion-foot-high wall! We’re not gonna pay a lot for this muffler!
All this coarseness is largely masking the truth that the Trump campaign is entirely about coarseness. Take away the unmappable comb-over and the unstoppable mouth and the Freudian-rich debates about genitalia, and there is no Trump campaign. Donald Trump’s few forays into actual issues suggest he is startlingly unaware of how the presidency or even ordinary governance works.
Wow, the hardships he's willing to endure to strike a blow for civil discourse in politics! Oh, it's Keith Olbermann? Never mind.
|
|
R_P

Gender:  
|
Posted:
Jun 3, 2016 - 11:19am |
|
steeler wrote:In earlier times and discussions, you railed against ends-justify-the-means policies. In this context, your support of Trump appears to be based on just that. Inconsistency and hypocrisy are the new Trump normal.
|
|
|