MassivRuss wrote:
Thom lives not far from me so I assume his situation is similar.  The maximum a household can put out is regulated by the collection rota which alternates on a weekly basis between green bins (standard waste) on week one then blue (recycling) and brown (garden waste) on week two.   Assuming that Thom has the same standard 360 litre bins as us he would have a maximum of just over 28,000 litres per year.  The garden waste collection is optional though so if he doesn't have a garden or manages his own composting that would exclude a third of the potential output.
On the subject of labelling; only the garden waste involves a label which is generally applied to the lid of the bin to verify the subscription payment.  If you don't opt in for this collection you don't get a label that says "no", you just don't get a label at all.
Since January it is now possible to put glass in the recycling and whilst this is more convenient the glass takes up some space so some of that 28,000 litre capacity will now have to include glass that would previously have been taken to the local bottle banks.  That would indicate a reduction in what can be put out so hopefully that is good news for you but it does depend on how much glass Thom's household is consuming - it could be considerably less than we do.

 Talus1 wrote:

It's twice as awful as ordinary TY droning crap.

"What is this awful grating whine?"

(unlocks screen)

"Oh. Yorke, in yet another project. Of course."

Why oh why is this crap so revered? 

Ty

Tt

I’m curious to know what Thom Yorke did on this to get billed twice. Or are there two Thom Yorkes?  (Artist is currently listed as “Mark Pritchard & Thom Yorke & Thom Yorke”)

 MassivRuss wrote:
TinyRuss don’t you know?  Everything Thom does is done just to make you post about how much you hate his music.  Well done Thom.  You got little Russ to listen to you again.

Ummm, no.  Let's face it.  Thom doesn't have a great voice, and it shows here with so little background to disguise it.

Couldn't even finish it.

My wee lad used to play with those little modular synths, I dunno if they sounded great, but he sure had fun plugging and plugging things.

 petecallaghan wrote:
Agreed.  I like it.  

 kicking wrote:

It's Yorke. By definition it's not new.

How much garbage can Yorke put out in one year? Will no labels just say "no"?

thom yorke & also thom yorke
is he really that great that he collaborates with himself?

It’s nice to hear something new on RP. This one is quite likable.

Always exciting to hear a new Thom .Yorke project! This one feels like it's missing something, I was hoping for a second part of the song a bit more punchy, change of tone, less repetitive. Let's hear the rest.

Oh as most of Thom Yorke's work. It needs multiple listen, quiet, headphones on. To appreciate fully. 

Spare but attention grabbing from the first few notes.

First! I thought this was Phosphorescent until the singing started.